Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 1794-1806.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01794
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2017-11-27
Online:
2018-10-15
Published:
2018-08-27
Contact:
HU Zhujing
E-mail:huzjing@jxnu.edu.cn
AI Yan, HU Zhujing. The cooperation and transformation mechanism of dual processing in reasoning and judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1794-1806.
双重加工理论提出者 | T1 | T2 |
---|---|---|
Posner & | 自动激活系统(automatic activation system) | 意识加工系统(conscious processing system) |
Shiffrin & | 自动加工过程(automatic processing) | 控制加工过程(controlled processing) |
Johnson-Laird (1983) | 内隐推理(implicit inferences) | 外显推理(explicit inferences) |
Evans (1984, 1989) | 启发式过程(heuristic processing) | 分析式过程(analytic processing) |
Pollock (1991) | 快速和灵活模块(quick and inflexible modules) | 智力(intellection) |
Reber (1993) | 内隐认知 (implicit cognition) | 外显学习(explicit learning) |
Epstein (1973, 1994) | 经验系统(experiential system) | 理性系统(rational system) |
Levinson (1995) | 交互智力(interactional intelligence) | 分析智力(analytic intelligence) |
Sloman (1996) | 联想系统(associative system) | 规则系统(rule-based system) |
Evans & Over (1996) | 内隐思维过程(tacit thought processes) | 外显思维过程(explicit thought processes) |
Hammond (1996) | 直觉认知(intuitive cognition) | 分析认知(analytical cognition) |
Klein (1998) | 预先认知决策(recognition-primed decisions) | 理性选择策略(rational choice strategy) |
Stanovich & West (2000) | 系统1 (System 1) | 系统2 (System 2) |
自动启发式加工(Automatic-heuristic processing) | 执行分析式加工(executive-analytic processing) | |
Evans (2011) | 直觉加工(Intuitive processing) | 反思性加工(Reflective processing) |
特征 | 联想的(associative) | 以规则为基础的(rule-based) |
整体性(holistic) | 分析性(analytic) | |
自动的(automatic) | 控制性的(controlled) | |
不需要认知能力(relatively undemanding of cognitive capacity) | 需要认知能力(demanding of cognitive capacity) | |
快速的(relatively fast) | 缓慢的(relatively slow) | |
通过生理、暴露和个体经验获得(acquisition by biology, exposure, and personal experience) | 通过文化和形式指导获得(acquisition by cultural and formal tuition) |
双重加工理论提出者 | T1 | T2 |
---|---|---|
Posner & | 自动激活系统(automatic activation system) | 意识加工系统(conscious processing system) |
Shiffrin & | 自动加工过程(automatic processing) | 控制加工过程(controlled processing) |
Johnson-Laird (1983) | 内隐推理(implicit inferences) | 外显推理(explicit inferences) |
Evans (1984, 1989) | 启发式过程(heuristic processing) | 分析式过程(analytic processing) |
Pollock (1991) | 快速和灵活模块(quick and inflexible modules) | 智力(intellection) |
Reber (1993) | 内隐认知 (implicit cognition) | 外显学习(explicit learning) |
Epstein (1973, 1994) | 经验系统(experiential system) | 理性系统(rational system) |
Levinson (1995) | 交互智力(interactional intelligence) | 分析智力(analytic intelligence) |
Sloman (1996) | 联想系统(associative system) | 规则系统(rule-based system) |
Evans & Over (1996) | 内隐思维过程(tacit thought processes) | 外显思维过程(explicit thought processes) |
Hammond (1996) | 直觉认知(intuitive cognition) | 分析认知(analytical cognition) |
Klein (1998) | 预先认知决策(recognition-primed decisions) | 理性选择策略(rational choice strategy) |
Stanovich & West (2000) | 系统1 (System 1) | 系统2 (System 2) |
自动启发式加工(Automatic-heuristic processing) | 执行分析式加工(executive-analytic processing) | |
Evans (2011) | 直觉加工(Intuitive processing) | 反思性加工(Reflective processing) |
特征 | 联想的(associative) | 以规则为基础的(rule-based) |
整体性(holistic) | 分析性(analytic) | |
自动的(automatic) | 控制性的(controlled) | |
不需要认知能力(relatively undemanding of cognitive capacity) | 需要认知能力(demanding of cognitive capacity) | |
快速的(relatively fast) | 缓慢的(relatively slow) | |
通过生理、暴露和个体经验获得(acquisition by biology, exposure, and personal experience) | 通过文化和形式指导获得(acquisition by cultural and formal tuition) |
1 |
胡竹菁, 胡笑羽 . ( 2012). Evans双重加工理论的发展过程简要述评. 心理学探新, 32( 4), 310-316.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2012.04.004 URL |
2 | 姚志强, 李亚非 . ( 2016). 逻辑-信念冲突与推理难度对逻辑和信念判断的影响. 心理科学, 39( 1), 36-42. |
3 |
Banks A. P., & Hope, C. ( 2014). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning: An event-related potential study of belief bias. Psychophysiology, 51( 3), 290-297.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12169 URL pmid: 25003167 |
4 | Barbey A. K., & Sloman, S. A . ( 2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 30( 3), 241-254. |
5 |
Barr N., Pennycook G., Stolz J. A., & Fugelsang J. A . ( 2015). Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought. Thinking & Reasoning, 21( 1), 61-75.
doi: 10.1080/13546783.2014.895915 URL |
6 |
Barrouillet P., ( 2011). Dual-process theories and cognitive development: Advances and challenges. Developmental Review, 31( 2-3), 79-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.002 URL |
7 |
Beevers, C. G . ( 2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model. Clinical Psychology Review, 25( 7), 975-1002.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.003 URL |
8 |
Bhatia S., ( 2017). Conflict and bias in heuristic judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43( 2), 319-325.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000307 URL pmid: 27685023 |
9 | Chaiken S. , & Trope, Y.( 1999) . Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press. |
10 |
De Neys W. , ( 2006). Automatic-heuristic and executive- analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59( 6), 1070-1100.
doi: 10.1080/02724980543000123 URL |
11 |
De Neys W. , ( 2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7( 1), 28-38.
doi: 10.1177/1745691611429354 URL |
12 | De Neys W. , ( 2014). Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking & Reasoning, 20( 2), 169-187. |
13 |
De Neys W., Cromheeke S., & Osman M . ( 2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS One, 6( 1), e15954.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015954 URL pmid: 21283574 |
14 |
De Neys W., , & Glumicic, T. ( 2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106( 3), 1248-1299.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002 URL pmid: 17631876 |
15 |
De Neys W., Rossi S., & Houdé O . ( 2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 2), 269-273.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5 URL pmid: 23417270 |
16 |
De Neys W., Vartanian O., & Goel V . ( 2008). Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science, 19( 5), 483-489.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x URL |
17 |
Epstein S., ( 1973). The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory . American Psychologist 28( 5), 404-416.
doi: 10.1037/h0034679 URL pmid: 4703058 |
18 |
Epstein S., ( 1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49( 8), 709-724.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709 URL |
19 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75( 4), 451-468.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01915.x URL |
20 | Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum. |
21 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7( 10), 454-459.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012 URL pmid: 14550493 |
22 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13( 3), 378-395.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193858 URL pmid: 17048720 |
23 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13( 4), 321-339.
doi: 10.1080/13546780601008825 URL |
24 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 URL pmid: 18154502 |
25 |
Evans, J. St B. T.. ( 2009) . How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 33-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0002 URL |
26 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual- process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21( 4), 313-326.
doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.521057 URL |
27 |
Evans, J. St. B. T . ( 2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31( 2-3), 86-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.007 URL |
28 |
Evans J. St. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. ( 2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual- process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11( 4), 382-389.
doi: 10.1080/13546780542000005 URL |
29 | Evans, J. St. B. T ., & Over, D. E.( 1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, England: Psychology Press. |
30 |
Evans J. St. B. T., Venn S., & Feeney A . ( 2002). Implicit and explicit processes in a hypothesis testing task. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 31-46.
doi: 10.1348/000712602162436 URL pmid: 11839100 |
31 |
Evans J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E . ( 2013 a). Dual-process theories of higher cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 3), 223-241.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685 URL |
32 |
Evans J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E . ( 2013 b). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 3), 263-271.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613483774 URL |
33 |
Franssens S., & De Neys, W. (2009). The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 15( 2), 105-128.
doi: 10.1080/13546780802711185 URL |
34 |
Frey D., Johnson E. D., & De Neys W . ( 2018). Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71( 5), 1188-1208.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283 URL |
35 |
Gigerenzer G., & Regier, T. ( 1996). How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin, 119( 1), 23-26.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.23 URL |
36 |
Goel V., ( 2007). Anatomy of deductive reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 10), 435-441.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.003 URL |
37 |
Goel V., & Dolan, R. J . ( 2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87( 1), B11-B22.
doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00185-3 URL pmid: 12499108 |
38 |
Gubbins E., & Byrne, R. M. J . ( 2014). Dual processes of emotion and reason in judgments about moral dilemmas. Thinking & Reasoning, 20( 2), 245-268.
doi: 10.1080/13546783.2013.877400 URL |
39 | Hammond K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy. Oxford University Press.. |
40 |
Handley S. J., Newstead S. E., & Trippas D . ( 2011). Logic, beliefs, and instruction: A test of the default interventionist account of belief bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37( 1), 28-43.
doi: 10.1037/a0021098 URL pmid: 21058879 |
41 |
Handley S. J., & Trippas, D. ( 2015). Dual processes and the interplay between knowledge and structure: A new parallel processing model. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 62, 33-58.
doi: 10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.002 URL |
42 |
Johnson E. D., Tubau E., & De Neys W . (2016). The doubting system 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity. Acta Psychogica, 164, 56-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.008 URL pmid: 26722837 |
43 | Johnson-Laird, P. N.( 1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Harvard University Press. |
44 | Kahneman D., ( 2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. |
45 | Kahneman D. , & Frederick, S.( 2005) . A model of heuristic judgment. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267-293). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
46 |
Keren G., ( 2013). A tale of two systems: A scientific advance or a theoretical stone soup? Commentary on evans stanovich. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 3), 257-262.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613483474 URL |
47 |
Keren G., & Schul, Y. ( 2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4( 6), 533-550.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x URL |
48 | Klein G., ( 1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT Press. |
49 |
Klein G., ( 2015). A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4( 3), 164-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.001 URL |
50 |
Kokis J. V., Macpherson R., Toplak M. E., West R. F., & Stanovich K. E . ( 2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Joural of Experimental Child Psychology, 83( 1), 26-52.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00121-2 URL |
51 |
Kruglanski, A. W . ( 2013). Only one? The default interventionist perspective as a unimodel—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 3), 242-247.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613483477 URL |
52 |
Kruglanski A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. ( 2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118( 1), 97-109.
doi: 10.1037/a0020762 URL |
53 |
Levinson S. C. ( 1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed. ), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221-260). Cambridge University Press.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.014 URL |
54 | Liang P. P., Goel V., Jia X. Q., & Li K. C . ( 2014). Different neural systems contribute to semantic bias and conflict detection in the inclusion fallacy task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 797. |
55 |
Lieberman, M. D . ( 2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 URL |
56 | Markovits H., Brisson J ., & de Chantal, P. L.( 2015). Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity. Memory & Cognition, 43( 8), 1208-1215. |
57 |
Markovits H., Brisson J., de Chantal P. L., & Thompson V. A . ( 2017). Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias. Memory & Cognition, 45( 7), 1182-1192.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0723-2 URL pmid: 28608194 |
58 |
Markovits H., Brunet M.-L., Thompson V., & Brisson J . ( 2013). Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 4), 1213-1222.
doi: 10.1037/a0030906 URL pmid: 23206167 |
59 |
Markovits H., Forgues H. L., & Brunet M. L . ( 2012). More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 40( 5), 736-747.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0186-4 URL pmid: 22287219 |
60 |
Osman M., ( 2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11( 6), 988-1010.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196730 URL pmid: 15875969 |
61 |
Osman M., ( 2013). A case study: Dual-process theories of higher cognition—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 3), 248-252.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613483475 URL |
62 | Pennycook G., ( 2017). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual-process models. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 . New York, NY: Psychology Press. |
63 |
Pennycook G., Cheyne J. A., Barr N., Koehler D. J., & Fugelsang J. A . ( 2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory and Cognition, 42( 1), 1-10.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7 URL pmid: 23784742 |
64 |
Pennycook G., Cheyne J. A., Seli P., Koehler D. J., & Fugelsang J. A . ( 2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123( 3), 335-346.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003 URL pmid: 22481051 |
65 |
Pennycook G., Fugelsang J. A., & Koehler D. J . ( 2012). Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning? Cognition, 124( 1), 101-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004 URL pmid: 22575046 |
66 |
Pennycook G., Fugelsang J. A., & Koehler D. J . ( 2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001 URL pmid: 26091582 |
67 |
Pennycook G., & Thompson, V. A . ( 2012). Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19( 3), 528-534.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0249-3 URL pmid: 22427266 |
68 |
Pennycook G., Trippas D., Handley S. J., & Thompson V. A . ( 2014). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40( 2), 544-554.
doi: 10.1037/a0034887 URL pmid: 24219086 |
69 |
Pollock J. L. ( 1991). OSCAR: A general theory of rationality. In R. Cummins & J. L. Pollock (Eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays at the interface (pp. 189-213). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
doi: 10.1080/09528138908953702 URL |
70 | Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R . ( 1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Robert L. Solso (Ed.),Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Lawrence Erlbaum. |
71 |
Prado J., Kaliuzhna M., Cheylus A., & Noveck I. A . ( 2008). Overcoming perceptual features in logical reasoning: An event-related potentials study. Neuropsychologia, 46( 11), 2629-2637.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.017 URL pmid: 18541277 |
72 |
Pyszczynski T., Greenberg J., & Solomon S . ( 1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106( 4), 835-845.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835 URL |
73 |
Scherer L. D., Yates J. F., Baker S. G., & Valentine K. D . ( 2017). The influence of effortful thought and cognitive proficiencies on the conjunction fallacy: Implications for dual-process theories of reasoning and judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43( 6), 874-887.
doi: 10.1177/0146167217700607 URL |
74 | Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider W. , (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 84( 2), 127-90. |
75 |
Sloman, S. A . ( 1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119( 1), 3-22.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 URL |
76 | Sloman, S. A . ( 2014). Two systems of reasoning: An update. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.),Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 69-79). New York: Guilford Press |
77 |
Stanovich K. E., & West, R. F . ( 2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23( 5), 645-665.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435 URL |
78 |
Stollstorff M., Vartanian O., & Goel V . ( 2012). Levels of conflict in reasoning modulate right lateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Research, 1428, 24-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.045 URL pmid: 21684531 |
79 | Stupple E. J. N., & Ball, L. J . ( 2008). Belief-logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model. Thinking & Reasoning, 14( 2), 168-181. |
80 |
Toplak M. E., West R. F., & Stanovich K. E . ( 2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20( 2), 147-168.
doi: 10.1080/13546783.2013.844729 URL |
81 |
Trippas D., Handley S. J., Verde M. F., & Morsanyi K . ( 2016). Logic brightens my day: Evidence for implicit sensitivity to logical validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42( 9), 1448-1457.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000248 URL pmid: 26889685 |
82 |
Trippas D., Thompson V. A., & Handley S. J . ( 2017). When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel- processing model of belief bias. Memory & Cognition, 45( 4), 539-552.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0680-1 URL pmid: 28028779 |
83 |
Thompson V. A., & Johnson, S. C . ( 2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20( 2), 215-244.
doi: 10.1080/13546783.2013.869763 URL |
84 |
Thompson V. A., & Morsany, K. ( 2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11( 1), 93-105.
doi: 10.1007/s11299-012-0100-6 URL |
85 |
Thompson V. A., Turner J. A. P., Pennycook G., Ball L. J., Brack H., Ophir Y., & Ackerman R . ( 2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128( 2), 237-251.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012 URL |
[1] | XU Kepeng, YANG Lingqian, WU Jiahong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Shuyue. Application of the CNI model in the studies of moral decision [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113. |
[2] | LIN Wenyi, ZHANG Jing, LI Guanzheng. Text-belief consistent effect and the way of avoidance [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 789-795. |
[3] | HU Jin-Sheng;YE Chun;LI Xu;GAO Ting-Ting. “Irrationality” in Justice Judgment: Processing Mechanisms, Main Forms and Influencing Factors [J]. , 2012, 20(5): 726-734. |
[4] | SHEN Wang-Bing;LIU Chang. Critical Review on Psychological Studies on Moral Hypocrisy [J]. , 2012, 20(5): 745-756. |
[5] | Feng Chengzhi;Jia Fengqin. Review on Binocular Rivalry [J]. , 2008, 16(2): 213-221. |
[6] | Wang Ruiming, Mo Lei, Yan Xiumei. Technique Models and New Views of Studies of Text Reading [J]. , 2006, 14(3): 346-353. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||