Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (3) : 486-496     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00486
Regular Articles |
Eating behavior from the perspective of embodied cognition: Based on the mental simulation approach
Suhong XIONG1(),Hongjie SUN2,Ji LU3,Qi YAO4,Quancheng ZHANG5
1 School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
2 Management School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
3 Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
4 School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 4000074, China
5 Business School, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
Download: PDF(638 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

With the development of the embodied cognition theory, studies on eating behavior have led to some novel and interesting findings based on the mental simulation approach. These findings provide a new perspective on solving overeating and obesity problems, as well as on improving food marketing performance. This article mainly focuses on discussing the effects of mental simulation on eating behavior and the factors which influence mental simulation. Based on the extant literature, first, we discuss the effects of mental simulation on eating behavior. Specifically, we conclude that, while on the one hand, mental simulation can promote eating, on the other hand, it may also inhibit eating. Second, we group factors of mental simulation into two major categories and refer to them as ease factors and motivational factors, and we elaborate on each of them. Third, we discuss the important potential applications on healthy eating behavior as well as on food marketing. Finally, future research issues are outlined.

Keywords embodied cognition      mental simulation      eating behavior     
Corresponding Authors: Suhong XIONG     E-mail: xiong@ctbu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 18 January 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Suhong XIONG
Hongjie SUN
Ji LU
Qi YAO
Quancheng ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Suhong XIONG,Hongjie SUN,Ji LU, et al. Eating behavior from the perspective of embodied cognition: Based on the mental simulation approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 486-496.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00486     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I3/486
[1] 董军, 付淑英, 卢山, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉 . (2018). 自我控制失败的理论模型与神经基础. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 134-143.
[2] 耿晓伟, 张峰, 王艳净, 范琳琳, 姚艳 . (2018). 健康目标启动降低高热量食物消费. 心理学报, 50(8), 840-847.
[3] 韩德昌, 王艳芝 . (2012). 心理模拟: 一种有效预防冲动购买行为的方法. 南开管理评论, 15(1), 142-150.
[4] 刘豫, 陈红, 李书慧, 罗念 . (2017). 在线抑制控制训练对失败的限制性饮食者不健康食物选择的改善. 心理学报, 49(2), 219-227.
[5] 汪宇, 路晖, 杜捷, 陈红 . (2016). 神经影像视角下的肥胖脑机制研究. 心理科学, 39(5), 1086-1092.
[6] 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎 . (2018). 具身认知视角下的消费者行为. 心理科学进展, 2 6(7), 1294-1306.
[7] 熊素红, 孙洪杰 . (2017). 奖赏敏感性在冲动性饮食行为中的作用. 心理科学, 40(2), 429-435.
[8] 叶浩生 . (2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
[9] 叶浩生 . (2016). 镜像神经元的意义. 心理学报, 48(4), 444-456.
[10] 钟毅平, 李琎, 王潇 . (2017). 时间洞察力特质对食品选择偏好的影响: 解释水平对内隐偏好的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 1161-1167.
[11] Barsalou L. W . (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645.
[12] Beaver J. D., Lawrence A. D., van Ditzhuijzen J., Davis M. H., Woods A., & Calder A. J . (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(19), 5160-5166.
[13] Bittman M . (2014). Will China defeat obesity? Retrieved August 25, 2015, from http://nyti.ms/1uvsGTV.
url: http://nyti.ms/1uvsGTV
[14] Blechert J., Klackl J., Miedl S. F., & Wilhelm F. H . (2016). To eat or not to eat: Effects of food availability on reward system activity during food picture viewing. Appetite, 99, 254-261.
[15] Cavazzana A., Larsson M., Hoffmann E., Hummel T., & Haehner A . (2017). The vessel’s shape influences the smell and taste of Cola. Food Quality & Preference, 59, 8-13.
url: http://dx.doi.org/od Quality
[16] Christian B. M., Miles L. K., Kenyeri S. T., Mattschey J., & Macrae C. N . (2016). Taming temptation: Visual perspective impacts consumption and willingness to pay for unhealthy foods. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 22(1), 85-94.
[17] Cornil Y . (2017). Mind over stomach: A review of the cognitive drivers of food satiation. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 419-429.
[18] Cornil Y., & Chandon P . (2016). Pleasure as a substitute for size: How multisensory imagery can make people happier with smaller food portions. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 847-864.
[19] Crum A. J., Corbin W. R., Brownell K. D., & Salovey P . (2011). Mind over milkshakes: Mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychology, 30(4), 424-429.
[20] Davis C., Patte K., Levitan R., Reid C., Tweed S., & Curtis C . (2007). From motivation to behaviour: A model of reward sensitivity, overeating, and food preferences in the risk profile for obesity. Appetite, 48(1), 12-19.
[21] Elder R. S., & Krishna A . (2010). The effects of advertising copy on sensory thoughts and perceived taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 748-756.
[22] Elder R. S., & Krishna A . (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.
[23] Harrar V., & Spence C . (2013). The taste of cutlery: How the taste of food is affected by the weight, size, shape, and colour of the cutlery used to eat it. Flavour, 2(1), 21.
[24] Haynes A., Kemps E., & Moffitt R . (2016a). Is cake more appealing in the afternoon? Time of day is associated with control over automatic positive responses to unhealthy food. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 67-74.
[25] Haynes A., Kemps E., & Moffitt R . (2016b). Does trait self-control predict weaker desire for unhealthy stimuli? A lab-based study of unhealthy snack intake. Personality & Individual Differences, 89, 69-74.
url: http://dx.doi.org/rsonality
[26] Jeannerod M . (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1), S103-S109.
[27] Keesman M., Aarts H., Vermeent S., HäFner M., & Papies E. K . (2016). Consumption simulations induce salivation to food cues. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165449.
[28] Kidd C., & Loxton N. J . (2018). Junk food advertising moderates the indirect effect of reward sensitivity and food consumption via the urge to eat. Physiology & Behavior, 188, 276-282.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ysiology
[29] Krishna A., Cian L., & Sokolova T . (2016). The power of sensory marketing in advertising. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 142-147.
[30] Krishna A., Morrin M., & Sayin E . (2014). Smellizing cookies and salivating: A focus on olfactory imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 18-34.
[31] Larson J. S., Redden J. P., & Elder R. S . (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188-194.
[32] Li X., Tao Q., Fang Y., Cheng C., Hao Y., Qi J., ... Zhang X . (2015). Reward sensitivity predicts ice cream-related attentional bias assessed by inattentional blindness. Appetite, 89, 258-264.
[33] Liem D. G., Miremadi F., Zandstra E. H., & Keast R. S . (2012). Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public Health Nutrition, 15(12), 2340-2347.
[34] Lu J., Xiong S., Arora N., & Dubé L . (2015). Using food as reinforcer to shape children's non-food behavior: The adverse nutritional effect doubly moderated by reward sensitivity and gender. Eating Behaviors, 19, 94-97.
[35] Malik S., McGlone F., Bedrossian D., & Dagher A . (2008). Ghrelin modulates brain activity in areas that control appetitive behavior. Cell Metabolism, 7(5), 400-409.
[36] Maxwell A. L., Loxton N. J., & Hennegan J. M . (2017). Exposure to food cues moderates the indirect effect of reward sensitivity and external eating via implicit eating expectancies. Appetite, 111, 135-141.
[37] Moore D. J., & Konrath S . (2015). “I can almost taste it:” Why people with strong positive emotions experience higher levels of food craving, salivation and eating intentions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 42-59.
[38] Morewedge C. K., Huh Y. E., & Vosgerau J . (2010). Thought for food: Imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science, 330(6010), 1530-1533.
[39] Papies E. K . (2013). Tempting food words activate eating simulations. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1), 838-849.
[40] Papies E. K., Best M., Gelibter E., & Barsalou L. W . (2017). The role of simulations in consumer experiences and behavior: Insights from the grounded cognition theory of desire. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 402-418.
[41] Papies E. K., Pronk T. M., Keesman M., & Barsalou L. W . (2015). The benefits of simply observing: Mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 148-170.
[42] Pecher D., & van Dantzig S . (2016). The role of action simulation on intentions to purchase products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 971-974.
[43] Redden J. P., Haws K. L., & Chen J . (2017). The ability to choose can increase satiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 186-200.
[44] Rennie L., Uskul A. K., Adams C., & Appleton K . (2014). Visualisation for increasing health intentions: Enhanced effects following a health message and when using a first-person perspective. Psychology & Health, 29(2), 237-252.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ychology
[45] Roefs A., Quaedackers L., Werrij M. Q., Wolters G., Havermans R., Nederkoorn C., ... Jansen A . (2006). The environment influences whether high-fat foods are associated with palatable or with unhealthy. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(5), 715-736.
url: http://dx.doi.org/haviour Research
[46] Shen H., & Sengupta J . (2012). If you can't grab it, it won't grab you: The effect of restricting the dominant hand on target evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 525-529.
[47] Shen H., Zhang M., & Krishna A . (2016). Computer interfaces and the "direct-touch" effect: Can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 745-758.
[48] Simmons W. K., Martin A., & Barsalou L. W . (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. C erebral Cortex, 15(10), 1602-1608.
[49] Steinmetz J., Tausen B. M., & Risen J. L . (2018). Mental simulation of visceral states affects preferences and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 406-417.
[50] Strack F., Martin L. L., & Stepper S . (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768-777.
[51] Van Dillen L. F., Papies E. K., & Hofmann W . (2013). Turning a blind eye to temptation: How cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 427-443.
[52] Wadhera D., & Capaldi-Phillips E. D . (2014). A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eating Behaviors, 15(1), 132-143.
[53] Wang Y. C., Mcpherson K., Marsh T., Gortmaker S. L., & Brown M . (2011). Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet, 378(9793), 815-825.
[54] World Health Organisation . (2016). Obesity and overweight: Fact sheet. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
url: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
[55] Yeomans M. R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., & Blake A . (2008). The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference, 19(6), 565-573.
[56] Zhou Y., Gao X., Chen H., & Kong F . (2017). High-disinhibition restrained eaters are disinhibited by self-regulatory depletion in the food-related inhibitory control. Eating Behaviors, 26, 70-75.
[57] Zhou Y., Liu Y., Du J., & Chen H . (2018). Effects of food exposure on food-related inhibitory control in restrained eaters: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 130-135.
[1] Wenhua YU,Zhongyi LU. A new perspective on the cognitive function of gestures: The “spatializing” gesture hypothesis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 426-433.
[2] LI Ying,ZHANG Can,WANG Yue. The effect of moral emotions on the metaphorical mapping of morality and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[3] CHEN Lin,TIAN Xiaoming,DUAN Jinyun. The cognitive mechanism of advice taking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[4] LI Heng. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[5] LU Hong, ZHANG Xinyuan, WEI Wenqi, LIU Yi.  The influence of spatial physical order on psychology and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[6] Chuanjun LIU,Jiangqun LIAO. An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2260-2271.
[7] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[8] XU Fuming; LI Ou; DENG Ying; LI Yan; SHI Yanwei. The projection bias in judgment and decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 422-430.
[9] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[10] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[11] LEE Hui-Min I.; WANG Ruo-Meng; WANG Quan-Hong; QIU Jiang. Handwriting Psychology in the Age of Computers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[12] Li Jinxing; Wang Zhenhong. Spatial-temporal Association of Response Codes Effect: Manifestation, Influencing Factors and Its Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 30-40.
[13] HAN Dong;YE Haosheng. Important Embodied in Weight: Weight’s Experience and Representation in Embodiment Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[14] CHEN Zhaorong;LI Ye. Embodied Social Relationship: Based on the Relational Models Frame[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.
[15] CHEN Yaping;LI Xiaodong. Infant’s Understanding of Actions: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech