Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 186-196    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00186
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 强弱语义语境下的否定句加工机制
 陈广耀1,2;  何先友2;  刘 涛1
 (1暨南大学新闻与传播学院/媒体国家级实验教学示范中心(暨南大学), 广州 510632) (2华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院, 广州 510631)
 The processing of negative sentences in different semantic context
 CHEN Guangyao; HE Xianyou; LIU Tao
 (1 Journalism and Communication College/Media State-level Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China) (2 School of Psychology, South China Normal University/Centre for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangzhou 510631, China)
全文: PDF(483 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  2个眼动实验分别探讨强弱语义语境下的否定句加工机制, 以便考察语言理解是命题表征的过程还是经验模拟的过程, 抑或是二者兼具。在实验中, 被试首先听句子(强语义语境:如“胳膊不是弯曲的”的备择选项为“伸直的胳膊”, 其中“弯曲−伸直”为具有反义关系的强语义连接关系; 弱语义语境:如加工“裙子不是蓝色的”的备择选项为“黑色的裙子”, “蓝色−黑色”为弱语义连接关系), 然后会看到4张同时呈现的图片, 被试的任务是按键选择与句子描述匹配的图片。结果发现, 在强语义语境条件下, 被试在早期(201~600 ms时窗)对描述事件否定状态的图片(弯曲的胳膊)与描述事件实际状态的图片(伸直的胳膊)的注视概率没有差别, 晚期(601 ms后)仅对描述事件实际状态的图片的注视概率更高; 弱语义语境条件下, 被试在早期(401~600 ms)仅对描述事件否定状态的图片(蓝裙子)注视概率更高, 晚期(801 ms后)仅对描述事件实际状态的图片(黑色裙子)注视概率更高; 并且, 都对描述事件否定状态的图片的注视概率低于随机水平。结果支持符号依存假设和抑制假设。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈广耀
何先友
刘涛
关键词 否定 语境 符号依存假设 两步模拟假设 锚激活与限制满足模型    
Abstract: Affirmation and negation are two main semantic and grammatical categories in any language. The propositional theory and experiential-simulations view were proposed to explain the processing mechanism of negative sentences. Both of their supporters have supplied plenty of empirical evidence, but neither of them can beat each other. Thus, the comprehensive theories, such as dual coding theory, LASS and symbolic interdependency hypothesis have been proposed to fill the gap. In the present study, we design two eye-tracking experiments to lend further support to comprehensive theories. In the two experiments, eye-tracking technical was adopted to explore the processing mechanism of negative sentences in different semantic contexts. In Experiment 1, the alternative choices (e.g., outspread arm) presented to the participants have close semantic connection with the negated events of the sentences (e.g., the arm isn’t crooked); In Experiment 2, the alternative choices (e.g., black skirt) presented to the participants have relatively weak semantic connection with the depicted negative events (e.g., the skirt isn’t blue). In summary, ‘blue-black’ has relatively weaker semantic connection than that of ‘outspread-crook’. In these two eye-tracking experiments, voice was used to present the negative sentence, and the corresponding pictures were presented at the moment of reading the words depicting the negated state (e.g., crook/blue). And the participants’ task was to choose which picture matched the sentence. The results demonstrated that, at the early stage of processing, there was no difference between the fixation probabilities to pictures depicting the negated state of affairs (crooked arm) and their alternative (outspread arm) in experiment 1 at time window 201~600 ms. In contrast, participants had higher fixation probabilities to pictures depicting the negated state of affairs (blue skirt) than that to pictures depicting the alternatives in experiment 2 at time window 401~600 ms. Then at the later stage, participants showed higher fixation probabilities to the pictures depicting alternatives to the pictures depicting the negated state of affairs from 601 ms in experiment 1 and 801ms in the experiment 2. Besides, the fixation probabilities to the pictures depicting the negated states were lower than the random level after 1001 ms in both of the two experiments. The results from the two experiments showed that, both propositional process and simulating process are necessary when processing negative sentences. Compared with processing negative sentence in weak semantic context, it’s easier for participants to get the actual state of event with the help of strong semantic context. In addition, participants will not keep the simulation of the negated state of event in his mind, which supports suppression hypothesis. In summary, the results support the symbolic interdependency hypothesis as well as suppression hypothesis.
Key words negation    context    symbolic interdependency hypothesis    two-step simulation hypothesis    anchor-based activation and satisfaction constrained mode
收稿日期: 2016-07-21      出版日期: 2017-12-26
中图分类号:     
  B842  
基金资助: 广东省自然科学基金博士科研启动项目(2017A030310536):“命题表征or经验模拟?来自否定句加工机制的证据”; 广东省哲学社会科学‘十三五’规划项目(GD16XXW01); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(17JNQN022); 2015教育部重点研究基地心理应用研究中心课题“文字符号否定与图形符号否定的加工机制:来自多方法的汇集证据”(15JJD190005)资助。
通讯作者: 何先友, E-mail: xianyouhe@163.com; 陈广耀, E-mail: ccggyy86@163.com   
引用本文:   
陈广耀, 何先友, 刘涛. (2018).  强弱语义语境下的否定句加工机制. 心理学报, 50(2): 186-196.
CHEN Guangyao, HE Xianyou, LIU Tao. (2018).  The processing of negative sentences in different semantic context. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(2), 186-196.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00186      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I2/186
[1] 徐迩嘉, 隋雪. 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 606-621.
[2] 何德娴, 李金惠, 周苗, 陈雅珏, 陈宇, 何先友. 视觉符号否定的加工进程[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(11): 1249-1258.
[3] 刘文理;周详;张明亮. 汉语塞−元−塞音序列语境效应机制探讨[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1057-1069.
[4] 张剑心;汤旦;李莹丽;刘电芝. 反向对抗逻辑范式的创立与证实 ——人工语法PDP对抗逻辑的改进[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1130-1142.
[5] 崔如霞; 高志华;唐艺琳;何皓璠; 鲁忠义. 汉语确定性无界否定句模拟加工的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 607-616.
[6] 刘聪;焦鲁;孙逊;王瑞明. 语言转换对非熟练双语者不同认知控制成分的即时影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 472-481.
[7] 陈广耀;吴洺仪;魏小平;周苗;何先友;莫雷. 状态不确定独立否定句的加工机制[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 204-215.
[8] 陈广耀;张维;陈庆;赵雪汝;何先友. 类别型状态不确定独立否定句的加工机制:来自眼动实验的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1426-1441.
[9] 任桂琴,韩玉昌,于泽. 句子语境中汉语词汇形、音作用的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(4): 427-434.
[10] 江新,房艳霞. 语境和构词法线索对外国学生汉语词义猜测的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(1): 76-86.
[11] 高志华,鲁忠义,马红霞. 汉语简单否定陈述句理解的心理模拟过程[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(12): 1380-1387.
[12] 赵俊华,莫雷. 非熟练中-英双语者英语句子语义通达的语境效应[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(09): 920-928.
[13] 钟年. 中文语境下的“心理”和“心理学”[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(06): 748-756.
[14]

高兵,杨玉芳

. 整体语境和局部语境对代词理解的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(04): 381-388.
[15] 鲁忠义,范宁. 工作记忆广度与汉语句子语境效应的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(01): 22-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn