员工绿色行为的影响因素及其理论解释

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01297

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

员工绿色行为决定了组织环保成效, 是促进组织可持续发展的关键。员工绿色行为是指员工实施的一系列旨在减少对环境造成负面影响、有助于环境可持续的行为。首先, 介绍了员工绿色行为的概念、结构; 其次, 基于自我决定理论、情感事件理论、计划行为理论、社会认知理论和社会学习理论解释了员工绿色行为影响因素; 最后, 提出未来研究可以从概念界定、研究层次、研究视角(均衡视角、动态视角)三大方面做进一步拓展。

关键词: 绿色行为, 可持续发展, 绿色管理

Abstract:

Employees’ green behavior directly affects the effectiveness of the environmental protection of organizations, and is the key to promote the sustainable development of the organizations. Employees’ green behavior refers to a series of behaviors implemented by employees that aim at reducing the negative effect on the environment and contributing to environmental sustainability. First, provides an overview of the concept and structure of employees’ green behavior. Second, drawing on self-determination theory, affective events theory, planning behavior theory, social cognitive theory and social learning theory, explains antecedents of employees’ green behavior. Finally, demonstrates that future research can pay attention to the three major aspects of concept definition, research level, research perspective (balanced perspective, dynamic perspective) to further research.

Key words: green behavior, sustainable development, environmental management

中图分类号:

B849:C93

彭坚, 侯楠, 庞宇. (2019). 员工绿色行为的影响因素及其理论解释. 心理科学进展 , 27(7), 1297-1306.

PENG Jian, HOU Nan, PANG Yu. (2019). Employees’ green behavior: Summarizing the concept and the theoretical explanation. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1297-1306.

图/表 5

参考文献 51

[1]	王乾宇, 彭坚 . (2018). CEO绿色变革型领导与企业绿色行为: 环境责任文化和环保激情气氛的作用. 中国人力资源开发, 35(1), 83-93.
[2]	邢璐, 林钰莹, 何欣露, 彭坚 . (2017). 理性与感性的较量: 责任型领导影响下属绿色行为的双路径探讨. 中国人力资源开发, (1), 31-40.
[3]	杨莹, 寇彧 . (2015). 亲社会互动中的幸福感: 自主性的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1226-1235.
[4]	张佳良, 袁艺玮, 刘军 . (2018). 伦理型领导对员工环保公民行为的影响. 中国人力资源开发, 35(2), 19-29.
[5]	周金帆, 张光磊 . (2018). 绿色人力资源管理实践对员工绿色行为的影响机制研究——基于自我决定理论的视角. 中国人力资源开发, 35(7), 20-30.
[6]	Afsar B., Badir Y., & Kiani U. S . (2016). Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011 URL
[7]	Ajzen I . (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T URL
[8]	Bandura A . (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 URL
[9]	Bandura A . (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[10]	Bakker A. B., Hakanen J. J., Demerouti E., & Xanthopoulou D . (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274 URL
[11]	Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., & Tice D. M . (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 URL
[12]	Bissing-Olson M. J., Iyer A., Fielding K. S., & Zacher H . (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro- environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156-175. doi: 10.1002/job.1788 URL
[13]	Bolger N., & Laurenceau J. P. ,(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research New York: Guilford Press An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.
[14]	Chen Y S., Chang C H., & Lin Y. H . (2014). Green Transformational leadership and green performance: The mediation effects of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Sustainability, 6(10), 6604-6621. doi: 10.3390/su6106604 URL
[15]	Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R, & Prescott S . (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6(3), 281-294. doi: 10.1007/BF02138940 URL
[16]	Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M . (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 URL
[17]	Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M . (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 URL
[18]	D’Mello S., Ones D. S., Klein R. M., Wiernik B. M., & Dilchert S . (2011). Green company rankings and reporting of pre-environmental efforts in organizations. In Poster session presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
[19]	Dumont J., Shen J., & Deng X . (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613-627. doi: 10.1002/hrm.2017.56.issue-4 URL
[20]	Eisenberg N., Fabes R. A., & Spinrad T. L . (1998). Prosocial development. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development. New York, NY: Wiley.
[21]	Frese M., Fay D., Hilburger T., Leng K., & Tag A . (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161. doi: 10.1111/joop.1997.70.issue-2 URL
[22]	Frese M., & Fay D. , (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6 URL
[23]	Frese M., Kring W., Soose A., & Zempel J . (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-63.
[24]	Gist M. E., & Mitchell T. R . (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. doi: 10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 URL
[25]	Graves L. M., Sarkis J., & Zhu Q. H . (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002 URL
[26]	Greaves M., Zibarras L. D., & Stride C . (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34(34), 109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003 URL
[27]	Hines J. M., Hungerford H. R., & Tomera A. N . (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
[28]	Inoue Y., & Alfaro-Barrantes P. , (2015). Pro-environmental behavior in the workplace: A review of empirical studies and directions for future research. Business and Society Review, 120(1), 137-160. doi: 10.1111/basr.2015.120.issue-1 URL
[29]	Kim A., Kim Y., Han K., Jackson S. E., & Ployhart R. E . (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358.
[30]	Kim S. H., Kim M., Han H. S., & Holland S . (2016). The determinants of hospitality employees’ pro-environmental behaviors: The moderating role of generational differences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 52, 56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.013 URL
[31]	Lanaj K., Johnson R. E., & Wang M . (2016). When lending a hand depletes the will: The daily costs and benefits of helping. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1097-1110. doi: 10.1037/apl0000118 URL
[32]	Mayer D. M., Aquino K., Greenbaum R. L., & Kuenzi M . (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151-171 doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.0276 URL
[33]	Mcdonald F. V . (2014). Developing an integrated conceptual framework of pro-environmental behavior in the workplace through synthesis of the current literature. Administrative Sciences, 4(3), 276-303. doi: 10.3390/admsci4030276 URL
[34]	Norton T. A., Parker S. L., Zacher H., & Ashkanasy N. M . (2016). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125.
[35]	Norton T. A., Zacher H., Parker S. L., & Ashkanasy N. M . (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996-1015. doi: 10.1002/job.v38.7 URL
[36]	Ones D. S., & Dilchert S. , (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444-466.
[37]	Osbaldiston R., & Schott J. P . (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment & Behavior, 44(2), 257-299.
[38]	Paillé P., Boiral O., & Chen Y . (2013). Linking environmental management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: A social exchange perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(18), 3552-3575. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.777934 URL
[39]	Paillé P., & Raineri N. , (2016). Trust in the context of psychological contract breach: Implications for environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.003 URL
[40]	Paillé P., Mejía-Morelos J. H., Marché-Paillé A., Chen C. C., & Chen Y . (2016). Corporate greening, exchange process among co-workers, and ethics of care: An empirical study on the determinants of pro-environmental behaviors at coworkers-level. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 655-673. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2537-0 URL
[41]	Robertson J. L . (2018). The nature, measurement and nomological network of environmentally specific transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 961-975. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3569-4
[42]	Robertson J. L., & Barling J. , (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176-194. doi: 10.1002/job.1820 URL
[43]	Robertson J. L., & Carleton E. , (2017). Uncovering how and when environmental leadership affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2) 197-210.
[44]	Russell S. V., & Ashkanasy N. M . (2010). Getting to the Heart of Climate Change: Three studies of the effectiveness of emotionally framed messages to encourage workplace proenvironmental behavior. Paper presented at 24th annual Australian and New Zealand academy of management conference: Managing for unknowable futures.
[45]	Shamir. B., House R. J., & Arthur M. B . (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self- concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4(4), 577-594. doi: 10.1287/orsc.4.4.577 URL
[46]	Stern P. C. (1997). Toward a working definition of consumption for environmental research and policy. In P. C. Stern, T. Dietz, V. R. Ruttan, R. H. Socolow, & J. L. Sweeney (Eds.). Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions (pp. 12-35). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[47]	Stern P. C . (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175 URL
[48]	Unsworth K. L., Dmitrieva A., & Adriasola E . (2013). Changing behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 211-229. doi: 10.1002/job.1837 URL
[49]	Weiss H. M., & Cropanzano R.. ,(1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp.1-74). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
[50]	Williams L. J., & Anderson S. E . (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
[51]	Xing Y. J., & Starik M. , (2017). Taoist leadership and employee green behavior: A cultural and philosophical micro foundation of sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(9), 1302-1319. doi: 10.1002/job.v38.9 URL

代表学者(年份)	绿色行为英文概念	绿色行为中文释义	概念内涵
Ones等(2012)	employee green behavior	员工绿色行为	员工实施的有助于环境可持续性的行为
Paillé, Boiral和Chen (2013)	pro-environmental behavior among their employees	员工环保行为	员工采取的能够补充正式绿色管理计划, 并提高绿色措施效率的行为
Graves等(2013)	employee pro-environmental behavior	员工环保行为	员工表现出的有益于环境的行为
Norton, Parker, Zacher和Ashkanasy (2016)	employee green behavior	员工环保行为	特定于组织中有利于环境的行为
Kim等(2017)	voluntary workplace green behavior	自愿型工作场所绿色行为	员工自愿展现的一系列保护生态环境的行为, 目的是降低员工活动对自然环境的负面影响

代表学者(年份)	绿色行为英文概念	绿色行为中文释义	概念内涵
Ones等(2012)	employee green behavior	员工绿色行为	员工实施的有助于环境可持续性的行为
Paillé, Boiral和Chen (2013)	pro-environmental behavior among their employees	员工环保行为	员工采取的能够补充正式绿色管理计划, 并提高绿色措施效率的行为
Graves等(2013)	employee pro-environmental behavior	员工环保行为	员工表现出的有益于环境的行为
Norton, Parker, Zacher和Ashkanasy (2016)	employee green behavior	员工环保行为	特定于组织中有利于环境的行为
Kim等(2017)	voluntary workplace green behavior	自愿型工作场所绿色行为	员工自愿展现的一系列保护生态环境的行为, 目的是降低员工活动对自然环境的负面影响

类别	结构	测量主体	题数	Cronbach’s α
第一类派别
Robertson和Barling (2013)	单维	研究生自愿者	7	0.86
Graves等(2013)	单维	员工	13	0.91
Kim等(2017)	单维	韩国和美国企业员工	6	0.81
Norton等(2017)	单维	员工	5	0.89
第二类派别
Bissing-Olson等(2013)	任务型绿色行为	员工	3	0.97和0.83
Bissing-Olson等(2013)	主动型绿色行为		3	0.97和0.83
Dumont等(2017)	角色内绿色行为	员工	3	0.86和0.85
Dumont等(2017)	角色外绿色行为		3	0.86和0.85

类别	结构	测量主体	题数	Cronbach’s α
第一类派别
Robertson和Barling (2013)	单维	研究生自愿者	7	0.86
Graves等(2013)	单维	员工	13	0.91
Kim等(2017)	单维	韩国和美国企业员工	6	0.81
Norton等(2017)	单维	员工	5	0.89
第二类派别
Bissing-Olson等(2013)	任务型绿色行为	员工	3	0.97和0.83
Bissing-Olson等(2013)	主动型绿色行为		3	0.97和0.83
Dumont等(2017)	角色内绿色行为	员工	3	0.86和0.85
Dumont等(2017)	角色外绿色行为		3	0.86和0.85

研究者(年份)	个体因素	研究者(年份)	情境因素
Kim等(2017)	责任心(+)	Robertson和Barling (2013)	领导绿色行为(+)
Russell和Ashkanasy (2010)	积极情绪(+)消极情绪(-)	Robertson和Carleton (2017)	变革型绿色领导行为(+) 责任型领导(+)
Bissing-Olson等(2013)	未激活情绪(+)已激活情绪(ns)	Afsar等(2016)	精神型领导
Paillé等(2016a, 2016b)	组织支持感(+)工作满意度(+)	Xing和Starik (2017)	道家领导(+)
邢璐等(2017)	利益相关者价值观(+)	邢璐等(2017)	责任型领导(+)
Kim, Kim, Han和Holland (2016)	绿色自我效能(+)	张佳良、袁艺玮和刘军(2018)	道德型领导(+)
Afsar, Badir和Kiani (2016)	内在动机(+)	Robertson等(2017)	组织绿色政策(+)
Kim等(2016)	自主动机(+)外部动机(+)	Dumont等(2017)	组织绿色程序(+) 组织绿色实践(+) 同事绿色工作氛围(+)
Norton等(2017)	绿色行为意图(+)	Robertson等(2017) 周金帆和张光磊(2018)	绿色人力资源管理实践(+)