ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1862-1875.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1862 cstr: 32111.14.2026.1862

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

刻板印象的计算认知机制:社会学习与泛化

王滢洁1, 张洳源2,3,4   

  1. 1国家精神疾病医学中心脑健康研究院, 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心; 上海交通大学心理学院, 上海 200030;
    2北京大学心理与认知科学学院;
    3IDG麦戈文脑科学研究所;
    4机器感知与智能教育部重点实验室, 北京大学, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-04 出版日期:2026-10-15 发布日期:2026-07-20
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金专项项目(32441102)、上海市教委“人工智能促进科研范式改革赋能学科跃升计划”项目(2024AIZD014)的资助

Computational cognitive mechanism of stereotype: Social learning and generalization

WANG Ying-Jie1, ZHANG Ru-Yuan2,3,4   

  1. 1Brain Health Institute, National Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai 200030, China;
    2School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijng Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    3IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    4Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2026-01-04 Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-07-20

摘要: 刻板印象是人们对社会群体所持有的概括性信念, 深刻影响人际互动与群体关系。然而传统理论多停留在描述层面, 缺乏对刻板印象从习得到应用的整合性计算机制解释。本文结合强化学习与贝叶斯理论, 围绕社会学习与社会泛化两个环节梳理刻板印象的计算认知机制。在社会学习层面, 阐述贝叶斯结构学习如何推断潜在群体结构, 区分经验通路与语言通路两条群体-特质联结建立路径, 并从预测误差、先验偏差与探索-利用困境三方面解析联结的更新与固化。在社会泛化层面, 分析基于知觉与功能线索的群体归类及联结知识检索机制。未来研究可从拓展泛化线索、整合多线索表征与计算模拟语言传播过程等方向推进。

关键词: 刻板印象, 社会泛化, 强化学习, 贝叶斯理论, 计算建模

Abstract: Stereotypes—generalized beliefs that members of a social group tend to possess certain traits—are central to human social cognition. Traditional accounts have attributed stereotyping to motivational needs or cognitive resource constraints. However, these perspectives remain largely descriptive, and offer limited insight into the computational mechanisms governing how stereotypes are acquired, updated, and applied. Adopting a computational cognitive neuroscience perspective, this review integrates two dominant formal frameworks, reinforcement learning (RL) and Bayesian theory, to provide a unified, process-oriented account of stereotype formation and generalization.
With respect to social learning, we first examine how Bayesian structure learning enables the brain to infer latent group categories from observable social data, estimating the posterior probability of group assignments. Building on this, we delineate two functionally distinct pathways through which group-trait associations are established. The experiential pathway encompasses Pavlovian conditioning, instrumental learning, and observational learning. These operate primarily through RL mechanisms—particularly value updating, formalized as V(group) ← V(group) + αδ—to form associative representations. These automatic links between group labels and affective valence that influence behavior without requiring propositional evaluation. The linguistic pathway, by contrast, supports the acquisition and transmission of propositional representations (truth-apt beliefs, e.g., “group G possesses trait T”) through symbolic communication. The Bayesian framework provides a natural computational account for this type of representation, formalizing stereotypic beliefs as conditional probabilities, P(trait | group), that are updated in accordance with Bayes’ rule. Recent empirical evidence confirms that human stereotype judgments closely approximate Bayesian posteriors, and methodological advances further enable the direct quantification of propositional stereotype content in natural language corpora.
We further analyze how these associations are maintained or revised. Prediction error (PE) constitutes the core learning signal driving stereotype updating: counter-stereotypical information generates heightened PE, accelerating the revision of existing associations. However, pre-existing stereotypes resist updating through biased priors and asymmetric learning rates; individuals tend to learn more rapidly from evidence that confirms their stereotypic expectations than from disconfirming evidence. We identify the explore-exploit dilemma as a critical convergence point of the two frameworks: Bayesian priors shape RL-based exploration strategies, producing biased information sampling that in turn reinforces existing beliefs, creating a self-perpetuating cycle. This computational mechanism offers a principled explanation for why stereotypes resistant to change, even in the absence of motivational bias or cognitive limitations.
At the level of social generalization, we focus on the computational challenge of group identification: how the brain categorizes a novel individual into a known group to deploy learned associations. We distinguish two routes of similarity-based matching. Perceptual generalization operates on directly observable physical features in early visual processing, whereas functional generalization relies on abstract role and category information mediated by latent variable inference. The dynamic interaction between bottom-up perceptual signals and top-down conceptual knowledge, coordinated by the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), means that group identification is not a serial process but a continuous integration of multiple cue types. Once group membership is established, both associative and propositional pathways are engaged during retrieval, with the former enabling rapid, resource-efficient behavioral responses and the latter supporting more deliberate trait inference.
Finally, we identify three promising directions for future research: (1) investigating how relational cues, such an individual’s position within a social network, contribute to stereotype generalization beyond feature-based similarity; (2) leveraging the social cognitive map framework, supported by recent evidence of distance and grid-like coding in the hippocampal-entorhinal system, to model the integrated representation of multi-dimensional social information; and (3) employing large language models (LLMs) to simulate linguistic transmission, in order to examine how minor initial biases become amplified and consolidated into shared cultural stereotypes through iterative communication.

Key words: stereotype, social generalization, reinforcement learning, Bayesian theory, computational modeling

中图分类号: