Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 740-754.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.0740
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
KANG Na1, LIU Wumei2, ZENG Fue3
Received:2025-02-17
Published:2026-04-25
Online:2026-01-16
KANG Na, LIU Wumei, ZENG Fue. (2026). Renting with urgency: How product acquisition mode shapes consumers’ propensity to sublet?. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 58(4), 740-754.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.0740
| [1] Aspara, J., & Wittkowski, K. (2019). Sharing-dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. [2] Bagga C. K., Bendle N., & Cotte J. (2019). Object valuation and non-ownership possession: How renting and borrowing impact willingness-to-pay. [3] Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. [4] Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., & Rothstein H. R. (2021). [5] Chen S. Y., Xiong J. W., & Peng K. P. (2025). The “diminished enjoyment with the best deal” effect: How does frugal mindset impact the anticipated enjoyment and experiential evaluation in food consumption? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(1), 152-172. [陈斯允, 熊继伟, 彭凯平. (2025). “羊毛薅尽口味乏”:节俭心态如何影响食物预期享受与体验评估. [6] Donnelly G. E., Lamberton C., Reczek R. W., & Norton M. I. (2017). Social recycling transforms unwanted goods into happiness. [7] Durgee, J. F., & O’Connor, G. C. (1995). An exploration into renting as consumption behavior. [8] Edbring E. G., Lehner M., & Mont O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. [9] Fan L., Li X., & Jiang Y. (2019). Room for opportunity: Resource scarcity increases attractiveness of range marketing offers. [10] Fuchs C., Prandelli E., & Schreier M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. [11] Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2018). The loss of loss aversion: Will it loom larger than its gain? [12] Gao, S. S., & Herbert, W. E. (1996). Lease finance in emerging markets: An eastern European study.Managerial Finance, 22(12), 39-53. [13] Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. [14] Goldsmith K., Roux C., & Ma J. (2017). When seeking the best brings out the worst in consumers: Understanding the relationship between a maximizing mindset and immoral behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 293-309. [15] Gong, X. S., & Jiang, J. (2018). The effect of incidental similarity (“dress same”) on consumers’ product disposition intentions and its underlying mechanism.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(3), 337-348. [宫秀双, 蒋晶. (2018). 撞衫对消费者产品处置意向的影响及其心理机制. [16] Guo Y., Lamberton C., & Goldsmith K. (2024). The role of product acquisition mode in self-and social-signals of status. [17] Harding R. D., Hildebrand D., Kramer T., & Lasaleta J. D. (2019). The impact of acquisition mode on expected speed of product mastery and subsequent consumer behavior. [18] Haws K. L., Naylor R. W., Coulter R. A., & Bearden W. O. (2012). Keeping it all without being buried alive: Understanding product retention tendency. [19] Hayes, A. F. (2013). [20] Huang B., Suri A., Tezer A., & Sénécal S. (2024). This is not mine anymore: The dark side of collaborative consumption. [21] Huang, F., & Fishbach, A. (2021). Feeling lonely increases interest in previously owned products. [22] Huang, F., & Wong, V. C. (2024). From second-hand to third-hand: Reuse and resale cycle.Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 104-113. [23] Kim, S., & Mcgill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception.Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107. [24] King D., Auschaitrakul S., & Lin, C. W. J. (2022). Search modality effects: Merely changing product search modality alters purchase intentions. [25] Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. [26] Lang C., Armstrong C. M., & Brannon L. A. (2013). Drivers of clothing disposal in the us: An exploration of the role of personal attributes and behaviours in frequent disposal. [27] Layous K., Kurtz J., Chancellor J., & Lyubomirsky S. (2018). Reframing the ordinary: Imagining time as scarce increases well-being. [28] Li A. M., Li B., Xu H., Li F. L., Zhang Y. H., & Liang Z. Y. (2018). Effects of cognitive and affective tags in mental accounting on consumer decision making.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(7), 976-986. [李爱梅, 李斌, 许华, 李伏岭, 张耀辉, 梁竹苑. (2014). 心理账户的认知标签与情绪标签对消费决策行为的影响. [29] Liu W., Kang N., & Song P. (2024). The rental-function effect: How does product acquisition mode affect consumer preference relating to product attributes? Psychology & Marketing, 41(12), 3024-3040. [30] Ma, J., & Roese, N. J. (2014). The maximizing mind-set.Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 71-92. [31] Mehta, R., & Zhu, M. (2016). Creating when you have less: The impact of resource scarcity on product use creativity. [32] Nie X., Yang Z., Zhang Y., & Janakiraman N. (2022). How does global-local identity affect consumer preference for access-based consumption? Investigating the mediating role of consumption openness. [33] Paden, N., & Stell, R. (2005). Consumer product redistribution: Disposition decisions and channel options. [34] Paundra J., Rook L., van Dalen J., & Ketter W. (2017). Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership. [35] Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. [36] Ross G. R., Bolton L. E., & Meloy M. G. (2023). Disorder in secondhand retail spaces: The countervailing forces of hidden treasure and risk. [37] Shah A. K., Mullainathan S., & Shafir E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. [38] Shani-Feinstein Y., Kyung E. J., & Goldenberg J. (2022). Moving, fast or slow: How perceived speed influences mental representation and decision making. [39] Thaler, R. H. (2000). From homo economicus to homo sapiens. [40] Thomson M., Macinnis D. J., & Park C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. [41] Trudel R., Argo J. J., & Meng M. D. (2016). The recycled self: Consumers’ disposal decisions of identity-linked products. [42] United Nations. (2022). [43] Wang L., Su X., & You Y. (2021). Purchasing luck: The impact of scarcity cues on superstitious behavior.Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2021, 20(3), 577-589. [44] Wang L., You Y., & Yang C. M. (2020). Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility. [45] Wang, Y. (2021). [王琰. (2021). [46] Weiss, L. (2017). Possession substitutability: Identity and usage of rented (versus owned) products. In A. Gneezy, V. Griskevicius, & P. Williams (Eds.), [47] Winterich K. P., Reczek R. W., & Irwin J. R. (2017). Keeping the memory but not the possession: Memory preservation mitigates identity loss from product disposition. [48] Yang, X. Y., & Deng, Y. K. (2014). The impact of emotional attachment on consumers’ participation in collaborative consumption: A perspective based on product disposition. [杨晓燕, 邓珏坤. (2014). 情感依恋对消费者参与协同消费的影响方式——基于产品处置的视角. [49] Young, M. M., & Wallendorf, M. (1989). Ashes to ashes, dust to dust: Conceptualizing consumer disposition of possessions. In Terry L. Childers, Richard P. Bagozzi, & J. Paul Peter (Eds.), [50] Zhu M., Yang Y., & Hsee C. K. (2018). The mere urgency effect.Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 673-690. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||