Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 333-342.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00333
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-04-10
Online:
2022-02-15
Published:
2021-12-24
Contact:
XUAN Bin
E-mail:xuanbin@ahnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
ZHANG Lina, XUAN Bin. Neural mechanisms and time course of the age-related word frequency effect in language production[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 333-342.
模型 | 主要观点 | 对老化效应的预测 |
---|---|---|
传递缺陷假说 (Burke & Shafto, | 老化削弱了存储语言信息的节点之间的连接, 导致整个词汇系统中的传递减弱 | 词频效应增加 |
秩频理论 (Murray & Forster, | 每个单词在频谱中有其固定的相对频率, 只要相对频率不发生改变, 词频效应就不会变化 | 词频效应不变 |
Logogen模型 (Morton & John, | 词频会随着经验和接触的增加而增加 | 词频效应减少 |
模型 | 主要观点 | 对老化效应的预测 |
---|---|---|
传递缺陷假说 (Burke & Shafto, | 老化削弱了存储语言信息的节点之间的连接, 导致整个词汇系统中的传递减弱 | 词频效应增加 |
秩频理论 (Murray & Forster, | 每个单词在频谱中有其固定的相对频率, 只要相对频率不发生改变, 词频效应就不会变化 | 词频效应不变 |
Logogen模型 (Morton & John, | 词频会随着经验和接触的增加而增加 | 词频效应减少 |
阶段 | 开始时间/ms | 加工持续时间/ms |
---|---|---|
概念准备 | 0 | 0~150 |
词汇选择 | 150 | 150~275 |
单词形式编码/音韵编码 | 275 | 275~355 |
音节化 | 355 | 355~455 |
语音编码 | 455 | 455~600 |
发音 | 600 | / |
阶段 | 开始时间/ms | 加工持续时间/ms |
---|---|---|
概念准备 | 0 | 0~150 |
词汇选择 | 150 | 150~275 |
单词形式编码/音韵编码 | 275 | 275~355 |
音节化 | 355 | 355~455 |
语音编码 | 455 | 455~600 |
发音 | 600 | / |
[1] | 高晓雷, 李晓伟, 孙敏, 白学军, 高蕾. (2020). 藏语阅读中中央凹词频效应及对副中央凹预视效应的影响. 心理学报, 52(10), 1143-1155. |
[2] | 何洁莹, 张清芳. (2017). 老年人书写产生中词汇频率和音节频率效应的时间进程: ERP研究. 心理学报, 49(12), 1483-1493. |
[3] | 娄昊, 李丛, 张清芳. (2019). 习得年龄对客体和动作图画口语命名的不同影响: ERP研究. 心理学报, 51(2), 143-153. |
[4] | 王成. (2015). 汉语书写产生中正字法信息提取的认知机制 (博士学位论文). 中国科学院大学, 北京. |
[5] | 王晓彤. (2015). 中文阅读中的眼动行为研究:不同阅读任务中的词频效应 (硕士学位论文). 辽宁师范大学. |
[6] | 杨群, 张清芳. (2015). 口语产生中的认知年老化及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2072-2084. |
[7] | 杨群, 张清芳. (2019). 汉语图画命名过程的年老化机制:非选择性抑制能力的影响. 心理学报, 51(10), 1079-1090. |
[8] | 杨玉芳. (2015). 心理语言学. 科学出版社. |
[9] | 张清芳. (2019). 语言产生:心理语言学的视角. 华东师范大学出版社. |
[10] | 张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2003). 影响图画命名时间的因素. 心理学报, 35(4), 447-454. |
[11] | Abel, S., Dressel, K., Weiller, C., & Huber, W. (2012). Enhancement and suppression in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. Brain & Behavior, 2(2), 109-127. |
[12] |
Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A., & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 274-282.
pmid: 8323730 |
[13] |
Almeida, J., Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2007). The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1177-1182.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193109 URL |
[14] |
Bakhtiar, M., Su, I. F., Lee, H. K., & Weekes, B. S. (2016). Neural correlates of age of acquisition on visual word recognition in Persian. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 39, 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.12.001 URL |
[15] |
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283-316.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 URL |
[16] |
Balota, D. A., & Ferraro, F. R. (1993). A dissociation of frequency and regularity effects in pronunciation performance across young-adults, older adults, and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer-type. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(5), 573-592.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1029 URL |
[17] |
Balota, D. A., & Ferraro, F. R. (1996). Lexical, sublexical, and implicit memory processes in healthy young and healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 10(1), 82-95.
doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.10.1.82 URL |
[18] | Baus, C., Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2013). When does word frequency influence written production? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 963. |
[19] |
Bayram, E., Yilmaz, R., Qiu, Y., Yalap, O., Aydin, O., Ergenc, H., & Akbostanci, M. (2021). The effect of Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on verb and noun naming in Turkish-Speaking Parkinson’s disease patients. Brain and Language, 212, 104865
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104865 pmid: 33220645 |
[20] |
Beber, B. C., Cruz, A. N., & Chaves, M. L. (2015). A behavioral study of the nature of verb production deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Language, 149, 128-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.010 URL |
[21] |
Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2002). Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(3), 289-313.
doi: 10.1080/09541440143000078 URL |
[22] |
Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 21-24.
doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x URL |
[23] |
Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45-50.
doi: 10.1177/0963721417727521 URL |
[24] | Can, E., & Kuruoğlu, G. (2018). A comparison of sentence production of Turkish patients with early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Psycho- Educational Sciences, 7(1), 74-85. |
[25] |
Catling, J. C., Dent, K., Johnston, R. A., & Balding, R. (2010). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(7), 1304-1317.
doi: 10.1080/17470210903380830 URL |
[26] | Catling, J. C., & Elsherif, M. M. (2020). The hunt for the age of acquisition effect: It's in the links! Acta Psychologica, 209, 103-138. |
[27] |
Catling, J. C., South, F., & Dent, K. (2013). The effect of age of acquisition on older individuals with and without cognitive impairments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(10), 1963-1973.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.771689 URL |
[28] |
Chang, Y. N., & Lee, C. Y. (2020). Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1317-1324.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01787-8 URL |
[29] |
Chee, M. W. L., Westphal, C., Goh, J., Graham, S., & Song, A. W. (2003). Word frequency and subsequent memory effects studied using event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 20(2), 1042-1051.
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00335-5 URL |
[30] |
Chen, H.-Y., Chang, E. C., Chen, S. H. Y., Lin, Y.-C., & Wu, D. H. (2016). Functional and anatomical dissociation between the orthographic lexicon and the orthographic buffer revealed in reading and writing Chinese characters by fMRI. Neuroimage, 129, 105-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.009 URL |
[31] |
Cohen-shikora, E. (2015). The Influence of Word Frequency and Aging on Lexical Access. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 20(1), 179-195.
doi: 10.1016/S0380-1330(94)71139-4 URL |
[32] | Dell, G. S., & Jacobs, C. L. (2016). Successful speaking:Cognitive mechanisms of adaptation in language production. In H.Gregory & L. S.Steven(Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp.209-219). Academic Press. |
[33] | Diaz, M., Hogstrom, L., Zhuang, J., Voyvodic, J., Johnson, M., & Camblin, C. (2014). Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 167. |
[34] | Diaz, M., Johnson, M., Burke, D., Truong, T.-K., & Madden, D. (2018). Age-related differences in the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes in the context of task-irrelevant information. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(4), 139-150. |
[35] |
Elsherif, M., Catling, J. C., & Frisson, S. (2019). Two words as one: A multi-naming investigation of the age-of- acquisition effect in compound-word processing. Memory & Cognition, 48, 511-525.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00986-6 URL |
[36] |
Feng, S., Qi, R., Yang, J., Yu, A., & Yang, Y. (2020). Neural correlates for nouns and verbs in phrases during syntactic and semantic processing: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 53, 100860.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100860 URL |
[37] |
Fernández, G., Sapognikoff, M., Guinjoan, S., Orozco, D., & Agamennoni, O. (2016). Word processing during reading sentences in patients with schizophrenia: Evidences from the eyetracking technique. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 68, 193-200.
doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.04.018 pmid: 27234202 |
[38] | Gertel, V. H., Karimi, H., Dennis, N. A., Neely, K. A., & Diaz, M. T. (2020). Lexical frequency affects functional activation and accuracy in picture naming among older and younger adults. Psychology & Aging, 35(4), 536-552. |
[39] |
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787-814.
pmid: 19343088 |
[40] |
Graves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S., & Gordon, J. K. (2007). A neural signature of phonological access: Distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 617-631.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.617 URL |
[41] | Hardy, S. M., Segaert, K., & Wheeldon, L. (2018). Healthy ageing and sentence production: Impaired lexical access in the context of intact syntactic planning. Aging and Sentence Production, 2, 1-47. |
[42] |
Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 pmid: 22016740 |
[43] |
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.001 URL |
[44] |
James, L. E., Schmank, C. J., Castro, N., & Buchanan, T. W. (2018). Tip of the tongue states increase under evaluative observation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(1), 169-178.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9524-9 pmid: 29019103 |
[45] |
Jescheniak, J. D., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 432.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.432 URL |
[46] | Juhasz, B., Chambers, D., Shesler, L., Haber, A., & Kurtz, M. (2012). Evaluating lexical characteristics of verbal fluency output in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 200(2-3), 177-183. |
[47] | Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., & Vallée, N. (2006). Morphemes also serve as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performan, 32(1), 18-31. |
[48] | Kileciolu, E., Raman, I., & Raman, E. (2020). The influence of age of acquisition on recall and recognition in Alzheimer's patients and healthy ageing controls in Turkish. Applied Neuropsychology Adult, 1-10. |
[49] | Lee, Y. N., & Choi, S. Y. (2016). Differences in tip-of-the- tongue phenomenon and resolving patterns according to vocabulary characteristics between young and elderly adults. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 21(1), 139-150. |
[50] |
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38.
pmid: 11301520 |
[51] |
Li, S., Oliver-Mighten, L., Li, L., White, S. J., Paterson, K. B., Wang, J., ... Mcgowan, V. A. (2019). Adult age differences in effects of text spacing on eye movements during reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2700.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02700 URL |
[52] |
Liu, Y., Yu, L., Fu, L., Li, W., Duan, Z., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1367-1376.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01577-x URL |
[53] |
Liu, Z., Tong, W., & Su, Y. (2020). Interaction effects of aging, word frequency, and predictability on saccade length in Chinese reading. PeerJ, 8, e8860.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8860 URL |
[54] | Malutina, S. A., Dragoy, O. V., Petrushevskiy, A. G., Fedina, O. N., Ivanova, M. V., Sevan, D. A., & Gutyrchik, E. F. (2012). Neurophisiological correlates of word frequency during naming task. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Functional Neuroimaging: Basic Research and Clinical Applications, Moscow, Russian. |
[55] |
Meekings, S., & Scott, S. (2020). Error in the superior temporal gyrus? A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of speech production studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(3), 422-444.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01661 URL |
[56] |
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165-178.
doi: 10.1037/h0027366 URL |
[57] |
Murray, W. S., & Forster, K. I. (2004). Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review, 111(3), 721-756.
pmid: 15250781 |
[58] |
Newman, R. S., & German, D. J. (2005). Life span effects of lexical factors on oral naming. Language and Speech, 48(2), 123-156.
doi: 10.1177/00238309050480020101 URL |
[59] |
Oh, A., Duerden, E. G., & Pang, E. W. (2014). The role of the insula in speech and language processing. Brain and Language, 135(1), 96-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.06.003 URL |
[60] |
Ostrand, R., & Gunstad, J. (2020). Using automatic assessment of speech production to predict current and future cognitive function in older adults. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 34(5), 357-369.
doi: 10.1177/0891988720933358 URL |
[61] |
Perret, C., & Laganaro, M. (2012). Comparison of electrophysiological correlates of writing and speaking: A topographic ERP analysis. Brain Topography, 25(1), 64-72.
doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0200-3 pmid: 21863371 |
[62] |
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
pmid: 8650300 |
[63] |
Qu, Q., Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2016). Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming. Brain and Language, 159, 118-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.008 URL |
[64] |
Räling, R., Schröder, A., & Wartenburger, I. (2016). The origins of age of acquisition and typicality effects: Semantic processing in aphasia and the ageing brain. Neuropsychologia, 86, 80-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.019 pmid: 27106392 |
[65] |
Rizio, A. A., Moyer, K. J., & Diaz, M. T. (2017). Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age-related differences in picture-word interference. Brain and Behavior, 7(4), e00660.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.2017.7.issue-4 URL |
[66] |
Rossi, E., & Diaz, M. (2016). How aging and bilingualism influence language processing: Theoretical and neural models. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(1-2), 9-42.
doi: 10.1075/lab URL |
[67] | Scott, S. (2017). The neural processing of phonetic information:The role of the superior temporal gyrus. In M.Maria(Ed.), Neural mechanisms of language (pp.11-25). Springer US. |
[68] |
Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583-587.
doi: 10.1126/science.1254404 URL |
[69] | Shin, S., Kwon, M., Lee, J.-H., & Sim, H. S. (2017). Verb naming and comprehension in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Focusing on instrumentality of action verbs. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 22(2), 190-204. |
[70] |
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 225-231.
pmid: 10879577 |
[71] |
Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912-928.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp153 URL |
[72] |
Strijkers, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Costa, A. (2012). Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 345-362.
pmid: 24039339 |
[73] |
Thothathiri, M., Rattinger, M., & Trivedi, B. (2017). Cognitive control during sentence generation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1), 39-49.
pmid: 26427343 |
[74] |
Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary scores: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332-339.
pmid: 12825780 |
[75] | Vlasova, R., Pechenkova, E., & Sinitsyn, V. (2013). fMRI correlates of the word frequency effect in russian. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2, 13. |
[76] | Wang, C., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Word frequency effect in written production: Evidence from erps and neural oscillations. Psychophysiology, 58(5), e13775. |
[77] | Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Chang, M., Paterson, K. B., … McGowan, V. A. (2018a). Adult age differences in eye movements during reading: The evidence from Chinese. Journals of Gerontology, 73(4), 584-593. |
[78] |
Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2018b). Effects of aging and text stimulus quality on the word frequency effect during Chinese reading. Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 693-712.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000259 URL |
[79] | Warrington, K. L., Mcgowan, V. A., Paterson, K. B., & White, S. J. (2018). Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 44(11), 1714. |
[80] |
White, S., Drieghe, D., Liversedge, S., & Staub, A. (2016). The word frequency effect during sentence reading: A linear or nonlinear effect of log frequency? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 46-55.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240813 URL |
[81] |
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2017). The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first-and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 32(2), 158-177.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000151 URL |
[82] |
Wilson, S. M., Isenberg, A. L., & Hickok, G. (2010). Neural correlates of word production stages delineated by parametric modulation of psycholinguistic variables. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3596-3608.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.v30:11 URL |
[83] |
Xu, X., Li, J., & Guo, S. (2020). Age of acquisition ratings for 19, 716 simplified Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 558-573.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01455-8 URL |
[84] |
Yang, Y., Zhang, J., Meng, Z.-L., Qin, L., Liu, Y.-F., & Bi, H.-Y. (2018). Neural correlates of orthographic access in Mandarin Chinese writing: An fMRI study of the word- frequency effect. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 288.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00288 pmid: 30555308 |
[85] |
Yang, Y., Zuo, Z., Tam, F., Graham, S., Tao, R., Wang, N., & Bi, H.-Y. (2019). Brain activation and functional connectivity during Chinese writing: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 199-211.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.03.002 |
[86] |
Yuan, Q., Wu, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Chen, M., Ding, G., & Guo, T. (2021). Patterns and networks of language control in bilingual language production. Brain Structure and Function, 226(4), 963-977.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02218-7 URL |
[87] |
Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older chinese readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(7), 1409-1425.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1083594 URL |
[1] | ZHANG Caihui, YE Jianqiao, YANG Jing. Brain mechanism underlying learning Chinese as a second language [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 747-758. |
[2] | WANG Yongli, GE Shengnan, Lancy Lantin Huang, WAN Qin, LU Haidan. Neural mechanism of speech imagery [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 608-621. |
[3] | ZHANG Mingxia, LI Yuxin, LI Jin, LIU Xun. The influence of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on memory in adolescents and the underlying neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 1-9. |
[4] | WANG Songxue, CHENG Si, JIANG Ting, LIU Xun, ZHANG Mingxia. The effect of external rewards on declarative memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 78-86. |
[5] | LIANG Fei, JIANG Yao, XIAO Tingwei, DONG Jie, WANG Fushun. Basic emotion and its neural basis: Evidence from fMRI and machine-vision studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1832-1843. |
[6] | ZHOU Zhenyou, KONG Li, CHAN Raymond. The relationship between gut microbiota and brain imaging and clinical manifestation in schizophrenia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1856-1869. |
[7] | DENG Xun, CHEN Ning, WANG Dandan, ZHAO Huanhuan, HE Wen. Neural mechanism of NSSI and comparative study with comorbidities [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1561-1573. |
[8] | LI Xi, LI Tongmao, HU Jihao. The mechanism and influences of multilingual packaging strategy for tourism product: From the perspective of selective accessibility model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1216-1229. |
[9] | DENG Yao, WANG Mengmeng, RAO Hengyi. Risk-taking research based on the Balloon Analog Risk Task [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1377-1392. |
[10] | LI Liang, LI Hong. Cognitive mechanism and neural basis of shyness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1038-1049. |
[11] | ZHAO Xinxian, YANG Xiaohu. Prosody perception in older adults [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 613-621. |
[12] | LIU Ping, ZHANG Rongwei, LI Dan. The effect and mechanisms of self-transcendence values on durable happiness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 660-669. |
[13] | LI Hehui, HUANG Huiya, DONG Lin, LUO Yuejia, TAO Wuhai. Developmental dyslexia and cerebellar abnormalities: Multiple roles of the cerebellum and causal relationships between the two [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 343-353. |
[14] | HU Jia-Bao, LEI Yang, DING Xian-Feng, CHENG Xiao-Rong, FAN Zhao. Shared vs. private aesthetic tastes: The cognitive and neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 354-364. |
[15] | YE Liqun, TAN Xin, YAO Kun, DING Yulong. Influence of normal aging on early stages of visual attention: Evidence from ERP studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2746-2763. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||