Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (5): 528-538    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00528
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 中国当代研究生的情感素质现状及其影响因素
 卢家楣;刘 伟;贺 雯;王俊山;陈念劬; 解登峰;雷开春
 (上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234)
 Affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students
 LU Jiamei; LIU Wei; HE Wen; WANG Junshan; CHEN Nianqu; XIE Dengfen; LEI Kaichun
 (Educational College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
全文: PDF(468 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  为揭示当代研究生情感素质及所受因素影响状况, 用自编问卷调查全国3类地区14座城市51所高校的10056名研究生。结果发现:研究生情感素质呈2层面6大类33种情感的结构; 爱国感、责任感、信用感、自立感、自尊感、成就感等水平较高, 正直感、宽恕感、人文美感、表达自己情绪能力等较低; 不同性别、获奖经历、学科研究生的情感素质有结构性差异; 核心价值观认同、对舆论关注、人际关系、自我要求等对其情感素质有正向影响; 研究生理智情感等高于本专科生。总之, 当代研究生情感素质总体尚好, 各部分发展不均衡, 发展水平受社会、人际和自我等多方因素影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
卢家楣
刘伟
贺雯
王俊山
陈念劬
解登峰
雷开春
关键词 情感 情感素质 影响因素 调查研究 研究生    
Abstract: Affective diathesis refers to an individual’s emotional psychological quality. It is a series of relatively stable psychological traits that are formed from the combination of both genes and the environment. In recent years, China's graduate student enrollment has increased each year. However, few studies have examined graduate students’ affective diathesis. A large-scale research study on the affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students is a significant, though challenging, endeavor. We analyzed affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students and its influencing factors using the self-developed “College Students’ Affective Diathesis Questionnaire” and “Affecting Factor Inventory.” The college students’ affective diathesis questionnaire has six sub-questionnaires (moral affection, rational affection, aesthetic affection, interpersonal affection, life affection, and emotional intelligence), including 33 different kinds of affects. The affecting factor inventory has 35 items in personal, family, school, and social respects. The questionnaires were administered to 10,056 graduate students from 51 colleges and universities in 14 major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Changchun, Zhengzhou, Xi'an, Wuhan, Xining, Lanzhou, Guiyang, Nanning, Haikou, Kunming, and so on). The geographical regions included well-developed, developing, and less-developed regions in China. The results revealed the following. First, the affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students is generally positive. The development levels of life affection and moral affection were relatively high; the development levels of interpersonal affection, aesthetic affection, and emotional intelligence were relatively low. For the specific affections, the development levels of patriotism, responsibility, credibility, self-reliance, self-esteem, achievement, aesthetic for nature, and emotional understanding ability were relatively high; the development levels of integrity, forgiveness, aesthetic for humanity, and emotional expression ability were relatively low. Second, the results revealed that there was a structural difference between males and females. The development levels of integrity and exploration for males were higher than those for females; the development levels of intimacy, emotionally appealing, gratefulness, self-esteem, cherish, aesthetic for nature, and aesthetic for deportment for females were higher than those for males. Additionally, those who received awards had higher levels of affective diathesis, including all of the six sub-affections and nearly all of the specific affections. Further, the development levels of exploration and aesthetics for science in students majoring in science were higher than those for students majoring in liberal arts. Third, the factors that influence the development of affective diathesis in the graduate students fell into four categories: individuals, families, schools, and society. Sound moral values, more public awareness, strong interpersonal relationships, high self-expectations, and so on had a positive impact on graduate students’ affective diathesis. Finally, graduate student's development levels of public benefit, self-improvement, exploration, learning happiness, major interest, self-confidence, aesthetic for humanity, and aesthetic for science were higher than those of undergraduates. Further, the negative influence of school pressure and time spent online on affective diathesis in undergraduate students was greater than it was in the graduate students. The results from this investigation provide educators with abundant first-hand information on how to improve graduate students’ affective diathesis, as well as for academics on the theoretical implications for affective diathesis research.
Key wordsaffection    affective diathesis    influencing factors    investigation    graduate students
收稿日期: 2017-06-05      出版日期: 2018-03-31
ZTFLH:     
  B849: G44  
基金资助:  教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(13JZD048)的研究成果。
通讯作者: 卢家楣, E-mail: lujiamei@vip.163.com      E-mail: E-mail: lujiamei@vip.163.com
引用本文:   
卢家楣, 刘伟, 贺雯, 王俊山, 陈念劬, 解登峰, 雷开春.  中国当代研究生的情感素质现状及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 528-538.
LU Jiamei, LIU Wei, HE Wen, WANG Junshan, CHEN Nianqu, XIE Dengfen, LEI Kaichun.  Affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 528-538.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00528      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I5/528
[1] 朱瑜, 谢斌斌.  差序氛围感知与沉默行为的关系:情感承诺的 中介作用与个体传统性的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 539-548.
[2] 莫申江;施俊琦. 情绪劳动策略对主动破坏行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 349-358.
[3] 耿晓伟, 姜宏艺.  调节定向和调节匹配对情感预测中 影响偏差的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1537-1547.
[4] 刘潞潞, 卢家楣, 和美, 周建设, 肖晶, 罗劲. 先苦后乐:英语乐学大学生在英语学习时情绪反应的脑认知特点[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(11): 1414-1427.
[5] 王雪芳 张红霞 陈振杰.  合作还是冲突?组合代言中代言人关系类型对广告效果的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(10): 1344-1356.
[6] 卢家楣;刘伟;贺雯;王俊山;陈念劬;解登峰. 中国当代大学生情感素质的现状及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 1-16.
[7] 叶勇豪;许燕;朱一杰;梁炯潜;兰天;于淼. 网民对“人祸”事件的道德情绪特点——基于微博大数据研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 290-304.
[8] 涂乙冬;陆欣欣;郭玮;王震. 道德型领导者得到了什么?道德型领导、团队平均领导?部属交换及领导者收益[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[9] 张剑心;武燕;陈心韵;刘电芝. 高低情感开放性者概率内隐序列学习进程差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1793-1804 .
[10] 常亚平;肖万福;覃伍;阎俊. 网络环境下第三方评论对冲动购买意愿的影响机制:以产品类别和评论员级别为调节变量[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(9): 1244-1264.
[11] 望海军. 品牌信任和品牌情感:究竟谁导致了品牌忠诚?—— 一个动态研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(6): 830-840 .
[12] 王宇清;龙立荣;周浩. 消极情绪在程序和互动不公正感与员工偏离行为间的中介作用:传统性的调节机制[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(12): 1663-1676.
[13] 陈雪军,黄月胜,党晓姣,郑希付. 创伤青少年自传体记忆具体性减少:情感调节还是执行控制受损[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(1): 112-120.
[14] 马晓辉,雷雳. 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(10): 988-997.
[15] 张晓,王晓艳,陈会昌. 气质与童年早期的师生关系:家庭情感环境的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(07): 768-778.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn