心理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 1320-1330.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01320
• 研究前沿 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2018-08-12
出版日期:
2019-07-15
发布日期:
2019-05-22
通讯作者:
田启瑞
E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
LIU Xiao-xiao1, TIAN Qirui2(), ZENG Yali1
Received:
2018-08-12
Online:
2019-07-15
Published:
2019-05-22
Contact:
TIAN Qirui
E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn
摘要:
随着人们对健康、环境以及动物保护的关注, 素食主义日渐兴起。国内外对素食的心理学研究仍处于起步阶段。个体选择素食的心理过程涉及认知、情感、动机、认同感等方面, 素食行为受到个体差异、刻板印象、宏观因素的影响。未来研究有待深入探讨社会文化对素食行为的影响、中国文化情境下对素与素食的社会表征、素食的具身认知效应以及素食亚文化的动态形成过程, 以期引导对个体健康与环境有益的饮食模式。
中图分类号:
刘潇肖, 田启瑞, 曾雅丽. (2019). 素食的心理过程及影响因素. 心理科学进展 , 27(7), 1320-1330.
LIU Xiao-xiao, TIAN Qirui, ZENG Yali. (2019). Psychological processes and influences on vegetarianism. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1320-1330.
问卷/来源 | 题项/维度 |
---|---|
1.吃肉的意愿 | 单一题项, 单一维度 |
2.肉食与动物的状态分离( | 测量实验中呈现的肉类食物与动物的分离 |
3.合理化吃肉行为( | 9个维度(共27题):对肉的正向态度、否认、食物链等级、二分法、分离、宗教、避免、健康、命运 |
4.肉类依赖问卷Meat Attachment Questionnaire ( | 4个维度(共16题):享乐主义、亲和力、应享权利、相依性 |
5.肉食道德脱离问卷 Moral Disengagement in Meat Questionnaire ( | 5个维度(共20题):手段-目的、脱敏、否认消极后果、分散责任、减少感知到的选择 |
6.肉食行为( | 按食肉量划分为重度、中度、轻度肉食者 |
7.饮食认同问卷Dietarian Identity Questionnaire ( | 8个维度(共52题):中心性、私人关怀、公众遵循、外群关注、亲社会动机、个人动机、道德动机、严格性 |
8. 对动物的态度量表 Animal Attitude Scale ( | 2个维度(共29题):行动—参与动物福利活动的意向; 伦理—对动物的利用和对待 |
9.人与动物的情绪相似度Human-animal emotions similarity ( | 2个维度(共12题):主要情绪, 次级情绪 |
10. 人与动物的心智能力的相似度Human-animal mental capacity similarity ( | 2个维度(共10题):感受、能动性 |
11. 素食行为及倾向( | 1道题单选题, 非素食者回答3道题, 测量规避肉食的倾向 |
12. 自我报告的饮食行为( | 分为肉食者、弹性素食者、素食者三大类 |
13. 对素食者的态度Attitudes Toward Vegetarians Scale ( | 素食主义者令人讨厌的行为、不同观念、健康与心理特征; 对素食者的适宜对待 |
14.食物在生活中的意义Meaning of Food in Life Questionnaire ( | 5个维度(共24题):道德、神圣、健康、社会、美学 |
15.素食主义倾向Vegetarianism Intentions Scale ( | 共3题:你愿意尝试成为素食者吗?你能否设想自己是一名素食者?你能否设想购买食物时, 素食是你最喜欢的选择? |
表1 研究工具与量表总结
问卷/来源 | 题项/维度 |
---|---|
1.吃肉的意愿 | 单一题项, 单一维度 |
2.肉食与动物的状态分离( | 测量实验中呈现的肉类食物与动物的分离 |
3.合理化吃肉行为( | 9个维度(共27题):对肉的正向态度、否认、食物链等级、二分法、分离、宗教、避免、健康、命运 |
4.肉类依赖问卷Meat Attachment Questionnaire ( | 4个维度(共16题):享乐主义、亲和力、应享权利、相依性 |
5.肉食道德脱离问卷 Moral Disengagement in Meat Questionnaire ( | 5个维度(共20题):手段-目的、脱敏、否认消极后果、分散责任、减少感知到的选择 |
6.肉食行为( | 按食肉量划分为重度、中度、轻度肉食者 |
7.饮食认同问卷Dietarian Identity Questionnaire ( | 8个维度(共52题):中心性、私人关怀、公众遵循、外群关注、亲社会动机、个人动机、道德动机、严格性 |
8. 对动物的态度量表 Animal Attitude Scale ( | 2个维度(共29题):行动—参与动物福利活动的意向; 伦理—对动物的利用和对待 |
9.人与动物的情绪相似度Human-animal emotions similarity ( | 2个维度(共12题):主要情绪, 次级情绪 |
10. 人与动物的心智能力的相似度Human-animal mental capacity similarity ( | 2个维度(共10题):感受、能动性 |
11. 素食行为及倾向( | 1道题单选题, 非素食者回答3道题, 测量规避肉食的倾向 |
12. 自我报告的饮食行为( | 分为肉食者、弹性素食者、素食者三大类 |
13. 对素食者的态度Attitudes Toward Vegetarians Scale ( | 素食主义者令人讨厌的行为、不同观念、健康与心理特征; 对素食者的适宜对待 |
14.食物在生活中的意义Meaning of Food in Life Questionnaire ( | 5个维度(共24题):道德、神圣、健康、社会、美学 |
15.素食主义倾向Vegetarianism Intentions Scale ( | 共3题:你愿意尝试成为素食者吗?你能否设想自己是一名素食者?你能否设想购买食物时, 素食是你最喜欢的选择? |
[1] | 福克斯, M.-A. , (2015). 深层素食主义 (王瑞香译). 北京: 电子工业出版社. |
[2] | 刘欣 . (2003). 阶级惯习与品味: 布迪厄的阶级理论. 社会学研究, 6, 33-42. |
[3] | 卢俊, 陈浩, 乐国安 . (2017). 松-紧文化:跨文化心理学研究的新维度. 心理科学进展, 25(5), 887-902. |
[4] | 鲁永超, 潘东潮 (主编). (2014). 我行我素: 中国素食研究. 武汉:武汉大学出版社. |
[5] | 毛绚霞, 沈秀华, 唐文静, 赵烨, 吴凡, 朱珍妮, … 蔡威 . (2015). 上海素食人群构成及素食者健康和饮食行为调查. 卫生研究, 44(2), 237-241. |
[6] |
Agarwal U., Mishra S., Xu J., Levin S., Gonzales J., & Barnard N. D . (2015). A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a nutrition intervention program in a multiethnic adult population in the corporate setting reduces depression and anxiety and improves quality of life: The GEICO study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 29(4), 245-254.
doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130218-QUAN-72 URL |
[7] | Arbit N., Ruby M., & Rozin P . (2017). Development and validation of the meaning of food in life questionnaire (MFLQ): Evidence for a new construct to explain eating behavior. Food Quality and Preference, 59, 35-45. |
[8] | Arora A. S., Bradford S., Arora A., & Gavino R . (2017). Promoting vegetarianism through moralization and knowledge calibration. Journal of Promotion Management, 23(6), 889-912. |
[9] | Bacon L., & Krpan D. , (2018). (Not) Eating for the environment: The impact of restaurant menu design on vegetarian food choice. Appetite, 125, 190-200. |
[10] |
Bastian B., & Loughnan S. , (2017). Resolving the meat-paradox: A motivational account of morally troublesome behavior and its maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 278-299.
doi: 10.1177/1088868316647562 URL |
[11] |
Bastian B., Loughnan S., Haslam N., & Radke H. R. M ., (2012). Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247-256.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211424291 URL |
[12] | Beardsworth A., & Keil T. , (1992). The vegetarian option: Varieties, conversions, motives and careers. The Sociological Review, 40(2), 253-293. |
[13] |
Beezhold B. L., Johnston C. S., & Daigle D. R . (2010). Vegetarian diets are associated with healthy mood states. A cross-sectional study in seventh day adventist adults. Nutrition Journal, 9, 1-7.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-1 URL |
[14] |
Bilewicz M., Imhoff R., & Drogosz M . (2011). The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 201-209.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.v41.2 URL |
[15] | Bilewicz M., Michalak J., & Kamińska O. K . (2016). Facing the edible. The effects of edibility information on the neural encoding of animal faces. Appetite, 105, 542-548. |
[16] | Billig M., Condor S., Edwards D., Gane M., Middle-ton D., & Radley A . (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage Publications. |
[17] | Blidaru L., & Opre A. , (2015). The moralization of eating behavior. Gendered cognitive and behavioral strategies. In M. Anitei, M. Chraif, & C. Vasile (Eds.), International Conference Psiworld 2014 - 5th Edition, Vol. 187, pp. 547-552. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. |
[18] | Bohm I., Lindblom C., Åbacka G., Bengs C., & Hörnell A . (2015). "He just has to like ham" - The centrality of meat in home and consumer studies. Appetite, 95, 101-112. |
[19] | Bratanova B., Loughnan S., & Bastian B . (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(2), 193-196. |
[20] | Byerly H., Balmford A., Ferraro P. J., Wagner C. H., Palchak E., Polasky S., … Fisher B . (2018). Nudging pro-environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 159-168. |
[21] |
Campbell-Arvai V, Arvai J, & Kalof L . (2014). Motivating sustainable food choices: The role of nudges, value orientation, and information provision. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 453-75.
doi: 10.1177/0013916512469099 URL |
[22] | Chin M., Fisak B. Jr., & Sims V. K . (2002). Development of the attitudes toward vegetarians scale. Anthrozoös, 15(4), 332-342. |
[23] |
de Backer, C. J. S., & Hudders L., (2014). From meatless Mondays to meatless Sundays: Motivations for meat reduction among vegetarians and semi-vegetarians who mildly or significantly reduce their meat intake. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 53(6), 639-657.
doi: 10.1080/03670244.2014.896797 URL |
[24] |
de Backer C. J. S, & Hudders L. , (2015). Meat morals: Relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior. Meat Science, 99, 68-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.011 URL |
[25] |
de Boer J., & Aiking H. , (2011). On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1259-1265.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.001 URL |
[26] | de Boer J., & Aiking H. , (2018). Prospects for pro-environmental protein consumption in Europe: Cultural, culinary, economic and psychological factors. Appetite, 121, 29-40. |
[27] |
de Boer J., Schösler H., & Aiking H . (2017). Towards a reduced meat diet: Mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters. Appetite, 113, 387-397.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.007 URL |
[28] | de Jonge J., van der Lans I. A., & van Trijp H. C ., (2015). Different shades of grey: Compromise products to encourage animal friendly consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 87-99. |
[29] | Dhont K., & Hodson G. , (2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12-17. |
[30] | Diaz E. M . (2016). Animal humanness, animal use, and intention to become ethical vegetarian or ethical vegan. Anthrozoös, 29(2), 263-282. |
[31] | Dwyer J. T., Kandel R. F., Mayer L. D., & Mayer J . (1974). The ‘‘new’’ vegetarians. Group affiliation and dietary strictures related to attitudes and life style. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 64(4), 376-382. |
[32] | Fiddes N . (1991). Meat: A natural symbol. London: Routledge. |
[33] | Filippi M., Riccitelli G., Falini A., Salle F. D., Vuilleumier P., Comi G., & Rocca M. A . (2010). The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. Plos One, 5(5), e10847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010847. |
[34] | Filippi M., Riccitelli G., Meani A., Falini A., Comi G., & Rocca M. A . (2013). The “vegetarian brain”: Chatting with monkeys and pigs? Brain Structure and Function, 218(5), 1211-1227. |
[35] | Forestell C. A., Spaeth A. M., & Kane S. A . (2012). To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite, 58(1), 319-325. |
[36] | Fox N., & Ward K. , (2008). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50(2-3), 422-429. |
[37] | Graca J., Calheiros M. M., & Oliveira A . (2015). Attached to meat? (Un)willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite, 95, 113-125. |
[38] | Graca J., Calheiros M. M., & Oliveira A . (2016). Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 353-364. |
[39] | Hamilton M . (2006). Eating death: Vegetarians, meat, and violence. Food, Culture & Society, 9(2), 155-177. |
[40] | Hayley A., Zinkiewicz L., & Hardiman K . (2015). Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption: Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians. Appetite, 84, 98-106. |
[41] | Herzog H. A., Betchart N. S., & Pittman R. B . (1991). Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoös, 4(3), 184-191. |
[42] | Herzog H. A., & Golden L. L . (2009). Moral emotions and social activism: The case of animal rights. Journal of Social Issues, 65(3), 485-498. |
[43] | Hodson G., & Earle M. , (2018). Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support). Appetite, 120, 75-81. |
[44] | Hoffman S. R., Stallings S. F., Bessinger R. C., & Brooks G. T . (2013). Differences between health and ethical vegetarians. Strength of conviction, nutrition knowledge, dietary restriction, and duration of adherence. Appetite, 65, 139-144. |
[45] | Jabs J., Devine C. M., & Sobal J . (1998). Model of the process of adopting vegetarian diets: Health vegetarians and ethical vegetarians. Journal of Nutrition Education, 30(4), 196-202. |
[46] | Jackson L. M., & Gibbings A. , (2016). Social dominance and legitimizing myths about animal use. Anthrozoös, 29(1), 151-160. |
[47] | Keller C., & Siegrist M. , (2015). Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects. Appetite, 84, 128-138. |
[48] | Kellman S. G . (2000). Fish, flesh, and foul: The anti-vegetarian animus. The American Scholar, 69(4), 85-96. |
[49] | Kessler C. S., Holler S., Joy S., Dhruva A., Michalsen A., Dobos G., & Cramer H . (2016). Personality profiles, values and empathy: Differences between lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans. Complementary Medicine Research, 23(2), 95-102. |
[50] | Kildal C. L., & Syse K. L . (2017). Meat and masculinity in the Norwegian Armed Forces. Appetite, 112, 69-77. |
[51] | Kunst J. R., & Hohle S. M . (2016). Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite, 105, 758-774. |
[52] | Loughnan S., Haslam N., & Bastian B . (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55(1), 156-159. |
[53] | Loy L. S., Wieber F., Gollwitzer P. M., & Oettingen G . (2016). Supporting sustainable food consumption: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) aligns intentions and behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 607. |
[54] | MacInnis C. C., & Hodson G. , (2017). It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 721-744. |
[55] | Minson J. A., & Monin B. , (2012). Do-Gooder derogation: Disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 200-207. |
[56] | Pollan M. , (2006). The omnivore's dilemma A natural history of four meals. Pollan Michael, Penguin Press, New York. Preventive Medicine, 47(4), 456-458. |
[57] | Radnitz C., Beezhold B., & DiMatteo B . (2015). Investigation of lifestyle choices of individuals following a vegan diet for health and ethical reasons. Appetite, 90, 31-36. |
[58] | Rosenfeld D. L., & Burrow A. L . (2017). The unified model of vegetarian identity: A conceptual framework for understanding plant-based food choices. Appetite, 112, 78-95. |
[59] | Rosenfeld D. L . (2018). The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. Appetite, 131, 125-138. |
[60] |
Rosenfeld D. L., & Burrow A. L . (2018). Development and validation of the Dietarian Identity Questionnaire: Assessing self-perceptions of animal-product consumption. Appetite, 127, 182-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.003 URL |
[61] | Rothgerber H . (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 363-375. |
[62] | Rothgerber H .(2014a). Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite, 79, 32-41. |
[63] | Rothgerber H .(2014b). A comparison of attitudes toward meat and animals among strict and semi-vegetarians. Appetite, 72, 98-105. |
[64] | Rothgerber H., & Mican F. , (2014). Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoidance. The mediating role of empathy toward animals. Appetite, 79, 11-17. |
[65] | Rozin P., & Fallon A. E . (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94(1), 23-41. |
[66] | Rozin P., Hormes J. M., Faith M. S., & Wansink B . (2012). Is meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 629-643. |
[67] | Rozin P., Markwith M., & Stoess C . (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8(2), 67-73. |
[68] |
Ruby M. B . (2012). Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58(1), 141-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019 URL |
[69] | Ruby M. B., Alvarenga M. S., Rozin P., Kirby T. A., Richer E., & Rutsztein G . (2016). Attitudes toward beef and vegetarians in Argentina, Brazil, France, and the USA. Appetite, 96, 546-554. |
[70] | Ruby M. B., & Heine S. J . (2011). Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite, 56(2), 447-450. |
[71] | Ruby M. B., & Heine S. J . (2012). Too close to home: Factors predicting meat avoidance. Appetite, 59(1), 47-52. |
[72] | Ruby M. B., Heine S. J., Kamble S., Cheng T. K., & Waddar M . (2013). Compassion and contamination: Cultural differences in vegetarianism. Appetite, 71, 340-348. |
[73] | Stockburger J., Renner B., Weike A., Hamm A., & Schupp H . (2009). Vegetarianism and food perception: Selective visual attention to meat pictures. Appetite, 52(2), 513-516. |
[74] | Tian Q., Hilton D., & Becker M . (2016). Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: Reactions among Chinese and French participants. Appetite, 96, 187-194. |
[75] | Twigg J . (1979). Food for thought: Purity and vegetarianism. Religion, 9(1), 13-35. |
[76] | Wilson M. S., Weatherall A., & Butler C . (2004). A rhetorical approach to discussions about health and vegetarianism. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 567-581. |
[77] | Zickfeld J. H., Kunst J. R., & Hohle S. M . (2018). Too sweet to eat: Exploring the effects of cuteness on meat consumption. Appetite, 120, 181-195. |
[1] | 杨盈, 朱慧珺, 周婉, 张明杨, 谢怡萍, 包寒吴霜, 苏展, 王潇欧, 敬一鸣, 杨紫嫣, 蔡华俭. 行为免疫系统理论及其研究:新视野下的再考察[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1865-1879. |
[2] | 陈庆伟, 汝涛涛, 罗雪, 董巧玲, 翟迪国, 熊晓, 周国富. 电子媒体使用对睡眠的影响,机制及其干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 70-82. |
[3] | 曹 奔, 夏勉, 任志洪, 林秀彬, 徐升, 赖丽足, 王 琪, 江光荣. 大数据时代心理学文本分析技术 ——“主题模型”的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 770-780. |
[4] | 崔丽霞;雷雳;蔺雯雯;郑日昌. 网络心理咨询的疗效与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(2): 350-357. |
[5] | 高文斌;陈祉妍. 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(4): 596-603. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||