Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (1) : 1-13     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00001
Editor-In-Chief Invited |
 Psychological issues inside social governance
 XIN Ziqiang
 (School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
Download: PDF(514 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract   In recent years, some psychologists began to pay attention to psychological issues in social governance. To correctly identify these research issues and problems, we should realize that the core of social governance is human being, on the basis of the psychological essence of social governance. Concretely, the subject of social governance is human beings such as civil servants, social workers and citizens; the object of the governance is social affairs related to human beings; the process of the governance is the activity of group decision making carried out by multiple subjects; and one pathway to good governance is mind construction. Therefore, psychological research should focus on the innate issues inside social governance, including the governance competences of various subjects, realistic social psychological problems as the object of governance, the psychological process of group decision making, and the strategies and solutions of mind construction. Research on these issues would produce an original framework of “social governance psychology”, and achieve the goal of “good governance based on mind”.
Keywords social governance      governance competency      social mentality      group decision making      mind construction     
ZTFLH:  B849: C91  
Corresponding Authors: XIN Ziqiang, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 28 November 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
XIN Ziqiang
Cite this article:   
XIN Ziqiang.  Psychological issues inside social governance[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 1-13.
URL:     OR
[1] LI Yue-Ran;LI Shu. The Retrospect and Prospect of Judge-Advisor System Model[J]. , 2009, 17(05): 1026-1032.
[2] Zeng Jianhua, He Guibing. Advances In Research On Constructive Group Decision Making Process[J]. , 2003, 11(06): 686-691.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech