Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 1268-1274.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01268
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2018-04-28
Online:
2019-07-15
Published:
2019-05-22
Contact:
FU Xinyuan
E-mail:fuxinyuan@cufe.edu.cn
CLC Number:
GUO Rong, FU Xinyuan. Social class signs and their effects on interpersonal social interactions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1268-1274.
[1] | 程淑华, 李欣, 韩毅初 . (2017). 群际接触对外群体信任的影响:内群体认同的中介效应. 心理学探新, 37(1), 54-58. |
[2] | 蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧 . (2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响:机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 120-132. |
[3] | 郭永玉, 杨沈龙, 李静, 胡小勇 . (2015). 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究. 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1299-1311. |
[4] | 杭斌, 修磊 . (2016). 收入不平等、信贷约束与家庭消费. 统计研究, 33(8), 73-79. |
[5] | 胡荣, 陈斯诗 . (2008). 时尚消费的符号意义与社会阶层建构. 社会科学研究, (6), 110-114. |
[6] | 李春玲 . (2017). “中产化”:中国社会阶层结构变化新趋势. 人民论坛, (22), 1-1. |
[7] | 陆学艺 . (2002). 当代中国社会阶层研究报告. 社会科学文献出版社. |
[8] | 王春晓, 朱虹 . (2016). 地位焦虑、物质主义与炫耀性消费——中国人物质主义倾向的现状、前因及后果. 北京社会科学, (5), 31-40. |
[9] | 徐凤娇 . (2016). 亲社会行为的阶层差异:施与受的双重视角(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学. |
[10] | 郑杭生 . (2002). 我国社会阶层结构新变化的几个问题. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(4), 5-9. |
[11] | 郑杭生 . (2005). 透视当代社会结构促进中国社会和谐. 中国人民大学学报, 19(2), 1-8. |
[12] | Abbate C. S., Ruggieri S., & Boca S . (2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(5), 619-622. |
[13] | Bar-Anan Y., Trope Y., Liberman N., & Algom D . (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610-622. |
[14] |
Bergeron A. P., & Zanna M. P . (1973). Group membership and belief similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction in Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 397-411.
doi: 10.1177/002202217300400402 URL |
[15] |
Bjornsdottir R. T., & Rule N. O . (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 530-546.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000091 URL |
[16] | Cao Y., Yu H., Wu Y., & Zhou X . (2015). Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1411-1421. |
[17] | Cappelen A. W., Eichele T., Hugdahl K., Specht K., Sørensen E. Ø., & Tungodden B . (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(43), 15368-15372. |
[18] | Clingingsmith D., & Sheremeta R. M . (2018). Status and the demand for visible goods: Experimental evidence on conspicuous consumption. Experimental Economics, 21(4), 877-904. |
[19] | DeCelles K. A., & Norton M. I . (2016). Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5588-5591. |
[20] |
Diener E., & Biswas-Diener R. , (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119-169.
doi: 10.1023/A:1014411319119 URL |
[21] | Evans J. S . (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278. |
[22] | Fussell P . (1983). Class: A guide through the American status system. New York: Summit Books. |
[23] | Giles H., & Sassoon C. , (1983). The effect of speaker's accent, social class background and message style on British listeners' social judgements. Language & Communication, 3(3), 305-313. |
[24] |
Gillath O., Bahns A. J., Ge F., & Crandall C. S . (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 423-430.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.003 URL |
[25] |
Haslam S. A . (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 1-20.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12061 URL |
[26] |
Haushofer J., & Fehr E. , (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862-867.
doi: 10.1126/science.1232491 URL |
[27] |
Kraus M. W., & Keltner D. , (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20(1), 99-106.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.x URL |
[28] | Kraus M. W., & Mendes W. B . (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2330-2340. |
[29] | Kraus M. W., & Stephens N. M . (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642-656. |
[30] | Kraus M. W., Horberg E. J., Goetz J. L., & Keltner D . (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376-1388. |
[31] |
Kraus M. W., Park J. W., & Tan J. J. X ., (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422-435.
doi: 10.1177/1745691616673192 URL |
[32] | Kuppens T., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R., Spruyt B., & Easterbrook M. J . (2018). Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 429-447. |
[33] | Leventhal G. S. .(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press. |
[34] | Makkar M. (2014). Luxury for oneself or luxury for others? Exploring the underlying emotions behind inconspicuous luxury consumption (Doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology. |
[35] | Malatesta C. Z., Fiore M. J., & Messina J. J . (1987). Affect, personality, and facial expressive characteristics of older people. Psychology & Aging, 2(1), 64-69. |
[36] | Manstead A. S. R . (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267-292. |
[37] |
Navarro-Carrillo G., Valor-Segura I., & Moya M . (2018). Do you trust strangers, close acquaintances, and members of your ingroup? Differences in trust based on social class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 585-597.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1527-7 URL |
[38] | Rivera L. A. (2016). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
[39] |
Rivera L. A., & Tilcsik A. , (2016). Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1097-1131.
doi: 10.1177/0003122416668154 URL |
[40] | Schilke O., Reimann M., & Cook K. S . (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(42), 12950-12955. |
[41] |
Thomas K. A., de Freitas J., DeScioli P., & Pinker S . (2016). Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 621-629.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000153 URL |
[42] |
van Doesum N. J., Tybur J. M., & van Lange P. A. M ., (2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.001 URL |
[1] | YAN Lei, YUAN Yiren, WANG Juan, ZHANG Yanhong, YANG Linchuan. The influence of social identity on depression and its theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 657-668. |
[2] | FANG Qi, LUAN Kun. Multiple team membership and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1143-1157. |
[3] | YAN Qiusi, SUI Yang, HAO Xuejing. Explanatory mechanism and theoretical model of unethical pro-organizational behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 338-352. |
[4] | JIN Yanghua, SHI Rongrong, XIE Jiangpei. A multi-level integrated model of helping behavior in teams [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(1): 167-177. |
[5] | WANG Biying, GAO Riguang, SHU Xiajun. Workplace status: The multifaceted characteristics and dynamic influence mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 904-923. |
[6] | YAN Lei, ZUO Bin, ZHANG Yanhong, WU Yang, YANG Linchuan. Cross-categorization and its influence on stereotyping [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1272-1283. |
[7] | WANG Xinyue, WANG Xingchao, LEI Li, WANG Pengcheng, ZHOU Hao. The role of Social Networking Sites’ using in social identity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2024-2034. |
[8] | DUAN Jinyun, XU Yue, YU Linhan. Theory of self-cultivation extracted from Confucianism: A reflection and supplement to social exchange paradigm [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1890-1900. |
[9] | TAN Chenhao; WANG Yibo; CUI Yichen; WANG Pei. The profit sacrificing tendency of reputation-profit game [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1907-1916. |
[10] | GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong; LI Jing; HU Xiaoyong. Social Fairness Researches in Perspectives of Social Class Psychology [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1299-1311. |
[11] | LIU Zhe; LIANG Juan; LIU Yanjun; MA Hongyu; LIU Tengfei; MA Lulu; YANG Linchuan. Theoretical Basis and Influential Factors of Leaders’ Adherence to Fairness Rules [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1258-1266. |
[12] | WANG Caiyu. The Connotation, Mechanism and Effects of Self-Brand Connections [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 922-933. |
[13] | XIN Sufei;MING Lang;XIN Ziqiang. Increasing Intergroup Trust: The Approaches of Social Identity and Intergroup Contact [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 290-299. |
[14] | WU Baopei;ZHU Xiaoqin;CHANG Lei. Cheater-Detection from Lens of Evolutionary Psychology: Accuracy and Modularity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2224-2234. |
[15] | GAO Cheng-Hai;HOU Ling;LV Chao;WAN Ming-Gang. Implicit Theories and Group Relation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1180-1188. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||