Uniqueness-seeking behavior can be driven by various factors. Despite the common phenomenon that better-off individuals seem to seek more uniqueness and express individuality more frequently, no researcher has investigated whether and how social comparison influences uniqueness-seeking behavior. According to the better-than-average effect, people tend to perceive themselves better off than the average on many important dimensions and are inclined to see themselves as unique when there are no social comparisons. Building on the compensatory consumption model, we aim to investigate the impact of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior, and further examine why this effect occurs as well as when it will be attenuated or intensified. In social comparisons, comparing upwardly (vs. downwardly) may threaten individuals’ pervasively held better-than-average self-evaluation bias, which motivates them to adjust their self-evaluations downwardly to the average. Prior research suggests that the average is mostly seen as ordinary, mediocre and unexceptional. Therefore, we infer that people comparing upwardly may experience a decreased sense of uniqueness, which drives them to seek unique options in subsequent unrelated contexts. This effect holds for many dimensions, such as economic status. In that case, perceived economic mobility acts as an important moderator. We predict that when perceived economic mobility is high, threats induced by upward comparisons will be mitigated, as are individuals’ psychological and behavioral responses. However, when perceived economic mobility is low, the responses will be intensified. Across five experiments, we demonstrate that upward comparisons increase consumer preference for less popular scenic spots (Study 1). The psychological mechanism underlying this effect is that upward comparisons lower perceived uniqueness, leading individuals to choose minority-endorsed products to compensate for the negative self-discrepancy (studies 2a and 2c). The fundamental driving force of the main effect is that upward comparisons increase consumers’ uniqueness-seeking tendency (Study 2b). Furthermore, when comparing upwardly on economic status, consumers still show stronger preference for niche book clubs, and the effect of social comparison on perceived uniqueness and uniqueness seeking will be mitigated when perceived economic mobility is high but is strengthened when perceived economic mobility is low (Study 3). The present research provides evidence that upward comparisons can lead to uniqueness-seeking behavior by examining the mediating role of perceived uniqueness, supporting our basic premise that individuals perceive themselves as unique when making no comparisons. In doing this, we make theoretical contributions to research on both uniqueness seeking and the strategies for coping with upward comparisons. This also sheds light on marketing strategies that enterprises can employ to increase sales of unpopular or customized products as well as coping strategies that consumers can use to alleviate threats of upward comparisons on different dimensions.
宫秀双,张红红. (2020). “别人家的孩子”vs.平庸的自己：社会比较对独特性寻求行为的影响. 心理学报, 52(5): 645-658.
GONG Xiushuang,ZHANG Honghong. (2020). Outstanding others vs. mediocre me: The effect of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(5), 645-658.
Alicke M. D . (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621-1630.
Alicke M. D., & Govorun O . (2005). The better-than-average effect. The Self in Social Judgment, 1, 85-106.
Alicke M. D., LoSchiavo F. M., Zerbst J., & Zhang S . (1997). The person who out performs me is a genius: Maintaining perceived competence in upward social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 781-789.
Allison S. T., Messick D. M., & Goethals G. R . (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7(3), 275-295.
Appel H., Gerlach A. L., & Crusius J . (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.
Argo J. J., & Dahl D. W . (2018). Standards of beauty: The impact of mannequins in the retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 974-990.
Aspinwall L. G., & Taylor S. E . (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 708-722.
Bozkurt S., & Gligor D . (2019). Scarcity (versus popularity) cues for rejected customers: The impact of social exclusion on cue types through need for uniqueness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 275-281.
Brown J. D . (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self- enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353-376.
Cannon C., Goldsmith K., Roux C., & Kirmani A . (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104-127.
Chen G., Gully S. M., & Eden D . (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
Clark J. V., & Arkowitz H . (1975). Social anxiety and self-evaluation of interpersonal performance. Psychological Reports, 36(1), 211-221.
Collins R. L . (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51-69.
Festinger H. L . (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
Fromkin H. L., & Snyder C. R . (1980). The search for uniqueness and valuation of scarcity. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 57-76). New York: Plenum.
Garcia S. M., Tor A., & Schiff T. M . (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634-650.
Gardner D. G., & Pierce J. L . (2010). The core self-evaluation scale: Further construct validation evidence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 291-304.
Han X., & Chi Y . (2012). The self-threat of unsolicited social comparison and its balance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1628-1640.
Hayes A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hoegg J., Scott M. L., Morales A. C., & Dahl D. W . (2014). The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 70-78.
Hoorens V . (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 113-139.
Huang T., Liu L., Wang D., & Zhang W . (2016). Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-being. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(9), 1163-1174.
Jin L., He Y., Zou D., & Xu Q . (2013). How affirmational versus negational identification frames influence uniqueness- seeking behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 891-902.
Klar Y., & Giladi E. E . (1997). No one in my group can be below the group’s average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 885-901.
Kraus M. W., Côté S., & Keltner D . (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723.
Li X., & Zhang M . (2011). Images of attractive women make young females behave virtuously. In R. Ahluwalia, T. L. Chartrand, & R. K. Ratner (Eds.), NA-Advances in consumer research: Vol. 39 (pp. 797-798). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Luhtanen R., & Crocker J . (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
Lynn M., & Harris J . (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology & Marketing, 14(6), 601-616.
Mandel N., Rucker D. D., Levav J., & Galinsky A. D . (2017). The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self- discrepancies drive consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 133-146.
Markey C. N., & Markey P. M . (2010). A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. Body Image, 7(2), 165-171.
Martin H. J., & Larsen K. S . (1976). Measurement of competitive-cooperative attitudes. Psychological Reports, 39(1), 303-306.
McClelland D. C . (1961). The achieving society. Princenton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Morse S., & Gergen K. J . (1970). Social comparison, self- consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 148-156.
Pleban R., & Tesser A . (1981). The effects of relevance and quality of another’s performance on interpersonal closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3), 278-285.
Roese N. J., & Olson J. M . (2007). Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 124-141.
Rosenberg M . (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schlosser A. E., & Levy E . (2016). Helping others or oneself: How direction of comparison affects prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 461-473.
Smeesters D., Mussweiler T., & Mandel N . (2010). The effects of thin and heavy media images on overweight and underweight consumers: Social comparison processes and behavioral implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 930-949.
Snyder C. R . (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9-24.
Snyder C. R., & Fromkin H. L . (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518-527.
Sobol K., & Darke P. R . (2014). “I’d like to be that attractive, but at least I’m smart”: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 533-540.
Tesser A., & Cornell D. P . (1991). On the confluence of self processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 501-526.
Tian K. T., Bearden W. O., & Hunter G. L . (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.
Wan E. W., Xu J., & Ding Y . (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1109-1122.
Wan L. C., & Wyer Jr, R. S . (2015). Consumer reactions to attractive service providers: Approach or avoid? Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 578-595.
Wills T. A . (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271.
Yoon S., & Kim H. C . (2016). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 759-772.
Yoon S., & Kim H. C . (2017). Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1141-1156.
Zheng X., Baskin E., & Peng S . (2018a). The spillover effect of incidental social comparison on materialistic pursuits. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5/6), 1107-1127.
Zheng X., Baskin E., & Peng S . (2018b). Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Business Research, 90, 196-205.
Zheng X., Peng S., & Dai S . (2014). Impact of social comparison on conspicuous consumption: A psychological compensation perspective. Journal of Marketing Science, 10(3), 19-31.