Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 690-689.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0690
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIAO Peihua1,2, KUANG Ziyi3, WANG Fuxing1,2()
Received:
2024-08-13
Online:
2025-04-15
Published:
2025-03-05
Contact:
WANG Fuxing
E-mail:fxwang@ccnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
QIAO Peihua, KUANG Ziyi, WANG Fuxing. Using emotions to promote learning: The role of teachers’ facial expressions in video learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(4): 690-689.
研究 | 样本量 | 平均年龄(岁) | 学习材料 | 实验操纵 | 感知情绪 | 学习效果 | 内在感知 | 注意分配 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
陈闽楠, Exp. 1 | 120 | 20.33 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.42) | CL (-0.20), PI (0.23) | FT幻灯片 (0.19) FT教师面部 (0.31) |
陈闽楠, Exp. 2 | 129 | 14.99 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U (0.03) | CL (-0.19), PI (0.05) | / |
凌宏娟, Exp. 1 | 100 | 21.02 | 气质类型学说 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PTA (0.15), PE* (0.48), NE (-0.26) | R* (0.43), T* (0.57) | CL* (-0.45), LM* (0.61) | FT幻灯片* (0.12) FT教师面部 (-0.08) |
凌宏娟, Exp. 2 | 33 | 19.15 | 英文单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PTA (0.10), PE* (0.60), NE* (-0.47) | R (0.10), T* (0.24) | CL* (-0.52), LM* (0.92) | FT幻灯片* (0.26) FT教师面部* (0.30) |
Pi et al., | 120 | 20.33 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.49) | / | FT幻灯片 (0.17) FT教师面部 (0.30) |
Pi et al., | 118 | 19.37 | 地震 | 惊讶 vs 中性 | / | U* (-0.42) | PI (0.34) | FT幻灯片* (0.27) FT教师面部* (-0.90) |
Pi et al., Exp. 2 | 32 | 19.22 | 英语单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PE* (0.49), NE* (-0.56) | R (0.12), T* (-0.45) | CL (0.10), LM* (0.66) | FT幻灯片 (0.13) FT教师面部* (0.73) |
Pi et al., Exp. 3 | 32 | 19.22 | 英语单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PE* (0.84), NE* (-0.71) | R* (0.62), T (0.25) | CL* (0.46), LM* (1.48) | FT幻灯片* (0.65) FT教师面部 (0.13) |
Schneider, Krieglstein, et al., 2022 | 163 | 23.09 | 间歇泉的特征、功能和主要特征 | 有vs 无 | / | R* (0.67), T* (0.57) | CL (0.04) | / |
Wang et al., | 69 | 21.65 | 微课程设计 | 高表达水平vs普通表达水平vs纯音频(无教师形象) | PTA* (1.52) | U即时 (0.10), U延迟* (0.64) | / | / |
Wang, | 78 | 20.4 | 微课程设计 | 高表达水平vs普通表达水平vs纯音频(无教师形象) | PTA* (2.87) | U即时 (0.10), U延迟* (1.15) | CL* (0.51) | / |
Zahra, | 267 | / | 基本的荷兰语单词 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.27) | / | |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 30 | 6.08 (被试为自闭症儿童) | 运动学习任务 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (1.49) | / | FT幻灯片* (1.38) FT教师面部* (0.59) |
Zhang et al., Exp. 2 | 30 | 5.90 | 运动学习任务 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U (0.11) | / | FT幻灯片* (1.27) FT教师面部* (0.75) |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 100 | 20.30 | 病理的动脉和静脉充血 | 积极 vs 中性 | / | R* (0.72), T* (1.19) | CL (0.05), LM* (0.90) | / |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 100 | 20.30 | 病理的动脉和静脉充血 | 积极 vs 消极 | / | R (-0.26), T (0.05) | CL (-0.37), LM* (0.80) | / |
Zhang et al., Exp. 2 | 80 | 20.28 | 动脉粥样硬化的病理−临床相关性 | 积极 vs 消极 | / | R* (1.00), T* (0.60) | CL* (-0.44), LM* (0.95) | / |
研究 | 样本量 | 平均年龄(岁) | 学习材料 | 实验操纵 | 感知情绪 | 学习效果 | 内在感知 | 注意分配 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
陈闽楠, Exp. 1 | 120 | 20.33 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.42) | CL (-0.20), PI (0.23) | FT幻灯片 (0.19) FT教师面部 (0.31) |
陈闽楠, Exp. 2 | 129 | 14.99 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U (0.03) | CL (-0.19), PI (0.05) | / |
凌宏娟, Exp. 1 | 100 | 21.02 | 气质类型学说 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PTA (0.15), PE* (0.48), NE (-0.26) | R* (0.43), T* (0.57) | CL* (-0.45), LM* (0.61) | FT幻灯片* (0.12) FT教师面部 (-0.08) |
凌宏娟, Exp. 2 | 33 | 19.15 | 英文单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PTA (0.10), PE* (0.60), NE* (-0.47) | R (0.10), T* (0.24) | CL* (-0.52), LM* (0.92) | FT幻灯片* (0.26) FT教师面部* (0.30) |
Pi et al., | 120 | 20.33 | 宇宙中的地球 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.49) | / | FT幻灯片 (0.17) FT教师面部 (0.30) |
Pi et al., | 118 | 19.37 | 地震 | 惊讶 vs 中性 | / | U* (-0.42) | PI (0.34) | FT幻灯片* (0.27) FT教师面部* (-0.90) |
Pi et al., Exp. 2 | 32 | 19.22 | 英语单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PE* (0.49), NE* (-0.56) | R (0.12), T* (-0.45) | CL (0.10), LM* (0.66) | FT幻灯片 (0.13) FT教师面部* (0.73) |
Pi et al., Exp. 3 | 32 | 19.22 | 英语单词 | 高兴 vs 无聊 | PE* (0.84), NE* (-0.71) | R* (0.62), T (0.25) | CL* (0.46), LM* (1.48) | FT幻灯片* (0.65) FT教师面部 (0.13) |
Schneider, Krieglstein, et al., 2022 | 163 | 23.09 | 间歇泉的特征、功能和主要特征 | 有vs 无 | / | R* (0.67), T* (0.57) | CL (0.04) | / |
Wang et al., | 69 | 21.65 | 微课程设计 | 高表达水平vs普通表达水平vs纯音频(无教师形象) | PTA* (1.52) | U即时 (0.10), U延迟* (0.64) | / | / |
Wang, | 78 | 20.4 | 微课程设计 | 高表达水平vs普通表达水平vs纯音频(无教师形象) | PTA* (2.87) | U即时 (0.10), U延迟* (1.15) | CL* (0.51) | / |
Zahra, | 267 | / | 基本的荷兰语单词 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (0.27) | / | |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 30 | 6.08 (被试为自闭症儿童) | 运动学习任务 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U* (1.49) | / | FT幻灯片* (1.38) FT教师面部* (0.59) |
Zhang et al., Exp. 2 | 30 | 5.90 | 运动学习任务 | 高兴 vs 中性 | / | U (0.11) | / | FT幻灯片* (1.27) FT教师面部* (0.75) |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 100 | 20.30 | 病理的动脉和静脉充血 | 积极 vs 中性 | / | R* (0.72), T* (1.19) | CL (0.05), LM* (0.90) | / |
Zhang et al., Exp. 1 | 100 | 20.30 | 病理的动脉和静脉充血 | 积极 vs 消极 | / | R (-0.26), T (0.05) | CL (-0.37), LM* (0.80) | / |
Zhang et al., Exp. 2 | 80 | 20.28 | 动脉粥样硬化的病理−临床相关性 | 积极 vs 消极 | / | R* (1.00), T* (0.60) | CL* (-0.44), LM* (0.95) | / |
(带*为纳入分析的文献) | |
[1] |
陈佳雪, 谢和平, 王福兴, 周丽, 李文静. (2018). 诱发的积极情绪会促进多媒体学习吗?. 心理科学进展, 26(10), 1818-1830.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01818 |
[2] | * 陈闽楠. (2020). 教学视频中教师面部表情和眼睛注视对学习者学习的影响 [硕士学位论文]. 华中师范大学, 武汉. |
[3] |
匡子翌, 成美霞, 李文静, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. (2022). 视频教学中教师的眼神注视能否促进学习?. 心理科学进展, 30(10), 2291-2302.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02291 |
[4] | * 凌宏娟. (2022). 教师面部表情和身体表情对视频学习的影响[硕士学位论文]. 陕西师范大学, 西安. |
[5] | Arroyo, I., Burleson, W., Tai, M., Muldner, K., & Woolf, B. P. (2013). Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 957-969. |
[6] | Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10-14. |
[7] | Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., Morger, V., & Ranellucci, J. (2014). The importance of teachers’ emotions and instructional behavior for their students’ emotions—An experience sampling analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 15-26. |
[8] | Beege, M., & Schneider, S. (2023). Emotional design of pedagogical agents: The influence of enthusiasm and model-observer similarity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 859-880. |
[9] |
Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2019). Social entities in educational videos: Combining the effects of addressing and professionalism. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 40-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.051 |
[10] | Beege, M., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2017). Look into my eyes! Exploring the effect of addressing in educational videos. Learning and Instruction, 49, 113-120. |
[11] | Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 195-203. |
[12] | Dibble, J. L, Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44. |
[13] | Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717-741. |
[14] | Graham, R., Kelland Friesen, C. K., Fichtenholtz, H. M., & LaBar, K. S. (2010). Modulation of reflexive orienting to gaze direction by facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 18(3), 331-368. |
[15] | Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[16] | Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., van Nassau, H., & van Gog, T. (2018). Model-observer similarity and task-appropriateness in learning from video modeling examples: Do model and student gender affect test performance, self-efficacy, and perceived competence?. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 457-464. |
[17] | Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. |
[18] | Kuang, Z., Wang, F., Xie, H., Mayer, R. E., & Hu, X. (2023). Effect of the instructor’s eye gaze on student learning from video lectures: Evidence from two three-level meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 109. |
[19] | Lawson, A. P., Mayer, R. E., Adamo-Villani, N., Benes, B., Lei, X., & Cheng, J.(2021a). Recognizing the emotional state of human and virtual instructors. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106554. |
[20] | Lawson, A. P., Mayer, R. E., Adamo-Villani, N., Benes, B., Lei, X., & Cheng, J. (2021b). The positivity principle: Do positive instructors improve learning from video lectures. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(6), 3101-3129. |
[21] | Li, W., Kuang, Z., Leng, X., Mayer, R. E., & Wang, F. (2024). Role of gesturing onscreen instructors in video lectures: A set of three-level meta-analyses on the embodiment effect. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 67. |
[22] | Lin, L., Ginns, P., Wang, T., & Zhang, P. (2020). Using a pedagogical agent to deliver conversational style instruction: What benefits can you obtain. Computers & Education, 143, 103658. |
[23] | Liu, R., Xu, X., Yang, H., Li, Z., & Huang, G. (2022). Impacts of cues on learning and attention in immersive 360-degree video: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 792069. |
[24] | Mayer, R. E. (2021a). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. In R. E.Mayer & L.Fiorella (The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning Eds.), (3rd ed., pp. 57-72). Cambridge University Press. |
[25] | Mayer, R. E. (2021b). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[26] | Meier, J., de Jong, B., van Montfort, D. P., Verdonschot, A., van Wermeskerken, M., & van Gog, T. (2023). Do social cues in instructional videos affect attention allocation, perceived cognitive load, and learning outcomes under different visual complexity conditions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 1339-1353. |
[27] | Messinger, D. S. (2002). Positive and negative: Infant facial expressions and emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 1-6. |
[28] | Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326. |
[29] | Norris, C. J. (2021). The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach. Social Neuroscience, 16(1), 68-82. |
[30] | * Pi, Z., Chen, M., Zhu, F., Yang, J., & Hu, W. (2020). Modulation of instructor’s eye gaze by facial expression in video lectures. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(1), 15-23. |
[31] | Pi, Z., Ling, H., Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2024). Instructors’ pointing gestures and positive facial expressions hinder learning in video lectures: Insights from teachers and students in China. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21115-21131. |
[32] | Pi, Z., Liu, R., Ling, H., Zhang, X., Wang, S., & Li, X. (2022). The emotional design of an instructor: Body gestures do not boost the effects of facial expressions in video lectures. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(3), 952-971. |
[33] | * Pi, Z., Liu, W., Ling, H., Zhang, X., & Li, X. (2023). Does an instructor's facial expressions override their body gestures in video lectures. Computers & Education, 193, 104679. |
[34] | * Pi, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, F., Chen, L., Guo, X., & Yang, J. (2021). The mutual influence of an instructor’s eye gaze and facial expression in video lectures. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3664-3681. |
[35] | Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1-38. |
[36] | * Schneider, S., Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The impact of video lecturers’ nonverbal communication on learning - An experiment on gestures and facial expressions of pedagogical agents. Computers & Education, 176, 104350. |
[37] | Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer-Verlag. |
[38] | Tsay-Vogel, M., & Schwartz, M. L. (2014). Theorizing parasocial interactions based on authenticity: The development of a media figure classification scheme. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3, 66-78. |
[39] | Tsai, J., Bowring, E., Marsella, S., Wood, W., & Tambe, M. (2012). A study of emotional contagion with virtual characters. In Y.Nakano, M.Neff, A.Paiva, & M.Walker (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 81-88). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. |
[40] | Um, E. R., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485-498. |
[41] | * Wang, Y. (2022). To be expressive or not: The role of teachers’ emotions in students’ learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 737310. |
[42] | * Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Stein, D. (2018). Effects of instructor’s facial expressions on students’ learning with video lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1381-1395. |
[43] | * Zahra, S. A. (2021). Learning through screens: How gestures, facial expressions, and motivational statements influence foreign language learning experience online[Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Twente. |
[44] | * Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Fang, Z., & Xia, X. (2024). Guiding student learning in video lectures: Effects of instructors’ emotional expressions and visual cues. Computers & Education, 218, 105062. |
[45] | Zhang, Q., & Fiorella, L. (2019). Role of generated and provided visuals in supporting learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101808. |
[46] | * Zhang, R., Cheng, G., & Wu, L. (2023). Influence of instructor’s facial expressions in video lectures on motor learning in children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11867-1188. |
[1] | WANG Yanqing, GONG Shaoying, JIANG Tiantian, Wu Yanan. Can affective pedagogical agent facilitate multimedia learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1524-1535. |
[2] | LIU Juncai, RAN Guangming, ZHANG Qi. The neural activities of different emotion carriers and their similarities and differences: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
[3] | ZHU Chuanlin, LIU Dianzhi, LUO Wenbo. The cognitive and brain mechanisms of how emotional experience affecting individuals’ utilization of estimation strategies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2639-2649. |
[4] | KUANG Ziyi, CHENG Meixia, LI Wenjing, WANG Fuxing, HU Xiangen. Can Instructors' eye gaze promote video learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2291-2302. |
[5] | KUANG Ziyi, ZHANG Yang, WANG Fuxing, YANG Xiaomeng, HU Xiangen. Can the presence of human teacher promote video learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2184-2194. |
[6] | WANG Yanqing, WANG Fuxing, XIE Heping, CHEN Jiaxue, LI Wenjing, HU Xiangen. A picture is worth a thousand words: Self-generation drawing for multimedia learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 623-635. |
[7] | CHEN Jiaxue, XIE Heping, WANG Fuxing, ZHOU Li, LI Wenjing. Do induced positive emotions facilitate multimedia learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1818-1830. |
[8] | WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; XIE Heping; LIU Huashan. Is pedagogical agent in multimedia learning good for learning? A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 12-28. |
[9] | WANG Fuxing; XIE Heping; LI Hui. Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 335-350. |
[10] | FAN Huiyong; LI Jingjing; ZHAO Manlu; LI Hong. Mental health of kindergarten teachers: Meta-analysis of studies using SCL-90 scale [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 9-20. |
[11] | ZHANG Qi; YIN Tianzi; RAN Guangming. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms for the Superiority Effect of Dynamic Facial Expressions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1514-1522. |
[12] | LI Songqing; ZHAO Qingbai; ZHOU Zhijin; ZHANG Yi. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Text and Picture Processing in Multimedia Learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1361-1370. |
[13] | XU Zhan;LI Canju. Emotional and Perceptual Explanations for Search Asymmetries of Emotional Faces [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 259-268. |
[14] | WANG Fuxing;DUAN Zhaohui;ZHOU Zongkui. Attention Guidance in Multimedia Learning: The Role of Cueing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1430-1440. |
[15] | LIU Ying;GONG Shaoying;CHAI Xiaoyun. Junior-High School Students’ Homework Effort and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1422-1429. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||