Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 351-361.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0351
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
YUE Tong1, WANG Hong2(), LI Qinggong3, REN Xiaoxiao4, ZHANG Xinyi1
Received:
2024-02-08
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2024-12-06
Contact:
WANG Hong
E-mail:20131691@cqnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
YUE Tong, WANG Hong, LI Qinggong, REN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Xinyi. Values conflicts from a psychological perspective: Impact and theoretical explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(2): 351-361.
[1] | 黄希庭. (2014). 探究人格奥秘. 北京: 商务出版社. |
[2] | 李静, 郭永玉. (2012). 大学生物质主义与儒家传统价值观的冲突研究. 心理科学, 35(1), 160-164. |
[3] | 陆娟芝, 廖冲, 关青, 罗跃嘉, 崔芳. (2019). 利他与利己动机下的欺骗行为. 心理科学, 42(4), 905-912. |
[4] | 秦慧源. (2018). 新时代中国的价值观冲突及其超越. 东南学术, (6), 10-17. |
[5] | 陶爱华, 刘雍鹤, 王沛. (2018). 人际冲突中失望的个人效应及冲突类型的调节作用. 心理学报, 50(2), 235-242. |
[6] | 王洪, 岳童, 符明秋. (2021). 从情感认同到自我认同:价值观认同的内隐实验研究. 广东社会科学, 5, 64-73. |
[7] | 袁贵仁. (1991). 价值学引论. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. |
[8] |
岳童, 黄希庭, 徐颖, 潘思存. (2020). 价值观的稳定性和可变性:基于认知神经科学的视角. 心理科学进展, 28(12), 2091-2101.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.02091 |
[9] | 岳童, 黄希庭, 傅安国. (2021). 人们何以能够 “舍生取义”? 基于保护性价值观认知神经机制的解释. 心理科学进展, 29(3), 40-548. |
[10] |
岳童, 王洪, 傅安国, 徐浩, 李文俏. (2024). 为何人际价值观冲突难以达成共识? 理论解释及调解策略. 心理科学进展, 32(9), 1528-1538.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01528 |
[11] | 张春泥, 史海钧. (2019). 性别观念, 性别情境与两性的工作—家庭冲突——来自跨国数据的经验证据. 妇女研究论丛, 153(3), 26-41. |
[12] |
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
pmid: 12500822 |
[13] |
Arens, E. A., Christoffel, M., & Stangier, U. (2022). Value priorities and value conflicts in patients with mental disorders compared to a general population sample. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 3974.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07758-4 pmid: 35273251 |
[14] | Au, A. K., & Lam, S. F. (2017). Understanding response patterns in dyadic conflict: An interactive approach combining self-construal and opponent's dominance- submissiveness. International Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 116-125. |
[15] | Bansal, Y., Malhotra, D., & Khosla, M. (2023). Understanding the relationship between values and self-conscious emotions: Implications for emotional well-being. Journal of Emotional Research, 15(3), 123-139. |
[16] | Bernuzzi, C., Setti, I., Maffoni, M., & Sommovigo, V. (2022). From moral distress to burnout through work-family conflict: The protective role of resilience and positive refocusing. Ethics & Behavior, 32(7), 578-600. |
[17] |
Brandt, M. J., Crawford, J. T., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2019). Worldview conflict in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 35-43.
doi: 10.1177/1948550617733517 |
[18] | Brosch, T., Coppin, G., Schwartz, S., & Sander, D. (2011). Generating value (s): Psychological value hierarchies reflect context-dependent sensitivity of the reward system. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 198-208. |
[19] | Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348-370. |
[20] | Carminati, L., & Gao Héliot, Y. (2023). Multilevel dynamics of moral identity conflict: Professional and personal values in ethically-charged situations. Ethics & Behavior, 33(1), 37-54. |
[21] |
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 415-430.
pmid: 17723057 |
[22] | Daniel, E., Döring, A. K., & Cieciuch, J. (2021). Development of intraindividual value structures in middle childhood: A multicultural and longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality, 91(2), 482-496. |
[23] | Foad, C. M., Maio, G. G., & Hanel, P. H. (2020). Perceptions of values over time and why they matter. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 689-705. |
[24] | Furchheim, P., Martin, C., & Morhart, F. (2020). Being green in a materialistic world: Consequences for subjective well-being. Psychology & Marketing, 37(1), 114-130. |
[25] | Harinck, F., & Ellemers, N. (2014). How values change a conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Social conflict within and between groups (pp. 33-50). Psychology Press. |
[26] | Hayes, B., Prihodova, L., Walsh, G., Doyle, F., & Doherty, S. (2017). What’s up doc? A national cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland. BMJ Open, 7(10), e018023. |
[27] |
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
pmid: 3615707 |
[28] | Horton, K. E., Bayerl, P. S., & Jacobs, G. (2014). Identity conflicts at work: An integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), 6-22. |
[29] | Huhtala, M., Fadjukoff, P., & Kroger, J. (2020). Managers as moral leaders: Moral identity processes in the context of work. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(4), 639-665. |
[30] | Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51. |
[31] | Joo, M., & Cross, S. E. (2021). A double-edged sword: Positive and negative implications of the dialectical self. Personal Relationships, 28(4), 961-977. |
[32] | Kaplan, J. T., Gimbel, S. I., & Harris, S. (2016). Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 39589. |
[33] |
Kouzakova, M., Ellemers, N., Harinck, F., & Scheepers, D. (2012). The implications of value conflict: How disagreement on values affects self-involvement and perceived common ground. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 798-807.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211436320 pmid: 22371353 |
[34] | Lange, B., & Pauli, P. (2019). Social anxiety changes the way we move: A social approach-avoidance task in a virtual reality CAVE system. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0226805. |
[35] |
Leszkowicz, E., Linden, D. E., Maio, G. R., & Ihssen, N. (2017). Neural evidence of motivational conflict between social values. Social Neuroscience, 12(5), 494-505.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1183517 pmid: 27128463 |
[36] | Mahmoudfakhe, H., Shiri, H., & Rezaei, N. (2023). Comparison of the effect of acceptance and commitment therapy and self-compassion therapy on cognitive flexibility in anxious female students of the second year of high school. Positive Psychology Research, 9(3), 63-82. |
[37] | Markauskaitė, R., & Rūtelionė, A. (2022). Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(9), 5021. |
[38] | Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F., & Begeny, C. (2021). The (in) compatibility of identities: Understanding gender differences in work-life conflict through the fit with leaders. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 448-469. |
[39] | Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2016). Coping with identity conflict: Perceptions of self as flexible versus fixed moderate the effect of identity conflict on well-being. Self and Identity, 15(2), 224-244. |
[40] | Rafaeli-Mor, E., & Steinberg, J. (2002). Self-complexity and well-being: A review and research synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 31-58. |
[41] | Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517-546. |
[42] | Schuster, C., Majer, J. M., & Trötschel, R. (2020). Whatever we negotiate is not what I like: How value-driven conflicts impact negotiation behaviors, outcomes, and subjective evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 103993. |
[43] | Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. |
[44] | Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20. |
[45] | Senftleben, U., & Scherbaum, S. (2021). Mid-frontal theta during conflict in a value-based decision task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(10), 2109-2131. |
[46] |
Seymour, B., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. (2007). The neurobiology of punishment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(4), 300-311.
pmid: 17375042 |
[47] |
Skimina, E., Cieciuch, J., & Revelle, W. (2021). Between-and within-person structures of value traits and value states: Four different structures, four different interpretations. Journal of Personality, 89(5), 951-969.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12627 pmid: 33606275 |
[48] | Skimina, E., Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, S. H., Davidov, E., & Algesheimer, R. (2018). Testing the circular structure and importance hierarchy of value states in real-time behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 42-49. |
[49] | Smallenbroek, O., Stanciu, A., Arant, R., & Boehnke, K. (2023). Are values stable throughout adulthood? Evidence from two German long-term panel studies. PloS One, 18(11), e0289487. |
[50] | Tang, S., & Li, K. (2021). The influence of Chinese machiavellianism and moral identity on the level of anxiety in moral dilemma situations in Chinese students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 615835. |
[51] |
Töllner, T., Wang, Y., Makeig, S., Müller, H. J., Jung, T.-P., & Gramann, K. (2017). Two independent frontal midline theta oscillations during conflict detection and adaptation in a Simon-type manual reaching task. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 2504-2515.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1752-16.2017 pmid: 28137968 |
[52] | Veage, S., Ciarrochi, J., Deane, F. P., Andresen, R., Oades, L. G., & Crowe, T. P. (2014). Value congruence, importance and success and in the workplace: Links with well-being and burnout amongst mental health practitioners. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(4), 258-264. |
[53] | Wang, H., King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2021). Conflicting or compatible? Evaluating teachers’ self-transcendence versus self-enhancement values from a multilevel perspective. Current Psychology, 42, 7224-7234. |
[54] | Xie, J.-Q., Yin, X.-Q., Qiu, J., Yang, J., Huang, Y.-Y., Li, M., … Xiong, J.-R. (2022). Latent profile analysis of personal values among Chinese college students: Associations with mental health disorders and life satisfaction. Current Psychology, 42, 27232-27244. |
[55] |
Yanagisawa, K., Kashima, E. S., Moriya, H., Masui, K., Furutani, K., Yoshida, H., ... Nomura, M. (2017). Tolerating dissimilar other when primed with death: Neural evidence of self-control engaged by interdependent people in Japan. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 910-917.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx012 pmid: 28338741 |
[56] | Yue, T., Anguo, F., Xu, Y., & Huang, X. (2021). The rank of a value in the importance hierarchy of values affects its relationship to self-concept: A SC-IAT study. Current Psychology, 41(10), 7290-7296. |
[57] | Zahn, R., Moll, J., Paiva, M., Garrido, G., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D., & Grafman, J. (2009). The neural basis of human social values: Evidence from functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 19(2), 276-283. |
[58] | Zavala, B., Jang, A., Trotta, M., Lungu, C. I., Brown, P., & Zaghloul, K. A. (2018). Cognitive control involves theta power within trials and beta power across trials in the prefrontal subthalamic network. Brain, 141, 3361-3376. |
[59] |
Zhao, J., Liang, W.-K., Juan, C.-H., Wang, L., Wang, S., & Zhu, Z. (2015). Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: Evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations. Biological Psychology, 104, 130-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.12.001 pmid: 25511611 |
[1] | XIAO Yao, WANG Xueke, FENG Tingyong. Why do humans procrastinate? An interpretation based on a multi-modal and multi-omics perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(3): 520-536. |
[2] | KANG Tinghu, ZHAO Jing. Narcissism research approaches and integration: Dynamics, regulation, and personality characteristics [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(8): 1354-1365. |
[3] | JI Yuexin, LIU Chang, ZHAO Yue, WANG Dixin, HU Xiaoyong. The heterogeneity and boundary conditions of growth mindset effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(3): 514-526. |
[4] | CHEN Lijun, HUANG Meilin, JIANG Xiaoliu, WANG Xinjian. Does classical music make you smarter? A meta-analysis based on generalized Mozart effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2232-2262. |
[5] | ZHANG Haotian, YU Feng. The concept, manifestation and cause of naturalness preference [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2393-2405. |
[6] | ZHAO Yue, HU Xiaoyong, MA Jiaxin. Awe’s prosocial effect: The mediating role of the small self and the authentic self [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 2171-2182. |
[7] | ZHANG Shunmin, LI Keqian. The cognitive mechanism and neural substrates enabling self-control to reduce the decision to procrastinate [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1560-1568. |
[8] | CHEN Xuefei, LI Zhenhua, NIE Yangang. More than inhibition: Self-control strategy and the mechanism of its application [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1528-1540. |
[9] | WU Fan, HU Yueqin. Personality dynamics: The integration of process and trait [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1269-1287. |
[10] | ZHANG Kaili, ZHENG Hong, WANG Fengyan. “One prelude” and “two movements”: A portrayal of the research process of wisdom psychology in the past 50 years [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 721-735. |
[11] | FENG Tingyong, ZHANG Biying. The cognitive neural model of procrastination and related interventions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 350-359. |
[12] | CHEN Nianqu. From induction to relief: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the curiosity feedback loop [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 256-273. |
[13] | LIU Shuang-shuang, XIAO Bing, WANG Kui, Raymond C.K. CHAN. Body size perception: Accuracy and cognitive mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2529-2539. |
[14] | XU Buxiao, BAI Jie, LI Ye, GUO Yongyu. Collective narcissism: A catalyst for intergroup conflicts [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2100-2116. |
[15] | JIAN Yunlong, LIU Yuan. Structure and effects of motivation: From the perspective of the motivation continuum [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1589-1603. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||