Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2020, Vol. 52 Issue (3): 371-385    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00371
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
1 中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 武汉 430073
2 武汉理工大学管理学院, 武汉 430070
3 暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude
Yaxuan RAN1,Jiani LIU1,Yishi ZHANG2(),Haiying WEI3
1 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
2 School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
全文: PDF(1724 KB)   HTML 评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料

有的品牌仅邀请一位名人代言, 而有的品牌由多位名人代言, 那么一人代言还是多人代言会更有效?为了回答该问题, 研究基于形象转移视角和单人积极偏差, 深入探究了品牌代言人数因素(一位代言人vs.多位代言人)对品牌态度的影响机制和边界条件。研究发现:相比品牌多人代言, 品牌单人代言使消费者的品牌态度更高。原因在于消费者与一位(vs.多位)品牌代言人的自我-品牌联结更紧密, 进而促进品牌态度。该品牌代言人效应仅局限于象征型产品, 而对于非身份象征型产品, 品牌单人代言(vs.品牌多人代言)对品牌态度无显著差异。此外, 当多位品牌代言人为一个团体时, 品牌代言人数效应将被逆转, 即品牌多人代言(vs.品牌单人代言)对品牌态度的影响更高。

E-mail Alert
关键词 品牌代言人数自我-品牌联结形象转移视角单人积极偏差    

The use of celebrity endorsements in advertising is quietly pervasive. One brand can be endorsed by either one celebrity or multiple celebrities. Notably, it is more and more common nowadays that a single brand harnesses multiple celebrity endorsers in its advertisement to potentially attract more consumers. Literature on consumer psychology has mainly studied the context of a single celebrity endorsing a single brand, suggesting that source characteristics, such as familiarity, expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness of the endorser, can affect consumer response and attitudes. A growing of recent studies have investigated the context of a single celebrity endorsing multiple brands, while surprisingly very few studies have examined whether one brand should be endorsed by either one person or multiple people. In the current research, we extend the extent literature by examining how consumer respond to celebrity advertising endorsed by either one person or multiple people.
Consumers can build their relationship with a brand through the celebrity endorsers. In this vein, the number of endorsers (one celebrity versus multiple celebrities) can influence consumer attitudes via their feelings of connecting with the brand. Based on the image transference perspective, the celebrity’s traits could be transferred to the brand’s perceived traits. Thus, when a brand is endorsed by one person (multiple people), this brand is perceived to hold one identity (multiple identities). According to person-positivity bias, we postulate that one endorser (versus multiple endorsers) can enhance consumers’ connected feelings with the brand, then in turn increase consumers’ positive brand attitude. And this effect is only constraint for status-signaling products. Although the main hypothesis seems straightforward, there are constraints on its applicability. If the associations between the number of endorsers and self-brand connection are attenuated, the effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude should be suppressed. That is, when multiple endorsers look like a whole (e.g., a team), the main effect would be reversed, such that multiple endorsers with wholeness characteristics elicit higher brand attitude than one endorser.
One pilot study and four studies were conducted to examine our hypotheses. Pilot study (n = 53) examined that the basic hypothesis of trait transference, such that the brand endorsed by one person (multiple people) would be perceived to hold one identity (multiple identities). Experiment 1 (n = 199) investigated the main effect and the mediating role of self-brand connection. Experiment 2 (n = 245) used a moderation-of-process approach to further validate the mediation of self-brand connection. Experiment 3 (n = 158) examined that the effect is constraint when the product is characterized as status-signaling, while targeting and eliminating possible alternative explanations. Experiment 4 (n = 92) identified the moderating effect of when multiple endorsers look like a whole and provide replication of the main effect. To document a robust effect, we varied the context of advertising and the endorsers across four studies.
Our investigation suggests that consumer facing a brand endorsed by one celebrity have greater brand attitude than those facing a brand endorsed by multiple celebrities. Specifically, compared to multiple endorsers, one endorser can enhance consumers’ feeling of connecting with the brand, which in turn increase brand attitudes. For non-status-signaling products, the relative difference between one endorser and multiple endorsers would be attenuated. At the same time, there are qualifications on these effects. When multiple endorsers are a whole, the superior of one endorser would be reversed. These findings offer novel insights on endorsing, number of people, and self-brand connection, while suggesting that companies must carefully consider the number of celebrities in the wake of considering the appropriate endorsement.

Key wordsbrand endorsement    number of people    self-brand connection    image transference perspective    person-positivity bias
收稿日期: 2019-02-27      出版日期: 2020-01-18
中图分类号:  B849: F713.55  
基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金(71802192);国家自然科学基金(71702066);国家自然科学基金(71772077);教育部人文社科基金资助(18YJC630137)
通讯作者: 张逸石     E-mail:
冉雅璇,刘佳妮,张逸石,卫海英. (2020). “一”人代言的魅力:品牌代言人数如何影响消费者的品牌态度. 心理学报, 52(3): 371-385.
Yaxuan RAN,Jiani LIU,Yishi ZHANG,Haiying WEI. (2020). The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(3), 371-385.
链接本文:      或
[1] Aron A., Aron E. N., & Smollan D . (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
[2] Barasch A., & Berger J . (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286-299.
[3] Bartz S., Molchanov A., & Stork P. A . (2013). When a celebrity endorser is disgraced: A twenty-five-year event study. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 131-141.
[4] Chaplin L. N., & John D. R . (2005). The development of self-brand connections in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 119-129.
[5] Chen A. C.-H., Chang R. Y.-H., Besherat A., & Baack D. W . (2013). Who benefits from multiple brand celebrity endorsements? An experimental investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 850-860.
[6] Cheng S. Y. Y., White T. B., & Lan N. C . (2012). The effects of self-brand connections on responses to brand failure: A new look at the consumer-brand relationship. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 280-288.
[7] Choi S. M., & Rifon N. J . (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639-650.
[8] Critcher C. R., & Dunning D . (2013). Predicting persons’ versus a person’s goodness: Behavioral forecasts diverge for individuals versus populations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 28-44.
[9] Critcher C. R., & Dunning D . (2014). Thinking about others versus another: Three reasons judgments about collectives and individuals differ. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(12), 687-698.
[10] Cunha M., Forehand M. R., & Angle J. W . (2015). Riding coattails: When co-branding helps versus hurts less-known brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1284-1300.
[11] Elberse A., & Verleun J . (2012). The economic value of celebrity endorsements. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(2), 149-165.
[12] Escalas J. E . (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 168-179.
[13] Escalas J. E., & Bettman J. R . (2017). Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297-308.
[14] Evers E. R. K., Inbar Y., & Zeelenberg M . (2014). Set-fit effects in choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 504-509.
[15] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., & Lang A.-G . (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[16] Galak J., Small D. A., & Stephen A. T . (2011). Micro-finance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(Special Issue), S130-S137.
[17] Gao H. C., Winterich K. P., & Zhang Y. L . (2016). All that glitters is not gold: How others’ status influences the effect of power distance belief on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Reserach, 43(2), 265-281.
[18] Halevy N., Chou E. Y., Cohen T. R., & Livingston R. W . (2011). Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 102(2), 351-366.
[19] Hamilton D. L., & Sherman S. J . (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336-355.
[20] Handriana T., & Wisandiko W. R . (2017). Consumer attitudes toward advertisement and brand, based on the number of endorsers and product involvement: An experimental study. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 19(3), 289-306.
[21] Hayes A. F., & Preacher K. J . (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451-470.
[22] Huang M. X., Yao S. Y., & Liu M. H . (2018). Self-enhancing or self-deprecating: How can celebrity endorsement enhance the marketing effectiveness of advertisements in social media. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(8), 907-919.
[22] [ 黄敏学, 姚舜禹, 刘茂红 . (2018). 自强还是自嘲? 名人代言如何提升社会化媒体广告的营销效果. 心理学报, 50(8), 907-919.]
[23] Huber F., Meyer F., Vogel J., Weihrauch A., & Hamprecht J . (2013). Endorser age and stereotypes: Consequences on brand age. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 207-215.
[24] Ilicic J., & Webster C. M . (2013). Celebrity co-branding partners as irrelevant brand information in advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 941-947.
[25] Insko C. A., Schopler J., Hoyle R. H., Dardis G. J., & Graetz K. A . (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 68-79.
[26] Iyengar S., Jackman S., Messing S., Valentino N., Aalberg T., Duch R., .. Kobayashi T . (2013). Do attitudes about immigration predict willingness to admit individual immigrants? A cross-national test of the person-positivity bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(3), 641-665.
[27] Köhler W . (1970). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
[28] Lafferty B. A., Goldsmith R. E., & Newell S. J . (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 10(3), 1-12.
[29] Louie T. A., & Obermiller C . (2002). Consumer response to a firm’s endorser (dis)association decisions. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 41-52.
[30] Miller F. M., & Allen C. T . (2012). How does celebrity meaning transfer? Investigating the process of meaning transfer with celebrity affiliates and mature brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 443-452.
[31] Mishra H., Mishra A., & Nayakankuppam D . (2006). Money: A bias for the whole. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 541-549.
[32] Newheiser A. K., Sawaoka T., & Dovidio J. F . (2012). Why do we punish groups? High entitativity promotes moral suspicion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 931-936.
[33] Niculescu M., Payne C. R., & Krishnan V . (2013). One-to-one and one-to-many business relationship marketing: Toward a theoretical framework. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 20(2), 51-64.
[34] Otterbring T., Ringler C., Sirianni N. J., & Gustafsson A . (2018). The Abercrombie & Fitch effect: The impact of physical dominance on male customers’ status-signaling consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 69-79.
[35] Packard G., Moore S. G., & McFerran B . (2018). (I'm) happy to help (you): The impact of personal pronoun use in customer-firm interactions. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 541-555.
[36] Park C. W., Eisingerich A. B., & Park J. W . (2013). Attachment-aversion (aa) model of customer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 229-248.
[37] Park C. W., Jaworski B. J., & Maclnnis D. J . (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
[38] Park C. W., MacInnis D. J., Priester J., Eisingerich A. B., & Iacobucci D . (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.
[39] Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., & Schumann D . (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
[40] Preacher K. J., & Hayes A. F . (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
[41] Rice D. H., Kelting K., & Lutz R. J . (2012). Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements: The influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 249-259.
[42] Saleem F . (2007). Effect of single celebrity and multiple celebrity endorsement on low involvement and high involvement product advertisements. European Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 125-132.
[43] Schopler J., & Insko C. A . (1992). The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: generality and mediation. European Review of Social Psychology, 3(1), 121-151.
[44] Sears D. O . (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(2), 233-250.
[45] Shaddy F., & Fishbach A . (2016). Seller beware: How bundling affects valuation. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 737-751.
[46] Shen H., & Sengupta J . (2018). Word of mouth versus word of mouse: Speaking about a brand connects you to it more than writing does. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 595-614.
[47] Slovic P . (2010). “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2(April), 79-95.
[48] Small D. A., Loewenstein G., & Slovic P . (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153.
[49] Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., & Fong G. T . (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851.
[50] Steffel M., & Le Boeuf R. A . (2014). Overindividuation in gift giving: Shopping for multiple recipients leads givers to choose unique but less preferred gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1167-1180.
[51] Susskind J., Maurer K., Thakkar V., Hamilton D. L., & Sherman J. W . (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 181-191.
[52] Thomas V. L., & Fowler K . (2015). More isn’t always better: Exploring the influence of familiarity when using multiple celebrity endorsers. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(2), 208-223.
[53] Um N. H . (2008). Exploring the effects of single vs. multiple products and multiple celebrity endorsements. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4, 104-114.
[54] van der Veen R., & Song H . (2014). Impact of the perceived image of celebrity endorsers on tourists’ intentions to visit. Journal of Travel Research, 53(2), 211-224.
[55] White K., Lin L., Dahl D. W., & Ritchie R. J. B . (2016). When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 110-123.
[56] Willis J., & Todorov A . (2010). Making up your mind after a 100ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598.
[57] Zhou X. Y., Kim S., & Wang L . (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953-972.
[1] 徐岚,蒋怡然,崔楠,张留霞,赵帅勤. 最心安处是吾乡:本体安全感威胁对家乡品牌偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 513-527.
[2] 朱振中,刘福,Haipeng (Allan) Chen. 能力还是热情?广告诉求对消费者品牌认同和购买意向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 357-370.
[3] 丁瑛,钟嘉琦. 社会拥挤对自我提升类产品偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 216-228.
[4] 陈斯允,卫海英,孟陆. 社会知觉视角下道德诉求方式如何提升劝捐效果[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1351-1362.
[5] 杨晨,陈增祥. 数字有形状吗?数字信息精确性和品牌标识形状的匹配效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 841-856.
[6] 张红,任靖远,刘晨阳,罗劲. 创造性产品评价中的从众效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 688-698.
[7] 黄敏学,王薇. 移动购物更快吗?决策场景与思维模式的相容性[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 612-624.
[8] 姚卿, 陈荣. 质量还是价格?折衷产品缺货情境下的消费者选择[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 625-636.
[9] 丁瑛,庞隽,王妍苏. 形状-性别内隐联结及其对消费者形状偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 216-226.
[10] 聂春艳, 汪涛, 赵鹏, 崔楠. 解释框架对文化混搭产品评价的影响——比较焦点和解释策略的调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(12): 1438-1448.
[11] 柳武妹, 雷亮, 李志远, 苏云, 黄晓治. 触摸, 还是不触摸?先前触摸促进新产品接受[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 782-792.
[12] 晋向东,张广玲,曹晶,谷传华,魏华,谢志鹏,段朝辉. 强势品牌广告竞争的溢出效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 678-692.
[13] 胡月, 王斌, 马红宇, 李改.  彩民命运控制与问题购彩的关系: 基于意义维持模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
[14] 宫秀双, 蒋晶.  撞衫对消费者产品处置意向的 影响及其心理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 337-348.
[15] 李巧, 刘凤军.  模糊产品展示对产品态度的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 349-357.
Full text



版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持