ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2027, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 395-411.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2027.0395 cstr: 32111.14.2027.0395

• 元分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会流动信念的变迁:一项基于2014~2024年中国样本的横断历史元分析

张晟轩, 江蕴怡, 丁毅, 郭永玉   

  1. 南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-19 出版日期:2027-02-15 发布日期:2026-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 丁毅, E-mail: yiding2017@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:张晟轩和江蕴怡为本文共同第一作者。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(25BSH111)支持

Have social mobility beliefs changed in China? A cross-temporal meta-analysis from 2014 to 2024

ZHANG Shengxuan, JIANG Yunyi, DING Yi, GUO Yongyu   

  1. School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
  • Received:2026-05-19 Online:2027-02-15 Published:2026-11-12

摘要: 社会流动信念是指个体对社会成员在不同社会经济地位间流动可能性(通常指向上流动)的感知与预期, 对于理解社会公平与维持社会稳定具有重要意义。为考察2014~2024年间中国样本社会流动信念的变化趋势, 本研究对采用社会流动信念量表的50篇文献(57个独立样本, N = 28089)进行横断历史元分析。结果发现:过去十年间, 中国被试样本的社会流动信念未呈现显著的时间变化趋势, 整体保持相对稳定。这一稳定的结果同时体现在不同维度(个人层面、社会层面)和样本群体(中学生、大学生、非学生成人)中。一些反映社会发展的指标(人均GDP、互联网普及率、城镇化率等)和反映社会治理的指标(现行有效法律数、反腐立案数等)与社会流动信念呈现显著的正向关联, 可能是支撑社会流动信念总体上保持稳定的重要宏观基础。本研究从宏观社会因素的视角为解释社会流动信念的稳定提供了线索, 为理解社会变迁背景下社会心态的变化与维系提供了新的实证证据。

关键词: 社会流动信念, 社会变迁与人类发展理论, 横断历史元分析, 社会变迁

Abstract: Social mobility beliefs refer to individuals' perceptions and expectations of the possibility of mobility across social classes for themselves or for others, and play an important role in promoting upward mobility, social fairness, and social stability. Over the past decade, China has experienced rapid and multifaceted social changes. The economy has continued to grow, higher education has further expanded, the Internet has been widely adopted, and the legal and anti-corruption systems have undergone substantial development. At the same time, economic inequality has remained at a relatively high level, and competition in education and the labor market has intensified. However, whether Chinese people's social mobility beliefs have shifted along with these societal changes remains unclear. The present research meta-analyzed 50 studies conducted between 2014 and 2024, with 57 independent samples and 28,089 participants, and further examined the macro-social correlates of these beliefs.
We conducted cross-temporal meta-analysis with the year of data collection as the predictor, while controlling for sample type, measurement dimension, and scale type. We also examined associations between social mobility beliefs and a set of macro-social indicators—including modernization indicators (e.g., GDP per capita, gross enrollment rate in higher education, urbanization rate, and Internet penetration rate), governance indicators (e.g., the number of effective laws, the number of corruption-related cases filed, and national education expenditure), and economic risk indicators (e.g., the Gini coefficient and the extent of economic slowdown). Results showed that, contrary to predictions of decline, Chinese people's social mobility beliefs remained stable from 2014 to 2024, showing no significant temporal trend. Subgroup analyses across measurement dimensions (individual-level vs. society-level beliefs) and sample groups (middle school students, college students, and adults) revealed no significant differences in temporal trends. The macro-social analyses revealed a differentiated pattern. Indicators of economic and educational development, including GDP per capita, higher education enrollment, urbanization, and Internet penetration, were generally positively associated with social mobility beliefs. Several indicators of social governance, including education expenditure, social security expenditure, the number of effective laws, and anti-corruption activity, also showed positive associations across multiple time lags. By contrast, economic-risk indicators, such as the Gini coefficient and the extent of economic slowdown, showed weaker and less consistent relationships with social mobility beliefs.
Overall, the present research shows that social mobility beliefs in Chinese samples remained relatively stable during a decade of substantial social transformation. The findings extend research on social change and human development by demonstrating that the psychological consequences of macro-social change may depend on the specific dimension of change under consideration. They also highlight the value of distinguishing developmental, governance, and economic-risk conditions when examining long-term changes in social attitudes. More broadly, this study provides evidence that continuity in social beliefs can coexist with rapid structural transformation and offers a macro-social perspective on the persistence and change of social attitudes in contemporary China.

Key words: social mobility belief, cross-temporal meta-analysis, social change, macro-social indicators, China