Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 1970-1978.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01970
• Research Method • Previous Articles
ZHANG Xueqin, MAO Xiuzhen(), LI Jia
Received:
2020-04-19
Online:
2020-11-15
Published:
2020-09-23
Contact:
MAO Xiuzhen
E-mail:maomao_wanli@163.com
CLC Number:
ZHANG Xueqin, MAO Xiuzhen, LI Jia. Online calibration based on computerized adaptive testing: Design and method[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(11): 1970-1978.
分类标准 | 方法 | 特点 |
---|---|---|
项目视角:参数信息量 | D-优化、序贯D-优化 | 自适应选取被试 |
D-TP、D-VR、ED 和D-c方法 | 自适应选取项目 | |
考生视角:能力与样本量 | OIRPI、SI指标 |
分类标准 | 方法 | 特点 |
---|---|---|
项目视角:参数信息量 | D-优化、序贯D-优化 | 自适应选取被试 |
D-TP、D-VR、ED 和D-c方法 | 自适应选取项目 | |
考生视角:能力与样本量 | OIRPI、SI指标 |
分类标准 | 方法 | 特点 | 适用情景 |
---|---|---|---|
条件极大似 然估计 | MethodA、MethodB、FFMLE-A和ECSE-A | 简单、易操作, 需要大样本 | 传统CAT/MCAT |
MLE-LBCI-A | 传统CAT | ||
CD-MethodA、MLE | CD-CAT | ||
MMLE/EM算法 | OEM、MEM | 计算复杂, 耗时, 不易收敛 | 传统CAT中二级和多级评分项目/MCAT |
CD-OEM、CD-MEM、MMLE | CD-CAT | ||
贝叶斯算法 | 贝叶斯版本:方法A, OEM和MEM | 精度高、计算复杂, 耗时 | 传统CAT/MCAT |
联合极大似 然估计 | JEA、SIE、SimIE、SIE-R、JEA-R、SIE-R-BIC、JEA-R-BIC RMSEA-N | 联合估计Q矩阵和项目参数 | CD-CAT |
分类标准 | 方法 | 特点 | 适用情景 |
---|---|---|---|
条件极大似 然估计 | MethodA、MethodB、FFMLE-A和ECSE-A | 简单、易操作, 需要大样本 | 传统CAT/MCAT |
MLE-LBCI-A | 传统CAT | ||
CD-MethodA、MLE | CD-CAT | ||
MMLE/EM算法 | OEM、MEM | 计算复杂, 耗时, 不易收敛 | 传统CAT中二级和多级评分项目/MCAT |
CD-OEM、CD-MEM、MMLE | CD-CAT | ||
贝叶斯算法 | 贝叶斯版本:方法A, OEM和MEM | 精度高、计算复杂, 耗时 | 传统CAT/MCAT |
联合极大似 然估计 | JEA、SIE、SimIE、SIE-R、JEA-R、SIE-R-BIC、JEA-R-BIC RMSEA-N | 联合估计Q矩阵和项目参数 | CD-CAT |
[1] | 陈平 . ( 2016). 两种新的计算机化自适应测验在线标定方法. 心理学报, 48( 9), 1184-1198. |
[2] | 陈平, 辛涛 . ( 2011a). 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中在线标定方法的开发. 心理学报, 43( 06), 710-724. |
[3] | 陈平, 辛涛 . ( 2011b). 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中的项目增补. 心理学报, 43(07), 836-850. |
[4] | 陈平, 张佳慧, 辛涛 . ( 2013). 在线标定技术在计算机化自适应测验中的应用. 心理科学进展, 21( 10), 1883-1892. |
[5] | 谭青蓉 . ( 2019). CD-CAT广义在线标定方法开发研究(硕士学位论文). 江西师范大学, 南昌. |
[6] | 汪文义, 丁树良, 游晓锋 . ( 2011). 计算机化自适应诊断测验中原始题的属性标定. 心理学报, 43( 08), 964-976. |
[7] | 熊建华, 罗慧, 王晓庆, 丁树良 . ( 2018). 基于GRM的在线校准研究. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 42( 01), 62-66. |
[8] | 游晓锋, 丁树良, 刘红云 . ( 2010). 计算机化自适应测验中原始题项目参数的估计. 心理学报, 42( 7), 813-820. |
[9] | Ali, U. S., & Chang, H. H . ( 2014). An item-driven adaptive design for calibrating pretest items, ETS Research Report Series, 2014( 2), 1-12. |
[10] |
Ban, J.-C., Hanson, B. A., Wang, T. Y., Yi, Q., & Harris, D. J . ( 2001). A comparative study of on-line pretest item-calibration/ scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(3), 191-212.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2001.38.issue-3 URL |
[11] |
Berger, M. P. F . ( 1992). Sequential sampling designs for the two-parameter item response theory model. Psychometrika, 57(4), 521-538.
doi: 10.1007/BF02294418 URL |
[12] |
Berger, M. P. F . ( 1994). D-Optimal Sequential Sampling Designs for Item Response Theory Models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19( 1), 43-56.
doi: 10.3102/10769986019001043 URL |
[13] | Buyske, S. ( 1998). Optimal design for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing: The 2PL case. In N. Flournoy et al.(Ed.), New developments and applications in experimental design. Lecture Notes—Monograph Series, 34. Haywood, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics. |
[14] |
Chang, Y.-C. I., & Lu, H. Y . ( 2010). Online calibration via variable length computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 75( 1), 140-157.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9133-0 URL |
[15] |
Chen, P. ( 2017). A comparative study of online item calibration methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42( 5), 559-590.
doi: 10.3102/1076998617695098 URL |
[16] |
Chen, P., & Wang, C. ( 2015). A new online calibration method for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing, Psychometrika, 81( 3), 674-701.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9482-9 URL pmid: 26608960 |
[17] |
Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Ying, Z . ( 2015). Online item calibration for Q-matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39( 1), 5-15.
doi: 10.1177/0146621613513065 URL pmid: 29882531 |
[18] |
Cheng, Y. ( 2009). When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika, 74( 4) 619-632.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9123-2 URL |
[19] |
Hassan, M. U., & Miller, F. ( 2019). Optimal item calibration for computerized achievement tests. Psychometrika, 84(4), 1101-1128.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09673-6 URL pmid: 31183669 |
[20] |
He, Y. H., & Chen, P. ( 2020). Optimal online calibration designs for item replenishment in adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 85( 1), 35-55.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09687-0 URL pmid: 31531789 |
[21] |
He, Y. H., Chen, P., & Li, Y . ( 2019). New efficient and practicable adaptive designs for calibrating items online. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44( 1), 3-16.
doi: 10.1177/0146621618824854 URL pmid: 31853155 |
[22] |
He, Y. H., Chen, P., Li, Y., & Zhang, S. M . ( 2017). A new online calibration method based on Lord's Bias-Correction. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41( 6), 456-471.
doi: 10.1177/0146621617697958 URL pmid: 29882532 |
[23] |
Jones, D. H., & Jin, Z. Y . ( 1994). Optimal sequential designs for on-line item estimation. Psychometrika, 59( 1), 59-75.
doi: 10.1007/BF02294265 URL |
[24] |
Kang, H. A., Zheng, Y., & Chang, H. H . ( 2020). Online calibration of a joint model of item responses and response times in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 45( 2), 175-208.
doi: 10.3102/1076998619879040 URL |
[25] | Kingsbury, G. G. ( 2009. Adaptive item calibration: A process for estimating item parameters within a computerized adaptive test. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC conference on computerized adaptive testing (pp.1-15). Retrieved from http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/CATCentral/ |
[26] | Makransky, G. ( 2009). An automatic online calibration design in adaptive testing. Paper presented at the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing, McLean, USA. |
[27] |
Mulder, J., & van der Linden, W. J . ( 2009, June). Multidimensional adaptive testing with optimal design criteria for Item Selection. Psychometrika, 74( 2), 273-296.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9097-5 URL pmid: 20119511 |
[28] |
Ren, H., van der Linden, W. J., & Diao, Q . ( 2017). Continuous online item calibration: Parameter recovery and item utilization. Psychometrika, 82( 2), 498-522.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9553-1 URL pmid: 28290109 |
[29] | Stefanski, L. A., & Carroll, R. J . ( 1985). Covariate measurement error in logistic regression. Annals of Statistics, 13( 4), 1335-1351. |
[30] | Stocking, M. L . ( 1988). Scale drift in on-line calibration (Research Rep. 88-28). Princeton, NJ: ETS. |
[31] |
van der, Linden, W., J., & Ren, H. ( 2015). Optimal bayesian adaptive design for test-item calibration. Psychometrika, 80( 2), 263-288.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9391-8 URL pmid: 24407735 |
[32] | Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. J . ( 1990). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, R. J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, & D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (Chap. 4, pp. 65-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[33] |
Wang, C., & Chang, H. H . ( 2011). Item selection in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing-gaining information from different angles. Psychometrika, 76( 3), 363-384.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9215-7 URL |
[34] |
Xiong, J., Ding, S., Luo, F., & Luo, Z . ( 2020). Online calibration of polytomous items under the graded response model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10( 1), 3085.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03085 URL |
[35] | Xu, X. L., Chang, H. H., & Douglas, J . ( 2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada. |
[36] | Zheng, Y. ( 2014). New methods of online calibration for item bank replenishment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL. |
[37] |
Zheng, Y. ( 2016). Online calibration of polytomous items under the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40( 6), 434-450.
doi: 10.1177/0146621616650406 URL pmid: 29881063 |
[38] |
Zheng, Y., & Chang, H. H . ( 2017). A comparison of five methods for pretest item selection in online calibration. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 4( 1), 133-158.
doi: 10.1504/IJQRE.2017.086500 URL |
[1] | TANG Qian, MAO Xiuzhen, HE Mingshuang, HE Jie. Item selection methods for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2160-2168. |
[2] | GAO Xuliang; TU Dongbo; WANG Fang; ZHANG Long; LI Xueying. The methods of computerized adaptive testing that allows changing answers [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 654-664. |
[3] | MAO Xiuzhen; XIN Tao. Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing: Model, Techniques and Methods [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 907-918. |
[4] | CHEN Ping;ZHANG Jiahui;XIN Tao. Application of Online Calibration Technique in Computerized Adaptive Testing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1883-1892. |
[5] | TANG Xiao-Juan;DING Shu-Liang;YU Zong-Huo. Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing in Cognitive Diagnosis [J]. , 2012, 20(4): 616-626. |
[6] | MAO Xiu-Zhen;XIN Tao. Item Selection Method in Computerized Adaptive Testing [J]. , 2011, 19(10): 1552-1562. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||