ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1468-1488.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1468 cstr: 32111.14.2026.1468

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    

经济不平等对地位焦虑的影响及其社会心理机制

赵亚飞1†, 张跃2†, 张冀琦2, 郭永玉2   

  1. 1三江学院学生发展与服务中心, 南京 210012;
    2南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-27 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 作者简介:†赵亚飞和张跃为本文共同第一作者。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72571147)、国家社会科学基金青年项目(23CSH049)、教育部人文社科青年项目(22YJC190028)资助

The impact of economic inequality on status anxiety and its socio-psychological mechanisms

ZHAO Yafei1, ZHANG Yue2, ZHANG Robert Jiqi2, GUO Yongyu2   

  1. 1Student Development and Service Center, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China;
    2School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
  • Received:2024-01-27 Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-06-03

摘要: 在经济不平等的影响下, 地位焦虑愈发成为一种弥漫性的社会心态。本文首先基于地位焦虑的认知(即横向社会比较与纵向时间比较)与动机(即趋近与回避)过程, 重构其概念框架, 厘清4种典型的焦虑类型。在此基础上, 构建出经济不平等影响地位焦虑的双路径模型:经济不平等既通过微观层面的异化机制, 也通过宏观层面的公正失效, 系统性地激活地位焦虑。还探讨了社会经济地位、经济发展阶段、优绩主义信念、媒介环境等因素对该模型的影响。最后, 在总结理论贡献与研究局限的基础上提出研究展望与治理方向, 以期为缓解地位焦虑、助推社会心态培育提供治理启示。

关键词: 地位焦虑, 经济不平等, 横向社会比较, 纵向时间比较, 趋近-回避动机

Abstract: Against the backdrop of persistently rising economic inequality, status anxiety has emerged as a pervasive societal mentality with profound implications for individual well-being and social cohesion. Thstudy develops a systematic theoretical framework to investigate how economic inequality systematically generates and shapes status anxiety within the context of China’s distinctive social structure. By shifting the analytical focus beyond the Western-centric preoccupation with “middle-class anxiety”, this inquiry extends to encompass all social strata, with particular attention to the vast lower-middle and disadvantaged groups.
The study begins by reconceptualizing status anxiety through a two-dimensional, four-quadrant typology. While existing research has largely confined status anxiety to interpersonal horizontal comparisons, this framework introduces a vertical temporal comparison dimension—comparison with one’s expected self—and integrates both horizontal-vertical cognitive comparisons with approach-avoidance motivational processes. This typology distinguishes four distinct types of status anxiety along a gradient of intensity.
In the first quadrant, individuals perceive themselves as superior to others horizontally and meet their self-expectations vertically. Satisfied on both dimensions, they experience minimal, nearly non-existent status anxiety. In the second quadrant, individuals meet vertical self-expectations but face horizontal disadvantage. While vertical satisfaction buffers some stress, the threat of falling behind relative to others triggers moderate-to-high anxiety dominated by horizontal deprivation. In the third quadrant, individuals suffer from both horizontal disadvantage and vertical disappointment. This “double deprivation”—failing to match others or one’s own expectations—creates a dual predicament that generates the highest level of status anxiety. In the fourth quadrant, individuals are horizontally advantaged yet fall short of their vertical self-expectations. Despite social success, the frustration of not becoming their “ideal self” leads to moderate-to-high anxiety dominated by vertical deprivation. Collectively, this typology extends classical theories such as social identity theory and relative deprivation theory by incorporating temporal comparison and motivational dynamics into the analysis, offering a more nuanced analytical lens for understanding the complexity and gradation of status anxiety.
The analysis then turns to the mechanisms through which economic inequality shapes status anxiety, proposing an integrated micro-macro dual-path framework that links structural pressures with individual psychological and behavioral responses. At the micro level, economic inequality fosters materialistic values, induces overwork, and reinforces zero-sum beliefs—maladaptive reactions that directly catalyze status anxiety. Materialism sets unattainable goals, overwork depletes physical and mental resources, and zero-sum beliefs frame social relations as sources of perpetual threat. At the macro level, economic inequality erodes perceived social justice by undermining the sense of opportunity equity, diminishing belief in social mobility, and shaping attributions of wealth and poverty—for instance, by leading individuals to attribute success to family background rather than personal effort. Through these intertwined pathways, economic inequality systematically erodes the perceived legitimacy of the social system and generates pervasive anxiety at its source.
Central to the analysis is a grounding in the reality of China’s unique social structure. In contrast to the relatively mature “olive-shaped” societies characteristic of Western developed countries, China exhibits a distinctive structural profile—often conceptualized as a “Tu-shaped” (resembling the Chinese character “土”) configuration—marked by a vast and vulnerable lower-middle stratum coexisting with a relatively small upper stratum. This structural reality suggests that status anxiety is not exclusive to the middle class but rather permeates all social strata, with its manifestations and generative mechanisms varying significantly by structural position. By foregrounding this context, the framework offers a theoretical complement to the study of inequality-induced mentalities in non-Western settings shaped by specific structural constraints. The study further considers how several key factors—including individuals’ socioeconomic status, prevailing meritocracy beliefs, and the contemporary media environment—may moderate the proposed relationships.
Taken together, this study provides a new theoretical lens for understanding the profound linkages between economic inequality and individual psychological states. The paper concludes by discussing theoretical contributions, acknowledging research limitations, and outlining future directions and governance implications aimed at mitigating status anxiety and fostering a healthier, more resilient societal mentality.

Key words: status anxiety, economic inequality, social comparison, temporal comparison, approach-avoidance motivation

中图分类号: