心理科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 191-201.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00191
• 研究构想 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2020-08-21
出版日期:
2021-02-15
发布日期:
2020-12-29
通讯作者:
顾俊娟
E-mail:jjshujing@163.com
基金资助:
Received:
2020-08-21
Online:
2021-02-15
Published:
2020-12-29
Contact:
GU Junjuan
E-mail:jjshujing@163.com
摘要:
在中文阅读中, 为了进行词汇识别, 需要对汉字在词中的相对顺序进行加工, 即汉字位置加工。汉字位置加工是词汇识别和阅读理解的重要环节。如果汉字位置未得到加工, 可转置词将很难被区分。可转置词由相同汉字构成, 但每个汉字所处位置不同。以往研究发现, 词内汉字位置加工是比较灵活的; 而且词边界信息会影响汉字位置的加工, 即汉字位置加工存在词边界效应。该效应产生的原因及影响因素有哪些?本项目采用眼动追踪技术, 在自然阅读中系统探讨如下三个问题:(1)词的首/尾汉字如何调节汉字位置加工过程; (2)嵌套词和歧义词边界如何影响汉字位置加工; (3)语境合理性和预测性如何影响汉字位置加工的词边界效应。本项目将为首个中文汉字位置加工模型的建立提供数据支持和科学基础, 推进现有的中文词汇识别和词切分模型的进一步完善, 并为词汇的高效率教授与学习提供科学指导。
中图分类号:
顾俊娟, 石金富. (2021). 汉字位置加工和词边界效应的认知机制. 心理科学进展 , 29(2), 191-201.
GU Junjuan, SHI Jinfu. (2021). The cognitive mechanism of Chinese character position processing and word boundary effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(2), 191-201.
[1] | 邓耀臣, 冯志伟. (2013). 词汇长度与词汇频数关系的计量语言学研究. 外国语, 36, 29-39. doi: CNKI:SUN:WYXY.0.2013-03-002 |
[2] | 顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18, 193-199. |
[3] | 滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊. (2017). 视觉词汇识别中的字符位置编码. 心理科学进展, 25, 1132-1138. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01132 |
[4] | 黄伯荣, 廖序东. (2007). 现代汉语. 北京: 高等教育出版社. |
[5] | 李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19, 459-470. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00459 |
[6] | 孟祥芝, 舒华. (1999). 汉语儿童阅读障碍研究. 心理发展与教育, 15, 54-57. doi: CNKI:SUN:XLFZ.0.1999-04-011 |
[7] | 彭聃龄, 丁国盛, 王春茂, Taft, M., 朱晓平. (1999). 汉语逆序词的加工——词素在词加工中的作用. 心理学报, 31, 36-46. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/16/12/025 |
[8] | 田晓梅, 王纯, 李童, 孟祥芝, 周晓林. (2006). 汉语双字词的心理词典存储——来自发展性阅读障碍个案的证据. 心理发展与教育, 22, 146-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2006.02.009 |
[9] |
Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712607X224478
URL pmid: 17631694 |
[10] |
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1798-1819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.672437
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437 URL pmid: 22540902 |
[11] |
Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2389-2410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.782326
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.782326 URL pmid: 23590520 |
[12] | Blythe, H. I., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading transposed text: Effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2424-2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0707-2 |
[13] |
Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327 URL pmid: 16393049 |
[14] |
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001 URL pmid: 17217942 |
[15] |
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1557- 1575. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2 URL pmid: 24643819 |
[16] | Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39(A), 211-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785 |
[17] | Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCradle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235-254). New York: Psychology Press. |
[18] |
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organisation in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293-1326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293
URL pmid: 16393048 |
[19] | Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5 |
[20] |
Gu, J. J., Li, X. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 41, 127-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038639
URL pmid: 25621586 |
[21] |
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20
doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20 URL pmid: 9483822 |
[22] |
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. L. ( 2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193367
URL pmid: 16615382 |
[23] | Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425-440). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. |
[24] |
Johnson, R. L., & Dunne, M. D. (2012). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 191-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025983
doi: 10.1037/a0025983 URL pmid: 22060141 |
[25] |
Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 336-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.013
URL pmid: 23089042 |
[26] |
Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed- letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209 URL pmid: 17311489 |
[27] | Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 291-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000133 |
[28] | Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002 |
[29] |
Li, X. S., Gu, J. J., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 879-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030337
URL pmid: 23088542 |
[30] |
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-Movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248
doi: 10.1037/rev0000231 URL pmid: 32658537 |
[31] |
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003 URL pmid: 19345938 |
[32] | Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 781-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.832682 |
[33] |
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035389
URL pmid: 24417292 |
[34] |
Ma, G. J., Pollatsek, A., Li, Y. G., & Li, X. S. (2017). Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it’s composed of noncontiguous characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 158- 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000298
URL pmid: 27504682 |
[35] |
Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476- 495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.658037
URL pmid: 23082239 |
[36] |
Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 411-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000175
URL pmid: 26348198 |
[37] |
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127- 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001 URL pmid: 19081083 |
[38] | Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578146 |
[39] |
Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 384-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384 URL pmid: 19130764 |
[40] | Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Psychology Press. |
[41] | Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5 |
[42] |
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.5
URL pmid: 9666972 |
[43] |
Rayner, K., Li, X. S., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. L. ( 2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206448
doi: 10.3758/bf03206448 URL pmid: 16615333 |
[44] |
Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x URL pmid: 16507057 |
[45] |
Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language & Cognitive Processes, 26, 482-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.500020 URL pmid: 22933829 |
[46] |
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 988-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
URL pmid: 23543423 |
[47] | Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 |
[48] | Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 745-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 |
[49] | Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.679662 |
[50] | Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Sub-morphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.761 |
[51] | Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children’s and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 531-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.999076 |
[52] |
White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261-1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261 URL pmid: 18823209 |
[53] | Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013). Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.753077 |
[54] |
Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012) On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology, 59, 68-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000127
URL pmid: 16556559 |
[55] |
Witzel, N., Qiao, X. M., & Forster, K. (2011). Transposed letter priming with horizontal and vertical text in Japanese and English readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 914-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022194
URL pmid: 21639675 |
[56] | Yang, J. M. (2013). Preview effects of plausibility and character order in reading Chinese transposed words: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 18-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01553.x. |
[57] |
Zhou, J. Y., Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., Taft, M., & Li, X. S. (2017). The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 31, 607-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y
doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y URL |
[58] |
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., & Grainger, J. (2014). Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1026-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035187
doi: 10.1037/a0035187 URL |
[1] | 张才蕙, 叶渐桥, 杨静. 汉语作为第二语言学习的脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 747-758. |
[2] | 张婕, 张火垠, 李红, 雷怡. 睡眠对恐惧学习的影响及其认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 631-640. |
[3] | 寇娟, 杨梦圆, 魏子杰, 雷怡. 自闭症谱系障碍社交动机理论:机制及干预探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 20-32. |
[4] | 林浇敏, 李爱梅, 周雅然, 何军红, 周蕾. 眼动操纵技术在决策研究中的应用前景:改变决策行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1794-1803. |
[5] | 李琳, 赵赛男, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 老年人汉语阅读中预测误差成本的产生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(1): 1-14. |
[6] | 于文勃, 王璐, 程幸悦, 王天琳, 张晶晶, 梁丹丹. 语言经验对概率词切分的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 787-795. |
[7] | 白玉, 杨海波. 创伤后应激障碍个体对威胁刺激的注意偏向:眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 737-746. |
[8] | 黄龙, 徐富明, 胡笑羽. 眼动轨迹匹配法:一种研究决策过程的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1454-1461. |
[9] | 张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军. 中文阅读中副中央凹预加工的范围与程度[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 871-882. |
[10] | 于洋, 姜英杰, 王永胜, 于明阳. 瞳孔变化在记忆加工中的生物标记作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 416-425. |
[11] | 卫垌圻, 曹慧, 毕鸿燕, 杨炀. 发展性阅读障碍书写加工缺陷及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 75-84. |
[12] | 张震, 李焕珠, 韩布新, 李兴珊, 刘萍萍. 跨文化视角下注视位置和词语熟悉性对信息加工的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 84-84. |
[13] | 王亚飞, 罗健亮, 杨糠, 黄飞云, 王玲. 多面孔识别过程中的视觉搜索策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 112-112. |
[14] | 陈鋆, 蔡华俭. 自我肯定降低个体对威胁信息的注意偏向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 148-148. |
[15] | 苟瑞娥, 李凌, 金贞兰. 不同注意负荷时额叶眼区对平滑追随眼动的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 150-150. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||