Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 362-380.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0362
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles
QIN Huanyu1, LIU Zhancheng1, XIE Zhipeng2(), LV Linxiang3
Received:
2023-05-28
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2024-12-06
Contact:
XIE Zhipeng
E-mail:xiezhipeng@ccnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
QIN Huanyu, LIU Zhancheng, XIE Zhipeng, LV Linxiang. Handmade effect on marketing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(2): 362-380.
分类依据 | 类别 | 具体内容 | 文献(部分) | 典型产品 |
---|---|---|---|---|
生产模式 | 批量化 | 按照一定标准进行规模生产 | Frizzo等( | 手工皂、古法香膏 |
定制化 | 根据客户的独特需求和偏好调整产品组合元素 | Kim等( | 高定礼服、手工DIY产品 | |
技术专业性 | 高技术专业性 | 需要制作者凭借其丰富的专业经验和精湛的手工艺技能来完成产品 | Manfredi Latilla等( | 非遗手工产品 |
低技术专业性 | 需要高度专业化的技能, 仅需制作者具备基本的手工技能和经验就可以开展 | Frizzo等( | 手搓冰粉、现烤面包 |
分类依据 | 类别 | 具体内容 | 文献(部分) | 典型产品 |
---|---|---|---|---|
生产模式 | 批量化 | 按照一定标准进行规模生产 | Frizzo等( | 手工皂、古法香膏 |
定制化 | 根据客户的独特需求和偏好调整产品组合元素 | Kim等( | 高定礼服、手工DIY产品 | |
技术专业性 | 高技术专业性 | 需要制作者凭借其丰富的专业经验和精湛的手工艺技能来完成产品 | Manfredi Latilla等( | 非遗手工产品 |
低技术专业性 | 需要高度专业化的技能, 仅需制作者具备基本的手工技能和经验就可以开展 | Frizzo等( | 手搓冰粉、现烤面包 |
效应类型 | 具体表现 | 影响因素 | 文献(部分) |
---|---|---|---|
正面效应 | 积极评价 | 情感共鸣 | Schroll等( |
真实性 | Frizzo等( | ||
创造力 | Magni等( | ||
自我展示 | Mochon等( | ||
溢价支付 | 工匠精神 | Reich等( | |
自然偏好 | Abouab和 Gomez ( | ||
文化内涵 | Zhang等( | ||
精细使用 | 努力感知 | Wu等( | |
口碑传播 | 品牌爱 | Lunardo和 Saintives ( | |
价值认同 | Wilcox等( | ||
负面效应 | 消极评价 | 质量风险 | 刘建新等( |
所有权侵犯 | Song等( | ||
负面联想 | White等( | ||
保守消费 | 使用成本 | Godfrey等( | |
负面形象 | 过度营销 | Newman等( |
效应类型 | 具体表现 | 影响因素 | 文献(部分) |
---|---|---|---|
正面效应 | 积极评价 | 情感共鸣 | Schroll等( |
真实性 | Frizzo等( | ||
创造力 | Magni等( | ||
自我展示 | Mochon等( | ||
溢价支付 | 工匠精神 | Reich等( | |
自然偏好 | Abouab和 Gomez ( | ||
文化内涵 | Zhang等( | ||
精细使用 | 努力感知 | Wu等( | |
口碑传播 | 品牌爱 | Lunardo和 Saintives ( | |
价值认同 | Wilcox等( | ||
负面效应 | 消极评价 | 质量风险 | 刘建新等( |
所有权侵犯 | Song等( | ||
负面联想 | White等( | ||
保守消费 | 使用成本 | Godfrey等( | |
负面形象 | 过度营销 | Newman等( |
[1] |
包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭. (2021). 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响:证据和理论. 心理科学进展, 29(6), 1067-1085.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01067 |
[2] | 董泽瑞, 杜建刚. (2020). 手工制造的积极效应及其对产品评价的影响机制研究. 南开管理评论, 23(3), 188-199. |
[3] | 范晓明, 王晓玉, 杨祎. (2019). 手工制作效应——手工制作对产品质量评价的影响研究. 管理科学学报, 22(8), 33-45. |
[4] | 柯佳宁, 王良燕. (2021). 跨品类延伸对老字号品牌和新兴品牌的影响差异研究. 南开管理评论, 24(2), 4-14. |
[5] | 刘建新, 范秀成. (2020). 心之所有, 言予他人? 心理所有权对消费者口碑推荐的影响研究. 南开管理评论, 23(1): 144-157. |
[6] | 刘建新, 范秀成, 张成虎. (2021). 手工产品的溢价效应: 基于多重中介模型. 管理评论, 33(8), 171-184. |
[7] |
孟陆, 谢育锋, 李同茂, 段珅, 张良波. (2022). 污染效应在消费者行为领域的表现及其心理机制. 心理科学进展, 30(4), 941-952.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00941 |
[8] | 冉雅璇, 张谱月, 陈斯允, 项典典. (2022). 有“新”同享:共有消费促进对不熟悉产品的选择. 心理学报, 54(8), 979-995. |
[9] |
谢志鹏, 肖婷婷, 秦环宇. (2021). 文字的“偷心术”:营销中的字体效应. 心理科学进展, 29(2), 365-380.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00365 |
[10] | 徐赣丽. (2022). 手工艺在今天意味着什么?. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 54(4), 125-136+178-179. |
[11] | 许衍凤, 范秀成. (2022). 老字号延伸产品购买意愿研究——基于文化契合与消费者创新融合的视角. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 37(6), 35-46. |
[12] |
张昊天, 喻丰. (2023). 自然性偏好的概念、表现及成因. 心理科学进展, 31(12), 2393-2405.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.02393 |
[13] |
Abouab, N., & Gomez, P. (2015). Human contact imagined during the production process increases food naturalness perceptions. Appetite, 91, 273-277.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.002 pmid: 25862979 |
[14] | Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 81-94. |
[15] | Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157-164. |
[16] | Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393-417. |
[17] | Bhaduri, G., & Stanforth, N. (2017). To (or not to) label products as artisanal: Effect of fashion involvement on customer perceived value. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(2), 177-189. |
[18] | Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Happiness from ordinary and extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 1-17. |
[19] | Boisvert, J., & Ashill, N. J. (2018). The spillover effect of downward line extensions on U.S. consumers’ evaluation of a French luxury parent brand: The role of branding strategies, authenticity, and fit. Psychology & Marketing, 35(10), 740-751. |
[20] | Campbell, C. (2005). The craft consumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 23-42. |
[21] | Carroll, B. A., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79-89. |
[22] | Cesareo, L., Townsend, C., & Pavlov, E. (2022). Hideous but worth it: Distinctive ugliness as a signal of luxury. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(3), 636-657. |
[23] | Chatterjee, A. (2016). Can our future be handmade? Journal of Heritage Management, 1(1), 1-11. |
[24] | Chen, G., Du, J., Shan, R., Lu, L., & Mao, X. (2022). The efficient heritage of the craftsmanship spirit in China: A configuration effect of family motivation and organizational learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 807619. |
[25] | Chen, T. Y., Yeh, T. L., & Wang, Y. J. (2020). The drivers of desirability in scarcity marketing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(4), 924-944. |
[26] | Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114(3), 489-500. |
[27] | Choi, D., Seo, Y., Septianto, F., & Ko, E. (2022). Luxury customization and self-authenticity: Implications for consumer wellbeing. Journal of Business Research, 141, 243-252. |
[28] | de Bellis, E., Johar, G. V., & Poletti, N. (2023). Meaning of manual labor impedes consumer adoption of autonomous products. Journal of Marketing, 87(6), 949-965. |
[29] | Droege, J. (2021). The handmade effect: A model of conscious shopping in an industrialised economy. Review of Industrial Organization, 60(2), 263-292. |
[30] | Eglash, R., Robert, L., Bennett, A., Robinson, K. P., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2020). Automation for the artisanal economy: Enhancing the economic and environmental sustainability of crafting professions with human-machine collaboration. Ai & Society, 35(3), 595-609. |
[31] | Fan, X., Lai, A., & Keh, H. T. (2024). Handmade vs. machine-made: The effects of handmade gifts on social relationships. Marketing Letters, 35, 1-14. |
[32] | Frizzo, F., Dias, H. B. A., Duarte, N. P., Rodrigues, D. G., & Prado, P. H. M. (2020). The genuine handmade: How the production method influences consumers’ behavioral intentions through naturalness and authenticity. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 26(4), 279-296. |
[33] | Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., & Van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2015). The handmade effect: What’s love got to do with It? Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 98-110. |
[34] | Fuchs, M., & Schreier, M. (2023). Paying twice for aesthetic customization? The negative effect of uniqueness on a product’s resale value. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(3), 602-624. |
[35] | Godfrey, D. M., Price, L. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2022). Repair, consumption, and sustainability: Fixing fragile objects and maintaining consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 229-251. |
[36] | Hatcher, J., & Tu, T. L. N. (2017). “Make what you love”: Homework, the handmade, and the precarity of the maker movement. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 45(3/4), 271-286. |
[37] | He, J., & Wang, C. L. (2015). Cultural identity and consumer ethnocentrism impacts on preference and purchase of domestic versus import brands: An empirical study in China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1225-1233. |
[38] |
Job, V., Nikitin, J., Zhang, S. X., Carr, P. B., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Social traces of generic humans increase the value of everyday objects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 785-792.
doi: 10.1177/0146167217697694 pmid: 28903674 |
[39] | Jones, R. J., Reilly, T. M., Cox, M. Z., & Cole, B. M. (2017). Gender makes a difference: Investigating consumer purchasing behavior and attitudes toward corporate social responsibility policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 133-144. |
[40] | Judge, M., Fernando, J. W., Paladino, A., Mikolajczak, G., & Kashima, Y. (2020). Lay concepts of art, craft, and manufacture and the Implications for sustainable consumption. Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 19-34. |
[41] | Kamleitner, B., & Feuchtl, S. (2015). “As if it were mine”: Imagery works by inducing psychological ownership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 208-223. |
[42] | Keinan, A., & Kivetz, R. (2011). Productivity orientation and the consumption of collectable experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 935-950. |
[43] | Kim, P., Chang, H., Vaidyanathan, R., & Stoel, L. (2023). When does customization improve brand attitude? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(8), 1233-1247. |
[44] | Kim, S., & Labroo, A. A. (2011). From inherent value to incentive value: When and why pointless effort enhances consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 712-742. |
[45] | Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 148-168. |
[46] | Knewtson, H. S., & Sias, R. W. (2010). Why susie owns starbucks: The name letter effect in security selection. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1324-1327. |
[47] | Köcher, S., & Wilcox, K. (2022). “I made it work”: How using a self-assembled product increases task performance. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 492-499. |
[48] | Koli, A. K. (2021). Handmade ok please: Key criteria for purchasing craft items by Indian consumers. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 43-65. |
[49] | Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L., & Altermatt, T. W. (2004). The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 91-98. |
[50] | Kurlinkus, W. C. (2014). Crafting designs: An archaeology of “craft” as God term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. |
[51] | Labbe, D., Pineau, N., & Martin, N. (2013). Food expected naturalness: Impact of visual, tactile and auditory packaging material properties and role of perceptual interactions. Food Quality and Preference, 27(2), 170-178. |
[52] | Lang, M., & Rodrigues, A. C. (2022). A comparison of organic-certified versus non-certified natural foods: Perceptions and motives and their influence on purchase behaviors. Appetite, 168, 105698. |
[53] | Lee, M. P., & Suk, K. (2010). Disambiguating the role of ambiguity in perceptual assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 890-897. |
[54] | Lee, Y. K., & DeLong, M. (2016). American and korean youths’ attachment to handcraft apparel and its relation to sustainability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 35(2), 67-80. |
[55] | Littrell, M. A., Anderson, L. F., & Brown, P. J. (1993). What makes a craft souvenir authentic? Annals of tourism research, 20(1), 197-215. |
[56] | Lunardo, R., & Saintives, C. (2013). The effect of naturalness claims on perceptions of food product naturalness in the point of purchase. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(6), 529-537. |
[57] | Macías-Mañas, M. D., Vila-López, N., & Küster-Boluda, I. (2024). Handmade virtual messages to promote foreign fashion brands in Instagram. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 15(2), 221-234. |
[58] | Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2024). Humans as creativity gatekeepers: Are we biased against AI creativity? Journal of Business and Psychology, 39, 643-656. |
[59] |
Manfredi Latilla, V., Frattini, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Berner, M. (2019). Knowledge management and knowledge transfer in arts and crafts organizations: Evidence from an exploratory multiple case-study analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1335-1354.
doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2018-0699 |
[60] | McLuhan, H. M. (1951). The mechanical bride. Routledge & Kegan Paul London. |
[61] | Menon, V. (2010). Art of marketing village crafts: Challenges in applying quantitative marketing to resist recession. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(5), 196-205. |
[62] | Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science, 25(3), 230-247. |
[63] | Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363-369. |
[64] | Morales, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Product contagion: Changing consumer evaluations through physical contact with “disgusting” products. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 272-283. |
[65] | Moreau, C. P., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Hieke, S. (2020). Customization in luxury brands: Can Valentino get personal? Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 937-947. |
[66] |
Moscato, E. M., & Machin, J. E. (2018). Mother natural: Motivations and associations for consuming natural foods. Appetite, 121, 18-28.
doi: S0195-6663(17)30473-7 pmid: 29080704 |
[67] | Mugge, R., Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2010). Product attachment and satisfaction: Understanding consumers’ post-purchase behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 271-282. |
[68] |
Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 141(3), 558-569.
doi: 10.1037/a0026035 pmid: 22082113 |
[69] | Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823-839. |
[70] | Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453-460. |
[71] | Nuttin Jr, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 353-361. |
[72] |
Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Guerrero, L., & Hersleth, M. (2009). Association between traditional food consumption and motives for food choice in six European countries. Appetite, 53(1), 101-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.019 pmid: 19500626 |
[73] | Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. |
[74] | Prados-Peña, M. B., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., Núñez-Cacho, P., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2024). Intention to purchase sustainable craft products: A moderated mediation analysis of the adoption of sustainability in the craft sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26( 1), 775-797. |
[75] | Rahman, S., Zasadzinski, L., Zhu, L., Edirisinghe, I., & Burton-Freeman, B. (2020). Assessing consumers’ understanding of the term “Natural” on food labeling. Journal of Food Science, 85(6), 1891-1896. |
[76] | Rao, B., & Gopi, A. G. (2016, September). Investigating the value chain of modern artisanal innovation. 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI. |
[77] | Rauschendorfer, N., Prügl, R., & Lude, M. (2022). Love is in the air. Consumers’ perception of products from firms signaling their family nature. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 239-249. |
[78] | Reich, T., Kupor, D. M., Smith, R. K., Dahl, D., & Hoegg, J. (2018). Made by mistake: When mistakes increase product preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1085-1103. |
[79] | Rezaei, A., & Zakariaie, M. (2011). Exploring the impact of handcraft activities on the creativity of female students at the elementary schools. International Education Studies, 4(1), 127-133. |
[80] |
Rozin, P. (2005). The meaning of “natural” process more important than content. Psychological Science, 16(8), 652-658.
pmid: 16102069 |
[81] | Scekic, A., & Krishna, A. (2021). Do firm cues impact product perceptions? When small is natural. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 350-359. |
[82] | Schnurr, B., & Halkias, G. (2022). Made by her vs. him: Gender influences in product preferences and the role of individual action efficacy in restoring social equalities. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 510-528. |
[83] | Schroll, R., Schnurr, B., & Grewal, D. (2018). Humanizing products with handwritten typefaces. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 648-672. |
[84] | Scott, S. E., Rozin, P., & Small, D. A. (2020). Consumers prefer “natural” more for preventatives than for curatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(3), 454-471. |
[85] | Segev, R., Shoham, A., & Ruvio, A. (2013). Gift-giving among adolescents: Exploring motives, the effects of givers’ personal characteristics and the use of impression management tactics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(5), 436-449. |
[86] | Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518-527. |
[87] | Sofi, A. H., Wani, M. S., Ahmad, S. R., & Wani, S. A. (2022). Comparative study on the quality characteristics of handmade and machine made pashmina shawls. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(14), 8277-8285. |
[88] | Song, J., He, D., & Jiang, Y. (2023). The negative handmade effect: How and why control deprivation thwarts desire for handmade products. Psychology & Marketing, 40(7), 1431-1445. |
[89] | Southworth, S. S., & Ha-Brookshire, J. (2016). The impact of cultural authenticity on brand uniqueness and willingness to try: The case of Chinese brands and US consumers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(4), 724-742. |
[90] | Sung, B., Hatton-Jones, S., Teah, M., Cheah, I., & Phau, I. (2020). Shelf-based scarcity as a cue of luxuriousness: An application of psychophysiology. European Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 497-516. |
[91] | Sunikka, A., & Bragge, J. (2012). Applying text-mining to personalization and customization research literature - who, what and where? Expert Systems with Applications, 39(11), 10049-10058. |
[92] | Tok, D., Huang, Y., & Yang, L. (2024). “Feel the green”: How a handwritten typeface affects tourists’ responses to green tourism products and services. Tourism Management, 104, 104920. |
[93] | Trivedi, P. M., Vasavada-Oza, F., & Krishna, R. (2023). Tell me a story! Antecedents to purchase of handloom products in India. Global Business Review, 24(4), 704-720. |
[94] | Troye, S. V., & Supphellen, M. (2012). Consumer participation in coproduction: “I made It myself” effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 33-46. |
[95] | van der Westhuizen, L.-M., & Kuhn, S. W. (2023). Handmade clothing consumption as a means of self-expression. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2021-0175 |
[96] | White, K., Lin, L., Dahl, D. W., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2016). When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 110-123. |
[97] | Wilcox, K., Laporte, S., & Ward, G. (2024). How traditional production shapes perceptions of product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(2), 256-275. |
[98] | Wu, F., Samper, A., Morales, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). It’s too pretty to use! When and how enhanced product aesthetics discourage usage and lower consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 651-672. |
[99] | Wu, R., Han, X., & Kardes, F. R. (2020). Special fonts: The competing roles of difficulty and uniqueness in consumer inference. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 86-100. |
[100] | Xu, H., Bolton, L. E., & Winterich, K. P. (2021). How do consumers react to company moral transgressions? The role of power distance belief and empathy for victims. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(1), 77-101. |
[101] | Yang, T., Dang, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). How to prioritize perceived quality attributes from consumers’ perspective? Analysis through social media data. Electronic Commerce Research, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09652-7 |
[102] | Yu, T., Hao, X., & Lange, F. (2024). The effects of virtual nature exposure on pro-environmental behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 59(1), 203-207. |
[103] | Zare, S., Asgari, M., Woods, T., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Consumer proximity and brand loyalty in craft soda marketing: A case study of Ale-8-One. Agribusiness, 36(4), 522-541. |
[104] | Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. |
[105] | Zhang, E. Y. (2018). Enchanting a world of crafts: Handmade and homemade things, affective labor and orality in The Road Home (1999). Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 12(1), 1-19. |
[106] | Zhang, M., Guo, X., Guo, X., & Jolibert, A. (2023). Consumer purchase intention of intangible cultural heritage products (ICHP): Effects of cultural identity, consumer knowledge and manufacture type. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(3), 726-744. |
[107] | Zhou, X., Kim, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953-972. |
[108] | Zhou, X., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Shi, K., & Feng, C. (2012). Nostalgia: The gift that keeps on giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 39-50. |
[1] | SHEN Manqiong, LIAO Jiancai, WANG Haizhong. Analysis of consumer medication adherence: Based on two-stage theoretical model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 859-872. |
[2] | SHU Lifang, WANG Kui, WU Yueyan, CHEN Siyun. Multi-stage impacts of artificial intelligence coaches on consumers’ long-term goal pursuit and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(3): 451-464. |
[3] | SUN Jin, YANG Jingshu. The power of circulation: The impact of reciprocal relationship on consumer behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(6): 1094-1108. |
[4] | YAN Yan, LIU Wumei, WANG Xuefeng. The influence of others and self-dressing style on consumer behavior: An interpretation based on regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2419-2440. |
[5] | XIE Zhipeng, QIN Huanyu, WANG Ziye, WANG Jingyuan, HE Yi. Tainted or elegant? Sexy effect on marketing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 2200-2218. |
[6] | LIU Wumei, XIAO Haiyi, WANG Xuefeng. Residential mobility and consumption: Explanation based on regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2595-2606. |
[7] | XIE Zhipeng, XIAO Tingting, QIN Huanyu. Typeface effect in marketing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 365-380. |
[8] | XIE Ying, LI Chunqing, GAO Peng, LIU Yi. The effect and mechanism of social presence in live marketing on online herd consumption from behavioral and neurophysiological perspectives [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 990-1004. |
[9] | Yinghao WU, Jing JIANG. The numerosity effects in consumer behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1680-1688. |
[10] | JIANG Hongyan, LIU Bangshun, SUN Peizhen. The influence of power on consumer behavior and its theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 156-168. |
[11] | WU Lili, SHI Xiaoxuan, WANG Beiyi, ZHANG Jianxin. Brand attachment: Theories, measurements and relationships to related variables [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1411-1422. |
[12] | HUANG Jun; LI Ye; ZHANG Hongwei. The Application and Development of Construal Level Theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 110-119. |
[13] | YIN Feifan;WANG Yong. Regulatory Focus in Consumer Behavior Research [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 347-357. |
[14] | HAO Hongda;WANG Yong. Implicit Association Test and Consumer Psychology [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1865-1873. |
[15] | He Jiaxun. Consumer Research: The Methodology of Existential-Phenomenology and Its Application [J]. , 2006, 14(5): 729-736. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||