ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 542-552.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00542

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国情境下团队伦理决策的过程机制及影响因素

杨建锋1; 明晓东2,3   

  1. (1江西财经大学工商管理学院, 南昌 330013) (2中国科学院行为科学重点实验室 (中国科学院心理研究所), 北京 100101) (3中国科学院大学, 北京 100049)
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21 出版日期:2017-04-15 发布日期:2017-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 明晓东, E-mail: jxmingxiaodong@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(71562017)。

The process and antecedents of team ethical decision-making: A study in Chinese context

YANG Jianfeng1; MING Xiaodong2,3   

  1. (1 School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China) (2 CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101) (3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049)
  • Received:2016-06-21 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2017-04-15
  • Contact: MING Xiaodong, E-mail: jxmingxiaodong@163.com

摘要:

尽管绝大多数商业伦理决策都是由团队而非个人所做出的, 但目前对团队伦理决策的研究还很少, 尤其缺乏基于理论的深入研究。在前人研究的基础上, 借鉴个体伦理决策和团队决策方面的研究成果, 结合中国文化强调反省、中庸、威权领导等特点, 我们对团队伦理决策的过程机制及影响因素的作用模式展开理论驱动的深入研究。具体来讲, 将综合利用多种方法来进行两个方面的4项子研究。在团队伦理决策的过程机制方面, 拟开展团队伦理决策的过程机制模型构建研究, 然后聚焦于团队伦理决策和个体伦理决策的核心区别, 展开基于社会决策图式理论的团队伦理决策观点整合机制研究; 在团队伦理决策的影响因素作用模式方面, 拟从成员和领导两个方面来进行:基于信息加工和团队冲突的成员多样性对团队伦理决策的影响机制研究, 基于信息取样模型的领导特征对团队伦理决策的影响机制研究。

关键词: 团队伦理决策, 社会决策图式, 团队多样性, 信息取样模型, 伦理领导

Abstract:

Although most business ethical decisions are made by teams rather than individuals, only a few studies have focused on team ethical decision making, which remain on comparing the results of individual and team ethical decision-making directly without much aid of theories. Based on studies of individual ethical decision-making, group decision-making, and Chinese cultural characteristics (reflection, zhongyong, authoritarian leadership, et al.), we intend to explore the mechanism of team ethical decision making process and the effect pattern of its antecedents. Specifically, it will include four sub-studies in two aspects via multiple methods. First, a process mechanism model is developed to look at the mechanism of team ethical decision-making process. Second, based on social decision scheme theory, an opinion integration mechanism is set up to integrate the opinions out of team ethical decision-making when focusing on the core differences between team and individual ethical decision-making. The other two are about member and leadership with regard to the effect pattern of antecedents: to study the mechanism of how member diversity influences team ethical decision-making via information processing and team conflict; to study the mechanism of how leadership features affects team ethical decision-making by information sampling model.

Key words: team ethical decision-making, social decision scheme, team diversity, information sampling model, ethical leadership