心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1611-1625.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01611
收稿日期:
2023-02-16
出版日期:
2023-09-15
发布日期:
2023-05-31
通讯作者:
龚思羽
E-mail:gongsy1993@163.com
基金资助:
Received:
2023-02-16
Online:
2023-09-15
Published:
2023-05-31
Contact:
GONG Siyu
E-mail:gongsy1993@163.com
摘要:
在消费者行为学领域, 以往有关绿色消费的研究多聚焦于促进和阻碍消费决策的客观因素和社会心理因素, 并分析绿色营销策略在消费者心理或行为层面的积极效应, 却很少对产品绿色属性信息的负面结果效应进行探讨。本研究以企业绿色产品策略为研究切入点, 在划分绿色属性信息内容维度的基础上, 探讨产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策行为的双刃剑效应。首先, 基于风险−收益、认知平衡和积极情感多个研究视角, 构建起产品绿色属性信息影响消费者行为决策的多层次整合模型; 其次, 从个体心理表征因素和外部情境因素出发探讨减弱负面效应的边界机制。
中图分类号:
龚思羽, 盛光华. (2023). 产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策的双刃剑效应:形成机理与边界机制. 心理科学进展 , 31(9), 1611-1625.
GONG Siyu, SHENG Guanghua. (2023). The double-edged sword effect of product green attributes information on consumer decision making: The formation mechanism and boundary mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(9), 1611-1625.
作者、研究时间与期刊 | 主要结论 |
---|---|
(Luchs et al., Journal of Marketing | 尽管多数消费者关心社会和环境问题, 但绿色属性并不总是一种资产。绿色属性在多大程度上提高产品偏好取决于产品类别和利益价值类型。 |
(Haws et al., Journal of Consumer Psychology | 消费者的绿色消费观越强, 消费者对绿色产品的非绿色环保属性评价越好, 对绿色产品的购买偏好更强烈。 |
(Rokka & Uusitalo, International Journal of Consumer Studies | 消费者对日常用品包装、品牌、价格和使用便利性的偏好存在差异, 在选择时更倾向于将环保标签包装作为最重要的标准。 |
(Peloza et al., Journal of Marketing | 自我担当的激活会导致消费者对伦理诉求而非内疚诉求产生积极响应。消费者对伦理属性产品的偏好源于预期内疚避免和欲望共同驱动。 |
(Brough et al., Journal of Consumer Research | 购买具有环保属性的产品会被认为是女性化的表现, 因而男性会避免选择绿色属性产品。促进男性消费者参与绿色购买行为可以通过肯定他们的男子气概的品牌定位实现。 |
(Olson, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 当绿色属性与产品质量的权衡不显著时, 消费者对绿色产品的偏好较强; 反之, 绿色属性偏好降低。只有“深绿色”的消费者愿意支付绿色溢价。 |
(Auger et al., International Business Review | 产品的社会属性对消费者购买行为具有重要影响且这种影响在发达国家更显著, 消费者对产品社会属性的关注成果还会受到消费者产品涉入度的影响。 |
(Rausch et al., Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services | 对于环保面料服饰, 消费者更看重传统的服装属性, 如合身、舒适、性价比、质量而非绿色属性。针对产品绿色属性, 消费者首要关注的是服装的耐用性以及服装生产过程的环保特征, 对环保包装、退货政策的关注度相对较低。 |
(Skard et al., Journal of Business Ethics | 产品的绿色属性会对功能质量推断产生影响, 从而影响产品评价。在强度相关的产品类别中, 两种绿色属性都会造成可持续性负债效应, 而在温和相关的产品类型中, 绿色核心属性存在激发可持续性资产效应。 |
(Pretner et al., Resources, Conservation and Recycling | 消费者对于可重复使用、可回收产品的购买意愿低于普通产品, 当产品的绿色属性拥有第三方认证时, 消费者的购买意愿会增加。 |
表1 产品绿色属性信息与消费者购买决策行为主题的代表性研究
作者、研究时间与期刊 | 主要结论 |
---|---|
(Luchs et al., Journal of Marketing | 尽管多数消费者关心社会和环境问题, 但绿色属性并不总是一种资产。绿色属性在多大程度上提高产品偏好取决于产品类别和利益价值类型。 |
(Haws et al., Journal of Consumer Psychology | 消费者的绿色消费观越强, 消费者对绿色产品的非绿色环保属性评价越好, 对绿色产品的购买偏好更强烈。 |
(Rokka & Uusitalo, International Journal of Consumer Studies | 消费者对日常用品包装、品牌、价格和使用便利性的偏好存在差异, 在选择时更倾向于将环保标签包装作为最重要的标准。 |
(Peloza et al., Journal of Marketing | 自我担当的激活会导致消费者对伦理诉求而非内疚诉求产生积极响应。消费者对伦理属性产品的偏好源于预期内疚避免和欲望共同驱动。 |
(Brough et al., Journal of Consumer Research | 购买具有环保属性的产品会被认为是女性化的表现, 因而男性会避免选择绿色属性产品。促进男性消费者参与绿色购买行为可以通过肯定他们的男子气概的品牌定位实现。 |
(Olson, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 当绿色属性与产品质量的权衡不显著时, 消费者对绿色产品的偏好较强; 反之, 绿色属性偏好降低。只有“深绿色”的消费者愿意支付绿色溢价。 |
(Auger et al., International Business Review | 产品的社会属性对消费者购买行为具有重要影响且这种影响在发达国家更显著, 消费者对产品社会属性的关注成果还会受到消费者产品涉入度的影响。 |
(Rausch et al., Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services | 对于环保面料服饰, 消费者更看重传统的服装属性, 如合身、舒适、性价比、质量而非绿色属性。针对产品绿色属性, 消费者首要关注的是服装的耐用性以及服装生产过程的环保特征, 对环保包装、退货政策的关注度相对较低。 |
(Skard et al., Journal of Business Ethics | 产品的绿色属性会对功能质量推断产生影响, 从而影响产品评价。在强度相关的产品类别中, 两种绿色属性都会造成可持续性负债效应, 而在温和相关的产品类型中, 绿色核心属性存在激发可持续性资产效应。 |
(Pretner et al., Resources, Conservation and Recycling | 消费者对于可重复使用、可回收产品的购买意愿低于普通产品, 当产品的绿色属性拥有第三方认证时, 消费者的购买意愿会增加。 |
[1] | 贾培培, 李东进, 金慧贞, 张宇东. (2020). 信誉标签结构线索对消费者健康食品购买意愿的影响研究. 南开管理评论, 23(2), 179-190. |
[2] | 宋洋, 徐英东, 张志远. (2019). 信息不对称条件下产品绿色质量虚假信息研究. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 59(1), 146-155+222-223. |
[3] | 滕乐法, 吴媛媛, 李峰. (2020). 越沉浸越好吗?——品牌体验中消费者沉浸程度的双重影响研究. 管理世界, 36(6), 153-167+251. |
[4] | 王财玉, 吴波. (2018). 时间参照对绿色消费的影响:环保意识和产品环境怀疑的调节作用. 心理科学, 41(3), 621-626. |
[5] | 王汉瑛, 邢红卫, 田虹. (2018). 定位绿色消费的“黄金象限”: 基于刻板印象内容模型的响应面分析. 南开管理评论, 21(3), 203-214. |
[6] | 卫海英, 熊继伟, 毛立静. (2020). 品牌仪式的“见”之效应:品牌仪式如何影响消费者信任. 商业经济与管理, (12), 50-60. |
[7] | 夏天生, 施卓敏, 赖连胜. (2020). 从众情景下社会排斥与亲社会消费行为的关系. 管理科学, 33(1), 114-125. |
[8] |
朱振中, 李晓君, 刘福, Haipeng (Allan) Chen. (2020). 外观新颖性对消费者购买意愿的影响: 自我建构与产品类型的调节效应. 心理学报, 52(11), 1352-1364.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01352 |
[9] |
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-4 URL |
[10] |
Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 URL |
[11] |
Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2010). The importance of social product attributes in consumer purchasing decisions: A multi-country comparative study. International Business Review, 19(2), 140-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.10.002 URL |
[12] |
Banerjee, S., Gulas, C. S., & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 21-31.
doi: 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673473 URL |
[13] |
Baskentli, S., Sen, S., Du, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2019). Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR domains. Journal of Business Research, 95, 502-513.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.046 |
[14] |
Bilgihan, A. (2016). Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: An integrated model of trust, user experience and branding. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 103-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.014 URL |
[15] |
Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & David, G. (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567-582.
doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucw044 URL |
[16] |
Carter, K., Jayachandran, S., & Murdock, M. R. (2021). Building a sustainable shelf: The role of firm sustainability reputation. Journal of Retailing, 97(4), 507-522.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.003 URL |
[17] |
Cervellon, M. C., & Carey, L. I. (2014). Sustainable, hedonic and efficient: Interaction effects between product properties and consumer reviews on post-experience responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48(7-8), 1375-1394.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-07-2012-0392 URL |
[18] | Chang, C. (2011). Feeling ambivalent about going green implications for green advertising processing. Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 19-31. |
[19] |
Cheng, Z.-H., Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2020). Linking hedonic and utilitarian shopping values to consumer skepticism and green consumption: The roles of environmental involvement and locus of control. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 61-85.
doi: 10.1007/s11846-018-0286-z |
[20] |
Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2021). When sustainability is not a liability: The halo effect of marketplace morality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 551-569.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v31.3 URL |
[21] |
de Luca, A., Verschoor, S., & Hommel, B. (2022). The transfer of global and local processing modes. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 48(10), 1054-1068.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0001033 URL |
[22] |
de Silva, M., Wang, P., & Kuah, A. T. H. (2021). Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China. Journal of Business Research, 122, 713-724.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.016 URL |
[23] |
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.
doi: 10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-1 URL |
[24] |
Elgaaied-Gambier, L., Monnot, E., & Reniou, F. (2018). Using descriptive norm appeals effectively to promote green behavior. Journal of Business Research, 82, 179-191.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.032 URL |
[25] |
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1115-1131.
pmid: 9866180 |
[26] |
Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 579-599.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579 pmid: 18361673 |
[27] |
Frost, P., Casey, B., Griffin, K., Raymundo, L., Farrell, C., & Carrigan, R. (2015). The influence of confirmation bias on memory and source monitoring. Journal of General Psychology, 142(4), 238-252.
doi: 10.1080/00221309.2015.1084987 pmid: 26649923 |
[28] |
Ganz, B., & Grimes, A. (2018). How claim specificity can improve claim credibility in green advertising: Measures that can boost outcomes from environmental product claims. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(4), 476-486.
doi: 10.2501/JAR-2018-001 URL |
[29] |
Gao, L., Li, Y., & Wyer, R. S. (2016). Choosing between two evils: The determinants of preferences for two equally goal-inconsistent options. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 1002-1012.
doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucw002 URL |
[30] |
Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 97-110.
doi: 10.1509/jm.13.0303 URL |
[31] |
Giebelhausen, M., Chun, H. H., Cronin, J. J. Jr., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Adjusting the warm-glow thermostat: How incentivizing participation in voluntary green programs moderates their impact on service satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 80(4), 56-71.
doi: 10.1509/jm.14.0497 URL |
[32] |
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001 URL |
[33] | Gong, S. Y., Wang, L., Peverelli, P., & Suo, D. N. (2022). When is sustainability an asset? The interaction effects between the green attributes and product category. Journal of Product&Brand Management, 31(6), 971-983. |
[34] |
Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through green-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002 URL |
[35] |
Ibrahim, H., & Al-Ajlouni, M. M. Q. (2018). Sustainable consumption Insights from the protection motivation, deontic justice and construal level theories. Management Decision, 56(3), 610-633.
doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2016-0323 URL |
[36] |
Johnstone, M. L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers' green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311-328.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3 URL |
[37] |
Karatas, M., & Gurhan-Canli, Z. (2020). When consumers prefer bundles with noncomplementary items to bundles with complementary items: The role of mindset abstraction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(1), 24-39.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v30.1 URL |
[38] |
Kohlová, M. B., & Urban, J. (2020). Buy green, gain prestige and social status. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101416.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101416 URL |
[39] |
Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95-102.
doi: 10.1509/jm.10.0416 URL |
[40] | Kumar, P. (2016). State of green marketing research over 25 years (1990-2014). Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 137-158. |
[41] |
Lee, J., Bhatt, S., & Suri, R. (2018). When consumers penalize not so green products. Psychology & Marketing, 35(1), 36-46.
doi: 10.1002/mar.2018.35.issue-1 URL |
[42] |
Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138(4), 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061 URL |
[43] | Lin, J., Lobo, A., & Leckie, C. (2017). The role of benefits and transparency in shaping consumers' green perceived value, self-brand connection and brand loyalty. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 35(3), 133-141. |
[44] |
Liu, J., Hull, V., Godfray, H. C. J., Tilman, D., Gleick, P., Hoff, H.,... Li, S. (2018). Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 466-476.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8 |
[45] |
Lu, F.-C., Park, J., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2023). The influence of mindset abstraction on preference for mixed versus extreme approaches to multigoal pursuits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(1), 62-76.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v33.1 URL |
[46] |
Luchs, M. G., & Kumar, M. (2017). "Yes, but this other one looks better/works better": How do consumers respond to trade-offs between sustainability and other valued attributes? Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 567-584.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2695-0 URL |
[47] | Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The Sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31. |
[48] |
Luo, B., Sun, Y., Shen, J., & Xia, L. (2020). How does green advertising skepticism on social media affect consumer intention to purchase green products? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(4), 371-381.
doi: 10.1002/cb.v19.4 URL |
[49] |
Marcon, A., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Dangelico, R. M., Medeiros, J. F., & Marcon, É. (2022). Exploring green product attributes and their effect on consumer behaviour: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 76-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.012 URL |
[50] |
Miniero, G., Codini, A., Bonera, M., Corvi, E., & Bertoli, G. (2014). Being green: From attitude to actual consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(5), 521-528.
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.2014.38.issue-5 URL |
[51] |
Muralidharan, S., Ferle, C., & Sung, Y. (2017). Are we a product of our environment? Assessing culturally congruent Green advertising appeals, novelty, and environmental concern in India and the U.S.A. Asian Journal of Communication, 27(4), 396-414.
doi: 10.1080/01292986.2017.1280063 URL |
[52] |
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353-383.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 URL |
[53] |
Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823-839.
doi: 10.1086/677841 URL |
[54] |
Olson, E. L. (2013). It’s not easy being green: The effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 171-184.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-012-0305-6 URL |
[55] |
Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15-28.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2 URL |
[56] |
Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude- behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623-628.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025 URL |
[57] |
Patel, J. D., Trivedi, R. H., & Yagnik, A. (2020). Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 102003.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102003 URL |
[58] | Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. Z. (2013). Good and Guilt-Free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104-119. |
[59] |
Pretner, G., Darnall, N., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105888.
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105888 URL |
[60] |
Ramirez, E., Jiménez, F. R., & Gau, R. (2015). Concrete and abstract goals associated with the consumption of environmentally sustainable products. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1645-1665.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-08-2012-0483 URL |
[61] |
Ran, K., & Zheng, Y. (2017). The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 59-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.005 URL |
[62] | Rausch, T. M., Baier, D., & Wening, S. (2021). Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63(3), 102681. |
[63] |
Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices - Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525.
doi: 10.1111/ijc.2008.32.issue-5 URL |
[64] |
Rubin, D., Hildebrand, D., & Malloy-Diniz, L. F. (2022). Does multitasking change how we think? The impact of specialized depletion from concurrent task performance on subsequent behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1244-1256.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v39.6 URL |
[65] |
Seo, J. Y., & Scammon, D. L. (2017). Do green packages lead to misperceptions? The influence of package colors on consumers’ perceptions of brands with environmental claims. Marketing Letters, 28(3), 357-369.
doi: 10.1007/s11002-017-9420-y URL |
[66] | Sheehan, K., & Atkinson, L. (2012). Special issue on green advertising: Revisiting green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 5-7. |
[67] | Spielmann, N. (2020). Green is the NEW White: How virtue motivates green product purchase. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(4), 56-64 |
[68] | Silva, M. E., de Sousa, J. M., Yamim, A. P., & Diógenes, A. P. (2020). Exploring nuances of green skepticism in different economies. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(4), 449-463. |
[69] |
Skard, S., Jørgensen, S., & Pedersen, L. J. T. (2021). When is sustainability a liability, and when is it an asset? Quality inferences for core and peripheral attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 109-132.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04415-1 |
[70] | Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value belief norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97. |
[71] |
Tezer, A., & Bodur, H. O. (2020). The Greenconsumption effect: How using green products improves consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 25-39.
doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucz045 URL |
[72] |
Tofighi, M., Grohmann, B., & Bodur, H. O. (2020). Ethical attribute and brand concept congruity enhances brand evaluations. European Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 79-108.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-02-2018-0104 |
[73] |
Usrey, B., Palihawadana, D., Saridakis, C., & Theotokis, A. (2020). How downplaying product greenness affects performance evaluations: Examining the effects of implicit and explicit green signals in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 49(2), 125-140.
doi: 10.1080/00913367.2020.1712274 URL |
[74] |
van der Linden, S. (2018). Warm glow is associated with low-but not high-cost sustainable behaviour. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 28-30.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-017-0001-0 |
[75] |
van der Wal, A. J., van Horen, F., & Grinstein, A. (2016). The paradox of 'green to be seen': Green high-status shoppers excessively use (branded) shopping bags. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 216-219.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.11.004 URL |
[76] |
van Doorn, J., Risselada, H., & Verhoef, P. C. (2021). Does sustainability sell? The impact of sustainability claims on the success of national brands' new product introductions. Journal of Business Research, 137, 182-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.032 URL |
[77] |
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238 URL |
[78] |
Wang, D., Weisstein, F. L., Duan, S., & Choi, P. (2022). Impact of ambivalent attitudes on green purchase intentions: The role of negative moods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 182-199.
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.v46.1 URL |
[79] | Wang, Y., Huscroft, J. R., Hazen, B. T., & Zhang, M. (2018). Green information, green certification and consumer perceptions of remanufctured automobile parts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 187-196. |
[80] |
Widegren, Ö. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 75-100.
doi: 10.1177/0013916598301004 URL |
[81] |
Wu, B., & Yang, Z. (2018). The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 74-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.011 URL |
[1] | 郭理, 加锁锁, 李圭泉, 李蔓林. 高处不胜寒?领导工作场所孤独感的多层次双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[2] | 杨智超, 王艇. 消费决策中的零:零价格效应和零比较效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 492-506. |
[3] | 加锁锁, 郭理, 蔡子君, 毛日佑. 组织中绩效压力的双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2846-2856. |
[4] | 栾墨, 吴霜. 消费决策过程如何彰显社会地位?基于最优化决策策略的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2194-2205. |
[5] | 张晶, 李伟贺, 史燕伟, 张南, 马红宇. 工作反刍及其“双刃剑”效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 358-367. |
[6] | 卢富荣, 宋煜静, 刘路培, 方选智, 张彩. 隔代教育对孙辈和祖辈的影响:双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1733-1741. |
[7] | 王震, 龙昱帆, 彭坚. 积极领导的消极效应:研究主题、分析视角和理论机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1123-1140. |
[8] | 刘培, 冯一丹, 李爱梅, 刘伟, 谢健飞. 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 406-417. |
[9] | 丁夏齐,马谋超,王詠,樊春雷. 信息显示板(IDB)实验在消费行为研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(3): 440-446. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||