心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1726-1735.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01726
收稿日期:
2024-04-19
出版日期:
2024-10-15
发布日期:
2024-08-13
通讯作者:
靳菲, E-mail: jinfei0221@126.com基金资助:
CHAI Minquan1, LIU Kexin1, JIN Fei2()
Received:
2024-04-19
Online:
2024-10-15
Published:
2024-08-13
摘要:
消费者的绿色消费行为不仅出于环境关切的目的, 还兼具构建自我身份的功能导向。本文通过梳理绿色消费动机的相关研究, 发现个体通过绿色消费进行自我建构的双重机制: 发挥道德补偿作用, 消弭道德失调状态, 重塑个体的内在道德身份; 充当社会地位、权力、声望和财富的信号表征体系, 彰显个体的外在社会身份。本文进而基于自我建构的理论视角, 提出了绿色消费心理动力机制的整合模型。未来研究可从绿色消费自我建构的路径模式、关系机制、研究领域和对象等方面进行深入探讨。
中图分类号:
柴民权, 刘可欣, 靳菲. (2024). 更道德抑或更社会: 绿色消费的自我建构机制. 心理科学进展 , 32(10), 1726-1735.
CHAI Minquan, LIU Kexin, JIN Fei. (2024). More moral or more social: The self-construction mechanism of green consumption. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(10), 1726-1735.
研究脉络 | 理论框架 | 核心心理变量 | 代表性研究 | 研究总结 |
---|---|---|---|---|
环保动机 | 亲生命假说 | 环保意识 | Schlegelmilch 等, 1996 | 消费者的环境保护意识与绿色消费行为显著正相关 |
环境关心 | Newton 等, | 消费者的环境关心水平可以显著预测环境购买意愿 | ||
道德动机 | 道德调节理论 | 道德意识 | Nordlund & Garvill, | 消费者的环保自我担当水平越高, 越倾向于选择绿色消费 |
道德情绪 | Young 等, | 当消费者产生内疚感等负向道德情绪时, 会通过绿色消费弥补负向道德情绪引起的道德失调的状态 | ||
道德认同 | 王财玉 等, | 道德认同能够提升个体对自我的环保要求, 从而提高个体绿色消费的意愿 | ||
社会动机 | 高成本信号理论 | 地位动机 | Griskevicius 等, | 个体的地位动机越强, 越倾向于在公开场合进行绿色消费 |
权力感 | 姚琦 等, | 高权力感个体拥有更强的自我矫饰的动机, 更想通过绿色消费为自己塑造“既有能力又温暖”的良好社会形象 | ||
孙瑾 等, 2023 | 高权力感个体更加偏好能力型(vs.温暖型)信息的绿色广告 | |||
面子意识 | 李海廷, 孙承文, | 面子意识强的个体更加偏好在公开场合进行绿色消费 |
表1 绿色消费动机研究的路径演进
研究脉络 | 理论框架 | 核心心理变量 | 代表性研究 | 研究总结 |
---|---|---|---|---|
环保动机 | 亲生命假说 | 环保意识 | Schlegelmilch 等, 1996 | 消费者的环境保护意识与绿色消费行为显著正相关 |
环境关心 | Newton 等, | 消费者的环境关心水平可以显著预测环境购买意愿 | ||
道德动机 | 道德调节理论 | 道德意识 | Nordlund & Garvill, | 消费者的环保自我担当水平越高, 越倾向于选择绿色消费 |
道德情绪 | Young 等, | 当消费者产生内疚感等负向道德情绪时, 会通过绿色消费弥补负向道德情绪引起的道德失调的状态 | ||
道德认同 | 王财玉 等, | 道德认同能够提升个体对自我的环保要求, 从而提高个体绿色消费的意愿 | ||
社会动机 | 高成本信号理论 | 地位动机 | Griskevicius 等, | 个体的地位动机越强, 越倾向于在公开场合进行绿色消费 |
权力感 | 姚琦 等, | 高权力感个体拥有更强的自我矫饰的动机, 更想通过绿色消费为自己塑造“既有能力又温暖”的良好社会形象 | ||
孙瑾 等, 2023 | 高权力感个体更加偏好能力型(vs.温暖型)信息的绿色广告 | |||
面子意识 | 李海廷, 孙承文, | 面子意识强的个体更加偏好在公开场合进行绿色消费 |
[1] | 才源源, 杜俏颖, 赵婧彤. (2018). 感恩对绿色消费意愿的影响机制研究——基于环保自我担当的中介和印象管理的调节. 消费经济, 34(2), 79-87. |
[2] | 高歌. (2023). 行为导向的绿色消费政策设计. 社会科学家, (9), 79-84. |
[3] |
龚思羽, 盛光华. (2023). 产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策的双刃剑效应: 形成机理与边界机制. 心理科学进展, 31(9), 1611-1625.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01611 |
[4] | 郭青青, 王良燕, 韩冰. (2020). 社会拥挤对助人行为意愿的影响. 管理科学, 33(3), 97-111. |
[5] | 郭养红, 胥兴安. (2023). 以小拨大: 酒店默认选项助推顾客绿色消费意愿. 旅游学刊, 38(2), 106-119. |
[6] | 李海廷, 孙承文. (2022). 绿色广告诉求与消费者购买意愿关系研究——产品类型和面子意识的调节作用. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 21(2), 81-94+112. |
[7] |
李静, 吴旭瑶, 岳磊, 曾祥丽, 方庆园. (2022). 物质主义对绿色消费的影响: 促进还是抑制?. 心理科学进展, 30(6), 1191-1204.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01191 |
[8] | 刘啸莳, 傅锐, 俞俊杰, 金国敏, 李丹, 彭凯平. (2023). 自我建构的构成特征及其与社会变迁的关系. 心理学探新, 43(6), 530-534. |
[9] | 刘艳. (2011). 自我建构研究的现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 19(3), 427-439. |
[10] | 刘艳, 邹泓. (2007). 自我建构理论的发展与评价. 心理科学, 30(5), 1272-1275. |
[11] | 刘志超, 陈依颖. (2021). 补偿性消费视角下消费者绿色产品偏好机制研究. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 20 (1), 77-86+112. |
[12] | 卢俊婷, 刘畅, 陈畅. (2023). 增强道德意识还是产生道德许可?助人声誉的双刃剑效应研究. 管理评论, 35(10), 228-236. |
[13] | 伦闰琪, 罗其友, 高明杰, 刘洋. (2023). 农产品标识认知、消费习惯对绿色农产品溢价支付意愿的影响——以绿色鲜食马铃薯为例. 中国农业大学学报, 28(5), 229-239. |
[14] | 牟宇鹏, 祁晓燕, 丁志华. (2024). 群体共情视角下的绿色消费行为——自我-他人重叠的调节效应. 管理评论, 36(1), 149-160. |
[15] |
戚海峰, 于辉, 向伟林, 孙韵益, 徐昌皓. (2019). 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一?. 心理科学进展, 27(7), 1307-1319.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01307 |
[16] | 乔时, 姚唐, 王宁, 曹花蕊, 易牧农. (2023). “外察”与“内省”: 环境威胁引发的绿色消费意愿研究——基于道德情绪的双路径模型. 南开管理评论, 27(1), 137-149. |
[17] | 任国英, 汪津, 李锐. (2020). 地位寻求与城镇家庭购买耐用消费品借贷行为的研究. 中央财经大学学报, (7), 79-90. |
[18] | 施卓敏, 张彩云. (2023). 消费者为何会落入绿色消费陷阱——绿色消费对过度消费的影响研究. 南开管理评论, 26(2), 17-26. |
[19] | 孙瑾, 陈晨, 渠文静. (2024). “利益至上”还是“环保先行”? ——金钱与时间资源对绿色消费的影响. 外国经济与管理, 46(2), 53-69. |
[20] | 孙瑾, 苗盼, 杨静舒. (2024). “爱自己”还是“亲社会” ——绿色消费利益诉求对绿色购买意愿的影响. 南开管理评论, 27(2), 83-95. |
[21] | 王财玉. (2020). 绿色消费的许可效应: 绿色让我们更不道德?. 心理科学, 43(1), 144-149. |
[22] |
王财玉, 郑晓旭, 余秋婷, 雷雳. (2019). 绿色消费的困境: 身份建构抑或环境关心?. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1507-1520.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01507 |
[23] | 王建明. (2013). 资源节约意识对资源节约行为的影响——中国文化背景下一个交互效应和调节效应模型. 管理世界, (8), 77-90+100. |
[24] | 王建明, 冯雨. (2023). 绿色消费会传染吗? ——绿色消费的社会扩散效应及其形成机制. 管理评论, 35(7), 185-198. |
[25] |
魏心妮, 喻丰, 彭凯平, 钟年. (2023). 心理丰富提高亲环境行为意愿. 心理学报, 55(8), 1330-1343.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01330 |
[26] | 吴波, 李东进, 王财玉. (2016a). 基于道德认同理论的绿色消费心理机制. 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1829-1843. |
[27] | 吴波, 李东进, 王财玉. (2016b). 绿色还是享乐? 参与环保活动对消费行为的影响. 心理学报, 48(12), 1574-1588. |
[28] |
谢晓非, 王逸璐, 顾思义, 李蔚. (2017). 利他仅仅利他吗? ——进化视角的双路径模型. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1441-1455.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01441 |
[29] | 谢玉洁. (2023). 自我构建理论视角下环保广告诉求对居民绿色消费的影响. 商业经济研究, (5), 100-103. |
[30] |
姚琦, 吴章建, 张常清, 符国群. (2020). 权力感对炫耀性亲社会行为的影响. 心理学报, 52(12), 1421-1435.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01421 |
[31] | 于春玲, 朱晓冬, 王霞, 张一飞. (2019). 面子意识与绿色产品购买意向——使用情境和价格相对水平的调节作用. 管理评论, 31(11), 139-146. |
[32] | 张玥阳, 张雪, 徐伟. (2023). 共情对青少年旁观者保护行为的影响: 道德认同的中介作用和社会自我效能感的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 31(5), 1189-1193. |
[33] | 赵晓煜. (2019). 奢侈品消费中的非炫耀性消费倾向研究. 东北大学学报 (社会科学版), 21(4), 350-359. |
[34] | 郑莹灿, 陈红, 胡媛艳, 胡小勇, 周一舟. (2017). 三重自我建构的神经基础. 心理科学, 40(6), 1464-1470. |
[35] | 周天爽, 潘玥杉, 崔丽娟, 杨莹. (2020). 权力感与助人行为: 社会距离的中介和责任感的调节. 心理科学, 43(5), 1250-1257. |
[36] |
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-41.
doi: 10.1037/a0015406 pmid: 19586244 |
[37] |
Bonini, N., Hadjichristidis, C., & Graffeo, M. (2018). Green nudging. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(8), 814-826.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00814 |
[38] | Buttlar, B., Latz, M., & Walther, E. (2017). Breaking bad: Existential threat decreases pro-environmental behavior. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 153-166. |
[39] |
Chen, X. (2015). Exploring the implications of social change for human development: Perspectives, issues and future directions. International Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 56-59.
doi: 10.1002/ijop.12128 pmid: 25501915 |
[40] | Chen, Y., & Moosmayer, D. (2020). When guilt is not enough: Interdependent self-construal as moderator of the relationship between guilt and ethical consumption in a Confucian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 551-572. |
[41] | Culiberg, B., Cho, H., Koklic, M. K., & Zabkar, V. (2023). From car use reduction to ride-sharing: The relevance of moral and environmental identity. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 22(2), 396-407. |
[42] | Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 139-145. |
[43] | Goenka, S., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2019). Charities can increase the effectiveness of donation appeals by using a morally congruent positive emotion. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 774-790. |
[44] | Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R., & Sandberg, J. (2021). “How do I carry all this now?”: Understanding consumer resistance to sustainability interventions. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 44-61. |
[45] |
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.
doi: 10.1037/a0017346 pmid: 20175620 |
[46] |
Gurven, M., Allen-Arave, W., Hill, K., & Hurtado, M. (2000). It’s a wonderful life: Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(4), 263-282.
pmid: 10899478 |
[47] | Haws, K. L., Bearden, W. O., & Nenkov, G. Y. (2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 695-710. |
[48] | Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through green-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354. |
[49] | Johnson, C. M., Tariq, A., & Baker, T. L. (2018). From Gucci to green bags: Conspicuous consumption as a signal for pro-social behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(4), 339-356. |
[50] | Karmarkar, U. R., & Bollinger, B. (2015). BYOB: How bringing your own shopping bags leads to treating yourself and the environment. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 1-15. |
[51] | Klucarova, S., & He, X. (2022). Status consumption and charitable donations: The power of empowerment. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1116-1128. |
[52] | Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(1), 113-126. |
[53] | Longoni, C., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2014). A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 158-165. |
[54] | Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), 1-24. |
[55] | Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people?. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 21(4), 494-498. |
[56] | Newton, J. D., Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1974-1981. |
[57] | Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756. |
[58] | Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 195-228. |
[59] | Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt- free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104-119. |
[60] | Poon, K.-T., Teng, F., Chow, J. T., & Chen, Z. (2015). Desiring to connect to nature: The effect of ostracism on ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 116-122. |
[61] | Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 178-193. |
[62] | Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2013). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35-55. |
[63] | Schmid, P. C., & Mast, M. (2010). Mood effects on emotion recognition. Motivation and Emotion, 34(3), 288-292. |
[64] | Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 25-36. |
[65] | Shahsavar, T., Kubeš, V., & Baran, D. (2020). Willingness to pay for eco-friendly furniture based on demographic factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 1-11. |
[66] | Sharma, A. P. (2021). Consumers’ purchase behaviour and green marketing: A synthesis, review and agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1217-1238. |
[67] | Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., … Sundie, J. (2013). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179-1185. |
[68] | Stanley, M. L., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2023). Heroization and ironic funneling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 29-56. |
[69] | Trudel, R., Argo, J. J., Meng, M. D. (2016). The recycled self: Consumers’ disposal decisions of identity-linked products, Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 246-264. |
[70] | White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to Shift consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22-49. |
[71] | White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433-447. |
[72] | Wu, B., & Yang, Z. (2018). The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 74-84. |
[73] | Xu, Q., Kwan, C. M. C., & Zhou, X. (2020). Helping yourself before helping others: How sense of control promotes charitable behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 486-505. |
[74] | Yan, L., Keh, H. T., & Chen, J. M. (2021). Assimilating and differentiating: The curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 914-936. |
[75] | Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31. |
[76] | Zhang, X. A., Cao, Q., & Grigoriou, N. (2011). Consciousness of social face: The development and validation of a scale measuring desire to gain face versus fear of losing face. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 129-149. |
[1] | 孙瑾, 陈晨. 资源类型对绿色消费的影响:时间还是金钱更有效?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(1): 39-57. |
[2] | 李静, 吴旭瑶, 岳磊, 曾祥丽, 方庆园. 物质主义对绿色消费的影响:促进还是抑制?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1191-1204. |
[3] | 武丽慧. 自我建构对口碑两极分化产品偏好的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 535-548. |
[4] | 王财玉, 郑晓旭, 余秋婷, 雷雳. 绿色消费的困境:身份建构抑或环境关心?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1507-1520. |
[5] | 戚海峰, 于辉, 向伟林, 孙韵益, 徐昌皓. 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1307-1319. |
[6] | 吴波;李东进;王财玉. 基于道德认同理论的绿色消费心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(12): 1829-1843. |
[7] | 杜伟强;曹花蕊. 基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(5): 775-784. |
[8] | 刘艳. 自我建构研究的现状与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(3): 427-439. |
[9] | 高良;郑雪;严标宾. 幸福感的中西差异:自我建构的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(7): 1041-1045. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||