Influence of group information on facial expression recognition

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00268

Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 268-280.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00268

• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles

Influence of group information on facial expression recognition

WANG Weihan¹, CAO Feizhen¹^,², YU Linwei¹, ZENG Ke³, YANG Xinchao¹, XU Qiang¹()

¹Department and Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
²School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
³Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Published:2024-03-25 Online:2023-12-13
Contact: XU Qiang E-mail:xuqiang1117@163.com

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

197

Knowledge

Abstract

Key words: emotion congruency effect, emotion recognition, expectation, facial expression, group information

Cite this article

WANG Weihan, CAO Feizhen, YU Linwei, ZENG Ke, YANG Xinchao, XU Qiang. (2024). Influence of group information on facial expression recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(3), 268-280.

share this article

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00268

https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/Y2024/V56/I3/268

Figures/Tables 3

Figure 1. Mean congruence indices and standard error (SE) under different group cues.
Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ***p < 0.001.

Figure 1. Mean congruence indices and standard error (SE) under different group cues.Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ***p < 0.001.

Figure 2. Mean discrimination indices and standard error (SE) under different group cues.
Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ***p < 0.001.

Figure 2. Mean discrimination indices and standard error (SE) under different group cues.Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ***p < 0.001.

Figure 3. Mean response times and standard error (SE) under different group cues.
Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ** p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 3. Mean response times and standard error (SE) under different group cues.Note. Error bars indicate standard errors (SE). ** p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

References

Related Articles 15

[1]	GUO Lei, QIN Haijiang. Cognitive diagnostic assessment based on signal detection theory: Modeling and application [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2024, 56(3): 339-351.
[2]	YOU Xiaofeng, YANG Jianqin, Qin Chunying, LIU Hongyun. Missing data analysis in cognitive diagnostic models: Random forest threshold imputation method [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(7): 1192-1206.
[3]	MA Jun, ZHU Mengting. Accept or change your fate: Exploring the Golem effect and underdog effect of underdog expectations [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(6): 1029-1048.
[4]	JIANG Yingjie, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Yuantao, REN Jimei, LONG Yiting. The effect of after-encoding rewards on agenda-based learning: The role of reward expectation and reward outcome [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(4): 542-555.
[5]	JIA Chenglong, WU Ting, SUN Li, QIN Jinliang. The effects of attachment figure’s response pattern on the support-giving expectation revision of young children with different attachment styles [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(3): 455-468.
[6]	LIU ZhiQiang, XU YuPing, XU JianWei, ZHOU Rong, LONG LiRong. Innovation expectation discrepancy and team radical innovation: A self-regulatory perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(2): 272-285.
[7]	LI Xin, LIU Pei, LI Aimei, WANG Xiaotian, ZHANG Junwei. A multipath model of leader after-hours electronic communication expectations and employee job performance [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(8): 964-978.
[8]	PAN Yuean, JIANG Yunpeng, GUO Maojie, WU Xia. The influence of uncertainty and validity of expectation on the perceptual decision of motion direction [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(6): 595-603.
[9]	ZHOU Zinuan, CHEN Yanzhang, FU Shimin. The effects of expectation on attention are dependent on whether expectation is on the target or on the distractor [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(3): 221-235.
[10]	LIU Hong-Zhi, LI Xingshan, LI Shu, RAO Li-Lin. When expectation-maximization-based theories work or do not work: An eye-tracking study of the discrepancy between everyone and every one [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(12): 1517-1531.
[11]	LI Xiying, JIN Yitong, LIU Jing, ZHANG Xingyu, PI Zhongling. Is older adult happier with more filial Piety children? The role of filial responsibility expectation of older adult [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(11): 1381-1390.
[12]	YANG Jimei, CHAI Jieyu, QIU Tianlong, QUAN Xiaoshan, ZHENG Maoping. Relationship between empathy and emotion recognition in Chinese national music: An event-related potential study evidence [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(10): 1181-1192.
[13]	LI Wanyue, LIU Shen, HAN Shangfeng, ZHANG Lin, XU Qiang. Emotional bias of trait anxiety on pre-attentive processing of facial expressions: ERP investigation [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(1): 1-11.
[14]	XIONG Chengqing, XU Jiaying, MA Danyang, LIU Yongfang. The effect of opponent’s emotional facial expressions on individuals’ cooperation and underlying mechanism in prisoner’s dilemma game [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(8): 919-932.
[15]	YU Wenbo, WANG Lu, QU Xingfang, WANG Tianlin, ZHANG Jingjing, LIANG Dandan. Transitional probabilities and expectation for word length impact verbal statistical learning [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(6): 565-574.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP

Influence of group information on facial expression recognition

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments