Dynamic antecedents of changes in abusive supervision: A latent change score model

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0479

Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 479-494.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0479

• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles

Dynamic antecedents of changes in abusive supervision: A latent change score model

WANG Yongyue¹, WANG Jing¹, LIU Jun², JIN Yanghua³()

¹School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
²School of Management/Research Institute of Digital Governance and Management Decision Innovation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
³Zhejiang Financial College, Hangzhou 310018, China

Published:2025-03-25 Online:2025-01-24
Contact: JIN Yanghua E-mail:jinyanghua@163.com
Supported by:
Key Project of National Social Science Fund of China(23AGL022);Key Project of National Social Science Fund of China(22AGL014)

Abstract

WANG Yongyue, WANG Jing, LIU Jun, JIN Yanghua. (2025). Dynamic antecedents of changes in abusive supervision: A latent change score model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(3), 479-494.

Variables	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. Subordinate gender ^a	—	—	—
2. Subordinate age ^b	—	—	0.06	—
3. Subordinate education ^c	2.86	0.67	?0.10	?0.29^***	—
4. Subordinate organizational tenure ^d	3.11	1.10	0.10	0.65^***	?0.21^**	—
5. Subordinate conscientiousness	5.40	0.82	0.15^*	0.08	0.02	0.08	—
6. Leader gender^e	—	—	0.18^**	?0.02	0.00	0.01	0.02	—
7. Leader age^f	—	—	0.04	0.42^***	?0.04	0.37^***	?0.02	?0.03	—
8. Leader education^g	2.92	0.62	?0.01	?0.20^**	0.31^***	?0.27^***	0.09	0.13^*	?0.32^***	—
9. Leader organizational tenure^h	2.40	1.08	0.04	0.39^***	?0.02	0.51^***	0.11	0.03	0.70^***	?0.39^***	—
10. Leader agreeableness	5.17	1.10	0.07	?0.03	0.00	0.04	0.08	?0.07	0.03	?0.05	0.14^*
11. Leader narcissism T1	4.29	1.25	0.11	?0.08	?0.02	?0.03	0.05	?0.09	?0.11	?0.02	?0.03
12. Abusive supervision T1	2.12	1.27	0.02	0.06	0.02	0.01	?0.17^**	0.15^*	0.05	0.04	?0.03
13. Abusive supervision T2	2.54	1.03	0.03	0.05	0.05	0.06	?0.19^**	0.07	0.04	?0.06	?0.06
14. Abusive supervision T3	2.13	1.00	0.06	0.09	0.06	0.08	?0.22^***	0.11	0.18^**	?0.08	0.07
15. Abusive supervision T4	2.51	1.28	?0.06	0.10	0.02	0.09	?0.18^**	0.08	0.04	0.02	?0.03
16. Constructive resistance T2	4.61	0.94	0.07	0.07	0.00	0.00	0.06	?0.06	0.05	0.02	?0.01
17. Constructive resistance T3	4.71	1.08	0.10	?0.03	0.04	?0.08	0.09	?0.05	?0.08	0.07	?0.09
18. Dysfunctional resistance T2	2.40	1.06	?0.03	?0.02	0.03	?0.03	?0.19^**	0.12	?0.03	0.11	?0.07
19. Dysfunctional resistance T3	2.50	1.08	0.08	0.02	?0.08	0.06	?0.19^**	0.10	?0.01	?0.03	?0.05
20. Defensive silence T2	3.50	1.29	0.04	?0.02	0.00	?0.05	?0.15^*	0.05	0.05	?0.02	?0.06
21. Defensive silence T3	3.65	1.28	0.05	0.00	?0.03	0.04	?0.21^**	0.07	0.01	?0.14^*	?0.01
Variables	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
11. Leader narcissism T1	0.07	—
12. Abusive supervision T1	?0.16^**	?0.14^*	—
13. Abusive supervision T2	?0.20^**	0.02	0.54^***	—
14. Abusive supervision T3	?0.13^*	?0.08	0.48^***	0.56^***	—
15. Abusive supervision T4	?0.19^**	?0.07	0.60^***	0.64^***	0.51^***	—
16. Constructive resistance T2	?0.02	0.03	0.16^**	0.10	?0.14^*	?0.07	—
17. Constructive resistance T3	?0.04	0.20^**	0.03	0.14^*	?0.10	?0.14^*	0.59^***	—
18. Dysfunctional resistance T2	?0.41^***	?0.05	0.42^***	0.43^***	0.35^***	0.44^***	?0.05	0.05	—
19. Dysfunctional resistance T3	?0.26^***	0.01	0.43^***	0.42^***	0.36^***	0.44^***	0.03	0.11	0.53^***	—
20. Defensive silence T2	?0.17^**	?0.05	0.39^***	0.27^***	0.40^***	0.26^***	?0.06	?0.06	0.32^***	0.34^***	—
21. Defensive silence T3	?0.14^*	?0.11	0.44^***	0.42^***	0.37^***	0.44^***	?0.01	?0.05	0.29^***	0.37^***	0.65^***

Variables	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. Subordinate gender ^a	—	—	—
2. Subordinate age ^b	—	—	0.06	—
3. Subordinate education ^c	2.86	0.67	?0.10	?0.29^***	—
4. Subordinate organizational tenure ^d	3.11	1.10	0.10	0.65^***	?0.21^**	—
5. Subordinate conscientiousness	5.40	0.82	0.15^*	0.08	0.02	0.08	—
6. Leader gender^e	—	—	0.18^**	?0.02	0.00	0.01	0.02	—
7. Leader age^f	—	—	0.04	0.42^***	?0.04	0.37^***	?0.02	?0.03	—
8. Leader education^g	2.92	0.62	?0.01	?0.20^**	0.31^***	?0.27^***	0.09	0.13^*	?0.32^***	—
9. Leader organizational tenure^h	2.40	1.08	0.04	0.39^***	?0.02	0.51^***	0.11	0.03	0.70^***	?0.39^***	—
10. Leader agreeableness	5.17	1.10	0.07	?0.03	0.00	0.04	0.08	?0.07	0.03	?0.05	0.14^*
11. Leader narcissism T1	4.29	1.25	0.11	?0.08	?0.02	?0.03	0.05	?0.09	?0.11	?0.02	?0.03
12. Abusive supervision T1	2.12	1.27	0.02	0.06	0.02	0.01	?0.17^**	0.15^*	0.05	0.04	?0.03
13. Abusive supervision T2	2.54	1.03	0.03	0.05	0.05	0.06	?0.19^**	0.07	0.04	?0.06	?0.06
14. Abusive supervision T3	2.13	1.00	0.06	0.09	0.06	0.08	?0.22^***	0.11	0.18^**	?0.08	0.07
15. Abusive supervision T4	2.51	1.28	?0.06	0.10	0.02	0.09	?0.18^**	0.08	0.04	0.02	?0.03
16. Constructive resistance T2	4.61	0.94	0.07	0.07	0.00	0.00	0.06	?0.06	0.05	0.02	?0.01
17. Constructive resistance T3	4.71	1.08	0.10	?0.03	0.04	?0.08	0.09	?0.05	?0.08	0.07	?0.09
18. Dysfunctional resistance T2	2.40	1.06	?0.03	?0.02	0.03	?0.03	?0.19^**	0.12	?0.03	0.11	?0.07
19. Dysfunctional resistance T3	2.50	1.08	0.08	0.02	?0.08	0.06	?0.19^**	0.10	?0.01	?0.03	?0.05
20. Defensive silence T2	3.50	1.29	0.04	?0.02	0.00	?0.05	?0.15^*	0.05	0.05	?0.02	?0.06
21. Defensive silence T3	3.65	1.28	0.05	0.00	?0.03	0.04	?0.21^**	0.07	0.01	?0.14^*	?0.01
Variables	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
11. Leader narcissism T1	0.07	—
12. Abusive supervision T1	?0.16^**	?0.14^*	—
13. Abusive supervision T2	?0.20^**	0.02	0.54^***	—
14. Abusive supervision T3	?0.13^*	?0.08	0.48^***	0.56^***	—
15. Abusive supervision T4	?0.19^**	?0.07	0.60^***	0.64^***	0.51^***	—
16. Constructive resistance T2	?0.02	0.03	0.16^**	0.10	?0.14^*	?0.07	—
17. Constructive resistance T3	?0.04	0.20^**	0.03	0.14^*	?0.10	?0.14^*	0.59^***	—
18. Dysfunctional resistance T2	?0.41^***	?0.05	0.42^***	0.43^***	0.35^***	0.44^***	?0.05	0.05	—
19. Dysfunctional resistance T3	?0.26^***	0.01	0.43^***	0.42^***	0.36^***	0.44^***	0.03	0.11	0.53^***	—
20. Defensive silence T2	?0.17^**	?0.05	0.39^***	0.27^***	0.40^***	0.26^***	?0.06	?0.06	0.32^***	0.34^***	—
21. Defensive silence T3	?0.14^*	?0.11	0.44^***	0.42^***	0.37^***	0.44^***	?0.01	?0.05	0.29^***	0.37^***	0.65^***

Dynamic antecedents of changes in abusive supervision: A latent change score model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments