心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1160-1171.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01160
收稿日期:
2022-12-19
出版日期:
2023-07-15
发布日期:
2023-04-23
通讯作者:
李宏汀
E-mail:lihongting@zjut.edu.cn
基金资助:
SUN Zaoyi, XU Weijing, XU Liang, LI Hongting()
Received:
2022-12-19
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-04-23
Contact:
LI Hongting
E-mail:lihongting@zjut.edu.cn
摘要:
合理且充分利用用户数据是互联网经济重要组成部分。数据采集不可避免会涉及用户隐私, 需要获得用户授权, 这就是用户隐私披露。目前对于隐私披露的相关研究缺乏基于客观和群体层面的视角, 而且在隐私授权的决策机制上也不清晰。本项目以调节定向理论为基础, 在个体和群体两个层次上, 将结合行为实验、眼动测量和数据挖掘方法系统探究调节定向和调节匹配对隐私披露不同阶段的影响机制。研究成果将有助于理解隐私授权过程中调节定向的作用机制, 也将在隐私授权的助推设计中发挥潜在的应用价值。
中图分类号:
孙造诣, 许苇婧, 徐亮, 李宏汀. (2023). 调节定向对App用户隐私披露的影响. 心理科学进展 , 31(7), 1160-1171.
SUN Zaoyi, XU Weijing, XU Liang, LI Hongting. (2023). The impact of regulatory focus on App users’ privacy disclosure. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(7), 1160-1171.
[1] | 陈嘉欣, 何贵兵. (2015). 环境结果时间折扣的测量: 匹配法和滴定法的比较. 应用心理学, 21(1), 12-20. |
[2] |
李晓明, 谭谱. (2018). 框架效应的应用研究及其应用技巧. 心理科学进展, 26(12), 2230-2237.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02230 |
[3] |
聂春艳, 汪涛, 赵鹏, 崔楠. (2018). 解释框架对文化混搭产品评价的影响——比较焦点和解释策略的调节效应. 心理学报, 50(12), 1438-1448.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01438 |
[4] | 潘定, 谢菡. (2020). 授权时间和信息框架的匹配效应对隐私披露意愿的影响. 外国经济与管理, 42(11), 81-93. |
[5] | 邱均平, 李艳红. (2012). 社交网络中用户隐私安全问题探究. 情报资料工作, (6), 34-38. |
[6] | 沈旺, 高雪倩, 代旺, 杨博全. (2020). 基于解释水平理论与调节定向理论的社交网络隐私悖论研究. 情报科学, 38(8), 12-127. |
[7] | 寿志钢, 郑伟华. (2017). 基于不确定性的促销策略研究: 理论综述与最新进展. 外国经济与管理, 39(3), 90-98. |
[8] | 舒聪. (2018). 成人依恋与社交网络自我表露的关系 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆. |
[9] | 孙淑兰, 黄翼彪. (2012). 用户产生内容(UGC)模式探究. 图书馆学研究, (13), 33-35. |
[10] |
吴茜, 姚乐野. (2022). 互联网用户隐私披露行为影响因素研究. 现代情报, 42(6), 121-131.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2022.06.012 |
[11] |
杨巧英, 柳武妹, 张东. (2021). 小标签, 大作用: 营销领域中的食品标签效应. 心理科学进展, 29(9), 1669-1683.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01669 |
[12] | 姚琦, 乐国安. (2009). 动机理论的新发展: 调节定向理论. 心理科学进展, 17(6), 1264-1273. |
[13] |
尹非凡, 王詠. (2013). 消费行为领域中的调节定向. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 347-357.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00347 |
[14] | 喻丰, 彭凯平, 郑先隽. (2015). 大数据背景下的心理学: 中国心理学的学科体系重构及特征. 科学通报, 60(5-6), 520-533. |
[15] |
赵宁, 刘鑫, 李纾, 郑蕊. (2022). 默认选项设置的助推效果: 来自元分析的证据. 心理科学进展, 30(6), 1230-1241.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01230 |
[16] | 周俊, 董晓蕾, 曹珍富. (2019). 推荐系统的隐私保护研究进展. 计算机研究与发展, 56(10), 2033-2048. |
[17] |
周蕾, 李爱梅, 张磊, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2019). 风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较: 以确定效应和即刻效应为例. 心理学报, 51(3), 337-352.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00337 |
[18] | 朱鹏, 李璐, Gary Marchionini.. (2019). 基于调节定向理论的社交网络用户信息分享行为研究. 情报学报, 38(3), 257-265. |
[19] |
Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 15-19.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.15 URL |
[20] | Acquisti, A., Adjerid, I., Balebako, R. H., Brandimarte, L., Cranor, L. F., Komanduri, S.,... Wilson, S. (2017). Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(3), 1-41. |
[21] |
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509-514.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1465 pmid: 25635091 |
[22] |
Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 225-232.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00100-8 URL |
[23] |
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13-28.
doi: 10.2307/25148715 URL |
[24] | Banisar, D., & Davies, S. (1999). Global trends in privacy protection: An international survey of privacy, data protection, and surveillance laws and developments. John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 18(1), 1-11. |
[25] | Banczyk, B., Krämer, N., & Senokozlieva, M. (2008, May). ‘‘The wurst’’ meets ‘‘fatless’’ in MySpace: The relationship between self-esteem, personality, and self- presentation in an online community. Paper Session Presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada. |
[26] |
Belanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017-1041.
doi: 10.2307/41409971 URL |
[27] |
Carpenter, C. J. (2012). A meta-analysis of the functional matching effect based on functional attitude theory. Southern Communication Journal, 77(5), 438-451.
doi: 10.1080/1041794X.2012.699989 URL |
[28] |
Cesario, J., Corker, K. S., & Jelinek, S. (2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 238-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014 URL |
[29] |
Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 444-463.
doi: 10.1111/spco.2008.2.issue-1 URL |
[30] |
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 11-21.
doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01265-0 pmid: 10234222 |
[31] |
Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 285-297.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2049 URL |
[32] | García, C., Ponsoda, V., & Estebaranz, H. (2000). Scanning ads: Effects of involvement and of position of the illustration in printed advertisements. Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 104-109. |
[33] |
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280 pmid: 9414606 |
[34] |
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
pmid: 11280936 |
[35] |
Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 335-354.
doi: 10.1017/S1930297500001182 URL |
[36] | Johnsen, J. A. K., Vambheim, S. M., Wynn, R., & Wangberg, S. C. (2014). Language of motivation and emotion in an internet support group for smoking cessation: Explorative use of automated content analysis to measure regulatory focus. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 7, 19-29. |
[37] |
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
doi: 10.2307/1914185 URL |
[38] |
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
doi: 10.1086/268109 URL |
[39] | Koenig, A. M., Cesario, J., Molden, D. C., Kosloff, S., & Higgins, E. T. (2009). Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1342-1355. |
[40] |
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802-5805.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110 URL |
[41] |
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205 pmid: 14769079 |
[42] |
Lee, Y.-H., Getz, B., & Xiao, M. (2019). Does that sound right? The effects of regulatory fit and nonfit headline frames on motivated information processing. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 336-356.
doi: 10.1080/03637751.2019.1575158 URL |
[43] | Levine, J. M., Alexander, K. M., Wright, A. G., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). Group brainstorming: When regulatory nonfit enhances performance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 257-271. |
[44] | Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2010). Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 62-71. |
[45] |
Liu, H., He, J., Wang, T., Song, W., & Du, X. (2013). Combining user preferences and user opinions for accurate recommendation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(1), 14-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2012.05.002 URL |
[46] |
McDonald, K., Graves, R., Yin, S., Weese, T., & Sinnott- Armstrong, W. (2021). Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 212, 104703.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104703 URL |
[47] |
Moon, S., Bergey, P. K., Bove, L. L., & Robinson, S. (2016). Message framing and individual traits in adopting innovative, sustainable products (ISPs): Evidence from biofuel adoption. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3553-3560.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.029 URL |
[48] |
Moon, Y. (2002). Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 313-325.
doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(16)30083-3 URL |
[49] |
Mosteller, J., & Poddar, A. (2017). To share and protect: Using regulatory focus theory to examine the privacy paradox of consumers' social media engagement and online privacy protection behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39(1), 27-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2017.02.003 URL |
[50] |
Niesta Kayser, D., Graupmann, V., Fryer, J. W., & Frey, D. (2016). Threat to freedom and the detrimental effect of avoidance goal frames: Reactance as a mediating variable. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 632.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00632 pmid: 27242572 |
[51] |
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673-693.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673 pmid: 17592961 |
[52] |
Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research, 11(9), 929-942.
pmid: 5133265 |
[53] |
Pennebaker, J. W., Colder, M., & Sharp, L. K. (1990). Accelerating the coping process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(3), 528-537.
pmid: 2324942 |
[54] | Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. |
[55] | Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 117-146). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. |
[56] |
Poddar, A., Mosteller, J., & Ellen, P. S. (2009). Consumers' rules of engagement in online information exchanges. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 419-448.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01147.x URL |
[57] | Rezgui, A., Bouguettaya, A., & Eltoweissy, M. Y. (2003). Privacy on the Web: Facts, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Security & Privacy, 1(6), 40-49 |
[58] | Rothman, A. J., Desmarais, K. J., & Lenne, R. L. (2020). Moving from research on message framing to principles of message matching: The use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior. Advances in Motivation Science, 7, 43-73. |
[59] |
See, Y. H. M., Petty, R. E., & Evans, L. M. (2009). The impact of perceived message complexity and need for cognition on information processing and attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 880-889.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.006 URL |
[60] |
Self, D. R., & Findley, C. S. (2010). Sensation seekers as a healthcare marketing metasegment. Health Marketing Quarterly, 27(1), 21-47.
doi: 10.1080/07359680903519719 pmid: 20155549 |
[61] |
Shumanov, M., Cooper, H., & Ewing, M. (2022). Using AI predicted personality to enhance advertising effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1590-1609.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2019-0941 URL |
[62] |
Song, Y. W., Lim, H. S., & Oh, J. (2021). “We think you may like this”: An investigation of electronic commerce personalization for privacy‐conscious consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(10), 1723-1740.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v38.10 URL |
[63] |
Teeny, J. D., Siev, J. J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2020). A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 382-414.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v31.2 URL |
[64] |
Updegraff, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(9), 668-679.
doi: 10.1111/spc3.v7.9 URL |
[65] |
Updegraff, J. A., Sherman, D. K., Luyster, F. S., & Mann, T. L. (2007). The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 249-257.
pmid: 18958299 |
[66] | Utz, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), 1-12. |
[67] |
van de Velde, L., Verbeke, W., Popp, M., & van Huylenbroeck, G. (2010). The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5541-5549.
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.053 URL |
[68] |
Vaughn, L. A., O’Rourke, T., Schwartz, S., Malik, J., Petkova, Z., & Trudeau, L. (2006). When two wrongs can make a right: Regulatory nonfit, bias, and correction of judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 654-661.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.004 URL |
[69] |
Vishwanath, A., Xu, W., & Ngoh, Z. (2018). How people protect their privacy on Facebook: A cost‐benefit view. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(5), 700-709.
doi: 10.1002/asi.2018.69.issue-5 URL |
[70] |
Wan, E. W., Hong, J. W., & Sternthal, B. (2009). The effect of regulatory orientation and decision strategy on brand judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 1026-1038.
doi: 10.1086/593949 URL |
[71] |
Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 28-38.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.28 URL |
[72] |
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, L., & Zhou, H. (2019). Impact of perceived uncertainty on public acceptability of congestion charging: An empirical study in China. Sustainability, 11(1). 129
doi: 10.3390/su11010129 URL |
[73] | Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom(p.7). New York: Atheneum. |
[74] | Wijesekera, P., Baokar, A., Hosseini, A., Egelman, S., Wagner, D., & Beznosov, K. (2015). Android permissions remystified:A field study on contextual integrity. In J. Y. Jung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium (pp. 499-514). Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association. |
[75] |
Yaveroglu, I., & Donthu, N. (2008). Advertising repetition and placement issues in on-line environments. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 31-44.
doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367370203 URL |
[76] |
Zlatolas, L. N., Welzer, T., Heričko, M., & Hölbl, M. (2015). Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 158-167.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.012 URL |
[1] | 陈晓, 谢彬, 彭坚, 聂琦. 职场孤独感的形成原因与作用机理:基于调节匹配理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1463-1481. |
[2] | 柳武妹, 肖海谊, 王雪枫. 居住流动性与消费:基于调节定向理论的阐释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2595-2606. |
[3] | 杨巧英, 柳武妹, 张东. 小标签, 大作用: 营销领域中的食品标签效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1669-1683. |
[4] | 田喜洲, 郭小东, 许浩. 工作重塑研究的新动向——基于调节定向的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1367-1378. |
[5] | 李倩, 龚诗阳, 李超凡. 团队文化多样性对团队创新的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539. |
[6] | 毛畅果. 调节焦点理论:组织管理中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 682-690. |
[7] | 苗秀影;迟立忠. 运动行为领域中的调节匹配[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(11): 1811-1818. |
[8] | 尹非凡;王詠. 消费行为领域中的调节定向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2): 347-357. |
[9] | 陈雪玲; 徐富明; 刘腾飞; 蒋多; 张军伟. 控制幻觉的研究方法、形成机制和影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5): 800-809. |
[10] | 姚琦;乐国安. 动机理论的新发展:调节定向理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1264-1273. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||