Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (10) : 1775-1786     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01775
|
How does encoding predict retrieval? Evidence from subsequent memory effects
NIE Aiqing(,LI Mengsi,PAN Ru
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
Download: PDF(357 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Within memory research, the relation between encoding and retrieval has been under the spotlight. Research in the past 37 years (1980-present) has demonstrated that there are differences between the neural mechanisms activated by subsequently remembered information and subsequently forgotten information during encoding, which are labeled as subsequent memory effects. Such effects indicate that it’s possible to predict retrieval according to the neural activities during encoding. In the past decade (2008~2017), researchers have opened new paths on subsequent memory effects inspired by previous studies in this field, such as focusing on the influences of processing levels and orientating tasks during encoding, comparing the effects among different retrieval tasks, exploring the similarities and differences among different age groups, and examining the impacts of emotional items and emotional contexts. In this sense, detailed reviews were made from these aspects. Furthermore, we pointed out several possible directions for future studies: (a) integrating previous results, (b) improving theoretical models, (c) exploring more social factors, (d) focusing on individual and group differences, as well as (e) extending applications.

Keywords subsequent memory effects      encoding task      retrieval task      age      emotion     
Corresponding Authors: Aiqing NIE     E-mail: nieaiq@126.com
Issue Date: 27 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
NIE Aiqing
LI Mengsi
PAN Ru
Cite this article:   
NIE Aiqing,LI Mengsi,PAN Ru. How does encoding predict retrieval? Evidence from subsequent memory effects[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1775-1786.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01775     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I10/1775
1 郭春彦, 朱滢, 丁锦红, 范思陆 . ( 2003). 不同加工与记忆编码关系的ERP研究. 心理学报, 35( 2), 150-156.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb200302002
2 秦绍正, 韩布新, 罗劲 . ( 2007). 相继记忆模式: 展现情节记忆形成脑机制的窗口. 心理科学进展, 15( 3), 401-408.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt200703003
3 Becker N., Kalpouzos G., Persson J., Laukka E. J., & Brehmer Y . ( 2017). Differential effects of encoding instructions on brain activity patterns of item and associative memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29( 3), 545-559.
url: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/jocn_a_01062
4 Brehmer Y., Shing Y. L., Heekeren H. R., Lindenberger U., & Bäckman L . ( 2016). Training-induced changes in subsequent-memory effects: No major differences among children, younger adults, and older adults. NeuroImage, 131, 214-225.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811915011118
5 Bridger E. K., & Wilding, E. L . ( 2010). Requirements at retrieval modulate subsequent memory effects: An event- related potential study. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1( 4), 254-260.
pmid: 24168378 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17588928.2010.484882
6 Brocher A., & Graf, T. ( 2017). Decision-related factors in pupil old/new effects: Attention, response execution, and false memory. Neuropsychologia, 102, 124-134.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393217302245
7 Cansino S., Estrada-Manilla C., Trejo-Morales P., Pasaye- Alcaraz E. H., Aguilar-Castañeda E., Salgado-Lujambio P., & Sosa-Ortiz A. L . ( 2015). fMRI subsequent source memory effects in young, middle-aged and old adults. Behavioural Brain Research, 280, 24-35.
pmid: 25476566 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432814007785
8 Cansino S., Trejo-Morales P., Estrada-Manilla C., Pasaye- Alcaraz E. H., Aguilar-Castañeda E., Salgado-Lujambio P., & Sosa-Ortiz A. L . ( 2017). Effective connectivity during successful and unsuccessful recollection in young and old adults. Neuropsychologia, 103, 168-182.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393217302695
9 Cassidy B. S., Hedden T., Yoon C., & Gutchess A. H . ( 2014). Age differences in medial prefrontal activity for subsequent memory of truth value. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 87.
pmid: 3916770 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570672
10 Collier A. K., Wolf D. H., Valdez J. N., Gur R. E., & Gur R. C . ( 2014). Subsequent memory effects in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 224( 3), 211-217.
pmid: 25453165 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925492714002649
11 de Chastelaine M., Mattson J. T., Wang T. H., Donley B. E., & Rugg M. D . ( 2015). Sensitivity of negative subsequent memory and task-negative effects to age and associative memory performance. Brain Research, 1612, 16-29.
12 de Chastelaine M., Mattson J. T., Wang T. H., Donley B. E., & Rugg M. D . ( 2016). The relationships between age, associative memory performance, and the neural correlates of successful associative memory encoding. Neurobiology of Aging, 42, 163-176.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S019745801600213X
13 de Chastelaine, M., & Rugg, M. D . ( 2015). The effects of study task on prestimulus subsequent memory effects in the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 25( 11), 1217-1223.
pmid: 26135908 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hipo.v25.11
14 de Chastelaine M., Wang T. H., Minton B., Muftuler L. T., & Rugg M. D . ( 2011). The effects of age, memory performance, and callosal integrity on the neural correlates of successful associative encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 21( 9), 2166-2176.
url: https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/cercor/bhq294
15 Doidge A. N., Evans L. H., Herron J. E., & Wilding E. L . ( 2017). Separating content-specific retrieval from post-retrieval processing. Cortex, 86, 1-10.
pmid: 5264396 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945216302738
16 Dolcos F., LaBar K. S., & Cabeza R . ( 2004). Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: An event- related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 64-74.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811904002940
17 Dulas M. R., & Duarte, A. ( 2013). The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1500, 55-71.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=19627446
18 Duverne S., Motamedinia S., & Rugg M. D . ( 2009). The relationship between aging, performance, and the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 19( 3), 733-744.
url: https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/cercor/bhn122
19 Estrada-Manilla C., & Cansino, S. ( 2012). Event-related potential variations in the encoding and retrieval of different amounts of contextual information. Behavioural Brain Research, 232( 1), 190-201.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432812002628
20 Fellner M. C., Bäuml K. T., & Hanslmayr S . ( 2013). Brain oscillatory subsequent memory effects differ in power and long-range synchronization between semantic and survival processing. NeuroImage, 79, 361-370.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811913004898
21 Fernandes M. A., Moscovitch M., Ziegler M., & Grady C . ( 2005). Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention. Neuropsychologia, 43( 8), 1115-1127.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393204002994
22 Friedman D., & Johnson, R. J . ( 2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51( 1), 6-28.
pmid: 11002349 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291097-0029
23 Galli G., Wolpe N., & Otten L. J . ( 2011). Sex differences in the use of anticipatory brain activity to encode emotional events. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 34), 12364-12370.
pmid: 3173860 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-11.2011
24 Gao C. J., Hermiller M. S., Voss J. L., & Guo C. Y . ( 2015). Basic perceptual changes that alter meaning and neural correlates of recognition memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 49.
pmid: 4324141 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717298
25 Gärtner M., & Bajbouj, M. ( 2014). Encoding-related EEG oscillations during memory formation are modulated by mood state. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscence, 9( 12), 1934-1941.
pmid: 24464848 url: https://academic.oup.com/scan/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/scan/nst184
26 Geng F., Canada K., & Riggins T . ( 2018). Age- and performance-related differences in encoding during early childhood: Insights from event-related potentials. Memory, 26( 4), 451-461.
url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09658211.2017.1366526
27 Ghetti S., DeMaster D. M., Yonelinas A. P., & Bunge S. A . ( 2010). Developmental differences in medial temporal lobe function during memory encoding. Journal of Neuroscience, 30( 28), 9548-9556.
pmid: 2937832 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-09.2010
28 Guo C., Duan L., Li W., & Paller K. A . ( 2006). Distinguishing source memory and item memory: Brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Research, 1118( 1), 142-154.
pmid: 16978588 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16978588
29 Hanslmayr S., & Staudigl, T. ( 2014). How brain oscillations form memories — A processing based perspective on oscillatory subsequent memory effects. NeuroImage, 85, 648-655.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811913006319
30 Hayes J. M., Tang L., Viviano R. P., Rooden V. S., Ofen N., & Damoiseaux J. S . ( 2017). Subjective memory complaints are associated with brain activation supporting successful memory encoding. Neurobiology of Aging, 60, 71-80.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0197458017302713
31 Hoppstädter M., Baeuchl C., Diener C., Flor H., & Meyer P . ( 2015). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals brain networks underlying recognition memory ERP old/new effects. NeuroImage, 116, 112-122.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811915004061
32 Hsieh L. T., Hung D. L., Tzeng O. J. L., Lee J. R., & Cheng S . ( 2009). An event-related potential investigation of the processing of remember/forget cues and item encoding in item-method directed forgetting. Brain Research, 1250, 190-201.
33 Kamp S. M., Bader R., & Mecklinger A . ( 2017). ERP subsequent memory effects differ between inter-item and unitization encoding tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 30.
pmid: 5403928 url: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2017.00030/full
34 Kamp S. M., Potts G. F., & Donchin E . ( 2015). On the roles of distinctiveness and semantic expectancies in episodic encoding of emotional words. Psychophysiology, 52( 12), 1599-1609.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.12537
35 Kiefer M., Schuch S., Schenck W., & Fiedler K . ( 2007). Emotion and memory: Event-related potential indices predictive for subsequent successful memory depend on the emotional mood state. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3( 3), 363-373.
url: http://newacp.vizja.pl/en/download-pdf/volume/3/issue/1/id/52
36 Kim H., ( 2011). Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: A meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies. NeuroImage, 54, 2446-2461.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811910012267
37 Kontaxopoulou D., Beratis I. N., Fragkiadaki S., Pavlou D., Yannis G., Economou A., .. Papageorgiou S. G . ( 2017). Incidental and intentional memory: Their relation with attention and executive functions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32( 5), 519-532.
pmid: 28383645 url: https://academic.oup.com/acn/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/arclin/acx027
38 Kuo M. C. C., Liu K. P. Y., Ting K. H ., & Chan, C. C. H. ( 2012). Differentiation of perceptual and semantic subsequent memory effects using an orthographic paradigm. Brain Research, 1486, 82-91.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=24344809
39 Leventon J. S., & Bauer, P. J . ( 2016). Emotion regulation during the encoding of emotional stimuli: Effects on subsequent memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 312-333.
pmid: 26597138 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022096515002283
40 Liang J. C., & Preston, A. R . ( 2017). Medial temporal lobe reinstatement of content-specific details predicts source memory. Cortex, 91, 67-78.
pmid: 28029355 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945216302581
41 Liu Y., Rosburg T., Gao C., Weber C., & Guo C . ( 2017). Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study. Biological Psychology, 127, 134-147.
pmid: 28552619 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301051117301084
42 Maillet D., & Rajah, M. N . ( 2014 a). Age-related differences in brain activity in the subsequent memory paradigm: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 246-257.
pmid: 24973756 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149763414001444
43 Maillet D., & Rajah, M. N . ( 2014 b). Dissociable roles of default-mode regions during episodic encoding. NeuroImage, 89, 244-255.
pmid: 24315838 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811913011993
44 Malejka S., & Bröder, A. ( 2016). No source memory for unrecognized items when implicit feedback is avoided. Memory & Cognition, 44, 63-72.
url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13421-015-0549-8
45 Martínez-Galindo J. G., & Cansino, S. ( 2015). Positive and negative emotional contexts unevenly predict episodic memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 291, 89-102.
pmid: 26003944 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432815003472
46 Nie A., Guo C., Wu Y., Qu N., & Ding J . ( 2004). Picture encoding and retrieval: An event-related potential study. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49( 20), 2148-2154.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03185781
47 Osipova D., Takashima A., Oostenveld R., Fernández G., Maris E., & Jensen O . ( 2006). Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 26( 28), 7523-7531.
pmid: 16837600 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1948-06.2006
48 Ozubko J. D., & Sel, P. ( 2016). Forget all that nonsense: The role of meaning during the forgetting of recollective and familiarity-based memories. Neuropsychologia, 90, 136-147.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393216302251
49 Paller K. A., Kutas M., & Mayes A. R . ( 1987). Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67( 4), 360-371.
pmid: 2441971 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0013469487901246
50 Park H., Kennedy K. M., Rodrigue K. M., Hebrank A., & Park D. C . ( 2013). An fMRI study of episodic encoding across the lifespan: Changes in subsequent memory effects are evident by middle-age. Neuropsychologia, 51( 3), 448-456.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393212004927
51 Park H., Uncapher M. R ., & Rugg, A. M. D. ( 2008). Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding. Learning & Memory, 15( 6), 417-425.
pmid: 2414252 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18511693
52 Proberbio A. M., La Mastra F., & Zani A . ( 2016). How negative social bias affects memory for faces: An electrical neuroimaging study. PLoS One, 11( 9), e0162671.
url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162671
53 Righi S., Marzi T., Toscani M., Baldassi S., Ottonello S., & Viggiano M. P . ( 2012). Fearful expressions enhance recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Acta Psychologica, 139( 1), 7-18.
pmid: 22036588 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001691811001855
54 Rollins L., & Riggins, T. ( 2013). Developmental changes in memory encoding: Insights from event-related potentials. Developmental Science, 16( 4), 599-609.
pmid: 23786477 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/desc.12072
55 Rollins L., & Riggins, T. ( 2018). Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval. Developmental Science, 21( 3), e12583.
pmid: 28677331 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/desc.2018.21.issue-3
56 Ross R. S., Medrano P., Boyle K., Smolen A., Curran T., & Nyhus E . ( 2015). Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter gene influences ERP old/new effects during recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 78, 95-107.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393215301718
57 Sanquist T. F., Rohrbaugh J. W., Syndulko K., & Lindsey D. B . ( 1980). Electrocortical signs of levels of processing: Perceptual analysis and recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 17( 6), 568-576.
pmid: 7443924 url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/psyp/17/6
58 Schwarz N., ( 2010). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology( pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
59 Shing Y. L., Brehmer Y., Heekeren H. R., Bäckman L., & Lindenberger U . ( 2016). Neural activation patterns of successful episodic encoding: Reorganization during childhood, maintenance in old age. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 59-69.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1878929315301110
60 Shing Y. L., Werkle-Bergner M., Brehmer Y., Müller V., Li S. C., & Lindenberger U . ( 2010). Episodic memory across the lifespan: The contributions of associative and strategic components. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34( 7), 1080-1091.
pmid: 19896974 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149763409001687
61 Sliwa J., & Freiwald, W. A . ( 2017). A dedicated network for social interaction processing in the primate brain. Science, 356, 745-749.
pmid: 5540642 url: http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aam6383
62 Tsoi L., Dungan J., Waytz A., & Young L . ( 2016). Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition. NeuroImage, 137, 86-96.
pmid: 27165762 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811916301094
63 Vogelsang D. A., Bonnici H. M., Bergström Z. M., Ranganath C., & Simons J. S . ( 2016). Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information. Neuropsychologia, 89, 356-363.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393216302603
64 Voss J. L., & Paller, K. A . ( 2009). Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval. NeuroImage, 46, 280-289.
pmid: 19457375 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811909000846
65 Wagner A. D., Koutstaal W., & Schacter D. L . ( 1999). When encoding yields remembering: Insights from event- related neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 354( 1387), 1307-1324.
pmid: 1692641 url: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rstb.1999.0481
66 Watts S., Buratto L. G., Brotherhood E. V., Barnacle G. E., & Schaefer A . ( 2014). The neural fate of neutral information in emotion-enhanced memory. Psychophysiology, 51( 7), 673-684.
pmid: 24673606 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2014.51.issue-7
67 Wilding E. L. , & Sharpe, H. ( 2003) . Episodic memory encoding and retrieval: Recent insights from event-related potentials. In A. Zani, A. M. Proverbio, & M. I. Posner (Eds.), The cognitive electrophysiology of mind and brain (pp. 169-196). San Diego: Academic Press.
68 Wong J. X., de Chastelaine M., & Rugg M. D . ( 2013). Comparison of the neural correlates of encoding item-item and item-context associations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 436.
pmid: 3743067 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23970858
69 Wong S., Irish M., O’Callaghan C., Kumfor F., Savage G., Hodges J. R., .. Hornberger M . ( 2017). Should I trust you? Learning and memory of social interactions in dementia. Neuropsychologia, 104, 157-167.
pmid: 28811259 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002839321730310X
70 Yick Y. Y., Buratto L. G., & Schaefer A . ( 2015). The effects of negative emotion on encoding-related neural activity predicting item and source recognition. Neuropsychologia, 73, 48-59.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393215300129
71 Yonelinas A. P., Aly M., Wang W. C., & Koen J. D . ( 2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20( 11), 1178-1194.
pmid: 20848606 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hipo.v20%3A11
[1] Chen LIU,Xu CHEN. Differences in autobiographical memory retrieval from the perspective of attachment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1590-1599.
[2] Xi HUANG,Hong-Yu LIANG,Fang LI,Shi-Min CHEN,Wei-Xin WANG,Miao-Lian LIN,Xue ZHENG. Moral elevation: A positive moral emotion associated with elevating moral sentiment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1253-1263.
[3] Jing ZHANG,Wei CHEN. The investigation of minimal self based on self-illusion: The embodied constructivism position[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1252.
[4] Huihui ZHANG,Liang ZHANG. The effects of early life stress on emotion regulation and the underlying mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1193-1203.
[5] Xiaoyan YE,Delong ZHANG,Song CHANG,Ming LIU. The individual difference of visual mental imagery and its neural basis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1186-1192.
[6] ZHANG Hengchao. Communicative language cognition theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1019-1019.
[7] WANG Ding, WANG Chao, LI Hong. The psychological mechanism of enjoying sad music[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1004-1011.
[8] CUI Xin, SU Mengmeng, SHU Hua. Application of sulcal morphometry analysis in cognitive neuroscience of language[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 994-1003.
[9] SHI Jian, LONG Lirong.  The depletion effects of sleep deprivation among employees: A new topic in organization and management research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 896-909.
[10] TIAN Haoyue, LI Lihong, XU Zhe, LI Fei, JIN Dan, AN Canling.  Sense of agency in the minimal self[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 872-885.
[11] LIN Yuting, ZHANG Delong, LIU Ming.  The system of visual imagery generation and its effect factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 636-644.
[12] WANG Haiwen, ZHANG Shuhua.  The relationship between emotional labor and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 599-613.
[13] LI Wenqi, ZHANG Mengyuan, KOU Yu.  Political orientation and its changing mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 549-559.
[14] YUE Tong, HUANG Xiting, LIU Guangyuan.  The effects of oxytocin on empathic response and its mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 442-453.
[15] SU Yi (ESTHER).  Acquisition of core Chinese grammar in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 391-399.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech