Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (8) : 1423-1430     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01423
|
 Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective
 LI Ming-Hui1,2; RAO Li-Lin1
 (1 CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (2 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Download: PDF(350 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   Moral judgment is critical for social cooperation. Research on moral judgment has been rapidly growing in the last 20 years. Empirical evidence has been accumulating to challenge the assumptions underlying the Social Intuitionist Model and Dual-process Model, which are the dominant models of moral judgment. Recently, construal level theory (CLT) has provided a new perspective for research on moral judgment. This article reviewed CLT-based research on moral judgment by classifying studies into two different categories, namely, moral judgment on moral dilemmas and moral judgment on moral and immoral actions. Evidence from the former arrived at a consistent conclusion, whereas that from the latter is inconclusive. We proposed that construal levels may affect moral judgment through turning people’s attention to different principles. Future research should focus on cross-cultural comparisons and exploring the mechanism underlying the relationship between CLT and moral judgment to clarify the controversy and provide additional empirical evidence.
Keywords        moral judgment      construal level theory      moral dilemma      moral transgression      moral action     
ZTFLH:     
  B849:C91  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: RAO Li-Lin, E-mail: raoll@psych.ac.cn     E-mail: E-mail: raoll@psych.ac.cn
Issue Date: 25 June 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Ming-Hui
RAO Li-Lin
Cite this article:   
LI Ming-Hui,RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01423     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2017/V25/I8/1423
[1] .  Context-dependent Laminar Processing of Visual Contours in Monkey V1 and V2[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 15-15.
[2] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 12-12.
[3] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 2-2.
[4] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 1-1.
[5] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 21-21.
[6] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 28-28.
[7] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 30-30.
[8] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 46-46.
[9] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 66-66.
[10] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 67-67.
[11] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 69-69.
[12] .  The effect of consecutive transcranial direct current stimulation on the learning of Vernier discrimination task[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 70-70.
[13] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 80-80.
[14] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 81-81.
[15] .  [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 83-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech