ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1664-1674.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01664

• 研究方法 • 上一篇    下一篇


 潘逸沁1;  骆方1,2   

  1.  (1北京师范大学心理学部) (2未来教育高精尖创新中心, 北京 100875)
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-20 出版日期:2017-10-15 发布日期:2017-08-13
  • 通讯作者: 骆方, E-mail: E-mail:E-mail:
  • 基金资助:

 Measurement and control of Socially Desirable Responding

 PAN Yiqin1; LUO Fang1,2   

  1.  (1 Faulty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University) (2 Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Education, Beijing 100875, China)
  • Received:2017-02-20 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2017-08-13
  • Contact: LUO Fang, E-mail: E-mail:E-mail:
  • Supported by:

摘要:  社会称许性反应是影响人格测验效度最常见的一种反应偏差, 从20世纪30年代至今, 测量学家一直努力揭示社会称许性反应的性质和内部结构, 并开发社会称许性量表对其直接测量。本文综述了社会称许性量表的发展脉络, 指出了至今遗留的问题。并且, 从事前控制和事后控制的角度, 对当前主要的控制社会称许性反应的方法进行了论述, 指出了社会称许性量表的效度对事后控制方法的重要影响, 并给出了一些如何控制社会称许性反应的指导建议。

关键词:  社会称许性反应, 自我欺骗, 印象管理

Abstract:   Socially Desirable Responding (SDR) is one of the most common sources of bias that affect the validity of personality tests. Considerable attempts have been made to investigate the concept and explore its underlying structure, resulting in a number of SDR measurement scales. The aim of the article is to review the literature on the development of SDR measures and identify unsolved issues. From both preventive and retrospective perspectives, the authors compared current approaches to coping with SDR and revealed the influence of retrospective control on the validity of SDR scales. Lastly, additional guidance is provided on potential methods of SDR reduction.

Key words:  Socially Desirable Responding (SDR), self-deception, impression management