Leader humor: Consequences and theoretical explanation

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01631

Abstract

Abstract:

As an effective management tool, in recent years, leader humor has received extensive attention from organizational scholars and practitioners. After reviewing leader humor’s conception, consequences, and mechanisms, we summarize several theoretical mechanisms: the relational process, social exchange theory, social information processing theory, relational identification, positive emotion, stress relief, and leadership styles. Future research should explore the consequences of leader humor from the perspective of interaction and structure, and focus on the mechanism of leader humor based on social information processing theory.

Key words: humor, leader humor, theoretical perspective, consequences

CLC Number:

B849: C936

WANG Ting, YANG Fu. Leader humor: Consequences and theoretical explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1631-1642.

Figures/Tables 3

References 75

1	蔡亚华, 贾良定, 尤树洋, 张祎, 陈艳露 . (2013). 差异化变革型领导对知识分享与团队创造力的影响:社会网络机制的解释. 心理学报, 45(5), 585-598.
2	崔智淞, 王弘钰, 赵迪 . (2018). 化平淡为风趣:幽默型领导的概念、测量及作用机制. 中国人力资源开发, 35(12), 55-67.
3	陈致中, 张德 .(2009). 中国背景下的组织人际和谐模型建构. 科学学与科学技术管理, (10), 177-182.
4	景保峰, 周霞 . (2019). 领导幽默研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 41(3), 70-84.
5	石冠峰, 毛舒婷, 王坤 . (2017). 幽默型领导对员工创造力的作用机制研究:基于社会交换理论的视角. 中国人力资源开发, (11), 17-31.
6	王磊 . (2015). 中国家族企业成长中差序式领导对员工及团队创造力的影响:一个跨层次跟踪研究. 心理科学进展, 23(10), 1688-1700.
7	赵祁, 李锋 . (2016). 团队领导与团队有效性:基于社会认同理论的多层次研究. 心理科学进展, 24(11), 1677-1689.
8	Ambrose M. L., Schminke M., & Mayer D. M . (2013). Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 678-689.
9	Avolio B. J., Howell J. M., & Sosik J. J . (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 219-227.
10	Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A . (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49-68.
11	Bandura, A .(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12	Barsoux, J. L . (1996). Why organisations need humour. European Management Journal, 14(5), 500-508.
13	Beersma B., Hollenbeck J. R., Conlon D. E., Humphrey S. E., Moon H., & Ilgen D. R . (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 131-142.
14	Bell, S. T., & Marentette, B. J . (2011). Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(4), 275-292.
15	Blau, P. M . (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
16	Chen T. T., Leung K., Li F. L., & Ou Z. Y . (2015). Interpersonal harmony and creativity in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 648-672.
17	Chiu C.-Y. C., Owens B. P., & Tesluk P. E . (2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1705-1720.
18	Cooper, C. D . (2005). Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 765-776.
19	Cooper, C. D . (2008). Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations, 61(8), 1087-1115.
20	Cooper C. D., Kong D. T., & Crossley C. D . (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: Integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 769-796.
21	Crawford, C. B . (1994). Theory and implications regarding the utilization of strategic humor by leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1(4), 53-68.
22	Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S . (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
23	Decker, W. H., & Rotondo, D. M . (2001). Relationships among gender, type of humor, perceived leader effectiveness. Journal of Management Issues, 13(4), 450-465.
24	Fredrickson, B. L . (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and- build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
25	Freud, S. .(1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: W. W. Norton.
26	Friedrich, A. L., & Ulber, D. (2017). Why are we in a team?Effects of teamwork and how to enhance team effectiveness. In N. Chmiel, F. Franco, & M. Sverke (Eds.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective(pp. 212-232). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
27	Gkorezis, P., & Bellou, V. (2016). The relationship between leader self-deprecating humor and perceived effectiveness: Trust in leader as a mediator. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 882-898.
28	Gkorezis P., Hatzithomas L., & Petridou E . (2011). The impact of leader’s humor on employees’ psychological empowerment: The moderating role of tenure. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23(1), 83-95.
29	Gkorezis P., Petridou E., & Lioliou K . (2016). The impact of supervisor humor on newcomer adjustment: The mediating role of relational identification. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(4), 540-554.
30	Gkorezis P., Petridou E., & Xanthiakos P . (2014). Leader positive humor and organizational cynicism: LMX as a mediator. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 35(4), 305-315.
31	Goswami A., Nair P., Beehr T., & Grossenbacher M . (2016). The relationship of leaders’ humor and employees’ work engagement mediated by positive emotions: Moderating effect of leaders’ transformational leadership style. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1083-1099.
32	Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-Sdomain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
33	Graham E. E., Papa M. J., & Brooks G. P . (1992). Functions of humor in conversation: Conceptualization and measurement. Western Journal of Communication, 56(2), 161-183.
34	Hobfoll, S. E . (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
35	Holmes, J. & Marra, M. (2006). Humor and leadership style. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19(2), 119-138.
36	Hu, J., Liden, R. C, & Liden, R. C . (2015). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102-1127.
37	Hughes, L. W., & Avey, J. B . (2009). Transforming with levity: Humor, leadership, and follower attitudes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 30(6),540-562.
38	Huo Y. Y., Lam W., & Chen Z. G . (2012). Am i the only one this supervisor is laughing at? Effects of aggressive humor on employee strain and addictive behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 65(4), 859-885.
39	Kim T.-Y., Lee D.-R., & Wong, N. Y. S . (2016). Supervisor humor and employee outcomes: The role of social distance and affective trust in supervisor. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 125-139.
40	Kouchaki, M., & Gino, F. (2016). Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6166-6171.
41	Kuiper, N. A., & Leite, C. (2010). Personality impressions associated with four distinct humor styles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 115-122.
42	Mallett, O., & Wapshott, R. (2014). Informality and employment relationships in small firms: Humour, ambiguity and straight-talking. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 118-132.
43	Malone, P. B . (1980). Humor: A double-edged tool for today’s managers? Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 357-360.
44	Mao J. Y., Chiang J. T. J., Zhang Y., & Gao M . (2017). Humor as a relationship lubricant: The implications of leader humor on transformational leadership perceptions and team performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 494-506.
45	Martin, R. A . (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504-519.
46	Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M . (1984). Situational humor response questionnaire: Quantitative measure of sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 145-155.
47	Martin R. A., Puhlik-Doris P., Larsen G., Gray J., & Weir K . (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75.
48	Martineau W. H. (1972). Chapter 5 - A model of the social functions of humor. In J. H. Coldstein (Ed. ), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 101-125). New York: Academic Press.
49	Mathieu J., Maynard M. T., Rapp T., & Gilson L . (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
50	Mayer D., Nishii L., Schneider B., & Goldstein H . (2007). The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 929-963.
51	Mesmer-Magnus J., Glew D. J., & Viswesvaran C . (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155-190.
52	Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 881-889.
53	Pundt, A. (2015). The relationship between humorous leadership and innovative behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 878-893.
54	Pundt, A., & Herrmann, F. (2015). Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader-member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 108-125.
55	Pundt, A., & Venz, L. (2017). Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 87-107.
56	Robert C., Dunne T. C., & Iun J . (2016). The impact of leader humor on subordinate job satisfaction: The crucial role of leader-subordinate relationship quality. Group and Organization Management, 41(3), 375-406.
57	Robert, C., & Wilbanks, J. E . (2012). The wheel model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizations. Human Relations, 65(9), 1071-1099.
58	Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W . (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58-69.
59	Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
60	Sherman, L. W . (1988). Humor and social distance in elementary school children. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 1(4), 389-404.
61	Sluss,D. M., & Ashforth, B. E . (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9-32.
62	Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C . (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(1), 13-23.
63	Tremblay, M., & Gibson, M. (2016). The role of humor in the relationship between transactional leadership behavior, perceived supervisor support, and citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 39-54.
64	Vecchio R. P., Justin J. E., & Pearce C. L . (2009). The influence of leader humor on relationships between leader behavior and follower outcomes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 171-194.
65	Vinton, K. L . (1989). Humor in the workplace: It is more than telling jokes. Small Group Research, 20(2), 151-166.
66	Wagner, J. A . (1995). Studies of individualism -collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152-173.
67	Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A . (2011). Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 153-172.
68	Wisse, B., & Rietzschel, E. (2014). Humor in leader-follower relationships: Humor styles, similarity and relationship quality. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(2), 249-269.
69	Wu, J., & Chan, R. M. C . (2013). Chinese teachers’ use of humour in coping with stress. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1050-1056.
70	Yam K. C., Christian M. S., Wei W., Liao Z. Y., & Nai J . (2018). The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 348-369.
71	Yang F., Huang X. Y., & Wu L. S . (2019). Experiencing meaningfulness climate in teams: How spiritual leadership enhances team effectiveness when facing uncertain tasks. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 155-168.
72	Yang I., Kitchen P. J., & Bacouel-Jentjens S . (2017). How to promote relationship-building leadership at work? A comparative exploration of leader humor behavior between North America and China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(10), 1454-1474.
73	Yue, X. D . (2010). Exploration of Chinese humor: Historical review, empirical findings, and critical reflections. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(3), 403-420.
74	Zhao J. J., Kong F., & Wang Y. H . (2012). Self-esteem and humor style as mediators of the effects of shyness on loneliness among Chinese college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(6), 686-690.
75	Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744-757.

作者(年份)	维度	典型条目	改编后
Thorson和Powell (1993)	创造幽默的能力、幽默应对、幽默欣赏能力、对幽默的态度	I can say things in such a way as to make people laugh. 我说话的方式可以让人们开怀大笑。 I can actually have some control over a group by uses of humor. 实际上, 我可以使用幽默对团队进行一些控制。	My leader says things in a such way as to make people laugh. 我的领导的说话方式可以让人们开怀大笑。 My leader actually has some control over a group by uses of humor. 实际上, 我的领导可以使用幽默对团队进行一些控制。
Martin等(2003)	亲和式幽默、自我增强式幽默、攻击式幽默、自我贬低式幽默	I enjoy making people laugh. 我喜欢逗人们开心。 If someone makes a mistake, I will often tease them about it. 如果有人犯了错误, 我会经常取笑他。	My leader enjoys making people laugh. 我的领导喜欢逗人们开心。 If someone makes a mistake, my leader will often tease them about it. 如果有人犯了错误, 我的领导会经常取笑他。
Avolio等(1999)	单维度	My leader uses humor to take the edge off during stressful periods. 我的领导在压力大的时候会用幽默来缓解。 My leader makes us laugh at ourselves when we are too serious. 当我们紧张时, 领导会让我们自嘲。
Decker和Rotondo (2001)	积极幽默、消极幽默	My supervisor has good sense of humor. 我的主管很有幽默感。 My supervisor uses sexual humor. 我的主管会开一些黄笑话/荤段子。
Cooper等(2018)	单维度	How frequently does your manager express humor with you at work, overall? 总体来说, 你的经理在工作中是否经常和你开玩笑? My manager jokes around with me. 我的经理会和我开玩笑。

作者(年份)	维度	典型条目	改编后
Thorson和Powell (1993)	创造幽默的能力、幽默应对、幽默欣赏能力、对幽默的态度	I can say things in such a way as to make people laugh. 我说话的方式可以让人们开怀大笑。 I can actually have some control over a group by uses of humor. 实际上, 我可以使用幽默对团队进行一些控制。	My leader says things in a such way as to make people laugh. 我的领导的说话方式可以让人们开怀大笑。 My leader actually has some control over a group by uses of humor. 实际上, 我的领导可以使用幽默对团队进行一些控制。
Martin等(2003)	亲和式幽默、自我增强式幽默、攻击式幽默、自我贬低式幽默	I enjoy making people laugh. 我喜欢逗人们开心。 If someone makes a mistake, I will often tease them about it. 如果有人犯了错误, 我会经常取笑他。	My leader enjoys making people laugh. 我的领导喜欢逗人们开心。 If someone makes a mistake, my leader will often tease them about it. 如果有人犯了错误, 我的领导会经常取笑他。
Avolio等(1999)	单维度	My leader uses humor to take the edge off during stressful periods. 我的领导在压力大的时候会用幽默来缓解。 My leader makes us laugh at ourselves when we are too serious. 当我们紧张时, 领导会让我们自嘲。
Decker和Rotondo (2001)	积极幽默、消极幽默	My supervisor has good sense of humor. 我的主管很有幽默感。 My supervisor uses sexual humor. 我的主管会开一些黄笑话/荤段子。
Cooper等(2018)	单维度	How frequently does your manager express humor with you at work, overall? 总体来说, 你的经理在工作中是否经常和你开玩笑? My manager jokes around with me. 我的经理会和我开玩笑。

理论视角	理论基础	研究者	研究结果
关系过程	幽默主要通过四种机制影响人际关系质量, 包括情感增强、相似吸引、自我揭露和降低等级差异的显著性(Cooper, 2008)。	Gkorezis等(2014)、 Wisse和Rietzschel (2014) 、Pundt和Herrmann (2015)	领导幽默对领导-下属关系的质量有重要的影响作用。
		Robert等(2016)	领导-下属的关系质量在领导幽默与员工工作满意度间关系没有起到中介作用, 领导幽默对工作满意度的影响效果更多的依赖于领导-下属间的关系。也就是说, 领导幽默的关系过程机制仍然受到边界条件的影响。
		Kim等(2016)	员工对领导的情感信任在亲和式领导幽默与社会距离的负向相关关系间起着调节作用。
社会交换理论	领导与下属在社会互动过程中主要进行着两种资源的交换(Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005)：经济性资源(Sparrowe & Liden, 1997)和社会情感性资源(Blau, 1964)。当领导向下属提供了社会情感性资源后, 基于互惠的原则, 下属会产生一种回报的义务感, 主动回馈相应的好处(Blau, 1964)。	Cooper等(2018)	领导成员交换关系在领导幽默与员工组织公民行为间关系起着中介作用。
社会交换理论		Gkorezis和Bellou (2016)	自我贬低式领导幽默对员工感知到的领导有效性有积极的影响作用。
社会信息加工理论	个体所处的社会环境提供了各种影响其态度和行为的信息, 个体对这些信息的解读决定着其随后的态度和行为(Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978)。	Yam等(2018)	感知到的规则违背可接受性(perceived acceptability of norm violation)在领导幽默感与下属越轨行为间关系起着中介作用。
关系认同	个体除了将自己定义为某种社会群体, 还倾向于根据自己与某个特定的人的关系来定义自己, 例如直接领导或者某个同事(Pundt & Herrmann, 2015)。关系认同将关系包含在自我的定义中, 是一种对自我的扩展(self-expansion)。	Pundt和Herrmann (2015)	下属对领导的关系认同在领导的亲和式幽默与领导成员交换间关系起着中介作用。
积极情绪	幽默事件像车轮一样反复、循环的影响着员工的情绪, 使得员工的积极情绪不断的得到累积和增强(Robert & Wilbanks, 2012)。而积极的情绪体验能够拓展下属的意识, 并且帮助下属构建认知的、社会的、心理的资源(Fredrickson, 2001), 例如, 与同事或者管理者建立积极的关系。	Goswami等(2016)	领导者的积极幽默会引起下属的积极情绪体验, 进而提高下属的工作投入水平, 促使下属在工作中展现出色的工作绩效。
积极情绪		Cooper等(2018)	领导幽默能够让下属产生积极的情绪, 这种由领导诱发的情绪体验会拓展下属的意识, 帮助下属建立和维持良好的领导成员交换关系。
压力释放	领导幽默作为一种人际间的社会情感性资源, 可以缓解下属面临的工作压力。	Pundt和Venz (2017)	领导幽默对下属的工作倦怠具有消极的影响作用。
领导风格类型	有效的领导者通常将幽默作为一种多方面、多功能的资源, 帮助其实现广泛的工作目标, 形成不同的领导风格类型。	Holmes和Marra (2006)	领导幽默不仅有助于形成交易型领导, 还有利于建立变革型领导。

理论视角	理论基础	研究者	研究结果
关系过程	幽默主要通过四种机制影响人际关系质量, 包括情感增强、相似吸引、自我揭露和降低等级差异的显著性(Cooper, 2008)。	Gkorezis等(2014)、 Wisse和Rietzschel (2014) 、Pundt和Herrmann (2015)	领导幽默对领导-下属关系的质量有重要的影响作用。
		Robert等(2016)	领导-下属的关系质量在领导幽默与员工工作满意度间关系没有起到中介作用, 领导幽默对工作满意度的影响效果更多的依赖于领导-下属间的关系。也就是说, 领导幽默的关系过程机制仍然受到边界条件的影响。
		Kim等(2016)	员工对领导的情感信任在亲和式领导幽默与社会距离的负向相关关系间起着调节作用。
社会交换理论	领导与下属在社会互动过程中主要进行着两种资源的交换(Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005)：经济性资源(Sparrowe & Liden, 1997)和社会情感性资源(Blau, 1964)。当领导向下属提供了社会情感性资源后, 基于互惠的原则, 下属会产生一种回报的义务感, 主动回馈相应的好处(Blau, 1964)。	Cooper等(2018)	领导成员交换关系在领导幽默与员工组织公民行为间关系起着中介作用。
社会交换理论		Gkorezis和Bellou (2016)	自我贬低式领导幽默对员工感知到的领导有效性有积极的影响作用。
社会信息加工理论	个体所处的社会环境提供了各种影响其态度和行为的信息, 个体对这些信息的解读决定着其随后的态度和行为(Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978)。	Yam等(2018)	感知到的规则违背可接受性(perceived acceptability of norm violation)在领导幽默感与下属越轨行为间关系起着中介作用。
关系认同	个体除了将自己定义为某种社会群体, 还倾向于根据自己与某个特定的人的关系来定义自己, 例如直接领导或者某个同事(Pundt & Herrmann, 2015)。关系认同将关系包含在自我的定义中, 是一种对自我的扩展(self-expansion)。	Pundt和Herrmann (2015)	下属对领导的关系认同在领导的亲和式幽默与领导成员交换间关系起着中介作用。
积极情绪	幽默事件像车轮一样反复、循环的影响着员工的情绪, 使得员工的积极情绪不断的得到累积和增强(Robert & Wilbanks, 2012)。而积极的情绪体验能够拓展下属的意识, 并且帮助下属构建认知的、社会的、心理的资源(Fredrickson, 2001), 例如, 与同事或者管理者建立积极的关系。	Goswami等(2016)	领导者的积极幽默会引起下属的积极情绪体验, 进而提高下属的工作投入水平, 促使下属在工作中展现出色的工作绩效。
积极情绪		Cooper等(2018)	领导幽默能够让下属产生积极的情绪, 这种由领导诱发的情绪体验会拓展下属的意识, 帮助下属建立和维持良好的领导成员交换关系。
压力释放	领导幽默作为一种人际间的社会情感性资源, 可以缓解下属面临的工作压力。	Pundt和Venz (2017)	领导幽默对下属的工作倦怠具有消极的影响作用。
领导风格类型	有效的领导者通常将幽默作为一种多方面、多功能的资源, 帮助其实现广泛的工作目标, 形成不同的领导风格类型。	Holmes和Marra (2006)	领导幽默不仅有助于形成交易型领导, 还有利于建立变革型领导。

[1]	LI Longjiao, WANG Fang. Disparagement humor: Could laughter dissolve hostility? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 670-683.
[2]	WEN Bo, TAO Lei. Public service motivation in the Chinese context: Theory construction and workplace consequences [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 239-254.
[3]	YANG Fu, LIU Qing. The consequences of calling [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(9): 1647-1656.
[4]	WU Lunwen, YANG Fu, TIAN Yixin, PEI Yurong. Job embeddedness: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 906-920.
[5]	ZHANG Yakun, CHEN Ning, CHEN Lung An, SHI Jiannong. Wisdom minds with creative wings: Igniting creative dynamics focusing on its interest cultivation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 707-722.
[6]	WU Lunwen, YANG Fu. Political skill: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2109-2121.
[7]	LI Fangjun, ZHENG Fenfang, YANG Qianyi, WANG Shuman. The consequential influence of employee voice behavior and its boundary conditions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 710-718.
[8]	HENG Shupeng, ZHOU Zongkui, SUN Lijun. HENG Shupeng; ZHOU Zongkui; SUN Lijun [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1565-1578.
[9]	WEI Xuhua, SHAO Jianping, WANG Aochen, JIANG Nan. Antecedents and consequences of organizational member status [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1972-1981.
[10]	LI Haidong; DUAN Jinyun; ZENG Kai. The concept, antecedents and consequences of loyalty to supervisor [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 133-144.
[11]	LIU Yanli; LU Guizhi; LIU Yong. Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 228-241.
[12]	SUN Jianmin; ZHANG Yejun. Presenteeism in the Workplace: A New Topic in Organization and Management Research [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 654-668.
[13]	LIU Chao. On Laughter of Human Beings: From the Perspectives of Evolution and Social Interaction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 2020-2028.
[14]	HU Shaonan; WANG Yong. Concept, Measurements, Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1975-1984.
[15]	ZHANG Tian;DING Xuechen;WENG Jing;FU Hong;XUE Yan. Does Forgiveness Increase or Reduce the Possibility of Further Offenses: The Discussion about the Consequences of Forgiveness Based on the Perspective of Offender [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 104-111.