Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (5) : 922-927     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00922
Regular Articles |
Research on intertemporal choice: From single dated outcomes to multiple dated outcomes
 JIANG Cheng-Ming1; XIE Kai-Jie2; HE Quan3
(1College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China) (2 College of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China) (3 College of Politics and Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)
Download: PDF(282 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  Intertemporal choice refers to any decision that requires tradeoffs among outcomes that occur at different times. With an increasing consensus on the psychological process for choices between single dated outcomes, an increasing amount of research focuses on choices between multiple dated outcomes. This paper reviews theories on intertemporal choices between multiple dated outcomes, including the sequences model, reason-based theory, salience account, and tradeoff model. In doing so, this paper suggests directions for future research on intertemporal choices between multiple dated outcomes, including a comparison and reconciliation of different theories, an examination of loss outcomes, and an application of eye-tracking techniques.
Keywords intertemporal choice      single dated outcome      multiple dated outcomes     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: JIANG Cheng-Ming, E-mail: jiangchengming@zjut.edu.cn或 wanderinghare@hotmail.com     E-mail: E-mail: jiangchengming@zjut.edu.cn或 wanderinghare@hotmail.com
Issue Date: 31 March 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
JIANG Cheng-Ming
XIE Kai-Jie
HE Quan
Cite this article:   
JIANG Cheng-Ming,XIE Kai-Jie,HE Quan. Research on intertemporal choice: From single dated outcomes to multiple dated outcomes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 922-927.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00922     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I5/922
[1] ZHANG Shunmin; FENG Tinyong. Neural mechanisms and gene of procrastination based on a behavior-brain-gene perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[2] LI Aimei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; WANG Xiaotian; LI Bin. The effect and cognitive mechanism of “time poverty” on intertemporal choice and proactive behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 874-884.
[3] SUN Hong-Yue; JIANG Cheng-Ming. Is intertemporal choice alternative-based or attribute-based?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 431-437.
[4] REN Tian-Hong; HU Zhi-Shan; SUN Hong-Yue; LIU Yang; LI Shu. Making A Decision vs. Sticking to A Decision: A Comparison of Intertemporal Choice and Delay of Gratification[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 303-315.
[5] PENG Juan;FENG Tingyong. Intervention Program and Neural Mechanisms for Intertemporal Choice in Addicts[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 810-821.
[6] FU Mei;WANG Qiang. The Neural Basis of Intertemporal Choice: Evidences from Voxel-Based Morphometry and Diffusion Tensor Imaging[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 659-667.
[7] LIANG Zhu-Yuan;LIU Huan. Exploring the Nature of Intertemporal Choice[J]. , 2011, 19(7): 959-966.
[8] SUN Yan. The Intertemporal Choice Under Risk: A Research Proposal[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 28-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech