[1] |
杜宣宣. (2010). 具有认知诊断功能的计算机化自适应测验的选题策略研究 (硕士学位论文). 江西师范大学, 南昌.
|
[2] |
郭磊, 郑蝉金, 边玉芳, 宋乃庆, 夏凌翔. (2016). 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验中新的选题策略:结合项目区分度指标. 心理学报, 48(7), 903-914.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00903
URL
|
[3] |
刘舒畅, 涂冬波, 蔡艳, 赵洋. (2018). 四种新的基于属性平衡的CD-CAT选题策略开发研究. 心理科学, 41(4), 976-981.
|
[4] |
罗照盛, 喻晓锋, 高椿雷, 李喻骏, 彭亚风, 王睿, 王钰彤. (2015). 基于属性掌握概率的认知诊断计算机化自适应测验选题策略. 心理学报, 47(5), 679-688.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00679
URL
|
[5] |
毛秀珍, 辛涛. (2013). 认知诊断CAT中项目曝光控制方法的比较. 心理学报, 45(6), 694-703.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00694
URL
|
[6] |
孙小坚, 王钰彤, 张世夷, 辛涛. (2019). 认知诊断计算机自适应测验中平衡属性收敛的新方法. 心理科学, 42(5), 1236-1244.
|
[7] |
汪文义, 丁树良, 宋丽红. (2014). 兼顾测验效率和题库使用率的CD-CAT选题策略. 心理科学, 37(1), 212-216.
|
[8] |
余丹, 潘奕娆, 丁树良, 杨庆红. (2011). 计算机化自适应诊断测验新的选题策略. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 35(5), 548-550.
|
[9] |
Cheng, Y. (2009). When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika, 74(4), 619-632.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9123-2
URL
|
[10] |
Cheng, Y. (2010). Improving cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing by balancing attribute coverage: The modified maximum global discrimination index method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(6), 902-913.
doi: 10.1177/0013164410366693
URL
|
[11] |
Cheng, Y. (2007). The dual information method for item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (Master’s thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
|
[12] |
Dai, B. Y., Zhang, M. Q., & Li, G. M. (2016). Exploration of item selection in dual-purpose cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing: Based on the RRUM. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 625-640.
doi: 10.1177/0146621616666008
URL
pmid: 29882535
|
[13] |
de la Torre, J., & Chiu,C. Y. (2016). A General method of empirical Q-Matrix validation. Psychometrika, 81(2), 253-273.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9467-8
URL
pmid: 25943366
|
[14] |
Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(4), 262-277.
doi: 10.1177/0146621604272623
URL
|
[15] |
Henson, R., Roussos, L., Douglas, J., & He, X. (2008). Cognitive diagnostic attribute-level discrimination indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(4), 275-288.
doi: 10.1177/0146621607302478
URL
|
[16] |
Kang, H.-A., Zhang, S., & Chang, H.-H. (2017). Dual- objective item selection criteria in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54(2), 165-183.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.12139
URL
|
[17] |
Kaplan, M., de la Torre, J., & Barrada, J. R. (2015). New item selection methods for cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39(3), 167-188.
doi: 10.1177/0146621614554650
URL
pmid: 29881001
|
[18] |
Kuo, B.-C., Pai, H.-S., & de la Torre, J. (2016). Modified cognitive diagnostic index and modified attribute-level discrimination index for test construction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(5), 315-330.
doi: 10.1177/0146621616638643
URL
pmid: 29881056
|
[19] |
Lin., C.-J., & Chang, H.-H. (2018). Item selection criteria with practical constraints in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(2), 335-357.
doi: 10.1177/0013164418790634
URL
pmid: 30911196
|
[20] |
Liu, H. Y., You, X. F., Wang, W. Y., Ding, S. L., & Chang, H. H. (2013). The development of computerized adaptive testing with cognitive diagnosis for an English achievement test in China. Journal of classification, 30(2), 152-172.
doi: 10.1007/s00357-013-9128-5
URL
|
[21] |
Lin, J. (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1), 145-151.
doi: 10.1109/18.61115
URL
|
[22] |
McGlohen, M., & Chang, H.-H. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 808-821.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.808
URL
|
[23] |
Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. . (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications New York: Guiford Press Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Guiford Press.
|
[24] |
Swanson,L., & Stocking,M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(2), 151-166.
doi: 10.1177/014662169301700205
URL
|
[25] |
Wang, C. (2013). Mutual information item selection method in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing with short test length. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 1017-1035.
doi: 10.1177/0013164413498256
URL
|
[26] |
Wang, C., Chang, H. -H., & Douglas, J. (2012). Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: A weighted item selection approach. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 95-109.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0143-3
URL
|
[27] |
Wang, C., Chang, H.-H., & Huebner, A. (2011). Restrictive stochastic item selection methods in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(3), 255-273.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2011.48.issue-3
URL
|
[28] |
Wang, C., Zheng, C., & Chang, H.-H. (2014). An enhanced approach to combine item response theory with cognitive diagnosis in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(4), 358-380.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.12057
URL
|
[29] |
Xu, X. L., Chang, H. H., & Douglas, J. (2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
|
[30] |
Zheng, C., & Chang, H.-H. (2016). High-efficiency response distribution-based item selection algorithms for short-length cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 608-624.
doi: 10.1177/0146621616665196
URL
pmid: 29881073
|
[31] |
Zheng, C., He, G., & Gao, C. (2018). The information product methods: A unified approach to dual-purpose computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 321-324.
doi: 10.1177/0146621617730392
URL
pmid: 29882539
|