Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (7) : 1284-1293     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01284
Regular Articles |
The dynamic process of social norm development
Weiyang CHEN,Tian XIE()
Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Download: PDF(444 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Classic studies distinguish social norms from descriptive and injunctive norms. In contrast to this static division, research has recently begun to focus on the dynamic process of social norm development, including the acquisition, transmission, and transformation of social norms as well as their influencing factors. The acquisition of social norms can be traced back to early childhood social interaction. The formation of descriptive norms can be considered a result of the learning of exemplars of a social category. The rationalization of the status quo has led to the transformation of descriptive norms into injunctive norms. The influencing factors of social norms are not only related to their psychological functions - to meet individuals’ needs for security, belonging, and uniqueness - but also to external environment, which involves power positions and punishment mechanisms. To probe the process of normative influence, future studies could further analyze the formation and action processes of social norms, take account of studies of social norm strength, and analyze social norms in their cultural context.

Keywords social norms      dynamic process      social networks      psychological needs     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Corresponding Authors: Tian XIE     E-mail: thanksky520@126.com
Issue Date: 29 May 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Weiyang CHEN
Tian XIE
Cite this article:   
Weiyang CHEN,Tian XIE. The dynamic process of social norm development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1284-1293.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01284     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I7/1284
1 陈思静, 何铨, 马剑虹 . ( 2015). 第三方惩罚对合作行为的影响: 基于社会规范激活的解释. 心理学报, 47( 3), 389-405.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xlxb201503009.aspx
2 卢俊, 陈浩, 乐国安 . ( 2017). 松-紧文化: 跨文化心理学研究的新维度. 心理科学进展, 25( 5), 887-902.
3 汪新建, 吕小康 . ( 2009). 作为惯习的潜规则——潜规则盛行的文化心理学分析框架. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), ( 4), 133-139.
4 吴思 . ( 2001). 潜规则: 中国历史中的真实游戏. 昆明: 云南人民出版社.
5 谢天, 石双 . ( 2016). 比较视角: 幸福感与物质主义、传统规范的交互影响. 黑龙江社会科学, ( 2), 96-102.
6 Anderson C., Hildreth J. A. D., & Howland L . ( 2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141( 3), 574-601.
pmid: 25774679 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0038781
7 Andrighetto G., Brandts J., Conte R., Sabater-Mir J., Solaz H., & Villatoro D . ( 2013). Punish and voice: Punishment enhances cooperation when combined with norm-signalling. PLoS One, 8( 6), e64941.
pmid: 3680389 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064941
8 Blake P. R., McAuliffe K., Corbit J., Callaghan T. C., Barry O., Bowie A., .. Warneken F . ( 2015). The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature, 528( 7581), 258-261.
pmid: 26580018 url: http://www.nature.com/articles/nature15703
9 Bowles, H. R., & Gelfand, M . ( 2010). Status and the evaluation of workplace deviance. Psychological Science, 21( 1), 49-54.
pmid: 20424022 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797609356509
10 Brewer, M. B . ( 1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17( 5), 475-482.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167291175001
11 Castano, E . ( 2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34( 4), 375-384.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-0992
12 Chao M. M., Zhang Z. X., & Chiu C. Y . ( 2010). Adherence to perceived norms across cultural boundaries: The role of need for cognitive closure and ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13( 1), 69-89.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-25105-005
13 Chen, Y. Y., & Hong, Y. Y . ( 2015). Different ways to resolve discrepancy between descriptive and injunctive norms across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46( 10), 1316-1319.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115600265
14 Cialdini R. B., Kallgren C. A., & Reno R. R . ( 1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065260108603305
15 Cialdini R. B., Martin S. J., & Goldstein N. J . ( 2015). Small behavioral science-informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1( 1), 21-27.
url: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/607747
16 Eom K., Kim H. S., Sherman D. K., & Ishii K . ( 2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27( 10), 1331-1339.
pmid: 27565535 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797616660078
17 Eriksson K., Strimling P., & Coultas J. C . ( 2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 59-69.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597814000764
18 Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U . ( 2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25( 2), 63-87.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090513804000054
19 Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. ( 2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415( 6868), 137-140.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/415137a
20 Galinsky A. D., Magee J. C., Gruenfeld D. H., Whitson J. A., & Liljenquist K. A . ( 2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95( 6), 1450-1466.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0012633
21 Gao W. J., Qiu L., Chiu C. Y., & Yang Y. Y . ( 2015). Diffusion of opinions in a complex culture system: Implications for emergence of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46( 10), 1252-1259.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115610212
22 Gelfand, M. J., & Jackson, J. C . ( 2016). From one mind to many: The emerging science of cultural norms. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 175-181.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352250X15002997
23 Gelfand M. J., Raver J. L., Nishii L., Leslie L. M., Lun J., Lim B. C., .. Yamaguchi S . ( 2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332( 6033), 1100-1104.
pmid: 21617077 url: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1197754
24 GÖckeritz S., Schmidt M. F. H., & Tomasello M . ( 2014). Young children's creation and transmission of social norms. Cognitive Development, 30, 81-95.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0885201414000161
25 Harrington, J. R., & Gelfand, M. J . ( 2014). Tightness- looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111( 22), 7990-7995.
pmid: 24843116 url: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1317937111
26 Jost J. T., Sterling J. L., & Langer M . ( 2015). From “Is” to “Ought” and sometimes “Not”: Compliance with and resistance to social norms from a system justification perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46( 10), 1287-1291.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115600268
27 Kashima E. S., Halloran M., Yuki M., & Kashima Y . ( 2004). The effects of personal and collective mortality salience on individualism: Comparing Australians and Japanese with higher and lower self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40( 3), 384-392.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103103001355
28 Kashima Y., Wilson S., Lusher D., Pearson L. J., & Pearson C . ( 2013). The acquisition of perceived descriptive norms as social category learning in social networks. Social Networks, 35( 4), 711-719.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378873313000531
29 Kosic A., Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., & Mannetti L . ( 2004). The social cognition of immigrants’ acculturation: Effects of the need for closure and the reference group at entry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 6), 796-813.
pmid: 15149256 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.796
30 Kreuzbauer R., Chiu C. Y., Lin S. D., & Bae S. H . ( 2014). When does life satisfaction accompany relational identity signaling: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45( 4), 646-659.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022113518369
31 Kruglanski A. W. ( 2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32 Kwan L. Y. Y., Yap S., & Chiu C. Y . ( 2015). Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 48-58.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597814001174
33 Livi S., Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., Mannetti L., & Kenny D. A . ( 2015). Epistemic motivation and perpetuation of group culture: Effects of need for cognitive closure on trans- generational norm transmission. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 105-112.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597814000752
34 McAuliffe K., Jordan J. J., & Warneken F . ( 2015). Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition, 134, 1-10.
pmid: 25460374 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001002771400170X
35 Morris M. W., Chiu C. Y., & Liu Z . ( 2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631-659.
url: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015001
36 Morris, M. W., & Liu, Z . ( 2015). Psychological functions of subjective norms: Reference groups, moralization, adherence, and defiance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46( 10), 1279-1287.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115612161
37 Mulder, L. B . ( 2008). The difference between punishments and rewards in fostering moral concerns in social decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44( 6), 1436-1443.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103108001017
38 Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E . ( 2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26( 4), 269-281.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
39 Roos P., Gelfand M., Nau D., & Lun J . ( 2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14-23.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597815000047
40 Savani K., Wadhwa M., Uchida Y., Ding Y., & Naidu, N. V. R . ( 2015). When norms loom larger than the self: Susceptibility of preference-choice consistency to normative influence across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 70-79.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597814000661
41 Stamkou E., van Kleef G. A., Homan A. C., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2016). How norm violations shape social hierarchies: Those who stand on top block norm violators from rising up. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19( 5), 608-629.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/301955591_How_norm_violations_shape_social_hierarchies_Those_who_stand_on_top_block_norm_violators_from_rising_up
42 van Kleef G. A., Homan A. C., Finkenauer C., Blaker N. M., & Heerdink M. W . ( 2012). Prosocial norm violations fuel power affordance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 4), 937-942.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103112000480
43 van Kleef G. A., Homan A. C., Finkenauer C., Gündemir S., & Stamkou E . ( 2011). Breaking the rules to rise to power: How norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2( 5), 500-507.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550611398416
44 Wan, C . ( 2015). Understanding cultural identification through intersubjective cultural representation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46( 10), 1267-1272.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022022115610213
45 Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M . ( 2013). The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116( 2), 338-350.
pmid: 23917162 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022096513001240
46 Williams, A., & Moore, C . ( 2016). A longitudinal exploration of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 294-306.
pmid: 27632711 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022096516300820
47 Xie W. W., Ho B., Meier S., & Zhou X. Y . ( 2017). Rank reversal aversion inhibits redistribution across societies. Nature Human Behavior, 1( 8), 0142.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0142
[1] ZHANG Rongwei, LI Dan.  How to experience a meaningful life: Based on the integration of theoretical models on meaning in life[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 744-760.
[2] LU Jun; CHEN Hao; YUE Guoan. Tight-loose culture: A new dimension of cross-cultural psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 887-902.
[3] JIANG Yong-zhi; BAI Xiao-li; A Latanbagen; LIU Yong; LI Min; LIU Gui-qin. Problematic social networks usage of adolescent[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1435-1447.
[4] GE Hongning; ZHOU Zongkui; NIU Gengfeng; CHEN Wu. Can social network sites use bring social capital to users?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 454-463.
[5] ZHAO Dan; YU Lin. Influence of social interaction on cognitive functions in the elderly[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 46-54.
[6] WEI Qingwang;SUN Jianmin. Promoting Pro-environmental Behaviors in Perspective of Psychology: The Focus Theory of Normative Conduct[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 751-760.
[7] LIU Jingdong;CHUNG Pak-Kwong;SI Gangyan. The Application of Self-Determination Theory among Chinese Populations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1803-1813.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech