Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1250-1264.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01250
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Shihao1, ZHANG Wenyue1, FU Guoqun2
Received:
2023-11-19
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-06-05
CLC Number:
LI Shihao, ZHANG Wenyue, FU Guoqun. For those who wash less dishes, please buy flowers: Couple’s contribution imbalance and family hedonic consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(8): 1250-1264.
[1] 白凯, 符国群. (2011). 家庭旅游决策研究的中国化理论视角与分析思路. [2] 符国群, 姜海纳, 张晓丹. (2020). 家务时间配置如何影响夫妻对家庭省时产品的购买. [3] 符国群, 李杨, 费显政. (2019). 中国城镇家庭结婚消费演变研究: 1980-2010年代. [4] 姜海纳, 符国群. (2018). 家务劳动时间分配对提升家务劳动效率产品购买意愿的影响. [5] 姜海纳, 符国群, 李世豪. (2017). 婚庆消费的拉动效应和挤出效应研究. [6] 靳菲, 朱华伟. (2016). 消费者的权力感与冲动购买. [7] 李杨, 符国群, 姜海纳. (2018). 中国城镇家庭结婚消费结构的区域差异分析. [8] 宋晓兵, 何夏楠. (2020). 人工智能定价对消费者价格公平感知的影响. [9] 王志云, Schoebi, D., Perrez, M. (2010). 中国和欧洲家庭的家务分工: 文化的视角(英文). [10] 薛海波, 符国群. (2015). 家庭宠物消费研究: 回顾与展望. [11] 姚琦, 符国群. (2017). 中国城镇家庭发展类文化消费决策行为的影响因素模型——基于扎根理论的探索性研究. [12] 张晓丹, 符国群, 李世豪. (2018). 家务劳动时间配置研究: 回顾与展望. [13] 郑加梅, 卿石松. (2014). 家务分工与性别收入差距: 基于文献的研究. [14] Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. [15] Bareket O., Shnabel N., Kende A., Knab N., & Bar-Anan Y. (2021). Need some help, honey? Dependency-oriented helping relations between women and men in the domestic sphere. [16] Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. [17] Bird, C. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework. [18] Blood R. O.,& Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living New York: Free Press Glencoe The dynamics of family living. New York: Free Press Glencoe. [19] Bolton L. E., Warlop L., & Alba J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. [20] Botkin D. R., Weeks M. O., & Morris J. E. (2000). Changing marriage role expectations: 1961-1996. [21] Braun M., Lewin-Epstein N., Stier H., & Baumgärtner M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. [22] Brick D. J., Fitzsimons G. M., Chartrand T. L., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2018). Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand compatibility, relationship power, and life satisfaction. [23] Cakanlar A., Nikolova H., & Nenkov G. Y. (2023). I will be green for us: When consumers compensate for their partners’ unsustainable behavior. [24] Chernev, A. (2004). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. [25] Chong, A., & Mickelson, K. D. (2016). Perceived fairness and relationship satisfaction during the transition to parenthood: The mediating role of spousal support. [26] Chung J., Lee L., Lehmann D. R., & Tsai C. I. (2023). Spending windfall (“found”) time on hedonic versus utilitarian activities. [27] Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. [28] Clark, M. S., & Mils, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. [29] Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. [30] Dancer, L. S., & Gilbert, L. A. (1993). Spouses’ family work participation and its relation to wives’ occupational level. [31] Davis, H. L. (1970). Dimensions of marital roles in consumer decision making. [32] Davis, H. L. (1971). Measurement of husband-wife influence in consumer purchase decisions. [33] Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision making within the household. [34] Davis, H. L., & Rigaux, B. P. (1974). Perception of marital roles in decision processes. [35] Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. [36] DeMaris, A., & Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. [37] Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. [38] Dholakia U. M., Gopinath M., Bagozzi R. P., & Nataraajan R. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in the experience and self-control of desire for temptations. [39] Dzhogleva, H., & Lamberton, C. P. (2014). Should birds of a feather flock together? Understanding self-control decisions in dyads. [40] Esping-Andersen G., Boertien D., Bonke J., & Gracia P. (2013). Couple specialization in multiple equilibria. [41] Ferber, R., & Lee, L. C. (1974). Husband-wife influence in family purchasing behavior. [42] Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. [43] Garbinsky, E. N., & Gladstone, J. J. (2019). The consumption consequences of couples pooling finances. [44] Garbinsky E. N., Gladstone J. J., Nikolova H., & Olson J. G. (2020). Love, lies, and money: Financial infidelity in romantic relationships. [45] Garcia-Rada X., Steffel M., Williams E. F., & Norton M. I. (2022). Consumers value effort over ease when caring for close others. [46] Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2004). Division of labor and working-class women’s well-being across the transition to parenthood. [47] Goodman N., Blumstein P., & Schwartz P. (1985). American couples: Money, work, sex. [48] Gordon, A. E., & Mickelson, K. D. (2018). Couple-level predictors of perceived fairness during pregnancy in first-time parents. [49] Hasford J., Kidwell B., & Lopez-Kidwell V. (2018). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. [50] Hempel, D. J. (1975). Family role structure and housing decisions. [51] Hsee, C. K. (1995). Elastic justification: How tempting but task-irrelevant factors influence decisions. [52] Hu, Y., & Yucel, D. (2018). What fairness? Gendered division of housework and family life satisfaction across 30 countries. [53] Inman J. J., Campbell M. C., Kirmani A., & Price L. L. (2018). Our vision for the journal of consumer research: It’s all about the consumer. [54] Keinan, A., & Kivetz, R. (2008). Remedying hyperopia: The effects of self-control regret on consumer behavior. [55] Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2010). Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. [56] Kirchler, E., & Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. [57] Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2006). Repenting hyperopia: An analysis of self-control regrets. [58] Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. [59] Kivetz, R., & Zheng, Y. (2006). Determinants of justification and self-control. [60] Kivetz, R., & Zheng, Y. (2017). The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. [61] Kluwer E. S., Heesink J. A. M., & Van De Vliert, E. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. [62] Köppen, K., & Trappe, H. (2019). The gendered division of labor and its perceived fairness: Implications for childbearing in Germany. [63] Lachance-Grzela M., Ross-Plourde M., Vautour M., Larocque M., & Duguay A. (2020). Mindfulness, perceived partner responsiveness, and relational conflict among emerging adult couples. [64] Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. [65] Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2002). Divison of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality: The effect of gender ideology. [66] Lee-Wingate, S. N., & Corfman, K. P. (2010). A little something for me and maybe for you, too: Promotions that relieve guilt. [67] Linden D. J.(2007). The accidental mind: How brain evolution has given us love, memory, dreams, and god. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [68] Liu P. J., Dallas S. K., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2019). A framework for understanding consumer choices for others. [69] Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. [70] Lothaller H., Mikula G., & Schoebi D. (2009). What contributes to the (im)balanced division of family work between the sexes? [71] Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor. [72] Mayser, S., & von Wangenheim, F. (2013). Perceived fairness of differential customer treatment: Consumers’ understanding of distributive justice really matters. [73] Mick, D. G., & Demoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. [74] Mikula, G., & Lerner, M. J. (1994). Justice in Close Relationships. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), [75] Mikula G., Freudenthaler H. H., Brennacher-Kroll S., & Brunschko B. (1997). Division of labor in student households: Gender inequality, perceived justice, and satisfaction. [76] Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (1996). The effect of new product features on brand choice. [77] O’Curry, S., & Strahilevitz, M. (2001). Probability and mode of acquisition effects on choices between hedonic and utilitarian options. [78] Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. [79] Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (Eds). (2018). [80] Piña, D. L., & Bengtson, V. L. (1993). The division of household labor and wives’ happiness: Ideology, employment, and perceptions of support. [81] Poeschl, G. (2007). What family organization tells us about fairness and power in marital relationships. [82] Potuchek, J. L. (1992). Employed wives’ orientations to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. [83] Pyke, K., & Coltrane, S. (1996). Entitlement, obligation, and gratitude in family work. [84] Qualls, W. J. (1987). Household decision behavior: The impact of husbands’ and wives’ sex role orientation. [85] Rands, M., & Levinger, G. (1979). Implicit theories of relationship: An intergenerational study. [86] Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. [87] Read D., Loewenstein G., & Kalyanaraman S. (1999). Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. [88] Read, D., & Van leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. [89] Robinson, J., & Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle while you work? The effect of household task performance on women’s and men’s well-being. [90] Rodriguez-Stanley J., Alonso-Ferres M., Zilioli S., & Slatcher R. B. (2020). Housework, health, and well-being in older adults: The role of socioeconomic status. [91] Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices. [92] Rubin J. Z., Pruitt D. G., & Kim S. H. (1994). [93] Sanchez, L., & Kane, E. W. (1996). Women’s and men’s constructions of perceptions of housework fairness. [94] Seiders, K., & Berry, L. L. (1998). Service fairness: What it is and why it matters. [95] Shafir E., Simonson I., & Tversky A. (1993). Reason- based choice. [96] Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. [97] Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. [98] Shu, S. B., & Gneezy, A. (2010). Procrastination of enjoyable experiences. [99] Shuptrine, F. K., & Samuelson, G. (1976). Dimensions of marital roles in consumer decision making: Revisited. [100] Simpson J. A., Griskevicius V., & Rothman A. J. (2012). Bringing relationships into consumer decision-making. [101] Smock, P. J., & Noonan, M. (2006). Gender, work, and family well-being in the United States. In S. M. Bianchi, L. M. Casper, & B. R. King (Eds.), [102] Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. [103] Thomas M., Ma Y., & Gauri D. K. (2024). Food craving increases unhealthy food purchases: A study of SNAP households. [104] Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. [105] Ward, A. F., & Lynch, J. G. (2019). On a need-to-know basis: How the distribution of responsibility between couples shapes financial literacy and financial outcomes. [106] West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. [107] Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. [108] Wood W.,& Eagly, A. H. (2012). Chapter two—Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55-123). Boston: Academic Press. [109] Xia L., Monroe K. B., & Cox J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. [110] Yang X., Mao H., Jia L., & Bublitz M. G. (2019). A sweet romance: Divergent effects of romantic stimuli on the consumption of sweets. |
[1] | SHEN Manqiong, LIAO Jiancai, WANG Haizhong. Analysis of consumer medication adherence: Based on two-stage theoretical model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 859-872. |
[2] | YAN Yan, LIU Wumei, WANG Xuefeng. The influence of others and self-dressing style on consumer behavior: An interpretation based on regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2419-2440. |
[3] | LU Changbao, WANG Ating, LU Cuimei. The psycholinguistic mechanism of large-scale online sales promotion inducing future-oriented emotions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1595-1610. |
[4] | XIAO Tingwen, WEI Haiying, CHEN Siyun, LIU Fu. The impact of audio-visual representation of a brand name on consumers and its mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1756-1774. |
[5] | GONG Siyu, SHENG Guanghua. The double-edged sword effect of product green attributes information on consumer decision making: The formation mechanism and boundary mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1611-1625. |
[6] | RAN Yaxuan, CAI Hui, ZHANG Yunhan, HAN Xinying. The maximizing bias and behavioral effects of joint consumption: A perspective of group mental accounting [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1429-1442. |
[7] | WANG Chujun, WAN Xiaoang. The “double-edged sword” effect of eating together on food consumption and its mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1318-1330. |
[8] | WANG Xingang, LI Zulan, ZHANG Ting. Double valence coping strategies for damaged brands in the social media environment: From the perspective of group polarization theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 709-720. |
[9] | LIU Hongyan, ZHENG Yun, LIU Yaozhong, QIAO Fei. The double-edged sword effect of consumers’ photo-taking behavior on consumption experience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 480-491. |
[10] | YANG Zhichao, WANG Ting. Zero in consumer decision-making: The zero-price effect and the zero-comparison effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 492-506. |
[11] | ZHANG Hao, XIAO Bangming, HUANG Minxue. The in-feed native advertising avoidance mechanism and re-targeting strategy based on user dynamic information processing mode [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 223-239. |
[12] | HUANG Jianping, XU Jingxian, WAN Xiaoang. Influence of associative learning on consumer behavior: From the perspective of product search experience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2414-2423. |
[13] | LI Danhui, DU Jiangang, LI Xiaonan. The effect of gaze cues on consumers [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2607-2618. |
[14] | LI Chunqing, ZHANG Jieli, LIU Wei, ZHANG Chenlu. The relationship between customer experience journey and input with digitalized interactive platforms offerings [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2424-2447. |
[15] | LIU Wumei, XIAO Haiyi, WANG Xuefeng. Residential mobility and consumption: Explanation based on regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2595-2606. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||