突破性创造力与渐进性创造力真的区分开了吗? 基于2011~2024文献的分析

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01882

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

员工创造力一直受到学界的广泛关注, 但以往将创造力作为单一变量越来越不能满足理论与实践的需要。自2011年Gilson和Madjar迁移创新研究文献中的突破性创新和渐进性创新这一对概念, 首次提出将创造力区分为突破性与渐进性两类以来, 相关理论与实证研究逐渐涌现。本文通过回顾此后13年的79篇相关中英文文献, 全面深入检验了区分两种创造力的理论基础与实证证据。结果表明,虽然多数研究在理论上对两者进行了区分, 但仅半数研究基于这两种创造力的差异性构建了研究问题与理论模型。在实证方面, 尽管部分研究呈现了测量工具的区分效度证据, 但多数研究尚未直接检验突破性与渐进性创造力影响差异的显著性。值得注意的是, 仍有超过四成的研究未在理论上进行区分或提供实证支持。总体而言, 未来学界应当在理论论证、研究问题与模型构建、实证检验中协同一致地探究这两种创造力的本质区别与影响。基于此, 指出了一系列有助于未来更好地区分这两种创造力的研究建议, 以及值得进一步探究的研究方向。

关键词: 突破性创造力, 渐进性创造力, 区分效度

Abstract:

Since Gilson and Madjar (2011) first introduced the distinction between radical and incremental creativity, echoing the concepts of radical and incremental innovation in organizational innovation research, related theoretical and empirical studies have gradually emerged. This study reviews 79 relevant articles published between 2011 and 2024, examining the theoretical foundations and empirical evidence supporting the differentiation of these two types of creativity. Our findings show that while most studies theoretically distinguish between radical and incremental creativity, only half of the studies have constructed research questions and theoretical models based on their differences. Empirically, although some studies present evidence of discriminant validity in measurement instruments, most have yet to directly test the significance of the differential impacts of radical and incremental creativity. Notably, over 40% of the studies fail to theoretically distinguish or provide empirical support for the two constructs.

Theoretically, the distinction between radical and incremental creativity is rooted in the literature on organizational innovation and learning (Benner & Tushman, 2003; Dewar & Dutton, 1986), with radical creativity referring to ideas that fundamentally differ from existing practices or products, and incremental creativity representing minor improvements within existing frameworks. This classification is grounded in the creativity component theory (Amabile et al., 1996), which posits that creativity comprises domain-relevant skills, creative-thinking skills, and task motivation, each of which may differentially influence radical and incremental creativity. For instance, internal motivation is more strongly associated with radical creativity, while external motivation tends to enhance incremental creativity.

Empirically, the relationship between radical and incremental creativity remains inconclusive. Within the empirical studies related to radical and incremental creativity in the current review, most studies report a positive correlation between the two, with varying degrees of strength, despite some studies also find negative correlations or no significant relationship. A meta-analysis conducted in this study reveals a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.47) between radical and incremental creativity, suggesting that these constructs are distinct yet related. However, the high correlation may be partly attributed to common method biases in data collection, highlighting the need for more rigorous empirical designs. Regarding discriminant validity, confirmatory factor analyses in the reviewed studies consistently demonstrate that measurement models with separate constructs for radical and incremental creativity fit the data better than those with a single combined construct, providing strong evidence for their distinction. Further, comparisons of average variance extracted (AVE) values and correlation coefficients also support the discriminant validity of the two constructs. Despite these advancements, the empirical evidence for the differentiated impacts of radical and incremental creativity remains limited. Only a minority of studies have directly tested the significance of differences in the regression coefficients of third variables on radical and incremental creativity. These studies reveal that various antecedents, moderators, and consequences exhibit differential effects on the two types of creativity, underscoring the importance of distinguishing them in research.

To advance the field, we propose four aspects for scholars to consider in their future work related with radical and incremental creativity: (1) strengthen the theoretical foundations for distinguishing radical and incremental creativity; (2) adopt more rigorous empirical designs to mitigate common method biases; (3) improve methodology rigor, such as collecting data at different time points or using objective measures; (4) directly test the significance of differences in the impacts of third variables on radical and incremental creativity. In addition, we urge more scholarly attention on exploring the antecedents, moderators, and consequences of the two types of creativity more thoroughly. Specifically, we highlight the following questions for future inquiries: (1) how does factors, such as task complexity, fairness, and culture, influence radical and incremental creativity? (2) how do these two types of creativities impact individuals and organizations differentially? (3) how do team structures, leadership, and culture facilitate or hinder these creativities at a team level? By addressing these gaps, future research can offer a more nuanced understanding of the nature and implications of radical and incremental creativity.

Key words: radical creativity, incremental creativity, discriminant validity

中图分类号:

B842

骆南峰, 李统鉴, 陈雯, 张慧君, 刘俊池, 沈子维. (2024). 突破性创造力与渐进性创造力真的区分开了吗? 基于2011~2024文献的分析. 心理科学进展 , 32(11), 1882-1897.

LUO Nanfeng, LI Tongjian, CHEN Wen, ZHANG Huijun, LIU Junchi, SHEN Ziwei. (2024). Are radical creativity and incremental creativity conceptually and empirically distinctive? An analysis on the 2011~2024 literature. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(11), 1882-1897.

图/表 3

参考文献 74

	(注: 开头带*的参考文献为本文重点分析的、同时研究了突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的文献。)
[1]	* 杜旌, 裘依伊, 尹晶. (2018). 中庸抑制创新吗?——一项多层次实证研究. 科学学研究, 36(2), 378-384.
[2]	* 冯明, 胡宇飞. (2021). 工作压力源对员工突破性和渐进性创造力的跨层次研究. 管理学报, 18(7), 1012-1021.
[3]	耿紫珍, 肖蒙蒙, 王海珍, 王艳粉. (2023). 突破性/渐进性创造力影响因素的差异:基于系统性文献综述及元分析方法. 中国人力资源开发, 40(9), 86-103.
[4]	* 郭婧, 苏秦, 张谦. (2017). 创造力绩效激励对产品创新中员工创造力的影响. 科技进步与对策, 34(13), 144-152.
[5]	刘晔, 曲如杰, 时勘, 邓麦村. (2016). 领导创新期待对员工根本性创新行为的影响:创新过程投入的视角. 南开管理评论, 19(6), 17-26.
[6]	刘晔, 曲如杰, 时勘, 邓麦村. (2022). 领导创新支持与员工突破性创新行为——基于角色认同理论和行为可塑性视角. 科学学与科学技术管理, 43(2), 168-182.
[7]	刘智强, 严荣笑, 唐双双. (2021). 领导创新期望与员工突破性创新投入: 基于悖论理论的研究. 管理世界, 37(10), 226-241.
[8]	* 马君. (2016). 奖励能否激励员工创造力: 不同成就动机氛围下的匹配研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 36(4), 945-957. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2016)04-0945-13
[9]	屠兴勇, 张怡萍, 刘雷洁. (2020). 创新性过程投入的前因与后果. 科研管理, 41(2), 133-141.
[10]	解志韬, 王辰轩. (2022). 辱虐管理对科研团队突破性创造力的影响. 统计与决策, 38(14), 184-188.
[11]	* 张勇, 龙立荣, 贺伟. (2014). 绩效薪酬对员工突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的影响. 心理学报, 46(12), 1880-1896.
[12]	* 张勇, 王明旋, 龙立荣. (2022). 目标导向如何影响员工创造力——基于创造力要素理论视角的分类研究. 南开管理评论, 25(6), 203-215.
[13]	* Abbasi, S. G., Alaghbari, M. A., Abbas, M., Beshr, B., & Al-Ghazali, B. M. (2023). Openness to experience and creativity: The role of promotion focus. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2238390.
[14]	Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
[15]	Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
[16]	* Bao, P., Liao, Z., & Li, C. (2024). Does inclusive leadership influence employee innovation? A multilevel investigation. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2023-0187
[17]	Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238.
[18]	* Bledow, R., Kühnel, J., Jin, M., & Kuhl, J. (2022). Breaking the chains: The inverted-U-shaped relationship between action-state orientation and creativity under low job autonomy. Journal of Management, 48(4), 905-935.
[19]	* Boekhorst, J. A., Halinski, M., & Good, J. R. L. (2021). Fun, friends, and creativity: A social capital perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 970-983.
[20]	* Bu, X., Zhang, J., Li, J., & Zhang, N. (2023). A latent profile analysis linking individual intellectual capital to radical and incremental creativity. Current Psychology, 42(11), 9391-9403.
[21]	Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 809-830. doi: 10.1037/a0027652 pmid: 22409506
[22]	* Cao, Y., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., Hou, Y., & Miao, R. (2023). The influence of leader humor on employee creativity: From the perspective of employee voice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1162790.
[23]	* Chang, Y.-Y., Shih, H.-Y., & Lin, B. (2023). Work curiosity and R&D professionals’ creative performance: Scientists vs. engineers. Technovation, 124, 102739.
[24]	Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
[25]	Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
[26]	George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477.
[27]	* Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., D’Innocenzo, L., & Moye, N. (2012). One size does not fit all: Managing radical and incremental creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 168-191.
[28]	* Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 21-28.
[29]	* Gong, Y., Wu, J., Song, L. J., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829-844. doi: 10.1037/apl0000185 pmid: 28150986
[30]	* González-Gómez, H. V., & Richter, A. W. (2015). Turning shame into creativity: The importance of exposure to creative team environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 142-161.
[31]	* Halinski, M., Boekhorst, J. A., Allen, D., & Good, J. R. L. (2023). Creativity during threat to organizational survival: The influence of employee creativity on downsizing survival selection. Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231216691
[32]	* He, Y., Yao, X., Wang, S., & Caughron, J. (2016). Linking failure feedback to individual creativity: The moderation role of goal orientation. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 52-59.
[33]	Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1984). Nonparametric estimators of effect size in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 573-580.
[34]	* Jaussi, K. S., Knights, A. R., & Gupta, A. (2017). Feeling good, being intentional, and their relationship to two types of creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 377-386.
[35]	* Jaussi, K. S., & Randel, A. E. (2014). Where to look? Creative self-efficacy, knowledge retrieval, and incremental and radical creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 400-410.
[36]	Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., Gralewski, J., Gajda, A., Wiśniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159-166.
[37]	Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
[38]	Li, H., Li, F., & Chen, T. (2018). A motivational-cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy. Journal of Business Research, 92, 179-188.
[39]	Li, S., Jia, R., Seufert, J. H., Wang, X., & Luo, J. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and radical innovative capability: The moderating role of leader support. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 621-633.
[40]	* Liu, H., Bracht, E., Zhang, X., Bradley, B., & Van Dick, R. (2021). Creativity in non-routine jobs: The role of transformational leadership and organizational identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(1), 129-143.
[41]	* Liu, Y., Janssen, O., & Vriend, T. (2022). How self- construals relate to employee incremental and radical creativity: A behavioral strategy perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(5), 755-767.
[42]	* Liu, Z., Zhou, K., & Wang, J. (2024). How narcissism, promotion criteria, and empowering leadership jointly influence creativity through diverse information searching: An expectancy perspective. Human Relations, 00187267241239855. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241239855
[43]	* Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730-743. doi: 10.1037/a0022416 pmid: 21319879
[44]	* Mao, J., Chang, S., Gong, Y., & Xie, J. L. (2021). Team job-related anxiety and creativity: Investigating team-level and cross-level moderated curvilinear relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(1), 34-47.
[45]	Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172-175.
[46]	Park, M., & Kim, S. (2021). Effects of personality traits and team context on individual innovative behavior (exploitation and exploration). Sustainability, 14(1), 306.
[47]	* Petrou, P., & Jongerling, J. (2024). Incremental and radical creativity in dealing with a crisis at work. Creativity Research Journal, 36(2), 378-394.
[48]	* Petrou, P., Van Der Linden, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Effects of openness on incremental versus radical creativity and the moderating role of leader behaviors. Journal of Individual Differences, 44(3), 190-204.
[49]	* Qu, H., Walter, F., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023). Unpacking the role of job insecurity for employee creativity: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Management, 01492063231213656.
[50]	* Rahman Malik, M. A., Butt, A. N., & Zahid, F. (2024). Drivers of radical and incremental creativity—A moderated mediation framework. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 41(1), 137-152.
[51]	Ren, F., & Song, Z. (2024). Employee radical and incremental creativity: A systematic review. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 58(2), 297-308.
[52]	Rhee, Y. W., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity: Goal orientations as antecedents and in-group social status as moderating contingency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 813-832.
[53]	Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6-14.
[54]	Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2017). Creativity and the management of technology: Balancing creativity and standardization. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 605-616.
[55]	* Song, W., Ma, Y., Fan, X., & Peng, X. (2023). Corporate environmental ethics and employee’s green creativity? The perspective of environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1856-1868.
[56]	Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 83-100.
[57]	* Sung, S. Y., Rhee, Y. W., Lee, J. E., & Choi, J. N. (2020). Dual pathways of emotional competence towards incremental and radical creativity: Resource caravans through feedback- seeking frequency and breadth. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 421-433.
[58]	* Tang, C., & Naumann, S. E. (2016). The impact of three kinds of identity on research and development employees’ incremental and radical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 123-131.
[59]	* Tang, C., Zhang, G., & Naumann, S. E. (2017). When do structural holes in employees’ networks improve their radical creativity? A moderated mediation model. R&D Management, 47(5), 755-766.
[60]	* Tolkamp, G., Vriend, T., Verwaeren, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Nijstad, B. (2022). Disentangling the creative process: An examination of differential antecedents and outcomes for specific process elements. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(6), 1329-1346.
[61]	Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289.
[62]	* Waheed, H., & Dastgeer, G. (2019). The impact of proactive personality on radical and incremental creativity: An interactionist perspective. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 706-718.
[63]	Wang, X., An, L., Yasir, N., Mahmood, N., & Gu, Y. (2021). Empirical study on the relationship between effective following behavior and derived creative work behavior: A moderating role of perceived organizational support and sustainable leadership. Sustainability, 13(10), 5693.
[64]	* Wang, Z., Bu, X., & Cai, S. (2021). Core self-evaluation, individual intellectual capital and employee creativity. Current Psychology, 40(3), 1203-1217.
[65]	* Xu, S., Jiang, X., & Walsh, I. J. (2018). The influence of openness to experience on perceived employee creativity: The moderating roles of individual trust. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 142-155.
[66]	Xu, X., Jiang, L., & Wang, H. (2019). How to build your team for innovation? A cross-level mediation model of team personality, team climate for innovation, creativity, and job crafting. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 848-872.
[67]	* Yu, M., & Choi, J. N. (2022). How do feedback seekers think? Disparate cognitive pathways towards incremental and radical creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 470-483.
[68]	Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2015). Effects of cultural power distance on group creativity and individual group member creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 990-1007.
[69]	* Zadow, A., Loh, M. Y., Dollard, M. F., Mathisen, G. E., & Yantcheva, B. (2023). Psychosocial safety climate as a predictor of work engagement, creativity, innovation, and work performance: A case study of software engineers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1082283.
[70]	* Zhang, Q., Sun, S., Zheng, X., & Liu, W. (2019). The role of cynicism and personal traits in the organizational political climate and sustainable creativity. Sustainability, 11(1), 257.
[71]	* Zhang, Y., Li, J., Song, Y., & Gong, Z. (2021). Radical and incremental creativity: Associations with work performance and well-being. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 968-983.
[72]	* Zhang, Y., Qu, H., Walter, F., Liu, W., & Wang, M. (2023). A new perspective on time pressure and creativity: Distinguishing employees’ radical versus incremental creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(9), 1400-1418.
[73]	Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333-359.
[74]	Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2570-2595.

实证文献				非实证文献(例如理论、概念、综述文献)	合计
同时研究突破性创造力与渐进性创造力	只研究突破性创造力	只研究渐进性创造力	不区分突破性创造力和渐进性创造力	非实证文献(例如理论、概念、综述文献)	合计
42	16	1	12	8	79

实证文献				非实证文献(例如理论、概念、综述文献)	合计
同时研究突破性创造力与渐进性创造力	只研究突破性创造力	只研究渐进性创造力	不区分突破性创造力和渐进性创造力	非实证文献(例如理论、概念、综述文献)	合计
42	16	1	12	8	79

文献类型	变量与两种创造力关系	作者及发表年份	变量名称	变量类型
直接检验突破性与渐进性创造力和第三方变量回归系数的差异显著性	与突破性创造力回归系数为负, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为正	Gilson et al., (2012)	支持性监督^*	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	Waheed & Dastgeer (2019)	主动型人格^*	前因
		Liu et al., (a) (2021)	创造性偏差投入^*	前因
		Mao et al.,(2021)	员工自恋^*	前因
		Mao et al.,(2021)	创造力自我效能感^*	前因
		Petrou et al.,(2023)	员工经验开放性^*	前因
	仅和突破性创造力之间存在显著关系	Gilson & Madjar (2011)	内部动机	前因
			抽象理论相关创意^*	前因
			问题驱动创造力	前因
		Madjar et al.,(2011)	职业承诺	前因
			创造力资源^*	前因
			冒险意愿^*	前因
		Gilson et al.,(2012)	内部动机^*	前因
		Jaussi & Randel (2014)	创造力自我效能感^*	前因
		Jaussi & Randel (2014)	外部扫描	前因
		Tolkamp et al.,(2022)	问题构建	前因
	仅和渐进性创造力之间存在显著关系	Gilson & Madjar (2011)	外部动机	前因
			具体实践相关创意	前因
			方案驱动创造力	前因
		Madjar et al.,(2011)	组织认同^*	前因
			创造性同事存在^*	前因
			循规蹈矩	前因
	与突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的关系没有差异	Jaussi & Randel (2014)	内部扫描	前因
通过比较回归系数的大小、方向和显著性暗示突破性和渐进性创造力的差异	与突破性创造力回归系数为正, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为负	Chang et al., (2023)	科学−工程研究	调节
	与突破性创造力回归系数为负, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为正	郭婧等(2017)	创造力绩效激励^*	前因
			陡峭型奖励结构^*	前因
			扁平型奖励结构^*	前因
		Halinski et al.,(2023)	管理者员工绩效评价^*	后果
		Halinski et al.,(2023)	裁员生存选择	后果
	仅和突破性创造力之间存在显著关系	Bledow et al., (2022)	工作自主性	调节
		Bledow et al., (2022)	自我决定感	调节
		Sung et al.,(2020)	反馈寻求宽度	前因
		杜旌等(2018)	中庸价值取向	前因
		马君(2016)	精熟成就动机氛围^*	前因
		Qu et al.,(2023)	职业承诺^*	前因
	仅和渐进性创造力之间存在显著关系	Boekhorst et al., (2021)	参与有趣活动	前因
		Boekhorst et al., (2021)	工作场所友谊	前因
		Sung et al.,(2020)	反馈寻求频率^*	前因
		Wang, Bu, & Cai,(2021)	核心自我评价	前因
		马君(2016)	表现成就动机氛围^*	前因
		Qu et al.,(2023)	组织认同^*	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	冯明和胡宇飞(2021)	挑战性压力源	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	冯明和胡宇飞(2021)	阻碍性压力源	前因

文献类型	变量与两种创造力关系	作者及发表年份	变量名称	变量类型
直接检验突破性与渐进性创造力和第三方变量回归系数的差异显著性	与突破性创造力回归系数为负, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为正	Gilson et al., (2012)	支持性监督^*	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	Waheed & Dastgeer (2019)	主动型人格^*	前因
		Liu et al., (a) (2021)	创造性偏差投入^*	前因
		Mao et al.,(2021)	员工自恋^*	前因
		Mao et al.,(2021)	创造力自我效能感^*	前因
		Petrou et al.,(2023)	员工经验开放性^*	前因
	仅和突破性创造力之间存在显著关系	Gilson & Madjar (2011)	内部动机	前因
			抽象理论相关创意^*	前因
			问题驱动创造力	前因
		Madjar et al.,(2011)	职业承诺	前因
			创造力资源^*	前因
			冒险意愿^*	前因
		Gilson et al.,(2012)	内部动机^*	前因
		Jaussi & Randel (2014)	创造力自我效能感^*	前因
		Jaussi & Randel (2014)	外部扫描	前因
		Tolkamp et al.,(2022)	问题构建	前因
	仅和渐进性创造力之间存在显著关系	Gilson & Madjar (2011)	外部动机	前因
			具体实践相关创意	前因
			方案驱动创造力	前因
		Madjar et al.,(2011)	组织认同^*	前因
			创造性同事存在^*	前因
			循规蹈矩	前因
	与突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的关系没有差异	Jaussi & Randel (2014)	内部扫描	前因
通过比较回归系数的大小、方向和显著性暗示突破性和渐进性创造力的差异	与突破性创造力回归系数为正, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为负	Chang et al., (2023)	科学−工程研究	调节
	与突破性创造力回归系数为负, 与渐进性创造力回归系数为正	郭婧等(2017)	创造力绩效激励^*	前因
			陡峭型奖励结构^*	前因
			扁平型奖励结构^*	前因
		Halinski et al.,(2023)	管理者员工绩效评价^*	后果
		Halinski et al.,(2023)	裁员生存选择	后果
	仅和突破性创造力之间存在显著关系	Bledow et al., (2022)	工作自主性	调节
		Bledow et al., (2022)	自我决定感	调节
		Sung et al.,(2020)	反馈寻求宽度	前因
		杜旌等(2018)	中庸价值取向	前因
		马君(2016)	精熟成就动机氛围^*	前因
		Qu et al.,(2023)	职业承诺^*	前因
	仅和渐进性创造力之间存在显著关系	Boekhorst et al., (2021)	参与有趣活动	前因
		Boekhorst et al., (2021)	工作场所友谊	前因
		Sung et al.,(2020)	反馈寻求频率^*	前因
		Wang, Bu, & Cai,(2021)	核心自我评价	前因
		马君(2016)	表现成就动机氛围^*	前因
		Qu et al.,(2023)	组织认同^*	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	冯明和胡宇飞(2021)	挑战性压力源	前因
	与突破性创造力的关系强于与渐进性创造力的关系	冯明和胡宇飞(2021)	阻碍性压力源	前因