ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1306-1320.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.1306 cstr: 32111.14.2025.1306

• 元分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

群际共情偏差的脑功能网络:基于fMRI研究的元分析

孙路闻, 周月, 蒋重清()   

  1. 辽宁师范大学心理学院, 大连 116029
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-08 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目-规划基金项目(24YJA190006)

The functional brain networks of intergroup empathy bias: A meta-analysis based on fMRI studies

SUN Luwen, ZHOU Yue, JIANG Zhongqing()   

  1. College of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
  • Received:2024-11-08 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-05-15

摘要:

群际共情偏差(Intergroup Empathy Bias)是指个体对内群体和外群体共情不平等的现象。目前, 关于群际共情偏差的神经机制, 尤其是其背后的脑功能网络及神经调控机制尚未明确。本研究利用激活似然性估计法(Activation Likelihood Estimation, ALE)对19篇群际共情偏差文献中报告的脑区坐标进行分析, 得到两组显著激活簇, 分别位于左侧前脑岛(left anterior insula, lAI)和内侧前额皮层(medial prefrontal cortex, mPFC)。进一步借助脑连通性元分析模型(Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling, MACM)与Neurosynth功能解码, 研究发现两组显著激活簇不仅在群际共情偏差中起着关键作用, 其所在的脑功能网络还与中央执行网络(Central Executive Network, CEN)存在功能重叠。该发现不仅深化了群际共情的神经科学理论基础, 还为制定教育干预策略提供了重要的神经科学依据。未来研究应着重探讨这些关键脑区的具体功能特征及其神经调控机制, 并致力于将神经科学发现转化为实际有效的共情偏差干预方案, 以促进群际和谐, 减少社会偏见和冲突。

关键词: 群际共情偏差, ALE元分析, 脑连通性元分析模型, Neurosynth

Abstract:

Intergroup Empathy Bias refers to the phenomenon characterized by differential empathic responsiveness toward in-group versus out-group members. The neurobiological substrates of this bias - particularly its associated functional neurocircuitry and neuroregulatory processes - remain incompletely characterized. To systematically identify consistent neuroanatomical regions implicated in intergroup empathy bias and elucidate their neurofunctional correlates, this investigation implements a tripartite methodological framework:
Phase I utilizes Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) to systematically map convergent neuroanatomical patterns associated with intergroup empathy bias. Stratified subgroup analyses are implemented to investigate moderating variables: affective dimensions (nociceptive vs. emotional processing), social categorization paradigm (racial vs. non-racial grouping), and task design characteristics (implicit vs. explicit empathy paradigms). Phase II applies Meta-Analytic Connectivity Modeling (MACM) to delineate functional connectivity between identified neural hubs and distributed cortical networks. The final phase leverages Neurosynth - a comprehensive neuroimaging meta-analysis platform integrating data from over 14,000 task-based fMRI studies - to characterize functional profiles of the identified network during intergroup empathy processing.
This study employs ALE meta-analysis to analyze neuroimaging coordinates from 19 independent experiments on intergroup empathy bias. Two suprathreshold activation clusters exhibit robust convergence: the left anterior insula (lAI) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). This lateralization reflects differential functional specialization: left insular activity is modulated by social group categorization during affective processing, whereas right insular functions (e.g., attentional modulation, network reconfiguration) are categorization-insensitive. Critically, in-group conditions demonstrating mPFC activation magnitude proportional to negative affect intensity highlight this region’s regulatory dominance. Post hoc subgroup analyses reveal task-dependent neural signatures: affective rating paradigms predominantly recruit the lAI through heightened subjective emotional resonance mechanisms, whereas emotion categorization tasks engage mPFC-mediated executive control circuitry via deliberate cognitive appraisal processes.
Through MACM and Neurosynth functional decoding, this study reveals robust functional interconnectivity between the two neural clusters and distributed cortical/subcortical regions, indicating an evolutionarily optimized network architecture for intergroup empathy modulation. The network’s operational mechanisms are conceptualized through three neurocognitive dimensions: (1) Executive regulation - mirroring Central Executive Network (CEN) dynamics via prefrontally mediated cognitive control; (2) Affective modulation - suppressing out-group empathy through dual pathways: impaired emotion recognition (ventral anterior cingulate cortex [vACC] hypoactivation) and diminished emotional resonance (reduced mirror neuron system efficacy); (3) Motivational valuation - striatal-orbitofrontal circuits perform neuroeconomic cost-benefit analyses, wherein in-group empathy demonstrates heightened utility in social exchange frameworks.
By synthesizing neuroimaging meta-analytic evidence, this study delineates consistent neural substrates underlying intergroup empathy bias, thereby proposing a theoretical framework to guide subsequent research. Furthermore, these empirical insights provide a neural foundation for precision-targeted neuromodulatory interventions. Systematic identification of critical neuroanatomical regions and their networks enables the development of optimized neuroregulatory strategies. These strategies aim to ameliorate intergroup empathy bias, ultimately fostering societal cohesion and enhancing cooperative dynamics.

Key words: intergroup empathy bias, ALE meta-analysis, MACM, Neurosynth

中图分类号: