Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (12) : 1907-1916     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01907
Regular Articles |
The profit sacrificing tendency of reputation-profit game
TAN Chenhao1; WANG Yibo1; CUI Yichen1,3; WANG Pei1,2
(1 Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China) (2 School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China) (3 Institute of Ideological and Political Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
Download: PDF(397 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

A situation in which one must make a choice between his reputation and profit is so called a reputation-profit game. Individual usually tends to sacrifice their profit to obtain reputation in this kind of game. Competitive altruism theory regards the reputation obtaining behavior as a strategy with which one can attract investor’s interest to gain more profit from the investment in the future. The identity of the observer would affect the degree of gamer’s tendency of reputation obtaining behavior. According to the purpose of reputation, observer’s objective capacity to pay back the investment of reputation (e.g. ability) which would decide the upper limit of the possible benefits in the future and observer’s subjective capacity to pay back the investment of reputation (e.g. social distance) which means the degree to which the gamer believes the observer would give him the chance would affect the generating of reputation obtaining behavior jointly. And these two capacities should be viewed as core factors which would decide the tendency of the game. Based on these two core factors, three levels of identity information (detailed/specific/ambiguous identity) should be taken seriously in future researches to verify the effectiveness of these two factors and provide empirical evidences for the construction of the mechanism of reputation-profit game.

Keywords reputation-profit game      reputation      competitive altruism      social identity     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Pei, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 December 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
TAN Chenhao
CUI Yichen
Cite this article:   
TAN Chenhao,WANG Yibo,CUI Yichen, et al. The profit sacrificing tendency of reputation-profit game[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1907-1916.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHANG Xuejiao; LIU Conghui. The watching eyes effect on prosociality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 475-485.
[2] YUAN Mingliang; ZHANG Mengyuan; KOU Yu. Prosocial reputation and prosocial behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1655-1662.
[3] WANG Caiyu. The Connotation, Mechanism and Effects of Self-Brand Connections[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 922-933.
[4] XIN Sufei;MING Lang;XIN Ziqiang. Increasing Intergroup Trust: The Approaches of Social Identity and Intergroup Contact[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 290-299.
[5] GAO Cheng-Hai;HOU Ling;LV Chao;WAN Ming-Gang. Implicit Theories and Group Relation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1180-1188.
[6] XIN Su-Fei;XIN Zi-Qiang. Social Identity Complexity: Theories, Methods and Advances[J]. , 2012, 20(3): 433-442.
[7] CHEN Hao;XUE Ting;YUE Guo-An. Instrumentality, Social Identity, and Group-based Anger: Overview of Collective Action Research[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 127-136.
[8] ZOU Wen-Chi1;LIU Jia. “One for All, All for One”: Review of Research on Team-Member Exchange[J]. , 2011, 19(8): 1193-1204.
[9] WAN Mei-Na;LIU Li;QIU Jia;YANG Xiao-Li. Collective Action: Definition, Psychological Mechanism and Behavior Measurement[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 723-730.
[10] YAN Ming;TU Hong-Wei;LI Ji. The Definition, Dimensionality and Content of Newcomer’s Organizational Socialization: A Perspective from Identity Theory[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 624-632.
[11] DUAN Jin-Yun. The Research of Employee Voice in Chinese Context: Construct, Formation Mechanism and Effect[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 185-192.
[12] LIU Guo-Fang;XIN Zi-Qiang. Reputation Mechanisms in Indirect Reciprocity: Image, Standing, Tag and Its Transmission[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 233-242.
[13] TIAN Xiao-Ming;DUAN Jin-Yun;Fu Qiang. The Group Engagement Model: Background, Introduction and Future Directions[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1628-1635.
[14] LIU Feng;ZUO Bin. Intergroup Emotions Theory and the Researches[J]. , 2010, 18(06): 940-947.
[15] SHEN Jie;WANG Yong. Formation and Development of Brand Community:
the Perspective of Social Identity and Theory of Planned Behavior
[J]. , 2010, 18(06): 1018-1024.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech