Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 967-977.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00967
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-05-27
Online:
2021-06-15
Published:
2021-04-25
Contact:
CAO Bingbing
E-mail:bbcao_neu@163.com
CLC Number:
PENG Jian, CAO Bingbing. The bottom-up effect of followers' proactive work behavior: An implicit followership perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(6): 967-977.
[1] | 曹元坤, 祝振兵. (2015). 内隐追随理论: 概念, 测量, 前因及后果. 心理科学进展, 23(2), 280-288. |
[2] | 陈鹏宇, 孙剑, 贾铖. (2020). 越级指挥的代价: 高管越级指挥对中层领导多重交换关系的影响. 中国人力资源开发, 37(3), 43-57. |
[3] | 段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43(10), 1185-1197. |
[4] | 刘超, 刘军, 陈星汶, 李巧, 朱丽. (2020). 本土组织情境下上下级匹配模型的构建与探讨. 中国人力资源开发, 37(3), 58-77. |
[5] | 刘德鹏, 贾良定, 尤树洋, 赵广军. (2020). 下属更加偏爱与自己相似的上级吗? 中国情境下同乡与同龄的差异化作用. 中国人力资源开发, 37(2), 34-52. |
[6] | 彭坚, 王霄. (2015). 追随力认知图式: 概念解析与整合模型. 心理科学, 38(4), 822-827. |
[7] | 彭坚, 王震. (2018). 做上司的“意中人”:负担还是赋能?追随原型-特质匹配的双刃剑效应. 心理学报, 50(2), 216-225. |
[8] | 隋杨, 王辉, 岳旖旎, Fred Luthans. (2012). 变革型领导对员工绩效和满意度的影响: 心理资本的中介作用及程序公平的调节作用. 心理学报, 44(9), 1217-1230. |
[9] | 陶厚永, 曹伟. (2019). 基于对偶心理定位的领导-追随行为模式及其实证研究. 珞珈管理评论, 21(1), 91-108. |
[10] | 陶厚永, 李薇, 陈建安, 李玲. (2014). 领导-追随行为互动研究: 对偶心理定位的视角. 中国工业经济, (12), 104-117. |
[11] | 周婉茹, 周丽芳, 郑伯埙, 任金刚. (2010). 专权与尚严之辨: 再探威权领导的内涵与恩威并济的效果. 本土心理学研究, 34, 223-284. |
[12] | 周琰喆, 李原. (2020). 基于人格特质视角的员工建言行为研究: 回顾与展望. 中国人力资源开发, 37(10), 33-51. |
[13] | Bai, Y., Dong, Z., Liu, H., & Liu, S. (2017). We may be different, but I can help you: The effects of leaders' political skills on leader-follower power distance value incongruence and withdrawal behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 216-229. |
[14] |
Benson, A. J., Hardy, J., & Eys, M. (2016). Contextualizing leaders' interpretations of proactive followership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 949-966.
doi: 10.1002/job.2077 URL |
[15] |
Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851-875.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0562 URL |
[16] |
Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543-562.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015 URL |
[17] | Chaleff, I. (1995). The courageous follower: Standing up to and for our leaders. San Francisco, Calif: Berrett-Koehler Publications. |
[18] |
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304 URL |
[19] |
de Vos, A., de Clippeleer, I., & Dewilde, T. (2009). Proactive career behaviours and career success during the early career. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 761-777.
doi: 10.1348/096317909X471013 URL |
[20] |
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573.
pmid: 12090614 |
[21] |
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858-881.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005 URL |
[22] |
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202 URL |
[23] |
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358.
doi: 10.1037/h0061470 URL |
[24] | Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp.133-187). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. |
[25] |
Fuller, B., Marler, L. E., Hester, K., & Otondo, R. F. (2015). Leader reactions to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due. Human Relations, 68(6), 879-898.
doi: 10.1177/0018726714548235 URL |
[26] |
Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611-1633.
doi: 10.1177/0149206310380250 URL |
[27] |
Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 31-55.
doi: 10.1111/peps.2009.62.issue-1 URL |
[28] | Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press. |
[29] |
Hakimi, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Giessner, S. (2010). Leader empowering behaviour: The leader's perspective. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 701-716.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00703.x URL |
[30] |
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7 URL |
[31] | Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Dick, R. V. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower — Advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1205-1222. |
[32] |
Keller T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 589-607.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00033-8 URL |
[33] | Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142-148. |
[34] |
Khan, A. K., Moss, S., Quratulain, S., & Hameed, I. (2016). When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2801-2826.
doi: 10.1177/0149206316653930 URL |
[35] | Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2011). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27-52. |
[36] | Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465. |
[37] |
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662 URL |
[38] |
Mawritz, M. B., Greenbaum, R. L., Butts, M. M., & Graham, K.A (2017). I just can't control myself: A self-regulation perspective on the abuse of deviant employees. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1482-1503.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0409 URL |
[39] |
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662.
doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554 URL |
[40] |
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 URL |
[41] |
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172.
pmid: 12529060 |
[42] | Sun, J., Li, W.-D., Li, Y., Liden, R. C., Li, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). Unintended consequences of being proactive? Linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000494 |
[43] |
Sun, S., & van Emmerik, H. I. (2015). Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 966-975.
doi: 10.1037/a0037833 URL |
[44] |
Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.001 URL |
[45] | Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. |
[46] |
Tepper, B. J., Dimotakis, N., Lambert, L. S., Koopman, J., Matta, F. K., Park, H. M., & Goo, W. (2018). Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person-environment fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1343-1368.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0163 URL |
[47] |
van Gils, S., van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader-member exchange agreement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 333-363.
doi: 10.1080/13594320902978458 URL |
[48] | Wang, X., & Peng, J. (2016). The effect of implicit-explicit followership congruence on benevolent leadership: Evidence from Chinese family firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 812. |
[49] |
Wei, X., Zhang, Z.-X., & Chen, X.-P. (2015). I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1641-1652.
doi: 10.1037/a0039046 URL |
[50] | Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Straw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research on organizational behavior (Vol 18, pp.1-74). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press. |
[51] |
Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders' conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822-834.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006 URL |
[52] |
Zhang, W., Hui, W., & Pearce, C. L. (2014). Consideration for future consequences as an antecedent of transformational leadership behavior: The moderating effects of perceived dynamic work environment. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 329-343.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.002 URL |
[53] |
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2014). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0995 URL |
[54] |
Zhang, Z., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111-130.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0865 URL |
[1] | YE Shuqi, YIN Junting, LI Zhaoxian, LUO Junlong. The influence mechanism of emotion on intuitive and analytical processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 736-746. |
[2] | GUO Li, JIA Suosuo, LI Guiquan, LI Manlin. Lonely at the top? Exploring the multi-level double-edged sword effect of leader workplace loneliness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[3] | MA Yuanxiao, CHEN Xu. The functional mechanism of oxytocin in anxiety detection and extinction among anxiety-susceptible groups [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 10-19. |
[4] | XIAO Tingwei, DONG Jie, LIANG Fei, WANG Fushun, LI Yang. The relationship between disgust and suicidal behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 87-98. |
[5] | KOU Dongxiao, WANG Xiaoyu. The influence of power on interpersonal sensitivity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 108-115. |
[6] | ZOU Di, LI Hong, WANG Fushun. An investigation into the definition of arousal and its cognitive neurophysiological basis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2020-2033. |
[7] | LIU Wei, SHEN Xiaoling. A dynamic perspective on the relationship between team reflection-in-action and innovation: A moderated mediation model integrating cognition and emotion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1759-1769. |
[8] | LIANG Fei, JIANG Yao, XIAO Tingwei, DONG Jie, WANG Fushun. Basic emotion and its neural basis: Evidence from fMRI and machine-vision studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1832-1843. |
[9] | LIU Chunxiao, LIU Lizhi, Wang Dan, CHEN Wenfeng. The mechanism of collective ritual promoting group emotional contagion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1870-1882. |
[10] | WANG Yanqing, GONG Shaoying, JIANG Tiantian, Wu Yanan. Can affective pedagogical agent facilitate multimedia learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1524-1535. |
[11] | WU Xiaofei, XIAO Feng, LUO Jing. The neural mechanism and transfer effect of creative cognitive reappraisal in negative emotion regulation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 477-485. |
[12] | LIU Juncai, RAN Guangming, ZHANG Qi. The neural activities of different emotion carriers and their similarities and differences: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
[13] | YAO Haijuan, WANG Qi, LI Zhaoqing. Cognitive reappraisal inventiveness in emotion regulation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 601-612. |
[14] | ZHAO Xinxian, YANG Xiaohu. Prosody perception in older adults [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 613-621. |
[15] | LIU Ping, ZHANG Rongwei, LI Dan. The effect and mechanisms of self-transcendence values on durable happiness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 660-669. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||