心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1676-1687.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01676
收稿日期:
2022-12-22
出版日期:
2023-09-15
发布日期:
2023-05-31
通讯作者:
张清芳
E-mail:qingfang.zhang@ruc.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2022-12-22
Online:
2023-09-15
Published:
2023-05-31
Contact:
ZHANG Qingfang
E-mail:qingfang.zhang@ruc.edu.cn
摘要:
在口语词汇产生过程中, 音节频率效应(syllable frequency effect)指的是高频音节相对于低频音节的加工优势。综述了言语产生过程中音节频率效应的表现形式和理论基础, 从影响因素、发生阶段和神经机制等角度阐述了印欧语系和汉语中音节频率效应的跨语言差异。基于口语产生的理论模型和合适单元假说, 结合不同语言的固有特性, 分析了音节频率效应存在跨语言差异的原因, 提出了一个有关汉语口语词汇产生中音节作用机制的模型, 为音节在汉语和字母语言口语产生过程中的作用提供了新的视角。未来应进一步探究音节频率的两种测量方式对音节频率效应产生影响的具体机制, 加强对汉语口语词汇产生中音节频率效应的考察, 利用多种实验技术和范式深入探讨言语产生过程中音节加工的跨语言差异。
中图分类号:
潘家冰, 张清芳. (2023). 言语产生中音节频率效应的认知机制:跨语言视角. 心理科学进展 , 31(9), 1676-1687.
PAN Jiabing, ZHANG Qingfang. (2023). The cognitive mechanism of syllable frequency effects in speech production: A cross-language perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(9), 1676-1687.
[1] |
端木三. (2021). 英汉音节分析及数量对比. 语言科学, 20(6), 561-588.
doi: 10.7509/j.linsci.202102.033530 |
[2] | 蒋宇宸. (2021). 音节累计词频和邻近项个数影响汉语口语词汇产生过程的认知机制 (硕士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[3] |
蒋宇宸, 蔡笑, 张清芳. (2020). θ频段( 4-8 Hz) 的活动反映了汉语口语产生中音节信息的加工. 心理学报, 52(10), 1199-1211.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01199 |
[4] | 欧阳明昆. (2020). 汉语词汇产生过程中语义和语音提取年老化的认知神经机制 (博士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[5] |
屈青青, 刘维琳, 李兴珊. (2018). 汉语言语产生的语音加工单元——基于音位的研究. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1535-1544.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01535 |
[6] | 史有为. (2019). 带调音节: 解释汉语的一个出发点. 华东师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 51(3), 1-17. |
[7] | 杨群. (2017). 汉语口语词汇产生中词汇通达过程的认知年老化机制 (博士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[8] | 杨群, 张清芳. (2015). 口语产生中词频效应、音节频率效应和语音促进效应的认知年老化. 心理科学, 38(6), 1303-1310. |
[9] | 岳源, 张清芳. (2015). 汉语口语产生中音节和音段的促进和抑制效应. 心理学报, 47(3), 319-328. |
[10] | 张清芳. (2005). 音节在语言产生中的作用. 心理科学进展, 13(6), 752-759. |
[11] |
张清芳, 王雪娇. (2020). 汉语口语词汇产生的音韵编码单元: 内隐启动范式的ERP研究. 心理学报, 52(4), 414-425.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00414 |
[12] | 张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2005). 汉语单音节词汇产生中音韵编码的单元. 心理科学, 28(2), 374-378. |
[13] |
朱晓农. (2019). 声调发生的五项前提. 语言科学, 18(6), 561-580.
doi: 10.7509/j.linsci.201705.030672 |
[14] |
Alario, F. X., Perre, L., Castel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102(3), 464-475.
pmid: 16545792 |
[15] | Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27( 2), 545-555. |
[16] |
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 233-252.
doi: 10.1080/14640748408402157 URL |
[17] |
Bürki, A. (2018). Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1973-2004.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1423-4 |
[18] |
Bürki, A., Cheneval, P. P., & Laganaro, M. (2015). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? ERP comparison of high frequency and novel syllable production. Brain and Language, 150, 90-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.006 pmid: 26367062 |
[19] | Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), Article e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 |
[20] | Cai, X., Yin, Y. L., & Zhang, Q. F. (2020). The roles of syllables and phonemes during phonological encoding in Chinese spoken word production: A topographic ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 140, Article 107382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107382 |
[21] |
Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 766-780.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1038 URL |
[22] |
Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., & Price, C. J. (2006). Effect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud. Human Brain Mapping, 27(12), 963-972.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20236 pmid: 16628608 |
[23] |
Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 393-400.
pmid: 15172555 |
[24] |
Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751-781.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2825 URL |
[25] | Chen, J.-Y., O’ Seaghdha, P. G., & Chen, T.-M. (2016). The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42( 5), 825-836. |
[26] |
Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2011). Effect of syllabic neighbourhood as a function of syllabic neighbour length. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 951-957.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0138-1 URL |
[27] |
Cholin, J. (2008). The mental syllabary in speech production: An integration of different approaches and domains. Aphasiology, 22(11), 1127-1141.
doi: 10.1080/02687030701820352 URL |
[28] | Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable- frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37( 1), 109-122. |
[29] |
Cholin, J., & Levelt, W. J. (2009). Effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency in speech production: Further evidence for syllabic units at a post-lexical level. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 662-684.
doi: 10.1080/01690960802348852 URL |
[30] |
Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99(2), 205-235.
pmid: 15939415 |
[31] | Clark, J., & Yallop, C. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. |
[32] |
Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 296-326.
doi: 10.1080/01690960701571570 URL |
[33] |
Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 974-983.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193470 URL |
[34] |
Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369-390.
doi: 10.1080/01690960344000224 URL |
[35] |
Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 339-345.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193854 URL |
[36] | Croot, K., Lalas, G., Biedermann, B., Rastle, K., Jones, K., & Cholin, J. (2017). Syllable frequency effects in immediate but not delayed syllable naming in English. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1119-1132. |
[37] |
Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 119-132.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00008-1 URL |
[38] |
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 195-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001 URL |
[39] | den Hollander, J., Jonkers, R., Mariën, P., & Bastiaanse, R. (2019). Identifying the speech production stages in early and late adulthood by using electroencephalography. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00298 |
[40] |
Farrell, M. T., & Abrams, L. (2014). Picture-word interference reveals inhibitory effects of syllable frequency on lexical selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 525-541.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.820763 URL |
[41] | Feng, C., Yue, Y., & Zhang, Q. F. (2019). Syllables are retrieved before segments in the spoken production of Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Study. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 11773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48033-3 |
[42] |
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(5), 708-723.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0037 URL |
[43] |
Hagoort, P., Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Herzog, H., Steinmetz, H., & Seitz, R. J. (1999). The neural circuitry involved in the reading of German words and pseudowords: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(4), 383-398.
pmid: 10471847 |
[44] |
Hutzler, F., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain and Language, 92(2), 138-152.
pmid: 15629488 |
[45] | Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 |
[46] |
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 pmid: 15037128 |
[47] | Jacobs, C. L., & Dell, G. S. (2014). ‘Hotdog’, not ‘Hot’ ‘dog’: The phonological planning of compound words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29( 4), 512-523. |
[48] |
Kwon, Y. (2014). The syllable type and token frequency effect in naming task. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25(2), 91-107.
doi: 10.19066/cogsci URL |
[49] | Laganaro, M. (2019). Phonetic encoding in utterance production: A review of open issues from 1989 to 2018. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1193-1201. |
[50] |
Laganaro, M., & Alario, F. X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178-196.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.001 URL |
[51] |
Laganaro, M., Python, G., & Toepel, U. (2013). Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: Evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls. Brain and Language, 126(2), 123-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.004 pmid: 23707932 |
[52] | Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Timing in speech production with special reference to word form encoding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 283-295. |
[53] |
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776 pmid: 11301520 |
[54] |
Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50(1-3), 239-269.
pmid: 8039363 |
[55] |
Macizo, P., & Van Petten, C. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295-331.
doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z URL |
[56] |
Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69-89.
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8 URL |
[57] |
Miguel-Abella, R. S., Pérez-Sánchez, M. Á., Cuetos, F., Marín, J., & González-Nosti, M. (2022). SpaVerb-WN—A megastudy of naming times for 4562 Spanish verbs: Effects of psycholinguistic and motor content variables. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2640-2664.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01734-y |
[58] |
Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Defior, S. A., & Simpson, I. C. (2019). RAN and orthographic processing: What can syllable frequency tell us about this relationship?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 182, 1-17.
doi: S0022-0965(18)30435-1 pmid: 30779968 |
[59] |
O’ Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J. Y., & Chen, T. M., (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115(2), 282-302.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001 pmid: 20149354 |
[60] |
Papoutsi, M., de Zwart, J. A., Jansma, J. M., Pickering, M. J., Bednar, J. A., & Horwitz, B. (2009). From phonemes to articulatory codes: An fMRI study of the role of Broca's area in speech production. Cerebral Cortex, 19(9), 2156-2165.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn239 URL |
[61] |
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134-144.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134 URL |
[62] | Perret, C., Schneider, L., Dayer, G., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Convergences and divergences between neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic data in the study of phonological and phonetic encoding: A parallel investigation of syllable frequency effects in brain-damaged and healthy speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29( 6), 714-727. |
[63] | Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound- sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14265-14270. |
[64] | Qu, Q. Q., Feng, C., Hou, F. Y., & Damian, M. F. (2020). Syllables and phonemes as planning units in Mandarin Chinese spoken word production: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 146, Article 107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107559 |
[65] |
Roelofs, A. (2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 22-37.
doi: 10.1111/jpr.12050 URL |
[66] |
Schiller, N. O. (2008). The masked onset priming effect in picture naming. Cognition, 106(2), 952-962.
pmid: 17442296 |
[67] |
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 pmid: 2798649 |
[68] |
Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Processing of syllables in production and recognition tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(1), 65-78.
pmid: 17260187 |
[69] |
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 URL |
[70] |
Tremblay, P., Deschamps, I., Bédard, P., Tessier, M. H., Carrier, M., & Thibeault, M. (2018). Aging of speech production, from articulatory accuracy to motor timing. Psychology and Aging, 33(7), 1022-1034.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000306 pmid: 30335443 |
[71] |
Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech?. Aphasiology, 15(1), 39-49.
doi: 10.1080/02687040042000115 URL |
[72] |
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325-329.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00064 URL |
[73] |
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374-408.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2618 URL |
[74] |
Wang, J., Wong, W. K., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C. (2017). Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5815-5822.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06186-z pmid: 28724982 |
[75] |
Whiteside, S. P., & Varley, R. A. (1998). A reconceptualisation of apraxia of speech: A synthesis of evidence. Cortex, 34(2), 221-231.
pmid: 9606587 |
[76] | You, W. P., Zhang, Q. F., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PLoS ONE, 7(10), Article e46595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046595 |
[77] | Yu, M. X., Mo, C., & Mo, L. (2014). The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS ONE, 9(9), Article e106486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106486 |
[78] | Zhang, Q. F., & Damian, M. F. (2019). Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. Psychophysiology, 56(4), Article e13317. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13317 |
[79] | Zhang, Q. F., & Wang, C. (2014). Syllable frequency and word frequency effects in spoken and written word production in a non-alphabetic script. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00120 |
[1] | 韩海宾, 许萍萍, 屈青青, 程茜, 李兴珊. 语言加工过程中的视听跨通道整合[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 475-489. |
[2] | 伍丽梅;伍国华;陈卓铭. 双语者言语产生中语码切换代价 ——从孤立词汇到句子语境[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(1): 37-48. |
[3] | 方杰;李小健. 复合词在言语产生的词汇通达中的表征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1116-1123. |
[4] | 方杰;李小健. 言语产生的同音词表征:模型争论与再思[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(5): 909-916. |
[5] | 李利;莫雷;王瑞明;潘敬儿. 双语言语产生中的词汇提取机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(5): 648-653. |
[6] | 杨锦陈,杨玉芳. 言语产生中的韵律生成[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(4): 481-488. |
[7] | 张清芳,杨玉芳. 言语产生中的词汇通达理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(1): 6-11. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||