ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2004, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 312-319.

• • 上一篇    

社会建构主义心理学：“反实在论”还是“实在论”？

杨莉萍   

  1. 南京师范大学教育科学学院心理系, 南京 210097
  • 收稿日期:2003-06-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-03-15 发布日期:2004-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨莉萍

Social Constructionist Psychology: ‘Anti-realism’ or ‘Realism’?

Yang Liping   

  1. School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University,210097
  • Received:2003-06-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-03-15 Published:2004-03-15
  • Contact: Yang Liping

PDF (PC)

3059

摘要： “反实在论”与“实在论”之争是当前有关社会建构主义心理学争论的核心。批判者指责社会建构主义心理学是“反实在论”，社会建构主义者则竭力澄清自己的“实在论”立场。该文认为：社会建构主义是一个芜杂的思想体系，任何一种简单的结论都难免失之武断，妨碍对它进一步的认识和理解；把握社会建构主义关键在于对“现实”的理解，社会建构主义的“现实”是统一了主客体的生活的现实，它对主客关系的超越对现代心理学具有重要的方法论意义；对于实在论者，了解实在论特有的问题和局限性，有助于更加理性地认识和参与这场争论。

关键词: 社会建构主义心理学, 实在论, 反实在论。

Abstract: Now ‘anti-realism and realism’ debate has been the core of contentions about social constructionism Psychology. The opponents condemned social constructionism for its anti-realism, and in the meantime many social constructionists tried to clarify their realist position. We insist that : (1) In respect that social constructionism is an inconstant system, none of the straightforward judgment can abstain from arbitrary decision, and they will only prevent us from appreciating social constructionism ultimately. (2) To realize social constructionism, we need a profound understanding of ‘reality’. Social constructionism treat ‘reality’ as ‘the reality in our beliefs’ or ‘the reality in representation’. This identification may help us to keep away from the simplification in critique. (3) As a realist, knowing the limitation of realism will make us reflect on and participate in the debate more rationally.

Key words: social constructionism, anti-realism, realism.

中图分类号: