Development of emotional bias in infants aged from 0 to 1 year old: A near-infrared spectroscopy study
ZHANG Dandan1,2(), LI Yiwei1, YU Wenwen2, MO Licheng1,2, PENG Cheng3, LIU Lili3
1Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China 2Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science, Shenzhen 518055, China 3Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
ZHANG Dandan, LI Yiwei, YU Wenwen, MO Licheng, PENG Cheng, LIU Lili. (2023). Development of emotional bias in infants aged from 0 to 1 year old: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(6), 920-929.
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of research methods. A. One neonate with optodes placed upon the head. B. The near-infrared light source and detector form 14 detection channels in the cortex.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of research methods. A. One neonate with optodes placed upon the head. B. The near-infrared light source and detector form 14 detection channels in the cortex.
Table 1 Spatial registration for NIRS channels (neonatal template)
Table 1 Spatial registration for NIRS channels (neonatal template)
Channel
Anatomic label (AAL)
Channel
Anatomic label (AAL)
1
Inferior frontal gyrus (triangular) left
8
Inferior frontal gyrus (triangular) right
2
Inferior frontal gyrus (triangular) left
9
Inferior frontal gyrus (triangular) right
3
Superior temporal gyrus left
10
Superior temporal gyrus right
4
Postcentral gyrus left
11
Postcentral gyrus right
5
Superior temporal gyrus left
12
Superior temporal gyrus right
6
Supramarginal gyrus left
13
Supramarginal gyrus right
7
Angular gyrus left
14
Angular gyrus right
Figure 2.Main effect of emotional category on brain functional connectivity. The first row: angry prosody caused stronger brain functional connectivity than neutral prosody (anger > neutral). The second row: happy prosody caused stronger brain functional connectivity than neutral prosody (happiness > neutral). For the brain functional connectivities with significant main effects (91 times of FWE correction), compare the three conditions of anger, happiness and neutral (Bonferroni correction). The figure shows the brain functional connectivities with significant differences between emotions (91 times of FWE correction). The color of brain functional connectivity (see colorbar) and the thickness (the thicker the value, the greater the value) reflect the t value.
Figure 2. Main effect of emotional category on brain functional connectivity. The first row: angry prosody caused stronger brain functional connectivity than neutral prosody (anger > neutral). The second row: happy prosody caused stronger brain functional connectivity than neutral prosody (happiness > neutral). For the brain functional connectivities with significant main effects (91 times of FWE correction), compare the three conditions of anger, happiness and neutral (Bonferroni correction). The figure shows the brain functional connectivities with significant differences between emotions (91 times of FWE correction). The color of brain functional connectivity (see colorbar) and the thickness (the thicker the value, the greater the value) reflect the t value.
Table 2 Interaction of emotion and group on brain functional connectivity
Table 2 Interaction of emotion and group on brain functional connectivity
Channel
Group × Emotion
Neonate Happiness > Anger
Infant Anger > Happiness
Happy prosody Neonate > Infant
Angry prosody Infant > Neonate
F
p
2-9
9.73
0.011
t = 4.59, p = 0.004
2-13
12.18
0.001
t = 4.08, p = 0.027
3-9
8.48
0.031
t = 3.91, p = 0.016
6-13
10.47
0.007
t = 3.61, p = 0.046
7-8
12.15
0.001
t = 4.06, p = 0.029
t = 3.66, p = 0.039
7-10
9.81
0.012
t = 3.96, p = 0.041
t = 4.16, p = 0.007
7-12
8.36
0.040
t = 3.92, p = 0.016
8-12
16.00
0.000
t = 5.69, p = 0.000
8-13
10.03
0.015
t = 4.05, p = 0.030
Channel
Group × Emotion
Neonate Happiness > Anger
Infant Anger > Happiness
Happy prosody Neonate > Infant
Angry prosody Infant > Neonate
F
p
8-14
18.21
0.000
t = 4.74, p = 0.002
t = 5.17, p = 0.000
t = 5.09, p = 0.000
9-10
15.10
0.000
t = 4.59, p = 0.004
t = 4.68, p = 0.003
t = 5.14, p = 0.000
9-11
17.04
0.000
t = 3.93, p = 0.046
t = 5.41, p = 0.000
t = 4.39, p = 0.003
9-12
15.50
0.000
t = 4.80, p = 0.002
t = 4.07, p = 0.028
t = 3.63, p = 0044
9-13
14.74
0.000
t = 3.96, p = 0.041
t = 4.59, p = 0.004
t = 4.45, p = 0.002
9-14
13.26
0.001
t = 4.65, p = 0.003
t = 4.23, p = 0.005
10-12
9.67
0.040
t = 5.46, p = 0.000
t = 3.82, p = 0.022
10-13
14.01
0.001
t = 4.01, p = 0.034
t = 5.20, p = 0.000
t = 4.00, p = 0.012
10-14
17.93
0.000
t = 4.30, p = 0.012
t = 5.29, p = 0.000
t = 5.66, p = 0.000
11-13
9.46
0.016
t = 4.38, p = 0.009
11-14
11.76
0.002
t = 4.63, p = 0.003
t = 3.59, p = 0.049
12-14
9.39
0.025
t = 4.27, p = 0.004
Figure 3.Interaction of emotional categories and groups on brain functional connectivity (simple effect test results). The first row: the positive bias (happiness > anger) of the neonatal group and the negative bias (anger > happiness) of the infant group. The second row is the difference between the two age groups in the brain functional connectivity for processing positive prosody (neonate > infant) and the difference between the two age groups in the brain functional connectivity for processing negative prosody (neonate < infant). For the brain functional connectivity with significant interaction (FWE correction), compare the three conditions of anger, happiness and neutral (Bonferroni correction). The figure shows the brain functional connectivity with significant difference between emotions (FWE correction).
Figure 3. Interaction of emotional categories and groups on brain functional connectivity (simple effect test results). The first row: the positive bias (happiness > anger) of the neonatal group and the negative bias (anger > happiness) of the infant group. The second row is the difference between the two age groups in the brain functional connectivity for processing positive prosody (neonate > infant) and the difference between the two age groups in the brain functional connectivity for processing negative prosody (neonate < infant). For the brain functional connectivity with significant interaction (FWE correction), compare the three conditions of anger, happiness and neutral (Bonferroni correction). The figure shows the brain functional connectivity with significant difference between emotions (FWE correction).
Tao Sha, Dong Qi, Wang Yanping(Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875)J.J. Campes(Institute of Human Development, University of California, Berkely, U.S.A.).
CRAWLING EXPERIENCE: ITS IMPACT ON INFANTS'DETOUR BEHAVIOUR
[J]. , 1999, 31(01): 69-75.
[9]
Zeng Qi Dong Qi Tao Sha (Institute of Developmental Psychology ,Beijing Normal University ) Joseph J. Campos (Institute of Human Development ,University of California).
TEH DEVELOPMENTAL MECHANISM OF OBJECT PERMANENCE DURING INFANCY
[J]. , 1997, 29(04): 393-399.