ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1160-1171.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01160

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

调节定向对App用户隐私披露的影响

孙造诣, 许苇婧, 徐亮, 李宏汀()   

  1. 浙江工业大学教育科学与技术学院应用心理研究所, 杭州 310023
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-19 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-04-23
  • 通讯作者: 李宏汀 E-mail:lihongting@zjut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(32200885);浙江省自然科学基金探索项目(LQ22C090006);浙江工业大学人文社科预研基金项目(SKY-ZX-20210206)

The impact of regulatory focus on App users’ privacy disclosure

SUN Zaoyi, XU Weijing, XU Liang, LI Hongting()   

  1. Institute of Applied Psychology, College of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
  • Received:2022-12-19 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-04-23
  • Contact: LI Hongting E-mail:lihongting@zjut.edu.cn

摘要:

合理且充分利用用户数据是互联网经济重要组成部分。数据采集不可避免会涉及用户隐私, 需要获得用户授权, 这就是用户隐私披露。目前对于隐私披露的相关研究缺乏基于客观和群体层面的视角, 而且在隐私授权的决策机制上也不清晰。本项目以调节定向理论为基础, 在个体和群体两个层次上, 将结合行为实验、眼动测量和数据挖掘方法系统探究调节定向和调节匹配对隐私披露不同阶段的影响机制。研究成果将有助于理解隐私授权过程中调节定向的作用机制, 也将在隐私授权的助推设计中发挥潜在的应用价值。

关键词: 调节定向, 调节匹配, 隐私披露, 信息框架, App用户

Abstract:

The reasonable and full use of user data is an important part of the Internet economy. Data collection is inevitably involved with user privacy information and requires user authorization, which is the procedure of privacy disclosure. Although it is well-documented that users’ regulatory focus type is a robust predictor of privacy disclosure intention, few studies have explored the underlying decision-making mechanism. Group-level studies based on objective data are also limited. In order to further explore the effects of regulatory focus and regulatory fit on app users’ privacy disclosure, this project considers privacy disclosure as a decision-making process. Privacy disclosure decisions largely depend on the tradeoff between costs and benefits, which is affected by the user’s regulatory focus. First of all, Study 1 explores the effects of individual regulatory focus types (promotion versus prevention) on app users’ privacy disclosure decision-making preferences through a situational simulation experiment (Experiment 1). Then, the titration experimental paradigm, which has previously been used in decision-making fields, is adopted in Experiment 2 to quantitatively represent the indifference point in the tradeoff between privacy disclosure’s costs and benefits. After that, it is examined whether users with promotion (versus prevention) regulatory focus have significantly higher (versus lower) indifference points. If so, users with a promotion regulatory focus tend to provide personal data for smaller benefits. Users’ privacy disclosure preferences are also influenced by contextual factors such as the information frame. Different from previous studies that examined personal traits and information features separately, in Study 2, the user’s regulatory focus and information frame (gain versus loss) are combined to find matching effects (regulatory fit). Experiment 3 explores the regulatory fit effects in nudging app users’ privacy disclosure. This experiment also tests whether the user’s perceived uncertainty mediates the relationship between regulatory fit and privacy disclosure preference. According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model, the level of message elaboration influences the persuasion effect. Following a high elaboration process, changed attitudes are more likely to guide behavior and persist over time. Thus, Experiment 4 explores whether users adopt a higher (versus lower) elaboration level for regulatory fit (versus nonfit) privacy authorization information. Specifically, the experiment tests whether the participants who receive strong arguments in the matched (versus mismatched) condition tend to show a stronger privacy disclosure preference as well as lower perceived uncertainty. The above individual-level experiments are advantageous in that they control for variables and causal interpretation; however, there are some deficiencies in the sample size and ecological validity. Accordingly, in Study 3, several participants’ regulatory focus questionnaire scores, as well as their Weibo accounts, are first selected. Then, machine learning classification algorithms are used to train a prediction model of the users’ regulatory focus types based on the data obtained from the questionnaire scores and the corresponding Weibo text contents (Experiment 5). Privacy-related behaviors not only occur in the authorization stage but can also be reflected in daily usage data. Experiment 6 evaluates the explicit and implicit privacy disclosure level by analyzing the user’s microblog profile and original texts. A machine learning association algorithm can be used to finally output the association rules and the frequent item sets of users’ regulatory focus types and of their privacy disclosure level. This project helps explain the mechanism of regulatory focus in the process of privacy authorization from the individual level to the group level. From the perspective of decision-making, it provides an integrated explanation of privacy disclosure from the stages of intention to behavior. In addition, the results are expected to have potential application values in modifying the designs of privacy authorization information.

Key words: regulatory focus, regulatory fit, privacy disclosure, message framing, App user

中图分类号: