Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 434-442.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00434
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2019-06-11
Online:
2020-03-15
Published:
2020-01-18
Contact:
XU Xiaodong
E-mail:412alix@gmail.com
CHEN Lijuan, XU Xiaodong. How does literature reading affect readers’ Theory of Mind?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 434-442.
[1] | 陈慧娟 . (2008). 论第一人称叙述视角的特性. 天津社会科学, 6, 110-112. |
[2] | 崔刚 . (2015). 神经语言学. 北京: 清华大学出版社. |
[3] | 申丹 . (1996). 论第一人称叙述与第三人称有限视角叙述在视角上的差异, 外国文学评论, 2, 14-23. |
[4] | 申丹, 韩加明, 王丽亚 . (2018). 英美小说叙事理论研究. 北京: 北京大学出版社. |
[5] | 亚里士多德 . (2002). 诗学 (罗念生译). 北京: 人民文学出版社. |
[6] | 张曼, 刘欢欢 . (2018). 社会交流中人际神经同步的认知机制. 心理科学, 41(2), 378-383. |
[7] | Altmann U., Bohrn I. C., Lubrich O., Menninghaus W., & Jacobs A. M . (2012). Fact vs fiction: How paratextual information shapes our reading processes, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22-29. |
[8] | Appel M., & Richter T . (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113-134. |
[9] | Bal P. M., & Veltkamp M . (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. |
[10] | Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Hill J., Raste Y., & Plumb I . (2001). The “Reading the mind in the eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251. |
[11] | Bowes A., & Katz A . (2015). Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 953-963. |
[12] | Brunyé T. T., Ditman T., Mahoney C. R., & Taylor H. A . (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 659-666. |
[13] | Buckner R. L., & Carroll D. C . (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 49-57. |
[14] | Burke M., Kuzmičová A., Mangen A., & Schilhab T . (2016). Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 6-41. |
[15] | Dai H. Y., Chen L. J., Ni C. B., & Xu X. D . (2019). Literature reading modulates pronoun resolution in counterfactual world: Evidence from Event-related Potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 904-919. |
[16] | de Mulder, H. N. M. Hakemulder F., van den Berghe R., Klaassen F., & van Berkum J. J. A . (2017). Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction from book smart to street smart? Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 129-169. |
[17] | Djikic M., Oatley K., & Moldoveanu M. C . (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy, Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28-47. |
[18] | Djikic M., & Oatley K . (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498-505. |
[19] | Dodell-Feder D., & Tamir D. I . (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713-1727. |
[20] | Dvash J., & Shamay-Tsoory S. G . (2014). Theory of mind and empathy as multidimensional constructs: Neurological foundations. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 282-295. |
[21] | Fong K., Mullin J. B., & Mar R. A . (2013). What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370-376. |
[22] | Hartung F., Burke M., Hagoort P., & Willems R. M . (2016). Taking perspective: Personal pronouns affect experiential aspects of literary reading. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154732. |
[23] | Jacobs A. M., & Willems R. M . (2018). The fictive brain: Neurocognitive correlates of engagement in literature. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 147-160. |
[24] | Johnson D. R . (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against, and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77-92. |
[25] | Kidd D. C., & Castano E . (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377-380. |
[26] | Koopman E. M . (2018). Does originality evoke understanding? The relation between literary reading and empathy. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 169-177. |
[27] | Koopman E. M., & Hakemulder F . (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79-111. |
[28] | Kotovych M., Peter D., Marisa B., & Mark H . (2011). Textual determinants of a component of literary identification. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(2), 260-291. |
[29] | Małechi W., Pawłowski B., Cieński M., & Sorokowski P . (2018). Can fiction make us kinder to other species? The impact of fiction on pro-animal attitudes and behavior. Poetics, 66, 54-63. |
[30] | Mar R. A . (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103-134. |
[31] | Mar R., Oatley K., & Eng A . (2003). Abstraction and the vividness of details in fiction. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada. |
[32] | Mar R. A., Oatley K., Hirsh J., dela Paz J., & Peterson J. B . (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694-712. |
[33] | Mar R. A., Oatley K., & Peterson J. B . (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407-428. |
[34] | Mar R. A., Tackett J. L., & Moore C . (2010). Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 69-78. |
[35] | Mildorf J . (2016). Reconsidering second-person narration and involvement. Language and Literature, 25(2), 145-158. |
[36] | Mullins B., & Dixon P . (2007). Narratorial implicatures: Readers look to the narrator to know what is important. Poetics, 35(4-5), 262-276. |
[37] | Mumper M. L., & Gerrig R. J . (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109-120. |
[38] | Oatley K . (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1-2), 53-74. |
[39] | Oatley K . (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5-6), 439-454. |
[40] | Panero M. E., Weisberg D. S., Black J., Goldstein T. R., Barnes J. L., Brownell H., & Winner E . (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46-e54. |
[41] | Papeo L., Corradi-Dell’Acqua C., & Rumiati R. I . (2011). “She” is not like “I”: The tie between language and action is in our imagination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3939-3948. |
[42] | Pino M. C., & Mazza M . (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0160254. |
[43] | Premack D., & Woodruff G . (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526. |
[44] | Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., & Fogassi L . (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131-141. |
[45] | Speer N. K., Reynolds J. R., Swallow K. M., & Zacks J. M . (2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989-999. |
[46] | Stemmer B . (2008). CHAPTER 17 - Neuropragmatics: Disorders and neural systems. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. |
[47] | Thompson J. M., Teasdale B., Duncan S., van Emde Boas E., Budelmann F., Maguire L., & Dunbar R. I. M . (2018). Individual differences in transportation into narrative drama. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 210-219. |
[48] | Vaughn L. A., Hesse S. J., Petkova Z., & Trudeau L . (2009). “This story is right on”: The impact of regulatory fit on narrative engagement and persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 447-456. |
[49] | Völlm B. A., Taylor A. N. W., Richardson P., Corcoran R., Stirling J., McKie S., ... Elliott R . (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 29(1), 90-98. |
[1] | YANG Qun, ZHU Bing, YU Yiming, ZHANG Jingmin, XUE Mengmeng. Prosociality increases under stress: Evidence from different types of prosocial preferences [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2809-2824. |
[2] | YIN Rong. Comparative studies of mind reading: Similarities and differences in theory of mind between non-human primates and humans and corresponding explanations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2540-2557. |
[3] | ZHAO Lihua, YANG Yunmei, LI Jing. The relationship between children’s reading and theory of mind [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(1): 65-76. |
[4] | CHENG Cheng, GUO Peiyang, YANG Li, WANG Mengya. A cognition-affective processing framework of psychopathy based on the TriPM model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(9): 1628-1646. |
[5] | CAO Si-Qi, LIU Xun, WU Hai-Yan. Controllable empathy? The adjustability of empathy from a top-down view [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(8): 1420-1429. |
[6] | HUO Chao, LI Zuoshan, MENG Jing. Empathy interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Giving full play to strengths or making up for weaknesses? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 849-863. |
[7] | JIN Guomin, LI Dan. The effects of loving-kindness and compassion meditation on altruistic behavior and its cognitive neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 978-986. |
[8] | SU Yanjie, XIE Dongjie, WANG Xiaonan. The role of cognitive control in third-party punishment [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(8): 1331-1343. |
[9] | PAN Yangu, XIAO Yao, HU Yu, LIU Guangzeng, LI Zhiyang. Effects of secure attachment on empathy and altruistic behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2077-2083. |
[10] | KANG Yiqi, CHONG Xia, WU Nan. Autism Spectrum Disorders early warning: Occurrence, development and influencing factors of joint attention and empathy [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1223-1231. |
[11] | YAN Bo, FAN Fumin, YU Feng. The application of kinesthetic empathy intervention in dance/movement therapy [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 496-502. |
[12] | Sun Juncai, Liu Ping. The advantage of empathy from evidence of visual processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 7-7. |
[13] | CHEN Tong, WU Zhen. Children’s distributive justice: The role of Theory of Mind [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1299-1309. |
[14] | ZHONG Yiping, ZHAN Youlong, LI Jin, FAN Wei. Study on the mechanism and intervention of moral decision: Effects of self-relevance and risk level [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102. |
[15] | JIANG Qin; LI Hong. ERP research on theory of mind: Perspective from the multiple elements framework [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 778-787. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||