ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 458-473.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00458

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

真实型领导：概念、测量、形成与作用

王震;宋萌;孙健敏   

  1. (1中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100081) (2中国人民大学劳动人事学院; 3中国人民大学心理学系, 北京 100872)
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-05 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 宋萌
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(71302129); 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(13YJC630176); 中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划。

Authentic Leadership: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Network

WANG Zhen;SONG Meng;SUN Jianmin   

  1. (1 Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China) (2 School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
  • Received:2013-08-05 Online:2014-03-15 Published:2014-03-15
  • Contact: SONG Meng

PDF (PC)

6919

摘要：

频发的道德丑闻和管理渎职现象使真实型领导受到了前所未有的关注。基于近十年来国、内外重要理论文章和67项实证文章, 本文对真实型领导研究进行了系统梳理与评析。总体来看, 研究者主要从特质/行为视角和过程视角界定真实型领导。真实型领导的测量已有标准化工具, 并在测量主体和方式上呈现多样化趋势。真实型领导受个体因素和情境因素影响, 也会通过积极组织行为学、社会学习、社会认定和社会交换机制对个体、团队和组织产生积极影响。未来研究应深入讨论真实型领导的概念、结构和测量问题, 对其影响因素、影响效果和作用机制做进一步探索, 并适时进行跨文化和本土化考察。

关键词: 真实型领导, 真实性, 领导有效性, 积极组织行为学

Abstract:

Due to the chilling examples of ethical scandals and management malfeasance, research has paid more attention to authentic leadership. Based on theoretical and 67 quantitative empirical studies published in last 10 years, this article reviewed the scientific status of authentic leadership. The review indicated that: (1) Either trait/behavioral perspective or process perspective was utilized to conceptualize authentic leadership; (2) Specific measures, coupled with rating sources and methods were developed to assess authentic leadership; (3) Antecedents of authentic leadership consisted of both individual and situational variables; (4) Authentic leadership was found to bring positive outcomes for individuals, teams and organizations through mechanisms of positive organizational behavior, social learning, social identity and social exchange. We concluded with an agenda for future research on the conceptualization, measurement, nomological network, and cross-cultural/indigenous investigation of authentic leadership.

Key words: authentic leadership, authenticity, leadership effectiveness, positive organizational behavior