Please wait a minute...
   2012, Vol. 20 Issue (6) : 894-901     DOI:
研究前沿 |
The Individual Differences of the Framing Effect
YU Hui-Hui;XU Fu-Ming;HUANG Bao-Zhen;WEN Gui-Chan;WANG Lan
(1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education;
School of Psychology, HuaZhong Normal University, and Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory, Wuhan 430079, China)
(2 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
Download: PDF(150 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Framing effect is a phenomenon that an individual has different preference to the alternative programs on the same issue due to different frames. A series of research, conducted by Tversky and Kahneman, confirmed the prevalence of the framing effect. However, with further study, many researchers have found that individual characteristics, mainly including personality, cognitive ability, cognitive style, age, gender and so on, have an impact on the stability of the framing effect. In the future, to explain the individual difference of the framing effect better, a dynamic, integrated model needs to be developed, in which the cognition and emotion are considered together.
Keywords framing effect      personality      cognition      emotion     
Corresponding Authors: XU Fu-Ming   
Issue Date: 15 June 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YU Hui-Hui
XU Fu-Ming
HUANG Bao-Zhen
WEN Gui-Chan
WANG Lan
Cite this article:   
YU Hui-Hui,XU Fu-Ming,HUANG Bao-Zhen, et al. The Individual Differences of the Framing Effect[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 894-901.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I6/894
[1] ZHANG Xiuping, ZHANG Yuping, YANG Xiaohong, YANG Yufang.  Emotion comprehension in discourse and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1289-1298.
[2] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[3] LU Fang.  The precedent correlates of parent-child emotion talk in early childhood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1162-1171.
[4] HUA Huimin, GU Junjuan, LIN Nan, LI Xingshan.  Letter/character position encoding in visual word recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1132-1138.
[5] ZHANG Yinpu, SHI Wei, LUO Ben Nanfeng, XING Lu, XU Yuan.  Applications of experience sampling method in organizational behavior research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 943-954.
[6] YIN Rong, ZHANG Fei-Fei, WANG Yuan-Yuan, XU Zhi-Hong.  Collective guilt: Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency and interventions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1058-1068.
[7] LU Jian; XIAO Zilun; FENG Tinyong. Metacognition: A new perspective on attitude and persuasion study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 866-877.
[8] HU Rui; LIANG Zong-bao; ZHANG Guang-zhen; DENG Hui-hua. The perspective of emotional parenting: Relation between parental meta-emotion philosophy and children’s psychosocial adjustment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 599-608.
[9] WANG Zuo-Jun; HOU Yi-Ru; KUANG Yi; TANG Hui-Yi. The amplification effect of group-shared emotion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 662-671.
[10] ZHANG Shunmin; FENG Tinyong. Neural mechanisms and gene of procrastination based on a behavior-brain-gene perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[11] LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
[12] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[13] QIAN Haoyue; ZHU Min; GAO Xiangping. Configural processing of faces in old adulthood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 230-236.
[14] WANG Pei; LIU Yonghe; TAN Chenhao; LI Yu; WANG Zixin; BAI Yonghai. Conflict schemas moderate the effects of emotions on interpersonal relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 331-341.
[15] PAN Zhe; GUO Yongyu; XU Buxiao; YANG Shenlong. Agency, Communion and their relationship in personality research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 99-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech