Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 1319-1330.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01319
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles
ZHANG Jianwei1(), LI Haihong1, LIU Yuxin2, ZHAO Hui1
Received:
2017-06-26
Online:
2018-07-15
Published:
2018-05-29
Contact:
ZHANG Jianwei
E-mail:jianweizhang@bit.edu.cn
CLC Number:
ZHANG Jianwei, LI Haihong, LIU Yuxin, ZHAO Hui. Effects and mechanisms of paternalistic leadership on multilevel creativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1319-1330.
1 | 常涛, 刘智强, 景保峰 . ( 2016). 家长式领导与团队创造力: 基于三元理论的新发现. 研究与发展管理, 28( 1), 62-72. |
2 |
陈璐, 高昂, 杨百寅, 井润田 . ( 2013). 家长式领导对高层管理团队成员创造力的作用机制研究. 管理学报, 10( 6), 831-838.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.06.008 URL |
3 | 樊景立, 郑伯埙 . ( 2000). 华人组织的家长式领导: 一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理学研究, ( 13), 126-180. |
4 |
傅晓, 李忆, 司有和 . ( 2012). 家长式领导对创新的影响: 一个整合模型. 南开管理评论, 15( 2), 121-127.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.02.013 URL |
5 | 高昂 . ( 2013). 华人组织中家长式领导有效性研究 (博士学位论文). 清华大学, 北京. |
6 | 葛伯彰 . ( 2013). 家长式领导对组织创造力的影响及其机制研究 (硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州. |
7 | 蒋琬, 顾琴轩 . ( 2015). 仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角. 北京理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 17( 1), 70-77. |
8 | 李超平, 田宝, 时勘 . ( 2006). 变革型领导与员工工作态度: 心理授权的中介作用. 心理学报, 38( 2), 297-307. |
9 |
李忆, 桂婉璐, 刘曜 . ( 2014). 家长式领导对双元创新的影响: 与企业战略匹配. 华东经济管理, 28( 1), 113-118.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2014.01.023 URL |
10 |
吕洁, 张钢 . ( 2013). 团队认知的涌现: 基于集体信息加工的视角. 心理科学进展, 21( 12), 2214-2223.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02214 URL |
11 |
石冠峰, 李琨 . ( 2014). 威权领导、仁慈领导对团队创造力——一个有中介的交互效应模型检验. 贵州财经大学学报, 32( 5), 53-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6636.2014.05.007 URL |
12 | 宋继文, 孙志强, 孟慧 . ( 2009). 变革型领导的中介变量: 一个整合的视角. 心理科学进展, 17( 1), 147-157. |
13 | 魏蕾, 时勘 . ( 2010). 家长式领导与员工工作投入: 心理授权的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 8( 2), 88-93. |
14 | 许彦妮, 顾琴轩, 蒋琬 . ( 2014). 德行领导对员工创造力和工作绩效的影响: 基于LMX理论的实证研究. 管理评论, 26( 2), 139-147. |
15 | 张银, 李燕萍 . ( 2011). 领导风格、心理授权与员工创造力: 基于中国电力行业的实证研究. 科技进步与对策, 28( 21), 140-146. |
16 |
赵新宇, 曹春辉, 席酉民 . ( 2014). 文化视角下领导研究的回顾与展望. 管理学报, 11( 10), 1559-1568.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.10.020 URL |
17 | 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 黄敏萍, 樊景立, 彭泗清 . ( 2003). 家长式领导的三元模式: 中国大陆企业组织的证据. 本土心理学研究, ( 20), 209-252. |
18 | 周浩, 龙立荣 . ( 2007). 家长式领导与组织公正感的关系. 心理学报, 39( 5), 909-917. |
19 | 邹文篪, 刘佳 . ( 2011). 团队中的“我为人人, 人人为我”——团队-成员交换研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19( 8), 1193-1204. |
20 |
Ahlstrom D., Chen S. J., & Yeh K. S . ( 2010). Managing in ethnic Chinese communities: Culture, institutions, and context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27, 341-354.
doi: 10.1007/s10490-010-9218-4 URL |
21 |
Allen S. L., Smith J. E., & Da Silva N . ( 2013). Leadership style in relation to organizational change and organizational creativity: Perceptions from nonprofit organizational members. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 24( 1), 23-42.
doi: 10.1002/nml.21078 URL |
22 | Amabile T. M. ( 1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. |
23 | Amabile T. M. ( 1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. |
24 |
Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L . ( 2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13( 6), 673-704.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00155-8 URL |
25 |
Aryee S., Chen Z. X., Sun L. Y., & Debrah Y. A . ( 2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92( 1), 191-201.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191 URL pmid: 17227160 |
26 | Aycan, Z . ( 2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context ( pp. 445-466). US: Springer. |
27 |
Bartol K. M., Liu W., Zeng X. Q., & Wu K. L . ( 2009). Social exchange and knowledge sharing among knowledge workers: The moderating role of perceived job security. Management and Organization Review, 5( 2), 223-240.
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00146.x URL |
28 |
Breaugh, J. A . ( 1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38( 6), 551-570.
doi: 10.1177/001872678503800604 URL |
29 |
Carmeli, A., & Paulus, P. B . ( 2015). CEO ideational facilitation leadership and team creativity: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49( 1), 53-75.
doi: 10.1002/jocb.59 URL |
30 |
Chan S. C., Huang X., Snape E., & Lam C. K . ( 2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34( 1), 108-128.
doi: 10.1002/job.1797 URL |
31 |
Chen X. P., Eberly M. B., Chiang T. J., Farh J. L., & Cheng B. S . ( 2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40( 3), 796-819.
doi: 10.1177/0149206311410604 URL |
32 |
Cheng B. S., Chou L. F., Wu T. Y., Huang M. P., & Farh J. L . ( 2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7( 1), 89-117.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x URL |
33 |
Deci E. L., Connell J. P., & Ryan R. M . ( 1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74( 4), 580-590.
doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.74.4.580 URL |
34 |
Dedahanov A. T., Lee D. H., Rhee J., & Yoon J . ( 2016). Entrepreneur’s paternalistic leadership style and creativity: The mediating role of employee voice. Management Decision, 54( 9), 2310-2324.
doi: 10.1108/MD-11-2015-0537 URL |
35 |
Farh J. L., Liang. J., Chou. L. F., & Cheng, B. S .( 2008) . Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C C Chen & Y T Lee (Eds), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp 171-205) London: Cambridge University Press.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753763.008 URL |
36 |
Farmer S. M., Tierney P., & Kung-McIntyre K . ( 2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46( 5), 618-630.
doi: 10.2307/30040653 URL |
37 |
Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C . ( 2007). Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32( 2), 438-458.
doi: 10.2307/20159310 URL |
38 |
Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M . ( 2012). Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118( 1), 14-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.004 URL |
39 |
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M . ( 1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6( 2), 219-247.
doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 URL |
40 |
Graf M. M., Schuh S. C., van Quaquebeke N., & van Dick R . ( 2012). The relationship between leaders’ group- oriented values and follower identification with and endorsement of leaders: The moderating role of leaders’ group membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 106( 3), 301-311.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0997-4 URL |
41 |
Gu Q. X., Tang T. L. P., & Jiang W . ( 2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader-member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126( 3), 513-529.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9 URL |
42 |
He Y. Q., Ding X. H., & Yang K. P . ( 2014). Unpacking the relationships between conflicts and team innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Management Decision, 52( 8), 1533-1548.
doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0127 URL |
43 |
Hu N., Chen Z., Gu J. B., Huang S. L., & Liu H. F . ( 2017). Conflict and creativity in inter-organizational teams: The moderating role of shared leadership. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28( 1), 74-102.
doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-01-2016-0003 URL |
44 |
Kim, M., & Shin, Y . ( 2015). Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32( 3), 693-716.
doi: 10.1007/s10490-015-9413-4 URL |
45 |
Liu D., Liao H., & Loi R . ( 2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55( 5), 1187-1212.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0400 URL |
46 | McCall, G., & Simmons, J. L .( 1978) . Identities and interaction. New York: Free Press. |
47 |
Morgeson F. P., Mitchell T. R., & Liu D . ( 2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40( 4), 515-537.
doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0099 URL |
48 |
Müller A., Herbig B., & Petrovic K . ( 2009). The explication of implicit team knowledge and its supporting effect on team processes and technical innovations: An action regulation perspective on team reflexivity. Small Group Research, 40( 1), 28-51.
doi: 10.1177/1046496408326574 URL |
49 |
Niu C. P., Wang A. C., & Cheng B. S . ( 2009). Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12( 1), 32-39.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.01267.x URL |
50 | Oldham, G. R . ( 2003). Stimulating and supporting creativity in organizations. In S. E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage ( pp. 243-273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
51 |
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A . ( 1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39( 3), 607-634.
doi: 10.2307/256657 URL |
52 |
Qu R. J., Janssen O., & Shi K . ( 2017). Leader-member exchange and follower creativity: The moderating roles of leader and follower expectations for creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28( 4), 603-626.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1105843 URL |
53 |
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J . ( 2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15( 1), 55-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005 URL |
54 |
Riley, A., & Burke, P. J . ( 1995). Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58( 2), 61-73.
doi: 10.2307/2787146 URL |
55 |
Schippers M. C., West M. A., & Dawson J. F . ( 2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41( 3), 769-788.
doi: 10.1177/0149206312441210 URL |
56 |
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A . ( 1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37( 3), 580-607.
doi: 10.2307/256701 URL |
57 |
Shalley, C. E . ( 1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38( 2), 483-503.
doi: 10.2307/256689 URL |
58 |
Spreitzer, G. M . ( 1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38( 5), 1442-1465.
doi: 10.2307/256865 URL |
59 | Tang, C. Y., & Naumann, S. E . ( 2016). Team diversity, mood, and team creativity: The role of team knowledge sharing in Chinese R & D teams. Journal of Management & Organization, 22( 3), 420-434. |
60 |
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M . ( 2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45( 6), 1137-1148.
doi: 10.2307/3069429 URL |
61 |
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M . ( 2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96( 2), 277-293.
doi: 10.1037/a0020952 URL pmid: 20954756 |
62 |
Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A . ( 2011). Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84( 1), 153-172.
doi: 10.1348/096317910X485818 URL |
63 |
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S . ( 2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31( 1), 106-121.
doi: 10.1002/job.634 URL |
64 |
Wang, P., & Rode, J. C . ( 2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63( 8), 1105-1128.
doi: 10.1177/0018726709354132 URL |
65 |
Wayne S. J., Hoobler J., Marinova S. V., & Johnson M. M . ( 2008). Abusive behavior: Trickle-down effects beyond the dyad. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-6.
doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2008.33622318 URL |
66 | West, M. A . ( 1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology( pp. 555-579). Chichester, UK: Wiley. |
67 | Wood, J. T . ( 2005). Communication in our lives. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. |
68 |
Wu, M . ( 2012). Moral leadership and work performance: Testing the mediating and interaction effects in China. Chinese Management Studies, 6( 2), 284-299.
doi: 10.1108/17506141211236721 URL |
69 |
Zhang A. Y., Tsui A. S., & Wang D. X . ( 2011). Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22( 5), 851-862.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.007 URL |
70 |
Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M . ( 2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53( 1), 107-128.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118 URL |
71 |
Zhou, J . ( 2006). A model of paternalistic organizational control and group creativity. In Y.-R. Chen (Ed. ), National culture and groups (pp. 75-94). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
doi: 10.1016/S1534-0856(06)09004-9 URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||