Please wait a minute...
   2011, Vol. 19 Issue (2) : 217-223     DOI:
研究前沿 |
An Overview of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
AO Ling-Min;LV Hou-Chao;HUANG Xi-Ting
School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Download: PDF(150 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Individual’s perception for future time is inevitably linked to the social motivation, pursuit of social goals, emotion regulation, and cognitive processing. According to socioemotional selectivity theory, the perceived time left to live is a composition of individual’s motivation which determines the priorities of social goals. When future time is perceived as limited, emotion regulationgoals assume primacy. In contrast, when future time is perceived as open-ended, knowledge-aquicition goals are prioritized. This paper provides a general instroduction and basic presumptions of the theory and reviews related empirical evidence. The paper also identifies several areas for future research development.
Keywords future time      future time perspective      socioemotional selectivity theory      social goal      social preference     
Corresponding Authors: LV Hou-Chao   
Issue Date: 15 February 2011
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
AO Ling-Min
LV Hou-Chao
HUANG Xi-Ting
Cite this article:   
AO Ling-Min,LV Hou-Chao,HUANG Xi-Ting. An Overview of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 217-223.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2011/V19/I2/217
[1] DENG Ying; XU Fu-Ming; LI Ou; SHI Yan-Wei; LIU Cheng-Hao. The framing effect on social preferences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 622-632.
[2] XU Fuming; LI Ou; DENG Ying; LIU Chenghao; SHI Yanwei. The inequity aversion in behavioral economics[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1613-1622.
[3] SHI Yanwei; XU Fuming; LUO Jiaojiang; LI Yan; LIU Chenghao. Trust in Behavioral Economics: Formation Mechanisms and Influential Factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1236-1244.
[4] BI Dandan;HAN Buxin. On the Methodological Issues of Studies on Positivity Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1103-1111.
[5] AO Lingmin;LV Houchao;PANG Xue. Poignancy: Conception, Measurement and Related Studies Review[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1643-1650.
[6] GONG Xian-Min,WANG Da-Hua. The Elderly’s Positivity Effect in Emotional Memory and Its Underlying Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1411-1418.
[7] LIU Xia; HUANG Xi-Ting; PU Bin; BI Cui-Hua. A Summary of Researches on Future Orientation[J]. , 2010, 18(03): 385-393.
[8] WU LIN;XING Xiao-Li. Positivity Effect in Attention and Memory: Paradox of Aging and the Perspective from Socioemotional Selectivity Theory[J]. , 2009, 17(02): 362-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech