REN Weicong, YANG Ting, WANG Hanlin. (2024). Different effects of linguistic and perceptual symbolic representations on foreign language vocabulary learning: Evidence from behavioral and EEG data. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(5), 542-554.
Figure 1.Flow chart of the perceptual symbol representation (A) and linguistic symbol representation (B) conditions.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the perceptual symbol representation (A) and linguistic symbol representation (B) conditions.
Figure 2.Results of JOL scores (A) and recognition accuracy (B).
Figure 2. Results of JOL scores (A) and recognition accuracy (B).
Figure 3.The average amplitude of LPC induced during the encoding stage in Frontal-Central (A) and Central-Parietal (B) regions. C represents the topographic map of the difference wave under two conditions (dashed line minus solid line condition).
Figure 3. The average amplitude of LPC induced during the encoding stage in Frontal-Central (A) and Central-Parietal (B) regions. C represents the topographic map of the difference wave under two conditions (dashed line minus solid line condition).
Figure 4.The average amplitude of N400 induced during the recognition stage in Frontal-Central (A) and Central-Parietal (B) regions. C represents the topographic map of the difference wave under two conditions (dashed line minus solid line condition).
Figure 4. The average amplitude of N400 induced during the recognition stage in Frontal-Central (A) and Central-Parietal (B) regions. C represents the topographic map of the difference wave under two conditions (dashed line minus solid line condition).
Figure 5.ERSP results under linguistic (A) and perceptual (B) symbolic representation conditions within θ (solid line boxes) and μ (dashed line boxes) frequency band.
Figure 5. ERSP results under linguistic (A) and perceptual (B) symbolic representation conditions within θ (solid line boxes) and μ (dashed line boxes) frequency band.