The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00746

Abstract

Abstract:

The present study (N = 58) investigated the influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment as well as the moderating effect of intuitive thinking by setting up the scene of car-hailing. The results showed that reputation and face trustworthiness could influence women’s trust judgment of car-hailing choices. In other words, they were more likely to trust drivers with good reputation and trustworthy face. Reputation had less influence on women’s trust judgment in high intuitive thinking group as compared to low intuitive thinking group, while face trustworthiness had more influence on trust judgment of women with high intuitive thinking.

Key words: trust decision, reputation, face, intuitive thinking, car-hailing

CLC Number:

B849:C91

LI Qinggong, WANG Zhenyan, SUN Jieyuan, SHI Yan. The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 746-751.

Figures/Tables 4

References 28

1	陈欣, 叶浩生 . ( 2009). 行为博弈视野下信任研究的回顾. 心理科学, 32( 3), 636-639.
2	洪名勇, 钱龙 . ( 2014). 信任、声誉及其内在逻辑. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 32( 1), 34-39.
3	李彬, 徐富明, 王伟, 张慧, 罗寒冰 . ( 2015). 决策的加工过程及个体差异: 模糊痕迹理论视角. 心理科学进展, 23( 2), 316-324.
4	李延喜, 吴笛, 肖峰雷, 姚宏 . ( 2010). 声誉理论研究述评. 管理评论, 22( 10), 3-11.
5	李易尚, 朱双洋 . ( 2018). 守住网约车的安全底线. 人民法治, ( 15), 94-95.
6	刘国芳, 辛自强 . ( 2011). 间接互惠中的声誉机制: 印象、名声、标签及其传递. 心理科学进展, 19( 2), 233-242.
7	施丽芳, 廖飞, 丁德明 . ( 2012). 个人声誉关注作为心理不确定的缓解器: 程序公平/合作关系下的实证研究. 管理世界, ( 12), 97-114.
8	文跃兰 . ( 2012). 大学生理性—经验思维方式的个体差异及其与社会问题解决的关系(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
9	于会会, 徐富明, 黄宝珍, 文桂婵, 王岚 . ( 2012). 框架效应中的个体差异. 心理科学进展, 20( 6), 894-901.
10	武洁, 杨建春 . ( 2014). 张、王、李、赵谁最多: 2010年人口普查姓氏结构和分布特点. 中国统计, ( 6), 21-22.
11	Bailey P. E., Szczap P., Mclennan S. N., Slessor G., Ruffman T., & Rendell P. G . ( 2015). Age-related similarities and differences in first impressions of trustworthiness. Cognition and Emotion, 30( 5), 1017-1026.
12	Boero R., Bravo G., Castellani M., & Squazzoni F . ( 2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38( 6), 871-877.
13	Cox J.C . ( 2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46( 2), 260-281.
14	Delgado M. R., Frank R. H., & Phelps E. A . ( 2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8( 11), 1611-1618.
15	Denes-Raj V. &Epstein S. , ( 1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66( 5), 819-829.
16	DeSteno D . ( 2014).The truth about trust: How it determines success in life, love, learning, and more . New York: Hudson Street Press.
17	Heyman G.D . ( 2008). Children's critical thinking when learning from others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17( 5), 344-347.
18	Kreps D. M., Milgrom P., Roberts J., & Wilson R . ( 1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27( 2), 245-252.
19	Li Q., Heyman G. D., Mei J., & Lee K . ( 2019). Judging a book by its cover: Children’s facial trustworthiness as judged by strangers predicts their real-world trustworthiness and peer relationships. Child Development, 90( 2), 562-575.
20	Li T., Liu X., Pan J., & Zhou G . ( 2017). The interactive effect of facial appearance and behavior statement on trust belief and trust behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 117( 1), 60-65.
21	Mahoney K. T., Buboltz W., Levin I. P., Doverspike D., & Svyantek D. J . ( 2011). Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51( 3), 248-257.
22	Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D . ( 1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20( 3), 709-734.
23	Pacini R. &Epstein S. , ( 1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 6), 972-987.
24	Slepian M. L., &Ames D. R . ( 2015). Internalized Impressions: The link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior is mediated by targets’ expectations of how they will be judged. Psychological Science, 27( 2), 282-288.
25	Stirrat M. &Perrett D. I . ( 2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 349-354.
26	Uleman J. S., Newman L. S., & Moskowitz G. B . ( 1996). People as flexible interpreters: evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28( 8), 211-279.
27	van't Wout, M., &Sanfey A. G . ( 2008). Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108( 3), 796-803.
28	Willis J. &Todorov A. , ( 2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17( 7), 592-598.

直觉性思维	低面孔可信度			高面孔可信度
直觉性思维	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉
低	0.52 ± 1.06	3.59 ± 1.62	4.55 ± 0.78	0.93 ± 1.28	3.97 ± 1.50	4.90 ± 0.31
高	0.83 ± 1.31	2.93 ± 1.67	3.97 ± 1.43	1.76 ± 1.88	4.00 ± 1.13	4.59 ± 0.98
总计	0.67 ± 1.19	3.26 ± 1.66	4.26 ± 1.18	1.34 ± 1.65	3.98 ± 1.31	4.74 ± 0.74

直觉性思维	低面孔可信度			高面孔可信度
直觉性思维	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉
低	0.52 ± 1.06	3.59 ± 1.62	4.55 ± 0.78	0.93 ± 1.28	3.97 ± 1.50	4.90 ± 0.31
高	0.83 ± 1.31	2.93 ± 1.67	3.97 ± 1.43	1.76 ± 1.88	4.00 ± 1.13	4.59 ± 0.98
总计	0.67 ± 1.19	3.26 ± 1.66	4.26 ± 1.18	1.34 ± 1.65	3.98 ± 1.31	4.74 ± 0.74

[1]	WANG Yongli, GE Shengnan, Lancy Lantin Huang, WAN Qin, LU Haidan. Neural mechanism of speech imagery [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 608-621.
[2]	CHEN Zi-Wei, FU Di, LIU Xun. Better to misidentify than to miss: A review of occurrence mechanisms and applications of face pareidolia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 240-255.
[3]	LI Dong, WU Qi, YAN Xiangbo, CUI Qian, JIANG Zhongqing. Similarities and differences between face-personality perception and voice-personality perception in first impression [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 684-692.
[4]	TIAN Jiayuan, LONG Yanling, YANG Hong, WU Huifang, XUE Peng, JIANG Zhongqing. Cues of eye region and their effects on face-personality perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2735-2745.
[5]	ZHOU Xingchen, HE Wen. The combination of metacognition and face cognition: Cut-in points and methods [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2473-2486.
[6]	JING Wei, ZHANG Jie, FU Jinxia, TIAN Lin, ZHAO Wei. Attention bias to faces in infants and toddlers: Inborn predispositions and developmental changes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1216-1230.
[7]	LI Yaning, TIAN Yangyang, WU Qi, LENG Haizhou, JIANG Zhongqing, YANG Yisheng. Effects of expression on social perceptions of faces [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(6): 1022-1029.
[8]	XIE Zhipeng, XIAO Tingting, QIN Huanyu. Typeface effect in marketing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 365-380.
[9]	MING Lili, HU Xueping. The neural mechanisms for human voice processing: Neural evidence from sighted and blind subjects [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2147-2160.
[10]	JIANG Qianni, ZHUANG Xiangling, MA Guojie. Evaluation of external HMI in autonomous vehicles based on pedestrian road crossing decision-making model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 1979-1992.
[11]	NA Yuting, ZHAO Yuwen, GUAN Lili. The neural mechanism of self-face recognition: An ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(10): 1783-1795.
[12]	WEN Fangfang, ZUO Bin, MA Shuhan, XIE Zhijie. Own-group bias in face recognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1164-1171.
[13]	FAN Xiaozhuang, BI Xiaobin, XIE Yu, HE Huizhong. Attention bias toward threatening emotional faces in individuals with high-functioning autism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1172-1186.
[14]	SUN Tuwei, LUO Nanfeng, SHI Wei, LI Hongyang. Psychological mechanisms underlying the negative effects of corporations’ high reputation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 497-509.
[15]	RAN Guangming, LI Rui, ZHANG Qi. Neural mechanism underlying recognition of dynamic emotional faces in social anxiety [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 1979-1988.