ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (9): 1542-1553.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01542

• 元分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

马基雅维利主义者的工作绩效和职业成功 —— 基于工作场所的元分析

秦峰;许芳   

  • 收稿日期:2012-07-30 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 秦峰

Machiavellians’ Job Performance and Career Success in Workplaces: A Meta-Analysis

QIN Feng;XU Fang   

  1. (1 Business School, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China) (2 Business School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Received:2012-07-30 Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-09-15
  • Contact: QIN Feng

PDF (PC)

4604

摘要： 为了确定马氏人格与工作绩效、马氏人格与职业成功的关系, 并探讨职业类型作为调节变量对马氏人格与工作绩效关系的调节作用, 本文系统性定量梳理了以往相关文献, 对符合纳入标准的45篇文献的元分析发现, 马氏人格与工作绩效不相关(r=0.008); 以职业类型作为调节变量, 营销类职业中马氏人格与工作绩效低度正相关(r=0.104), 管理类职业中马氏人格与工作绩效不相关(r=-0.030)。元分析还发现, 马氏人格与收入低度负相关(r=-0.063), 与职位不相关(r=0.007), 与工作满意低度负相关(r=-0.130)。作为马氏人格在工作场所中应用研究的阶段性总结, 本文为后续研究提供了参照。

Abstract: To determine the relationship between Machiavellianism and job performance or career success, and explore the moderating effect of profession type as moderator variable to the relationship between Machiavellianism and job performance, this paper reviewed the related literatures systematically and quantitatively and carried out a meta-analysis on 45 literatures which meeting the accepted standards. The results indicated: (1)Machiavellianism is uncorrelated with job performance (r=0.008); When types of profession as the moderator variables, Machiavellianism is in low positive correlation with job performance for marketing professions (r=0.104) and in uncorrelation with job performance for general administrative professions (r= -0.030). (2)There is a low negative correlation between Machiavellianism and income (r=-0.063); (3)Machiavellianism is uncorrelated with position (r=0.007); (4)Machiavellianism is in negative correlation with job satisfaction (r=-0.130). As periodic summaries of study on Machiavellianism applied in workplaces, this paper provided the reference for the follow-up studies.

Key words: Machiavellianism, job performance, career success, income, position, job satisfaction, meta-analysis