ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8): 1473-1481.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01473

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

决策评估中的结果偏差

相鹏;徐富明;郭永玉;李海军;孔诗晓;孟贞贞   

  1. (青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室暨华中师范大学心理学院, 湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉 430079)
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-08 出版日期:2013-08-15 发布日期:2013-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 徐富明
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目“不同社会阶层分配不公平感的归因模式及应对策略” (项目批准号:71171094)资助。

Outcome Bias in Decision Evaluation

XIANG Peng;XU Fuming;GUO Yongyu;LI Haijun;KONG Shixiao;MENG Zhenzhen   

  1. (Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, and Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Received:2013-01-08 Online:2013-08-15 Published:2013-08-15
  • Contact: XU Fuming

摘要: 结果偏差又称结果效应, 它是发生在决策评估中的一种偏差式判断, 即当决策结果与决策质量不存在实质性联系时, 评估者仍根据结果信息评估决策质量。针对这一判断谬误的产生根源, 研究者们提出了认知解释和申辩模型。结果偏差的影响因素主要包括动机、情境因素和评估手段等。基于先前研究存在的问题和不足, 今后的研究应着眼于改进研究手段, 理清与其他现象的关系并提出有效的应对策略。

关键词: 结果偏差, 结果效应, 申辩模型

Abstract: Outcome bias occurs when an evaluator base his evaluation for decision quality on the outcome of decision rather than on the appropriateness of decision. That is, when an outcome is good (bad), evaluator tends to evaluate the decision positively (negatively) regardless of the actual appropriateness of the decision resulting in that outcome. As for now, researchers have provided two main underlying causes for outcome bias, cognitive explanations and justification model. Evidences show outcome bias could be influenced by some factors, such as motive, context information, and evaluation measure. Instead of laboratory experiments, further researches are expected to be operated in real settings. In addition, further researches should explore how to effectively mitigate outcome bias and make a distinction with other biases in behavioral decision making.

Key words: outcome bias, outcome effect, justification model